Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Virchows Archiv 1/2009

01-01-2009 | Original Article

Microscopic esophagitis in gastro-esophageal reflux disease: individual lesions, biopsy sampling, and clinical correlations

Authors: Luca Mastracci, Paola Spaggiari, Federica Grillo, Patrizia Zentilin, Pietro Dulbecco, Paola Ceppa, Paola Baccini, Carlo Mansi, Vincenzo Savarino, Roberto Fiocca

Published in: Virchows Archiv | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Patients with non-erosive reflux disease may show microscopic damage. This study is aimed to describe distribution, sensitivity, and specificity of histological lesions (i.e., basal cell hyperplasia—BH, papillae elongation—PE, dilatation of intercellular spaces—DIS, intraepithelial eosinophils—IE, neutrophils, and erosions) and sampling criteria. Four groups were identified on the basis of symptoms, endoscopy, and pH monitoring: (1) erosive esophagitis (n = 48), (2) non-erosive esophagitis with abnormal pH (n = 59), (3) non-erosive esophagitis with normal pH (n = 12), and (4) controls (n = 20). Biopsies were taken at the Z-line and 2 and 4 cm above it. BH, PE, DIS, IE, neutrophils, and erosions were assessed. A global severity score was calculated on the basis of the above parameters and allowed the distinction of patients from controls with 80% sensitivity and 85% specificity. Lesions were more severe at Z-line than proximally and more expressed in erosive than in non-erosive disease, although more than 70% of latter patients still showed histological damage. Esophageal biopsy seems very attractive in non-erosive disease where it may contribute to diagnosis and play a role in the comparative evaluation of different therapies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference El-Serag HB, Sonnenberg A (1998) Opposing time trends of peptic ulcer and reflux disease. Gut 43:327–333PubMedCrossRef El-Serag HB, Sonnenberg A (1998) Opposing time trends of peptic ulcer and reflux disease. Gut 43:327–333PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Armstrong D (1999) Endoscopic evaluation of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Yale J Biol Med 72:93–100PubMed Armstrong D (1999) Endoscopic evaluation of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Yale J Biol Med 72:93–100PubMed
3.
go back to reference Armstrong D, Bennet JR, Blum AL et al (1996) The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology 111:85–92PubMedCrossRef Armstrong D, Bennet JR, Blum AL et al (1996) The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology 111:85–92PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schindlbeck NE, Klauser AG, Berghammer G et al (1992) Three year follow-up of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gut 33:1016–1019PubMedCrossRef Schindlbeck NE, Klauser AG, Berghammer G et al (1992) Three year follow-up of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gut 33:1016–1019PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P et al (2006) The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 101:1900–1920PubMedCrossRef Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P et al (2006) The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 101:1900–1920PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Galmiche JP, Clouse RE, Bálint A et al (2006) Functional esophageal disorders. Gastroenterology 130:1459–1465PubMedCrossRef Galmiche JP, Clouse RE, Bálint A et al (2006) Functional esophageal disorders. Gastroenterology 130:1459–1465PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Quigley EM (1992) 24-h pH monitoring for gastroesophageal reflux disease: already standard but not yet gold. Am J Gastroenterol 87:1071–1075PubMed Quigley EM (1992) 24-h pH monitoring for gastroesophageal reflux disease: already standard but not yet gold. Am J Gastroenterol 87:1071–1075PubMed
8.
go back to reference Ismail-Beigi F, Horton PF, Pope CE (1970) Histological consequences of gastroesophageal reflux in man. Gastroenterology 58:163–174PubMed Ismail-Beigi F, Horton PF, Pope CE (1970) Histological consequences of gastroesophageal reflux in man. Gastroenterology 58:163–174PubMed
9.
go back to reference Brown LF, Goldman H, Antonioli DA (1984) Intraepithelial eosinophils in endoscopic biopsies of adults with reflux esophagitis. Am J Surg Pathol 8:899–905PubMedCrossRef Brown LF, Goldman H, Antonioli DA (1984) Intraepithelial eosinophils in endoscopic biopsies of adults with reflux esophagitis. Am J Surg Pathol 8:899–905PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Dent J, Brun J, Fendrick AM et al (1999) An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management—the Genval Workshop Report. Gut 44:S1–S16CrossRef Dent J, Brun J, Fendrick AM et al (1999) An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management—the Genval Workshop Report. Gut 44:S1–S16CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nandurkar S, Talley NJ, Martin CJ et al (2000) Esophageal histology does not provide additional useful information over clinical assessment in identifying reflux patients presenting for esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 45:217–224PubMedCrossRef Nandurkar S, Talley NJ, Martin CJ et al (2000) Esophageal histology does not provide additional useful information over clinical assessment in identifying reflux patients presenting for esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 45:217–224PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tobey NA, Carson JL, Alkiek RA et al (1996) Dilated intercellular spaces: a morphological feature of acid reflux–damaged human esophageal epithelium. Gastroenterology 111:1200–1205PubMedCrossRef Tobey NA, Carson JL, Alkiek RA et al (1996) Dilated intercellular spaces: a morphological feature of acid reflux–damaged human esophageal epithelium. Gastroenterology 111:1200–1205PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Calabrese C, Fabbri A, Bortolotti M et al (2003) Dilated intercellular spaces as a marker of oesophageal damage: comparative results in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with and without bile reflux. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 8:525–532CrossRef Calabrese C, Fabbri A, Bortolotti M et al (2003) Dilated intercellular spaces as a marker of oesophageal damage: comparative results in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with and without bile reflux. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 8:525–532CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Caviglia R, Ribolsi M, Maggiano N et al (2005) Dilated intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium in nonerosive reflux disease patients with physiological esophageal acid exposure. Am J Gastroenterol 100:543–548PubMedCrossRef Caviglia R, Ribolsi M, Maggiano N et al (2005) Dilated intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium in nonerosive reflux disease patients with physiological esophageal acid exposure. Am J Gastroenterol 100:543–548PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Solcia E, Villani L, Luinetti O et al (2000) Altered intercellular glycoconjugates and dilated intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium in reflux disease. Virchows Arch. 436:207–216PubMedCrossRef Solcia E, Villani L, Luinetti O et al (2000) Altered intercellular glycoconjugates and dilated intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium in reflux disease. Virchows Arch. 436:207–216PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Villanacci V, Grigolato PG, Cestari R et al (2001) Dilated intercellular spaces as markers of reflux disease: histology, semiquantitative score and morphometry upon light microscopy. Digestion 64:1–8PubMedCrossRef Villanacci V, Grigolato PG, Cestari R et al (2001) Dilated intercellular spaces as markers of reflux disease: histology, semiquantitative score and morphometry upon light microscopy. Digestion 64:1–8PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Weinstein WM, Bogoch ER, Bowes KL (1975) The normal human esophageal mucosa: a histological reappraisal. Gastroenterology 68:40–44PubMed Weinstein WM, Bogoch ER, Bowes KL (1975) The normal human esophageal mucosa: a histological reappraisal. Gastroenterology 68:40–44PubMed
19.
go back to reference Narayani RI, Burton MP, Young GS (2003) Utility of esophageal biopsy in the diagnosis of nonerosive reflux disease. Dis Esophagus 16:187–192PubMedCrossRef Narayani RI, Burton MP, Young GS (2003) Utility of esophageal biopsy in the diagnosis of nonerosive reflux disease. Dis Esophagus 16:187–192PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Schindlbeck NE, Wiebecke B, Klauser AG et al (1996) Diagnostic value of histology in non-erosive reflux disease. Gut 39:151–154PubMedCrossRef Schindlbeck NE, Wiebecke B, Klauser AG et al (1996) Diagnostic value of histology in non-erosive reflux disease. Gut 39:151–154PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Collins BJ, Elliott H, Sloan JM et al (1985) Oesophageal histology in reflux oesophagitis. J Clin Pathol 38:1265–1272PubMedCrossRef Collins BJ, Elliott H, Sloan JM et al (1985) Oesophageal histology in reflux oesophagitis. J Clin Pathol 38:1265–1272PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Vieth M, Fiocca R, Haringsma J et al (2004) Radial distribution of dilated intercellular spaces of the esophageal squamous epithelium in patients with reflux disease exhibiting discrete endoscopic lesions. Dig Dis 22:208–212PubMedCrossRef Vieth M, Fiocca R, Haringsma J et al (2004) Radial distribution of dilated intercellular spaces of the esophageal squamous epithelium in patients with reflux disease exhibiting discrete endoscopic lesions. Dig Dis 22:208–212PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Zentilin P, Savarino V, Mastracci L et al (2005) Reassessment of the diagnostic value of histology in patients with GERD, using multiple biopsy sites and an appropriate control group. Am J Gastroenterol 100:2299–2306PubMedCrossRef Zentilin P, Savarino V, Mastracci L et al (2005) Reassessment of the diagnostic value of histology in patients with GERD, using multiple biopsy sites and an appropriate control group. Am J Gastroenterol 100:2299–2306PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Carlsson R, Dent J, Bolling-Sternevald E et al (1998) The usefulness of a structured questionnaire in the assessment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 33:1023–1029PubMedCrossRef Carlsson R, Dent J, Bolling-Sternevald E et al (1998) The usefulness of a structured questionnaire in the assessment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 33:1023–1029PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Jarvis LR, Dent J, Whitehead R (1985) Morphometric assessment of reflux oesophagitis in fibreoptic biopsy specimens. J Clin Pathol 38:44–48PubMedCrossRef Jarvis LR, Dent J, Whitehead R (1985) Morphometric assessment of reflux oesophagitis in fibreoptic biopsy specimens. J Clin Pathol 38:44–48PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH et al (1996) Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994. Am J Surg Pathol 20:1161–1181PubMedCrossRef Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH et al (1996) Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994. Am J Surg Pathol 20:1161–1181PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Zentilin P, Conio M, Mele MR et al (2002) Comparison of the main oesophageal pathophysiological characteristics between short- and long-segment Barrett’s oesophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 16:893–898PubMedCrossRef Zentilin P, Conio M, Mele MR et al (2002) Comparison of the main oesophageal pathophysiological characteristics between short- and long-segment Barrett’s oesophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 16:893–898PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kahrilas PJ, Quigley EM (1996) Clinical esophageal pH recording: a technical review for practice guideline development. Gastroenterology 110:1982–1996PubMedCrossRef Kahrilas PJ, Quigley EM (1996) Clinical esophageal pH recording: a technical review for practice guideline development. Gastroenterology 110:1982–1996PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Dent J (2007) Microscopic esophageal mucosal injury in non-erosive reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:4–16PubMedCrossRef Dent J (2007) Microscopic esophageal mucosal injury in non-erosive reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:4–16PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Microscopic esophagitis in gastro-esophageal reflux disease: individual lesions, biopsy sampling, and clinical correlations
Authors
Luca Mastracci
Paola Spaggiari
Federica Grillo
Patrizia Zentilin
Pietro Dulbecco
Paola Ceppa
Paola Baccini
Carlo Mansi
Vincenzo Savarino
Roberto Fiocca
Publication date
01-01-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Virchows Archiv / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-008-0704-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Virchows Archiv 1/2009 Go to the issue