Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2022

01-02-2022 | Crohn's Disease | Original Article

A pilot study on prophylactic tube enterostomy for the prevention of anastomotic leakage in patients with high-risk intestinal anastomosis

Authors: Wenhao Chen, Yichao Zhang, Haibo Qin, Zhou Fan, Hang Hu, Min Chen, Congqing Jiang, Qun Qian, Zhao Ding

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Anastomotic leakages (ALs) are one of the most serious complications following gastrointestinal anastomosis. Currently, very few operative measures are available for the prevention of ALs. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tube enterostomy (T-E) for the prevention of ALs in patients with high-risk intestinal anastomosis.

Methods

In this retrospective study, demographic data and postoperative outcomes were compared among patients who received T-E and two historical cohorts: one group that underwent primary anastomosis without T-E (non-T-E group) and another that underwent conventional stoma construction without anastomosis (stoma group). The operative procedures were selected according to a scoring system that quantitatively evaluated risk of Als (Zhongnan score).

Results

From March 2017 to March 2020, a total of 45 consecutive patients were enrolled in the T-E group. Among these patients, 53.3% (24/45) were diagnosed with Crohn’s disease (CD), and 66.7% (30/45) of them underwent emergency surgery. After propensity score matching, the demographic data were comparable among the three groups. One case of AL (2.2%) occurred in the T-E group, while four cases of ALs (8.9%, 4/45) were found in the non-T-E group (p = 0.13). Tube feeding was provided to 33.3% (15/45) of the T-E patients. Major tube-related complications included one tube dislocation (2.2%) and 3 (6.7%) minor leakages after tube withdrawal (treated conservatively). One death occurred in the stoma group. In the subgroup analysis of CD patients, lower rates of ALs and abdominal abscesses were observed in the T-E group than in the non-T-E and stoma subgroups, but the differences were not significant.

Conclusions

T-E seems to be a safe and feasible operative method for the protection of high-risk intestinal anastomosis, can be reversed and can provide enteral feeding with acceptable tube-related complications. Further studies are needed to validate the role of T-E.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Turrentine FE, Denlinger CE, Simpson VB, Garwood RA, Guerlain S, Agrawal A et al (2015) Morbidity, mortality, cost, and survival estimates of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks. J Am Coll Surg 220:195–206CrossRef Turrentine FE, Denlinger CE, Simpson VB, Garwood RA, Guerlain S, Agrawal A et al (2015) Morbidity, mortality, cost, and survival estimates of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks. J Am Coll Surg 220:195–206CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chadi SA, Fingerhut A, Berho M, DeMeester SR, Fleshman JW, Hyman NH et al (2016) Emerging trends in the etiology, prevention, and treatment of gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage. J Gastrointest Surg 20:2035–2051CrossRef Chadi SA, Fingerhut A, Berho M, DeMeester SR, Fleshman JW, Hyman NH et al (2016) Emerging trends in the etiology, prevention, and treatment of gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage. J Gastrointest Surg 20:2035–2051CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chen H, Cai HK, Tang YH (2018) An updated meta-analysis of transanal drainage tube for prevention of anastomotic leak in anterior resection for rectal cancer. Surg Oncol 27:333–340CrossRef Chen H, Cai HK, Tang YH (2018) An updated meta-analysis of transanal drainage tube for prevention of anastomotic leak in anterior resection for rectal cancer. Surg Oncol 27:333–340CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Venskutonis D, Bradulskis S, Adamonis K, Urbanavicius L (2007) Witzel catheter feeding jejunostomy: is it safe? Dig Surg 24:349–353CrossRef Venskutonis D, Bradulskis S, Adamonis K, Urbanavicius L (2007) Witzel catheter feeding jejunostomy: is it safe? Dig Surg 24:349–353CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Haskins IN, Strong AT, Baginsky M, Sharma G, Karafa M, Ponsky JL et al (2018) Comparison of laparoscopic jejunostomy tube to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube with jejunal extension: long-term durability and nutritional outcomes. Surg Endosc 32:2496–2504CrossRef Haskins IN, Strong AT, Baginsky M, Sharma G, Karafa M, Ponsky JL et al (2018) Comparison of laparoscopic jejunostomy tube to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube with jejunal extension: long-term durability and nutritional outcomes. Surg Endosc 32:2496–2504CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ramamurthy A, Negi SS, Chaudhary A (2008) Prophylactic tube jejunostomy: a worthwhile undertaking. Surg Today 38:420–424CrossRef Ramamurthy A, Negi SS, Chaudhary A (2008) Prophylactic tube jejunostomy: a worthwhile undertaking. Surg Today 38:420–424CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Liu Y, Wan X, Wang G, Ren Y, Cheng Y, Zhao Y et al (2014) A scoring system to predict the risk of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 109:122–125CrossRef Liu Y, Wan X, Wang G, Ren Y, Cheng Y, Zhao Y et al (2014) A scoring system to predict the risk of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 109:122–125CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tapia J, Murguia R, Garcia G, de los Monteros PE, Onate E (1999) Jejunostomy: techniques, indications, and complications. World J Surg 23:596–602CrossRef Tapia J, Murguia R, Garcia G, de los Monteros PE, Onate E (1999) Jejunostomy: techniques, indications, and complications. World J Surg 23:596–602CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zapas JL, Karakozis S, Kirkpatrick JR (1998) Prophylactic jejunostomy: a reappraisal. Surgery 124:715–9 (discussion 9-20)CrossRef Zapas JL, Karakozis S, Kirkpatrick JR (1998) Prophylactic jejunostomy: a reappraisal. Surgery 124:715–9 (discussion 9-20)CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Zhu X, Wu Y, Qiu Y, Jiang C, Ding Y (2014) Comparative analysis of the efficacy and complications of nasojejunal and jejunostomy on patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 38:996–1002CrossRef Zhu X, Wu Y, Qiu Y, Jiang C, Ding Y (2014) Comparative analysis of the efficacy and complications of nasojejunal and jejunostomy on patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 38:996–1002CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bugiantella W, Rondelli F, Mariani L, Boni M, Ermili F, Avenia N et al (2014) Temporary percutaneous ileostomy for faecal diversion after intestinal resection for acute abdomen in elderly: how to avoid the conventional loop ileostomy. Int J Surg 12(Suppl 2):S144–S147CrossRef Bugiantella W, Rondelli F, Mariani L, Boni M, Ermili F, Avenia N et al (2014) Temporary percutaneous ileostomy for faecal diversion after intestinal resection for acute abdomen in elderly: how to avoid the conventional loop ileostomy. Int J Surg 12(Suppl 2):S144–S147CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hua H, Xu J, Chen W, Zhou X, Wang J, Sheng Q et al (2014) Defunctioning cannula ileostomy after lower anterior resection of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 57:1267–1274CrossRef Hua H, Xu J, Chen W, Zhou X, Wang J, Sheng Q et al (2014) Defunctioning cannula ileostomy after lower anterior resection of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 57:1267–1274CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rondelli F, Balzarotti R, Bugiantella W, Mariani L, Pugliese R, Mariani E (2012) Temporary percutaneous ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in mechanical extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: a retrospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:1065–1070CrossRef Rondelli F, Balzarotti R, Bugiantella W, Mariani L, Pugliese R, Mariani E (2012) Temporary percutaneous ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in mechanical extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: a retrospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:1065–1070CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rygl M, Pycha K, Stranak Z, Skaba R, Brabec R, Cunat V et al (2007) T-tube ileostomy for intestinal perforation in extremely low birth weight neonates. Pediatr Surg Int 23:685–688CrossRef Rygl M, Pycha K, Stranak Z, Skaba R, Brabec R, Cunat V et al (2007) T-tube ileostomy for intestinal perforation in extremely low birth weight neonates. Pediatr Surg Int 23:685–688CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schwaitzberg SD, Sable DB (1995) Transverse Witzel-T-tube feeding jejunostomy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 19:326–327CrossRef Schwaitzberg SD, Sable DB (1995) Transverse Witzel-T-tube feeding jejunostomy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 19:326–327CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sheng QS, Hua HJ, Cheng XB, Wang WB, Chen WB, Xu JH et al (2016) A modified spontaneously closed defunctioning tube ileostomy after anterior resection of the rectum for rectal cancer with a low colorectal anastomosis. Indian J Surg 78:125–129CrossRef Sheng QS, Hua HJ, Cheng XB, Wang WB, Chen WB, Xu JH et al (2016) A modified spontaneously closed defunctioning tube ileostomy after anterior resection of the rectum for rectal cancer with a low colorectal anastomosis. Indian J Surg 78:125–129CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rondelli F, Mariani L, Boni M, Federici MT, Cappotto FP, Mariani E (2010) Preliminary report of a new technique for temporary faecal diversion after extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 12:1159–1161CrossRef Rondelli F, Mariani L, Boni M, Federici MT, Cappotto FP, Mariani E (2010) Preliminary report of a new technique for temporary faecal diversion after extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 12:1159–1161CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hocking MP, Carlson RG, Courington KR, Bland KI (1990) Altered motility and bacterial flora after functional end-to-end anastomosis. Surgery 108:384–91 (discussion 91-2)PubMed Hocking MP, Carlson RG, Courington KR, Bland KI (1990) Altered motility and bacterial flora after functional end-to-end anastomosis. Surgery 108:384–91 (discussion 91-2)PubMed
19.
go back to reference Smeets BJJ, Luyer MDP (2018) Nutritional interventions to improve recovery from postoperative ileus. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 21:394–398CrossRef Smeets BJJ, Luyer MDP (2018) Nutritional interventions to improve recovery from postoperative ileus. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 21:394–398CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hubner M, Klek S et al (2017) ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr 36:623–650CrossRef Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hubner M, Klek S et al (2017) ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr 36:623–650CrossRef
21.
go back to reference MacLellan A, Moore-Connors J, Grant S, Cahill L, Langille MGI, Van Limbergen J (2017) The impact of exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) on the gut microbiome in Crohn’s disease: a review. Nutrients 9:447 MacLellan A, Moore-Connors J, Grant S, Cahill L, Langille MGI, Van Limbergen J (2017) The impact of exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) on the gut microbiome in Crohn’s disease: a review. Nutrients 9:447
Metadata
Title
A pilot study on prophylactic tube enterostomy for the prevention of anastomotic leakage in patients with high-risk intestinal anastomosis
Authors
Wenhao Chen
Yichao Zhang
Haibo Qin
Zhou Fan
Hang Hu
Min Chen
Congqing Jiang
Qun Qian
Zhao Ding
Publication date
01-02-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02326-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue