Top

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-10-2009 | Original Article

Effect of Functional Capacity Evaluation information on the judgment of physicians about physical work ability in the context of disability claims

Authors: Haije Wind, Vincent Gouttebarge, P. Paul F. M. Kuijer, Judith K. Sluiter, Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen

Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health | Issue 9/2009

Abstract

Purpose

To test whether Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) information lead insurance physicians (IPs) to change their judgment about the physical work ability of claimants with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs).

Methods

Twenty-seven IPs scored twice the physical work ability of two claimants for 12 specified activities, using a visual analogue scale. One claimant performed an FCE, the other served as a control. Outcome measure was the difference between experimental and control group in number of shifts in the physical work ability for the total of 12 specified activities.

Results

The IPs changed their judgment about the work ability 141 times when using FCE information compared to 102 times when not using this information (P-value = 0.001), both in the direction of more and less ability.

Conclusions

The IPs change their judgment of the physical work ability of claimants with MSDs in the context of disability claim procedures more often when FCE information is provided.

Altman DG (1991) Comparing groups—categorical data. In: Altman DG (ed) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington DC, pp 229–272

Anagnostis C, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Proctor TJ (2003) The million visual analog scale: its utility for predicting tertiary rehabilitation outcomes. Spine 28:1051–1060. doi:10.1097/00007632-200305150-00018 PubMedCrossRef

Baldwin M (2004) Reducing the costs of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: targeting strategies to chronic disability cases. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 14:33–41. doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.013 PubMedCrossRef

Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y (2001) The visual analogue scale for pain. Anesthesiology 95:1356–1361. doi:10.1097/00000542-200112000-00013 PubMedCrossRef

Brooks PM (2006) The burden of musculoskeletal disease—a global perspective. Clin Rheumatol 25:778–781. doi:10.1007/s10067-006-0240-3 PubMedCrossRef

Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Groothoff JW, Schellekens JM, Goëken LNH (2003) Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen work systems functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 13:207–218. doi:10.1023/A:1026264519996 PubMedCrossRef

Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, Stewart RE, Goëken LNH, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH (2005) Comparing self-report, clinical examination and functional testing in the assessment of work-related limitations in patients with chronic low back pain. Disabil Rehabil 27:999–1005. doi:10.1080/09638280500052823 PubMedCrossRef

Carey TS, Hadler NM, Gillings D, Stinnett S, Wallstein T (1988) Medical disability assessment of the back pain patient for the social security administration: the weighting of presenting clinical features. J Clin Epidemiol 417:691–697. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(88)90121-7 CrossRef

de Bont A, Brink van den JC, Berendsen L, Boonk M (2002) Limited control of information for work disability evaluation. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 146:27–30. De beperkte controle van de informatie voor de arbeidsongeschiktheidsbeoordeling (in Dutch)

Duruöz MT, Poiraudeau S, Fermanian J, Menkes CJ, Amor B, Dougados M, Revel M (1996) Development and validation of a rheumatoid hand functional disability scale that assesses functional handicap. J Rheumatol 23(7):1167–1172PubMed

Ehrich EW, Davies GM, Watson DJ, Bolognese JA, Seidenberg BC, Bellamy N (2000) Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 27(11):2635–2641PubMed

Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Buijer PE (2001) Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analogue scale. Ann Emerg Med 38(6):633–638. doi:10.1067/mem.2001.118863 PubMedCrossRef

Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PPFM, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW (2005) Intra- and interrater reliability of the Ergo-Kit functional capacity evaluation method in adults without musculoskeletal complaints. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:2354–2360. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.06.004 PubMedCrossRef

Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PPFM, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW (2006) Reliability and agreement of 5 Ergo-Kit functional capacity evaluation lifting tests in subjects with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:1365–1370. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.028 PubMedCrossRef

Gross DP, Battié MC (2002) Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther 82:364–371PubMed

Gross DP, Battié MC (2003) The construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a workers’ compensation environment. J Occup Rehabil 12:287–295. doi:10.1023/A:1026276822721 CrossRef

Hart DL, Isernhagen SJ, Matheson LN (1993) Guidelines for functional capacity evaluation of people with medical conditions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 18:682–686PubMed

Kelly AM (1998) Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? Am Emerg Med 5:1086–1090

Knepper S (2002) Significance of medical data in work disability evaluation. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 146:6–8. De betekenis van medische gegevens bij de beoordeling van arbeidsongeschiktheid (in Dutch)

Knop C, Oeser M, Bastian L, Lange U, Zdichavsky M, Blauth M (2001) Development and validation of the visual analogue scale (VAS) spine score. Unfallchirurg 104:488–497. Entwicklung und Validierung des VAS-Wirbelsäulenscores (in German). doi:10.1007/s001130170111

Krief OP, Huguet D (2005) Shoulder pain and disability: comparison with MR findings. AJR 186:1234–1239. doi:10.2214/AJR.04.1766 CrossRef

Kwa VIH, Limburg M, De Haan RJ (1996) The role of cognitive impairment in the quality of life after ischaemic stroke. J Neurol 243:599–604. doi:10.1007/BF00900948 PubMedCrossRef

Liang MH, Dalroy LH, Larson MG, Partridge AJ, Abeles M, Taylor C, Fossel AH (1991) Evaluation of social security disability in claimants with rheumatic diseases. Ann Intern Med 115:26–31PubMed

Lyth JR (2001) Disability management and functional capacity evaluation: a dynamic resource. Work 16:13–22PubMed

Matheson LN, Melhorn JM, Mayer TG, Theodore BR, Gatchel RJ (2006) Reliability of a visual analogue version of the QuickDash. J Bone Joint Surg 88-A(8):1782–1787. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00406 CrossRef

Oesch PR, Kool JP, Bachmann S, Devereaux J (2006) The influence of a functional capacity evaluation on fitness for work certificates in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. Work 26:259–271PubMed

Patel B, Buschbacher R, Crawford J (2003) National variability in permanent partial impairment ratings. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 82:302–306. doi:10.1097/00002060-200304000-00009 PubMedCrossRef

Post RB, Keizer HJE, Leferink VJM, Van der Sluis CK (2006) Functional outcome 5 years after non-operative treatment of type A spinal fractures. Eur Spine J 15:472–478. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0887-5 PubMedCrossRef

Rainville J, Pransky G, Indahl A, Mayer EK (2005) The physician as disability advisor for patients with musculoskeletal complaints. Spine 30:2579–2584. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000186589.69382.1d PubMedCrossRef

Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M, Goëken LNH (2002) Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil 12:269–276. doi:10.1023/A:1020274624791 PubMedCrossRef

Scott PJ, Huskisson EC (1977) Measurement of functional capacity with visual analogue scales. Rheumatol Rehabil 16(4):257–259PubMedCrossRef

United States Department of Labor (1991) Dictionary of occupational titles, 4th edn. US Government Printing Office. Washington, DC

Wind H, Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PPFM, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW (2005) Assessment of functional capacity of the musculoskeletal system in the context of work, daily living, and sport: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 15:253–272. doi:10.1007/s10926-005-1223-y PubMedCrossRef

Zanoli G, Stromqvist B, Jonsson B (2001) Visual analog scales for interpretation of back and leg pain intensity in patients operated for degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Spine 26:2375–2380. doi:10.1097/00007632-200111010-00015 PubMedCrossRef

Zinn W, Furutani N (1996) Physician perspectives on the ethical aspects of disability determination. J Gen Intern Med 11:525–532. doi:10.1007/BF02599599 PubMedCrossRef

Title: Effect of Functional Capacity Evaluation information on the judgment of physicians about physical work ability in the context of disability claims
Authors: Haije Wind
Vincent Gouttebarge
P. Paul F. M. Kuijer
Judith K. Sluiter
Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen
Publication date: 01-10-2009
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health / Issue 9/2009
Print ISSN: 0340-0131
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1246
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-009-0423-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Effect of Functional Capacity Evaluation information on the judgment of physicians about physical work ability in the context of disability claims

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 9/2009

Longitudinal analysis of respiratory symptoms in population studies with a focus on dyspnea in marine transportation workers

Associations between two job stress models and measures of salivary cortisol

Effect of the magnitude and frequency of hand-transmitted vibration on finger blood flow during and after exposure to vibration

Work-related recovery opportunities: testing scale properties and validity in relation to health

Age-related differences in muscular capacity among workers

Predicting long-term sickness absence and early retirement pension from self-reported work ability