Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2/2007

01-03-2007 | Original Article

Effect of pyloric drainage procedures on gastric passage and bile reflux after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction

Authors: Daniel Palmes, Matthias Weilinghoff, Mario Colombo-Benkmann, Norbert Senninger, Matthias Bruewer

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and aims

Controversy still exists about the need for pyloric drainage procedures (pyloroplasty or pyloromyotomy) after esophagectomy with esophagogastrostomy and vagotomy. Although pyloric drainage may prevent postoperative delayed gastric emptying, it may also promote bile reflux into the oesophagus. We analysed pyloric drainage methods for their potential effect on gastric outlet obstruction and bile reflux in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Materials and methods

One hundred and ninety-eight patients with esophageal carcinoma were treated by transthoracal esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction either with pyloromyotomy (group II, n = 118), pyloroplasty (group III, n = 34) or without pyloric drainage (group I, n = 46) between January 2000 and December 2004. The postoperative gastrointestinal passage by radiological investigation, anastomotic leakage rate, mortality and incidence of gastroesophageal reflux by endoscopy within the first postoperative year were retrospectively analysed.

Results

Patient demographics and the types of surgical procedures did not differ between the three groups. There was no difference in hospital mortality, anastomotic leakage rate, gastrointestinal passage and postoperative hospital stay between the three groups. However, more patients with pyloric drainage showed bile reflux (I = 0% vs II+III=14.9%, p = 0.069) and reflux esophagitis (I = 10.3% vs II+III = 34.5%, p < 0.05) compared to patients without pyloric drainage. On the multivariate analysis, pyloric drainage and the anastomotic height were independent and were significant risk factors associated with postoperative reflux esophagitis.

Conclusion

Pyloric drainage after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction should be omitted because it does not improve gastric emptying and may favour biliary reflux esophagitis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF (1998) Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer 83:2049–2053PubMedCrossRef Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF (1998) Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer 83:2049–2053PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, Shibakita M, Tonomoto Y, Dhar DK, Tabara H, Nagasue N (2004) En-bloc esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Am J Surg 188:254–260PubMedCrossRef Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, Shibakita M, Tonomoto Y, Dhar DK, Tabara H, Nagasue N (2004) En-bloc esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Am J Surg 188:254–260PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Korst RJ (2005) Surgical resection for esophageal carcinoma: speaking the language. World J Gastroenterol 11:2211–2212PubMed Korst RJ (2005) Surgical resection for esophageal carcinoma: speaking the language. World J Gastroenterol 11:2211–2212PubMed
4.
go back to reference Yildirim S, Koksal H, Celayir F, Erdem L, Oner M, Baykan A (2004) Colonic interposition vs gastric pull-up after total esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 8:675–678PubMedCrossRef Yildirim S, Koksal H, Celayir F, Erdem L, Oner M, Baykan A (2004) Colonic interposition vs gastric pull-up after total esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 8:675–678PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lerut T, Coosemans W, DeLeyn P, VanRaemdonck D (2001) Gastroplasty: yes or no to gastric drainage procedure. Dis Esophagus 14:173–177PubMedCrossRef Lerut T, Coosemans W, DeLeyn P, VanRaemdonck D (2001) Gastroplasty: yes or no to gastric drainage procedure. Dis Esophagus 14:173–177PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Visbal AL, Allen MS, Miller DL, Deschamps C, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC (2001) Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 71:1803–1808PubMedCrossRef Visbal AL, Allen MS, Miller DL, Deschamps C, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC (2001) Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 71:1803–1808PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fok M, Cheng SWK, Wong J (1991) Pyloroplasty versus no drainage in gastric replacement of the esophagus. Am J Surg 162:447–452PubMedCrossRef Fok M, Cheng SWK, Wong J (1991) Pyloroplasty versus no drainage in gastric replacement of the esophagus. Am J Surg 162:447–452PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bonavina L, Anselmino M, Ruol A, Bardini R, Borsato N, Peacchia A (1992) Functional evaluation of the intrathoracic stomach as an esophageal substitute. Br J Surg 79:529–532PubMed Bonavina L, Anselmino M, Ruol A, Bardini R, Borsato N, Peacchia A (1992) Functional evaluation of the intrathoracic stomach as an esophageal substitute. Br J Surg 79:529–532PubMed
9.
go back to reference Law S, Cheung MC, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J (1997) Pyloroplasty and pyloromyotomy in gastric replacement of the esophagus after esophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg 184:630–636PubMed Law S, Cheung MC, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J (1997) Pyloroplasty and pyloromyotomy in gastric replacement of the esophagus after esophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg 184:630–636PubMed
10.
go back to reference Huang GJ, Zhang DW (1985) A comparative study of resection of carcinoma of the esophagus with and without pyloroplasty. In: Demeester TR, Skinner DB (eds) Esophageal disorders pathophysiology and therapy. Raven, New York, pp 383–388 Huang GJ, Zhang DW (1985) A comparative study of resection of carcinoma of the esophagus with and without pyloroplasty. In: Demeester TR, Skinner DB (eds) Esophageal disorders pathophysiology and therapy. Raven, New York, pp 383–388
11.
go back to reference Chattopadhyay TK, Gupta S, Padhy AK, Kapoor VK (1991) Is pyloroplasty necessary following intrathoracic transposition of stomach? Results of a prospective clinical study. Aust N Z J Surg 61:366–369PubMed Chattopadhyay TK, Gupta S, Padhy AK, Kapoor VK (1991) Is pyloroplasty necessary following intrathoracic transposition of stomach? Results of a prospective clinical study. Aust N Z J Surg 61:366–369PubMed
12.
go back to reference Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Young JE, Miller JD, Bennett WF (2002) Pyloric drainage (pyloroplasty) or no drainage in gastric reconstruction after esophagectomy: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Surg 19:160–164PubMedCrossRef Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Young JE, Miller JD, Bennett WF (2002) Pyloric drainage (pyloroplasty) or no drainage in gastric reconstruction after esophagectomy: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Surg 19:160–164PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Otte JB, Kestens PJ (1998) The denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute is a contractile organ. Ann Surg 227:33–39PubMedCrossRef Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Otte JB, Kestens PJ (1998) The denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute is a contractile organ. Ann Surg 227:33–39PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Johansson J, Sloth M, Bajc M, Walther B (1999) Radioisotope evaluation of the esophageal remnant and the gastric conduit after gastric pull-up esophagectomy. Surgery 125:297–303PubMed Johansson J, Sloth M, Bajc M, Walther B (1999) Radioisotope evaluation of the esophageal remnant and the gastric conduit after gastric pull-up esophagectomy. Surgery 125:297–303PubMed
15.
go back to reference Walsh TN, Caldwell MT, Fallon C, McGeown G, Kidney D, Freyne P, Byrne PJ, Hennessy TP (1995) Gastric motility following oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 82:91–94PubMed Walsh TN, Caldwell MT, Fallon C, McGeown G, Kidney D, Freyne P, Byrne PJ, Hennessy TP (1995) Gastric motility following oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 82:91–94PubMed
16.
go back to reference Gutschow CA, Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Michel JM, Salizzoni M, Hölscher A (2001) Bile exposure of the denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute. Ann Thorac Surg 71:1786–1791PubMedCrossRef Gutschow CA, Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Michel JM, Salizzoni M, Hölscher A (2001) Bile exposure of the denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute. Ann Thorac Surg 71:1786–1791PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lindahl H, Rintala R, Sariola H, Louhimo I (1990) Cervical Barrett’s esophagus: a common complication of gastric tube reconstruction. J Pediatr Surg 25:446–448PubMedCrossRef Lindahl H, Rintala R, Sariola H, Louhimo I (1990) Cervical Barrett’s esophagus: a common complication of gastric tube reconstruction. J Pediatr Surg 25:446–448PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bemelman WA, Verburg J, Brummelkamp WH, Klopper PJ (1988) A physical model of the intrathoracic stomach. Am J Physiol 254:G168–175PubMed Bemelman WA, Verburg J, Brummelkamp WH, Klopper PJ (1988) A physical model of the intrathoracic stomach. Am J Physiol 254:G168–175PubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of pyloric drainage procedures on gastric passage and bile reflux after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction
Authors
Daniel Palmes
Matthias Weilinghoff
Mario Colombo-Benkmann
Norbert Senninger
Matthias Bruewer
Publication date
01-03-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-006-0119-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2/2007 Go to the issue