Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2/2010

Open Access 01-02-2010 | How to do it

Laparoscopic TME in rectal cancer – electronic supplementary: op-video

Authors: Alois Fürst, Oliver Schwandner, Arthur Heiligensetzer, Igors Iesalnieks, Ayman Agha

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer has been proved in various studies. The minimal invasive procedure is feasible and safe which was demonstrated in many studies. However, the results of prospective, randomized studies providing valuable evidence are still not available. Compared to conventional surgery, the laparoscopic technique has short-term advantages including less pain, shorter duration of postoperative ileus, less fatigue, better pulmonary function, and less blood loss (Leung et al., Lancet 363:1187–1192, 2004; Braga et al., Dis Colon Rectum 48:217–223, 2005; Jayne et al., J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068, 2007; Agha et al., Surg Endosc 22:2229–2237, 2008).

Methods

The autonomic nerve sparing TME technique is the gold standard in rectal cancer resection even in conventional or laparoscopic procedure. With regard of the oncological dimension, the laparoscopic TME technique is not different compared to the open procedure. However, a standardized laparoscopic step-by-step procedure may simplify the operation and can reduce operation time.

Results

There are no studies available which compare different types of TME procedures. Most surgeons start the operation left laterally mobilizing the sigmoid colon first. In the laparoscopic technique, we recommend the medial to lateral approach starting the operation at the right side of the rectum and sigmoid colon. A nerve sparing TME technique can be performed easier, and the identification of the left ureter may be simplified. After multiple workshops and extensive discussion with national and international experts, we developed a standardized laparoscopic “10 step TME procedure.” Reviewing the results of laparoscopic TME the studies do not allow firm conclusions as to the questions of whether the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic TME is equal or superior to open TME (Breukink et al. 2006). Actually, we are waiting for large prospective randomized studies comparing laparoscopic TME with the traditional open procedure (Bonjer et al., Dan Med Bull 56:89–91, 2009).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic TME appears to have clinically measurable short-term advantages in patients with primary resectable rectal cancer based on evidence mainly from nonrandomized studies (Breukink et al. 5). In nearly all published studies, the efficacy and technical feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer could be demonstrated regarding perioperative morbidity and oncological outcome. A standardized laparoscopic TME technique can be strongly recommended.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192CrossRefPubMed Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Civelli V, Di Carlo V (2005) Laparoscopic versus open colectomy in cancer patients: long-term complications, quality of life, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 48:217–223CrossRef Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Civelli V, Di Carlo V (2005) Laparoscopic versus open colectomy in cancer patients: long-term complications, quality of life, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 48:217–223CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith A, Heath RM, Brown J (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASSIC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith A, Heath RM, Brown J (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASSIC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Agha A, Fürst A, Hierl J, Iesalnieks I, Glockzin G, Anthuber M, Jauch KW, Schlitt H (2008) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer—oncological results and clinical outcome of 225 patients. Surg Endosc 22:2229–2237CrossRefPubMed Agha A, Fürst A, Hierl J, Iesalnieks I, Glockzin G, Anthuber M, Jauch KW, Schlitt H (2008) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer—oncological results and clinical outcome of 225 patients. Surg Endosc 22:2229–2237CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Breukink S, Pierie J, Wiggers T (2006) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4. Art. No.:CD005200 Breukink S, Pierie J, Wiggers T (2006) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4. Art. No.:CD005200
6.
go back to reference Bonjer HJ, Cuesta MA, Lacy AM, Haglind E, Fürst A, Lange JF, Hoop WCJ, Buunen M (2009) COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Dan Med Bull 56:89–91PubMed Bonjer HJ, Cuesta MA, Lacy AM, Haglind E, Fürst A, Lange JF, Hoop WCJ, Buunen M (2009) COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Dan Med Bull 56:89–91PubMed
7.
go back to reference Anthuber M, Fürst A, Elser F et al (2003) Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in 101 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1047–1053CrossRefPubMed Anthuber M, Fürst A, Elser F et al (2003) Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in 101 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1047–1053CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bärlehner E, Benhidjeb T, Anders S et al (2005) Aktueller Stand der laparoskopischen Rektumresektion beim Karzinom. Chir Gastroenterol 21:54–61CrossRef Bärlehner E, Benhidjeb T, Anders S et al (2005) Aktueller Stand der laparoskopischen Rektumresektion beim Karzinom. Chir Gastroenterol 21:54–61CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Paganini M et al (2003) Long-term results of laparoscopic vs. open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients. Surg Endosc 17:1530–1535CrossRefPubMed Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Paganini M et al (2003) Long-term results of laparoscopic vs. open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients. Surg Endosc 17:1530–1535CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L et al (2003) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2:281–289 Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L et al (2003) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2:281–289
11.
go back to reference Milsom JW, Böhm B, Hammerhofer KA et al (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. Am Coll Surg 187:46–57CrossRef Milsom JW, Böhm B, Hammerhofer KA et al (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. Am Coll Surg 187:46–57CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Morino M, Parini U, Giraudo G et al (2003) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. A consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg 237:335–342CrossRefPubMed Morino M, Parini U, Giraudo G et al (2003) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. A consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg 237:335–342CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tang CL, Eu KW, Tai BC et al (2001) Randomized clinical trial of the effect of open versus laparoscopically assisted colectomy on systemic immunity in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:801–807CrossRefPubMed Tang CL, Eu KW, Tai BC et al (2001) Randomized clinical trial of the effect of open versus laparoscopically assisted colectomy on systemic immunity in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:801–807CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124CrossRefPubMed Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bruch HP, Esnaashari H, Schwandner O (2005) Current status of laparoscopic therapy of colorectal cancer. Dig Dis 23:127–134CrossRefPubMed Bruch HP, Esnaashari H, Schwandner O (2005) Current status of laparoscopic therapy of colorectal cancer. Dig Dis 23:127–134CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ, Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ, Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fazio VW, Zutshi M, Remzi FH, Parc Y, Ruppert R, Fürst A, Celebrezze J Jr, Galanduik S, Orangio G, Hyman N, Bokey L, Tiret E, Kirchdorfer B, Medich D, Tietze M, Hull T, Hammel J (2007) A randomized multicenter trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life, and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers. Ann Surg 246:481–490CrossRefPubMed Fazio VW, Zutshi M, Remzi FH, Parc Y, Ruppert R, Fürst A, Celebrezze J Jr, Galanduik S, Orangio G, Hyman N, Bokey L, Tiret E, Kirchdorfer B, Medich D, Tietze M, Hull T, Hammel J (2007) A randomized multicenter trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life, and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers. Ann Surg 246:481–490CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Fleshman J, Wexner S, Anvari M et al (1999) Laparoscopic vs. open abdominoperineal resection for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42:930–939CrossRefPubMed Fleshman J, Wexner S, Anvari M et al (1999) Laparoscopic vs. open abdominoperineal resection for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42:930–939CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASSIC trail): multicentre, randomized controlled trail. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASSIC trail): multicentre, randomized controlled trail. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasa JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasa JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Lezoche E, Guerrieri M, De Sanctis A et al (2006) Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resections for cancer in 235 patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Surg Endosc 20:546–553CrossRefPubMed Lezoche E, Guerrieri M, De Sanctis A et al (2006) Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resections for cancer in 235 patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Surg Endosc 20:546–553CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740CrossRefPubMed Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic TME in rectal cancer – electronic supplementary: op-video
Authors
Alois Fürst
Oliver Schwandner
Arthur Heiligensetzer
Igors Iesalnieks
Ayman Agha
Publication date
01-02-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0556-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2/2010 Go to the issue