Top

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-07-2013 | Original Article

What factors are most relevant to the assessment of work ability of employees on long-term sick leave? The physicians’ perspective

Authors: Patricia M. Dekkers-Sánchez, Haije Wind, Judith K. Sluiter, Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen

Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health | Issue 5/2013

Abstract

Purpose

To reach insurance physician (IPs) consensus on factors that must be taken into account in the assessment of the work ability of employees who are sick-listed for 2 years.

Methods

A Delphi study using online questionnaires was conducted from October 2010 to March 2011.

Results

One hundred and two insurance physicians reached a consensus on important factors for return to work (RTW) of employees on long-term sick leave; from those factors, the most relevant for the assessment of work ability was determined. From a total of 22 relevant factors considered for the return to work of long-term sick-listed employees, consensus was reached on nine relevant factors that need to be taken into account in the assessment of the work ability of employees on long-term sick leave. Relevant factors that support return to work are motivation, attitude towards RTW, assessment of cognitions and behaviour, vocational rehabilitation in an early stage and instruction for the sick-listed employee to cope with his disabilities. Relevant factors that hinder RTW are secondary gain from illness, negative perceptions of illness, inefficient coping style and incorrect advice of treating physicians regarding RTW.

Conclusions

Non-medical personal and environmental factors may either hinder or promote RTW and must be considered in the assessment of the work ability of long-term sick-listed employees. Assessment of work ability should start early during the sick leave period. These factors may be used by IPs to improve the quality of the assessment of the work ability of employees on long-term sick leave.

Available only for authorised users

Bernacki EJ, Guidera JA, Schaeffer JA, Tsai S (2000) A facilitated early return to work program at a Large Urban Medical Center. J Occup Environ Med 42:1172–1177CrossRef

Black N (2006) Consensus development methods. In: Mays N, Pope C (eds) Qualitative research in health care. BMJ Books, London

Black DC (2008) Working for a healthier tomorrow. The Stationery Office, London

Burton A, Waddell G, Bartys S, Main CJ (2003) Screening to identify people at risk of long term incapacity: a conceptual and scientific review. Disabil Med 3:72–83

Dekkers-Sánchez PM, Hoving JL, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW (2008) Factors associated with long-term sick leave in sick-listed employees: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med 65:153–157CrossRef

Dekkers-Sánchez PM, Wind H, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW (2010) A qualitative study of perpetuating factors for long term sick leave and promoting factors for return to work: chronic work disabled patients in their own words. J Rehabil Med 42:544–552CrossRef

Dekkers-Sánchez PM, Wind H, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW (2011) What promotes RTW of long term sick listed employees? The views of vocational rehabilitational professionals. Scand J Work Environ Health. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3173

Dionne CE, Dunn KM, Croft PR (2008) A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies. Spine 33:95–103CrossRef

Elms J, O’Hara R, Pickvance S, Fishwick D et al (2005) The perceptions of occupational health in primary care. Occup Med 55:523–527CrossRef

Henderson M, Glozier N, Holland Elliott K (2005) Long-term sickness absence. Br Med J 330:802–803CrossRef

Jones J, Hunter D (1995) Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 311:376–380CrossRef

Krause N, Frank JW, Dasinger LK, Sullivan TJ et al (2001) Determinants of duration of disability and return to work after work related injury and illness: challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med 40:464–484CrossRef

Macdonald EB, Ritchie KA, Murray KJ, Gilmour WH (2000) Requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe: a Delphi study. Occup Environ Med 57:98–105CrossRef

OECD (2007) Sickness, disability and Work: sickness and disability schemes in The Netherlands

OECD (2010) Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. A synthesis of findings across OECD countries

Payne K, Nicholls SG, McAllister M (2007) Outcome measures for clinical genetics services: a comparison of genetics healthcare professionals and patients’ views. Health Policy 84:112–122CrossRef

Piram M, Frenkel J, Gattorno M, Ozen S (2011) A preliminary score for the assessment of disease activity in hereditary recurrent fevers: results from the AIDAI (Auto-Inflammatory Diseases Activity Index) Consensus Conference. Ann Rheum Dis 70:309–314CrossRef

Pransky G, Katz JN, Benjamin K, Himmelstein J (2002) Improving the physician role in evaluating workability and managing disability: a survey of primary care practitioners. Disabil Rehabil 24:867–874CrossRef

Reetoo KN, Harrington JM, Macdonald EB (2005) Required competencies of occupational physicians: a Delphi survey of UK customers. Occup Environ Med 62:406–413CrossRef

Sinha IP, Smyth RL, Williamson PR (2011) Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. PLoS Med 2011:e1000393CrossRef

Slebus FG, Kuijer PP, Willems JH, Frings-Dresen MHW, Sluiter JK (2008) Work ability in sick-listed patients with major depressive disorder. Occup Med (Lond) 58:475–479CrossRef

Soklaridis S, Tang G, Cartmill C, Cassidy JD et al (2011) Can you go back to work? Can Fam Physician 57:202–209

Stephens MA, Druley JA, Zautra AJ (2002) Older adults’ recovery from surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee: psychosocial resources and constraints as predictors of outcomes. Health Psychol 21:377–383CrossRef

Thompson M (2009) Considering the implication of variations within Delphi research. Fam Pract 26:420–424CrossRef

Tveito TH, Hysing M, Eriksen HR (2004) Low back pain interventions at the workplace: a systematic literature review. Occup Med 54:3–13CrossRef

Wahlstrőm R, Alexanderson K (2004) Chapter 11 physicians’ sick-listing practices. Scand J Public Health 32:222–255CrossRef

World Health Organization (2003) Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions, vol 81 No 9. Bull World Health Organ, Geneva

Title: What factors are most relevant to the assessment of work ability of employees on long-term sick leave? The physicians’ perspective
Authors: Patricia M. Dekkers-Sánchez
Haije Wind
Judith K. Sluiter
Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen
Publication date: 01-07-2013
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0340-0131
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1246
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-012-0783-3

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

What factors are most relevant to the assessment of work ability of employees on long-term sick leave? The physicians’ perspective

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Do physical or psychosocial factors at work predict multi-site musculoskeletal pain? A 4-year follow-up study in an industrial population

Contribution of occupational factors to social inequalities in self-reported health among French employees

Effect of molybdenum oxide interference on urinary cadmium analyses

Association between blood lead and mercury levels and periodontitis in the Korean general population: analysis of the 2008–2009 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data

Airway irritation among indoor swimming pool personnel: trichloramine exposure, exhaled NO and protein profiling of nasal lavage fluids

Cancer morbidity and quartz exposure in Swedish iron foundries