Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Virchows Archiv 4/2015

01-10-2015 | Original Article

Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy

Authors: Daniel T. Keefe, Nicola Schieda, Soufiane El Hallani, Rodney H. Breau, Chris Morash, Susan J. Robertson, Kien T. Mai, Eric C. Belanger, Trevor A. Flood

Published in: Virchows Archiv | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Selected patients with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies containing Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer (PCa) may be considered candidates for active surveillance (AS). The purpose of this study was to determine if there are features that predict PCa upstaging and/or upgrading after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 PCa diagnosed on TRUS-guided biopsies. We searched our institution’s database for patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 PCa diagnosed on TRUS-guided biopsy who underwent subsequent RP between January 2010 and January 2015. Two blinded genitourinary pathologists independently reviewed and assessed the following on biopsies: (a) nuclear size, nucleolar size and distribution of macronucleoli of PCa, which were subjectively graded using a semi-quantitative scale from 1 to 3, and (b) PCa with cribriform morphology and the size of cribriform disease. Patient age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density (PSAD) were also recorded. The Gleason score and stage (presence or absence of organ-confined disease (OCD)) were retrieved from RP reports. Comparisons were performed between groups using the chi-square test and Spearman correlation. One hundred and four patients were identified to have met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 63 (±6.1) years. Mean PSA and PSAD at diagnosis were 7.5 (±4.2) and 0.25 (±0.15) ng/mL, respectively. Gleason scores were upgraded to greater than 3 + 4 = 7 in 26.9 % (28/104) of patients, and 44.2 % (46/104) of patients had no OCD after RP. There was no correlation between age, PSA, PSAD or percent of biopsies with Gleason pattern 4 for either Gleason score upgrading or absence of OCD at the time of RP (p > 0.05). Thirty patients had cribriform morphology on TRUS-guided biopsy of which 60 % (18/30) had no OCD at RP (p = 0.04) while 36.7 % (11/30) were upgraded to Gleason score ≥3 + 4 = 7 after RP (p = 0.15). There was no association between nuclear size, nucleolar size and/or distribution of macronucleoli with upgrading and/or absence of OCD (p > 0.05). The size of cribriform pattern was not associated with the absence of OCD (p = 0.43) or Gleason score upgrade (p = 0.28). A proportion of patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 PCa at needle biopsy do not have OCD or are upgraded to higher Gleason scores after RP. In our study, patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 PCa with the presence of cribriform pattern 4 had a significantly increased chance of being found to have no OCD at the time of RP. There were no clinical or pathologic parameters at the time of TRUS-guided biopsy that identified risk factors for Gleason score upgrading at RP in this study. Cribriform morphology detected on biopsy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 PCa is associated with tumour upstaging after RP and may be considered a contraindication to active surveillance.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ploussard G, Epstein JI, Montironi R, Carroll PR, Wirth M, Grimm MO, Bjartell AS, Montorsi F, Freedland SJ, Erbersdobler A, van der Kwast TH (2011) The contemporary concept of significant versus insignificant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 60:291–303. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.006 CrossRefPubMed Ploussard G, Epstein JI, Montironi R, Carroll PR, Wirth M, Grimm MO, Bjartell AS, Montorsi F, Freedland SJ, Erbersdobler A, van der Kwast TH (2011) The contemporary concept of significant versus insignificant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 60:291–303. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2011.​05.​006 CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference van As NJ, Norman AR, Thomas K, Khoo VS, Thompson A, Huddart RA, Horwich A, Dearnaley DP, Parker CC (2008) Predicting the probability of deferred radical treatment for localised prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. Eur Urol 54:1297–1305. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.02.039 CrossRefPubMed van As NJ, Norman AR, Thomas K, Khoo VS, Thompson A, Huddart RA, Horwich A, Dearnaley DP, Parker CC (2008) Predicting the probability of deferred radical treatment for localised prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. Eur Urol 54:1297–1305. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2008.​02.​039 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Epstein JI, Feng Z, Trock BJ, Pierorazio PM (2012) Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades. Eur Urol 61:1019–1024. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.050 CrossRefPubMed Epstein JI, Feng Z, Trock BJ, Pierorazio PM (2012) Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades. Eur Urol 61:1019–1024. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2012.​01.​050 CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Huang CC, Kong MX, Zhou M, Rosenkrantz AB, Taneja SS, Melamed J, Deng FM (2014) Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of Gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen. Am J Surg Pathol 38:1096–1101. doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000000235 PubMed Huang CC, Kong MX, Zhou M, Rosenkrantz AB, Taneja SS, Melamed J, Deng FM (2014) Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of Gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen. Am J Surg Pathol 38:1096–1101. doi:10.​1097/​pas.​0000000000000235​ PubMed
12.
go back to reference Iczkowski KA, Torkko KC, Kotnis GR, Wilson RS, Huang W, Wheeler TM, Abeyta AM, La Rosa FG, Cook S, Werahera PN, Lucia MS (2011) Digital quantification of five high-grade prostate cancer patterns, including the cribriform pattern, and their association with adverse outcome. Am J Clin Pathol 136:98–107. doi:10.1309/ajcpz7wbu9yxsjpe CrossRefPubMed Iczkowski KA, Torkko KC, Kotnis GR, Wilson RS, Huang W, Wheeler TM, Abeyta AM, La Rosa FG, Cook S, Werahera PN, Lucia MS (2011) Digital quantification of five high-grade prostate cancer patterns, including the cribriform pattern, and their association with adverse outcome. Am J Clin Pathol 136:98–107. doi:10.​1309/​ajcpz7wbu9yxsjpe​ CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kryvenko ON, Gupta NS, Virani N, Schultz D, Gomez J, Amin A, Lane Z, Epstein JI (2013) Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate with lymph node metastases: analysis of 184 radical prostatectomy specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med 137:610–617. doi:10.5858/arpa.2012-0128-OA CrossRefPubMed Kryvenko ON, Gupta NS, Virani N, Schultz D, Gomez J, Amin A, Lane Z, Epstein JI (2013) Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate with lymph node metastases: analysis of 184 radical prostatectomy specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med 137:610–617. doi:10.​5858/​arpa.​2012-0128-OA CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Tilki D, Schlenker B, John M, Buchner A, Stanislaus P, Gratzke C, Karl A, Tan GY, Ergun S, Tewari AK, Stief CG, Seitz M, Reich O (2011) Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series. Urol Oncol 29:508–514. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.07.003 CrossRefPubMed Tilki D, Schlenker B, John M, Buchner A, Stanislaus P, Gratzke C, Karl A, Tan GY, Ergun S, Tewari AK, Stief CG, Seitz M, Reich O (2011) Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series. Urol Oncol 29:508–514. doi:10.​1016/​j.​urolonc.​2009.​07.​003 CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Dinh KT, Mahal BA, Ziehr DR, Muralidhar V, Chen YW, Viswanathan VB, Nezolosky MD, Beard CJ, Choueiri TK, Martin NE, Orio PF, Sweeney CJ, Trinh QD, Nguyen PL (2015) Incidence and predictors of upgrading and upstaging among 10,000 contemporary patients with low-risk prostate cancer. J Urol. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.015 PubMed Dinh KT, Mahal BA, Ziehr DR, Muralidhar V, Chen YW, Viswanathan VB, Nezolosky MD, Beard CJ, Choueiri TK, Martin NE, Orio PF, Sweeney CJ, Trinh QD, Nguyen PL (2015) Incidence and predictors of upgrading and upstaging among 10,000 contemporary patients with low-risk prostate cancer. J Urol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​juro.​2015.​02.​015 PubMed
17.
go back to reference Bul M, Zhu X, Valdagni R, Pickles T, Kakehi Y, Rannikko A, Bjartell A, van der Schoot DK, Cornel EB, Conti GN, Boeve ER, Staerman F, Vis-Maters JJ, Vergunst H, Jaspars JJ, Strolin P, van Muilekom E, Schroder FH, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ (2013) Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study. Eur Urol 63:597–603. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.005 CrossRefPubMed Bul M, Zhu X, Valdagni R, Pickles T, Kakehi Y, Rannikko A, Bjartell A, van der Schoot DK, Cornel EB, Conti GN, Boeve ER, Staerman F, Vis-Maters JJ, Vergunst H, Jaspars JJ, Strolin P, van Muilekom E, Schroder FH, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ (2013) Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study. Eur Urol 63:597–603. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2012.​11.​005 CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Latour M, Amin MB, Billis A, Egevad L, Grignon DJ, Humphrey PA, Reuter VE, Sakr WA, Srigley JR, Wheeler TM, Yang XJ, Epstein JI (2008) Grading of invasive cribriform carcinoma on prostate needle biopsy: an interobserver study among experts in genitourinary pathology. Am J Surg Pathol 32:1532–1539. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e318169e8fd CrossRefPubMed Latour M, Amin MB, Billis A, Egevad L, Grignon DJ, Humphrey PA, Reuter VE, Sakr WA, Srigley JR, Wheeler TM, Yang XJ, Epstein JI (2008) Grading of invasive cribriform carcinoma on prostate needle biopsy: an interobserver study among experts in genitourinary pathology. Am J Surg Pathol 32:1532–1539. doi:10.​1097/​PAS.​0b013e318169e8fd​ CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1228–1242CrossRefPubMed Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1228–1242CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kweldam CF, Wildhagen MF, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, van der Kwast TH, van Leenders GJ (2015) Cribriform growth is highly predictive for postoperative metastasis and disease-specific death in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. Mod Pathol 28:457–464. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2014.116 CrossRefPubMed Kweldam CF, Wildhagen MF, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, van der Kwast TH, van Leenders GJ (2015) Cribriform growth is highly predictive for postoperative metastasis and disease-specific death in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. Mod Pathol 28:457–464. doi:10.​1038/​modpathol.​2014.​116 CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Dong F, Yang P, Wang C, Wu S, Xiao Y, McDougal WS, Young RH, Wu CL (2013) Architectural heterogeneity and cribriform pattern predict adverse clinical outcome for Gleason grade 4 prostatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 37:1855–1861. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182a02169 CrossRefPubMed Dong F, Yang P, Wang C, Wu S, Xiao Y, McDougal WS, Young RH, Wu CL (2013) Architectural heterogeneity and cribriform pattern predict adverse clinical outcome for Gleason grade 4 prostatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 37:1855–1861. doi:10.​1097/​PAS.​0b013e3182a02169​ CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Khan MA, Walsh PC, Miller MC, Bales WD, Epstein JI, Mangold LA, Partin AW, Veltri RW (2003) Quantitative alterations in nuclear structure predict prostate carcinoma distant metastasis and death in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 98:2583–2591. doi:10.1002/cncr.11852 CrossRefPubMed Khan MA, Walsh PC, Miller MC, Bales WD, Epstein JI, Mangold LA, Partin AW, Veltri RW (2003) Quantitative alterations in nuclear structure predict prostate carcinoma distant metastasis and death in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 98:2583–2591. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​11852 CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Makarov DV, Marlow C, Epstein JI, Miller MC, Landis P, Partin AW, Carter HB, Veltri RW (2008) Using nuclear morphometry to predict the need for treatment among men with low grade, low stage prostate cancer enrolled in a program of expectant management with curative intent. Prostate 68:183–189. doi:10.1002/pros.20679 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Makarov DV, Marlow C, Epstein JI, Miller MC, Landis P, Partin AW, Carter HB, Veltri RW (2008) Using nuclear morphometry to predict the need for treatment among men with low grade, low stage prostate cancer enrolled in a program of expectant management with curative intent. Prostate 68:183–189. doi:10.​1002/​pros.​20679 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Partin AW, Steinberg GD, Pitcock RV, Wu L, Piantadosi S, Coffey DS, Epstein JI (1992) Use of nuclear morphometry, Gleason histologic scoring, clinical stage, and age to predict disease-free survival among patients with prostate cancer. Cancer 70:161–168CrossRefPubMed Partin AW, Steinberg GD, Pitcock RV, Wu L, Piantadosi S, Coffey DS, Epstein JI (1992) Use of nuclear morphometry, Gleason histologic scoring, clinical stage, and age to predict disease-free survival among patients with prostate cancer. Cancer 70:161–168CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Veltri RW, Isharwal S, Miller MC, Epstein JI, Partin AW (2010) Nuclear roundness variance predicts prostate cancer progression, metastasis, and death: a prospective evaluation with up to 25 years of follow-up after radical prostatectomy. Prostate 70:1333–1339. doi:10.1002/pros.21168 PubMed Veltri RW, Isharwal S, Miller MC, Epstein JI, Partin AW (2010) Nuclear roundness variance predicts prostate cancer progression, metastasis, and death: a prospective evaluation with up to 25 years of follow-up after radical prostatectomy. Prostate 70:1333–1339. doi:10.​1002/​pros.​21168 PubMed
26.
go back to reference Wittschieber D, Kollermann J, Schlomm T, Sauter G, Erbersdobler A (2010) Nuclear grading versus Gleason grading in small samples containing prostate cancer: a tissue microarray study. Pathol Oncol Res 16:479–484. doi:10.1007/s12253-010-9270-x CrossRefPubMed Wittschieber D, Kollermann J, Schlomm T, Sauter G, Erbersdobler A (2010) Nuclear grading versus Gleason grading in small samples containing prostate cancer: a tissue microarray study. Pathol Oncol Res 16:479–484. doi:10.​1007/​s12253-010-9270-x CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy
Authors
Daniel T. Keefe
Nicola Schieda
Soufiane El Hallani
Rodney H. Breau
Chris Morash
Susan J. Robertson
Kien T. Mai
Eric C. Belanger
Trevor A. Flood
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Virchows Archiv / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1809-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Virchows Archiv 4/2015 Go to the issue

Editorial

In this issue