Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 4/2009

01-07-2009 | Original Article

Which parameters are needed for targeting a multitined radiofrequency device—an approach to a simple algorithm

Authors: Dirk L. Stippel, Christopher Bangard, Klaus Prenzel, Selim Yavuzyasar, Jürgen H. Fischer, Arnulf H. Hölscher

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treatment of liver malignancies is limited by the high rate of local recurrences. The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate parameters describing the reproducible target volume of a RFA procedure in order to facilitate better applicator placement.

Materials and methods

RFA was performed in perfused and nonperfused pig livers. The following parameters were measured: axial and transverse diameter, front margin, coagulation center, diameter of sphere ablated (D S), distance to center (DC), and volume. Graphic overlays were utilized to visualize variability. Parameters were evaluated for Rita XL (2 algorithms), LeVeen, and Rita Xli applicators.

Results

The best prediction of a reproducibly ablated target volume can be made by the diameter of the sphere ablated and the distance of the applicator tip to center of the sphere (DC). The spheres were significantly different in diameter (D S) depending on the applicator Rita XL 29 ± 6 mm, Rita XLwet 35 ± 5 mm, LeVeen 35 ± 8 mm, Rita Xli 44 ± 5 mm (perfused livers, p < 0.001). Graphic overlay demonstrated differences in variability that can influence the reliability of the system.

Conclusions

D S and DC as specific values for each applicator and algorithm facilitate a placement of the applicator relative to the target volume that maximizes the chance of complete ablation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mulier S, Ni Y, Jamart J, Ruers T, Marchal G, Michel L (2005) Local recurrence after hepatic radiofrequency coagulation: multivariate meta-analysis and review of contributing factors. Ann Surg 242:158–171PubMedCrossRef Mulier S, Ni Y, Jamart J, Ruers T, Marchal G, Michel L (2005) Local recurrence after hepatic radiofrequency coagulation: multivariate meta-analysis and review of contributing factors. Ann Surg 242:158–171PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Aloia TA, Vauthey JN, Loyer EM et al (2006) Solitary colorectal liver metastasis: resection determines outcome. Arch Surg 141:460–466PubMedCrossRef Aloia TA, Vauthey JN, Loyer EM et al (2006) Solitary colorectal liver metastasis: resection determines outcome. Arch Surg 141:460–466PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stippel DL, Brochhagen HG, Arenja M, Hunkemoller J, Holscher AH, Beckurts KT (2004) Variability of size and shape of necrosis induced by radiofrequency ablation in human livers: a volumetric evaluation. Ann Surg Oncol 11:420–425PubMedCrossRef Stippel DL, Brochhagen HG, Arenja M, Hunkemoller J, Holscher AH, Beckurts KT (2004) Variability of size and shape of necrosis induced by radiofrequency ablation in human livers: a volumetric evaluation. Ann Surg Oncol 11:420–425PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mulier S, Ni Y, Frich L et al (2007) Experimental and clinical radiofrequency ablation: proposal for standardized description of coagulation size and geometry. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1381–1396PubMedCrossRef Mulier S, Ni Y, Frich L et al (2007) Experimental and clinical radiofrequency ablation: proposal for standardized description of coagulation size and geometry. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1381–1396PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Goldberg SN, Grassi CJ, Cardella JF et al (2005) Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria. Radiology 235:728–739PubMedCrossRef Goldberg SN, Grassi CJ, Cardella JF et al (2005) Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria. Radiology 235:728–739PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bangard C, Gossmann A, Kasper HU et al (2006) Experimental radiofrequency ablation near the portal and the hepatic veins in pigs: differences in efficacy of a monopolar ablation system. J Surg Res 135:113–119PubMedCrossRef Bangard C, Gossmann A, Kasper HU et al (2006) Experimental radiofrequency ablation near the portal and the hepatic veins in pigs: differences in efficacy of a monopolar ablation system. J Surg Res 135:113–119PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Solazzo SA, Liu Z, Lobo SM et al (2005) Radiofrequency ablation: importance of background tissue electrical conductivity—an agar phantom and computer modeling study. Radiology 236:495–502PubMedCrossRef Solazzo SA, Liu Z, Lobo SM et al (2005) Radiofrequency ablation: importance of background tissue electrical conductivity—an agar phantom and computer modeling study. Radiology 236:495–502PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ng KK, Lam CM, Poon RT et al (2005) Porcine liver: morphologic characteristics and cell viability at experimental radiofrequency ablation with internally cooled electrodes. Radiology 235:478–486PubMedCrossRef Ng KK, Lam CM, Poon RT et al (2005) Porcine liver: morphologic characteristics and cell viability at experimental radiofrequency ablation with internally cooled electrodes. Radiology 235:478–486PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Brieger J, Pereira PL, Trubenbach J et al (2003) In vivo efficiency of four commercial monopolar radiofrequency ablation systems: a comparative experimental study in pig liver. Invest Radiol 38:609–616PubMedCrossRef Brieger J, Pereira PL, Trubenbach J et al (2003) In vivo efficiency of four commercial monopolar radiofrequency ablation systems: a comparative experimental study in pig liver. Invest Radiol 38:609–616PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lencioni RA, Allgaier HP, Cioni D et al (2003) Small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: randomized comparison of radio-frequency thermal ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection. Radiology 228:235–240PubMedCrossRef Lencioni RA, Allgaier HP, Cioni D et al (2003) Small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: randomized comparison of radio-frequency thermal ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection. Radiology 228:235–240PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lin SM, Lin CJ, Lin CC, Hsu CW, Chen YC (2005) Randomised controlled trial comparing percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, and percutaneous acetic acid injection to treat hepatocellular carcinoma of 3 cm or less. Gut 54:1151–1156PubMedCrossRef Lin SM, Lin CJ, Lin CC, Hsu CW, Chen YC (2005) Randomised controlled trial comparing percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, and percutaneous acetic acid injection to treat hepatocellular carcinoma of 3 cm or less. Gut 54:1151–1156PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mazzaferro V, Battiston C, Perrone S et al (2004) Radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation: a prospective study. Ann Surg 240:900–909PubMedCrossRef Mazzaferro V, Battiston C, Perrone S et al (2004) Radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation: a prospective study. Ann Surg 240:900–909PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Seror O, Lepetit-Coiffe M, Quesson B, Trillaud H, Moonen CT (2006) Quantitative magnetic resonance temperature mapping for real-time monitoring of radiofrequency ablation of the liver: an ex vivo study. Eur Radiol 16:2265–2274PubMedCrossRef Seror O, Lepetit-Coiffe M, Quesson B, Trillaud H, Moonen CT (2006) Quantitative magnetic resonance temperature mapping for real-time monitoring of radiofrequency ablation of the liver: an ex vivo study. Eur Radiol 16:2265–2274PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Berber E, Herceg NL, Casto KJ, Siperstein AE (2004) Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors: prospective clinical evaluation of ablation size comparing two treatment algorithms. Surg Endosc 18:390–396PubMedCrossRef Berber E, Herceg NL, Casto KJ, Siperstein AE (2004) Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors: prospective clinical evaluation of ablation size comparing two treatment algorithms. Surg Endosc 18:390–396PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Montgomery RS, Rahal A, Dodd GD, Leyendecker JR, Hubbard LG (2004) Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors: variability of lesion size using a single ablation device. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:657–661PubMed Montgomery RS, Rahal A, Dodd GD, Leyendecker JR, Hubbard LG (2004) Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors: variability of lesion size using a single ablation device. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:657–661PubMed
16.
go back to reference Mulier S, Ni Y, Miao Y et al (2003) Size and geometry of hepatic radiofrequency lesions. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:867–878PubMedCrossRef Mulier S, Ni Y, Miao Y et al (2003) Size and geometry of hepatic radiofrequency lesions. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:867–878PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pereira PL, Trubenbach J, Schenk M et al (2004) Radiofrequency ablation: in vivo comparison of four commercially available devices in pig livers. Radiology 232:482–490PubMedCrossRef Pereira PL, Trubenbach J, Schenk M et al (2004) Radiofrequency ablation: in vivo comparison of four commercially available devices in pig livers. Radiology 232:482–490PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Oshio A, Tamaki K, Shimizu I et al (2007) Double radiofrequency ablation is more extensive with a spherical zone shape compared to single ablation in a pig liver model. J Med Invest 54:28–34PubMedCrossRef Oshio A, Tamaki K, Shimizu I et al (2007) Double radiofrequency ablation is more extensive with a spherical zone shape compared to single ablation in a pig liver model. J Med Invest 54:28–34PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kobayashi M, Ikeda K, Someya T et al (2002) Stepwise hook extension technique for radiofrequency ablation therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 63:139–144PubMedCrossRef Kobayashi M, Ikeda K, Someya T et al (2002) Stepwise hook extension technique for radiofrequency ablation therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 63:139–144PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Which parameters are needed for targeting a multitined radiofrequency device—an approach to a simple algorithm
Authors
Dirk L. Stippel
Christopher Bangard
Klaus Prenzel
Selim Yavuzyasar
Jürgen H. Fischer
Arnulf H. Hölscher
Publication date
01-07-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0306-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 4/2009 Go to the issue