Top

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

Published in:

01-05-2009 | Original Article

Impairing effects of noise in high and low noise sensitive persons working on different mental tasks

Authors: Stephan Sandrock, Martin Schütte, Barbara Griefahn

Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health | Issue 6/2009

Abstract

Objective

There is no information of mental strain in noise sensitive persons working under moderate levels of noise. The aim of the study was to determine relevant dimensions of impairing effects differentiating between noise sensitive and insensitive persons.

Methods

56 participants (27 men, 29 women; 18–31 years old) were classified into 28 low and 28 high noise sensitive persons. They worked either on a grammatical reasoning task (GRT) or a mental arithmetic task (MPT) under realistic road traffic scenarios [LAeq 55 dB(A)]. Afterwards they rated their annoyance and subjective mental strain.

Results

A multivariate analysis of variance provided significant effects for the individual noise sensitivity (P < 0.01) and the kind of task being performed (P < 0.01). To determine to what extent the rating scales lead to a differentiation of the four groups, a 2-factorial discriminant analysis was carried out subsequently. Results showed, that psycho-physiological effort and emotional strain differentiated best between the noise sensitivity groups and psycho physiological effort and focus on tasks (attention) separated the tasks.

Conclusion

Noise sensitive persons are more distracted by noise than insensitive persons. Furthermore the results suggest that noise sensitive subjects do not only evaluate a noisy situation as more annoying but experience higher levels of strain than insensitive persons.

Ackermann H (2006) Basics of medical biometrics. [Grundlagen der medizinischen Biometrie.]. Epsilon-Verlag, Darmstadt

AGARD (1989) Human performance assessment methods. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research & Development, Essex

Babisch W (2004) Health aspects of extra-aural noise research. Noise Health 6(22):69–81PubMed

Baddeley AD (1968) A three minute reasoning test based on grammatical transformation. Psychon Sci 10(10):341–342

Belojevic G, Öhrström E, Rylander R (1992) Effects of noise on mental performance with regard to subjective noise sensitivity. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 64:293–301. doi:10.1007/BF00378288 PubMedCrossRef

Belojevic G, Slepcevic V, Jakovljevic B (1999) Individual differences in mental processing under quiet and noisy laboratory conditions. Facta Univ 1(4):45–50

Belojevic G, Jakovljevic B, Slepcevic V (2003) Noise and mental performance: personality attributes and noise sensitivity. Noise Health 6(21):77–89PubMed

Borsky PN (1972) Sonic boom exposure effects II.4: annoyance reactions. J Sound Vib 20:527–530CrossRef

Bortz J (2005) Statistics for human and social scientists. [Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler.]. Springer, Berlin

Bortz J, Liehnert G, Boehnke K (2008) Non-parametric methods in biostatistics. [Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik.]. Springer, Berlin

Cooley WW, Lohnes PR (1971) Multivariate data analysis. Wiley, New York

Dornic S, Laaksonen T, Ekehammar B (1990) Noise sensitivity: general self-reports vs. noise effect in laboratory situations. Report No. 716. Department of Psychology, University Stockholm, Stockholm

Dudek B, Marszal-Wisniewska M, Merecz-Kot D et al (1991) Effects of noise on cognitive processes of individuals in a laboratory experiment. Pol J Occup Med Environ Health 4(3):269–279PubMed

European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation (2007) EUROCONTROL medium-term forecast: IFR flight movements 2007–2013. EATMP Infocentre, Brussels

Fields JM, de Jong RG, Gjestland T et al (2001) Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: research and a recommendation. In community response to noise team of ICBEN (ed). J Sound Vib 242:641–679CrossRef

Guski R, Felscher-Suhr U, Schuemer R (1999) The concept of noise annoyance: how international experts see it. J Sound Vib 223:513–527. doi:10.1006/jsvi.1998.2173 CrossRef

Hacker W, Richter P (1984) Mental strain: mental fatigue, monotony, satiation and stress. [Psychische Fehlbeanspruchung. Psychische Ermüdung, Monotonie, Sättigung und Streß.]. Springer, Berlin

ISO 10075-1:1991, Ergonomic principles related to mental work-load—general terms and definitions. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

ISO 10075-3: 2004, Ergonomic principles related to mental workload—part 3: principles and requirements concerning methods for measuring and assessing mental workload. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

ISO/TS 15666: 2003, Acoustics—assessment of noise annoyance by means of social and socio-acoustic surveys. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

Jelínková Z, Picek M, Hynčica V (1989) Psychophysiological aspects of noise influence. Int J Psychophysiol 7(2–4):249–250. doi:10.1016/0167-8760(89)90190-6 CrossRef

Job RFS (1996) The influence of subjective reactions to noise on health effects of the noise. Environ Int 22(1):93–104. doi:10.1016/0160-4120(95)00107-7 CrossRef

Job RFS (1999) Noise sensitivity as a factor influencing human reactions to noise. Noise Health 3:57–68

Johnson RA, Wichern DW (1992) Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

Joiko K, Schmauder M, Wolff G (2008) Mental stress and strain in the job: identification—design. [Psychische Belastung und Beanspruchung im Berufsleben: Erkennen—Gestalten.] Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Dortmund

Kjellberg A, Sköldström B (1991) Noise annoyance during the performance of different nonauditory tasks. Percept Mot Skills 73:39–49. doi:10.2466/PMS.73.4.39-49 PubMedCrossRef

Kjellberg A, Landström U, Tesarz M, Söderberg L, Akerlund E (1996) The effects of nonphysical noise characteristics, ongoing task and noise sensitivity on annoyance and distraction due to noise at work. J Environ Psychol 16:123–136. doi:10.1006/jevp.1996.0010 CrossRef

Ljungberg JK, Neely G (2007) Stress, subjective experience and cognitive performance during exposure to noise and vibration. J Environ Psychol 27:44–54. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.003 CrossRef

Mann HU, Ratzenberger R, Schubert M et al (2001) Traffic forecast 2015 for the Bundesverkehrswegeplanung. [Verkehrsprognose 2015 für die Bundesverkehrswegeplanung.]. Federal Ministry of Transport, Building, and Urban Affairs, Bonn

Miedema HME, Vos H (2003) Noise sensitivity and reactions to noise and other environmental conditions. J Acoust Soc Am 113:1492–1504. doi:10.1121/1.1547437 PubMedCrossRef

Öhrström E, Björkman M, Rylander R (1988) Noise annoyance with regard to neurophysiological sensitivity, subjective noise sensitivity and personality variables. Psychol Med 18(3):605–613PubMed

Plath HE, Richter P (1984) Fatigue, monotony, satiation, stress (BMS II) method for the scaled assessment of perceived strain. [Ermüdung, Monotonie, Sättigung, Stress (BMS II). Verfahren zur skalierten Erfassung erlebter Beanspruchungsfolgen.] Psychodiagnostisches Zentrum, Berlin

Schlegel RE, Gilliland K (1990) Evaluation of the criterion task set. Part 1. CTS performance and SWAT data—baseline conditions. Wright-Patterson Airforce Base, Dayton

Schütte M, Marks A, Wenning E, Griefahn B (2007a) The development of the noise sensitivity questionnaire. Noise Health 9(34):15–24PubMedCrossRef

Schütte M, Sandrock S, Griefahn B (2007b) Factorial validity of the noise sensitivity questionnaire. Noise Health 9(37):96–100PubMedCrossRef

Shingledecker CA (1984) A task battery for applied human performance assessment research. Wright-Patterson Airforce Base, Dayton

Smith A (1990) Noise, performance efficiency and safety. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 62:1–5. doi:10.1007/BF00397841 PubMedCrossRef

Stansfeld SA (1992) Noise, noise sensitivity and psychological studies, psychological medicine—monograph supplement, vol 22. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education, Inc, Boston

van Kamp I, Job RFS, Hatfield J et al (2004) The role of noise sensitivity in the noise–response relation: a comparison of three international airport studies. J Acoust Soc Am 116:3471–3479. doi:10.1121/1.1810291 PubMedCrossRef

VDI guideline 2058-3 (1999) Rating of noise at the workplace with respect to different tasks. [Beurteilung von Lärm am Arbeitsplatz unter Berücksichtigung unterschiedlicher Tätigkeiten.] Beuth, Berlin

Weinstein N (1978) Individual differences in reactions to noise: a longitudinal study in a college dormitory. J Appl Psychol 63(4):458–466PubMedCrossRef

Wetherell A (1996) Perfomance tests. Environ Health Perspect 104(Suppl 2):247–273PubMedCrossRef

Wierwille WW, Eggemeier FT (1993) Recommendations for mental workload measurement in a test and evaluation environment. Hum Factors 35:263–281

Zimmer K, Ellermeier W (1999) Psychometric properties of four measures of noise sensitivity: a comparison. J Environ Psychol 19:295–302CrossRef

Title: Impairing effects of noise in high and low noise sensitive persons working on different mental tasks
Authors: Stephan Sandrock
Martin Schütte
Barbara Griefahn
Publication date: 01-05-2009
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health / Issue 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0340-0131
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1246
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0379-0

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Impairing effects of noise in high and low noise sensitive persons working on different mental tasks

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 6/2009

Absorption of chemicals through compromised skin

Prevalence of workplace bullying and risk groups: a representative population study

Persulphate challenge in female hairdressers with nasal hyperreactivity suggests immune cell, but no IgE reaction

Self-collected urine sampling to study the kinetics of urinary toluene (and o-cresol) and define the best sampling time for biomonitoring

Working conditions in call-centers, the impact on employee health: a transversal study. Part II

Occupational styrene exposure, colour vision and contrast sensitivity: a cohort study with repeated measurements