Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 12/2012

01-12-2012 | Retinal Disorders

Success rates of retinal detachment surgery: routine versus emergency setting

Authors: Konrad R. Koch, Manuel M. Hermann, Bernd Kirchhof, Sascha Fauser

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 12/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) should usually be performed as soon as possible. However, a risk of operating in an emergency setting has to be considered against the risk of delaying it.

Methods

In a retrospective, interventional, non-comparative clinical case series we reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent surgery for primary noncomplex RRD between February 1999 and July 2009. The primary anatomical success (PAS) of RRD surgery was the primary outcome measure, which was defined as permanent reattachment of the retina after a single surgical procedure. All cases were classified as (I) surgical cases, which were performed as emergency procedures the night of the patient’s admission to the hospital (emergency setting), and as (II) those cases, which were operated in a routine setting during daytime (routine setting). Visual acuity was documented 2 and 6 months after surgery

Results

1810 cases of primary noncomplex RRD were analysed. PAS rates were 88.0 % in the routine setting and 87.3 % in the emergency setting (p = 0.67). While expert surgeons’ PAS rates did not differ between routine and emergency, non-experts achieved inferior anatomical results, when performing surgery in the emergency setting (81.6 % vs. 88.3 %; p = 0.02). There was no difference between expert (87.7 %) and non-expert surgeons (88.6 %) in the routine setting (p = 0.75). There was no statistically significant difference in visual acuity.

Conclusions

Prompt RRD surgery in an emergency setting did not improve the anatomical outcome and was worse if performed by non-expert surgeons. The possibility to schedule surgery may improve delivery of care without compromising the outcome. Although we did not see a significant functional difference, there was a trend for better visual acuity for experts and routine setting. If one decides that prompt surgery is necessary, it should only be done by an experienced vitreoretinal surgeon.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Doyle E, Herbert EN, Bunce C, Williamson TH, Laidlaw DA (2007) How effective is macula-off retinal detachment surgery. Might good outcome be predicted? Eye 21:534–540PubMedCrossRef Doyle E, Herbert EN, Bunce C, Williamson TH, Laidlaw DA (2007) How effective is macula-off retinal detachment surgery. Might good outcome be predicted? Eye 21:534–540PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Oshima Y, Yamanishi S, Sawa M, Motokura M, Harino S, Emi K (2000) Two-year follow-up study comparing primary vitrectomy with scleral buckling for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44:538–549PubMedCrossRef Oshima Y, Yamanishi S, Sawa M, Motokura M, Harino S, Emi K (2000) Two-year follow-up study comparing primary vitrectomy with scleral buckling for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44:538–549PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Salicone A, Smiddy WE, Venkatraman A, Feuer W (2006) Visual recovery after scleral buckling procedure for retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 113:1734–1742PubMedCrossRef Salicone A, Smiddy WE, Venkatraman A, Feuer W (2006) Visual recovery after scleral buckling procedure for retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 113:1734–1742PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wykoff CC, Smiddy WE, Mathen T, Schwartz SG, Flynn HWJ, Shi W (2010) Fovea-sparing retinal detachments: time to surgery and visual outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol 150:205.e2–210.e2 Wykoff CC, Smiddy WE, Mathen T, Schwartz SG, Flynn HWJ, Shi W (2010) Fovea-sparing retinal detachments: time to surgery and visual outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol 150:205.e2–210.e2
5.
go back to reference Diederen RM, La Heij EC, Kessels AG, Goezinne F, Liem AT, Hendrikse F (2007) Scleral buckling surgery after macula-off retinal detachment: worse visual outcome after more than 6 days. Ophthalmology 114:705–709PubMedCrossRef Diederen RM, La Heij EC, Kessels AG, Goezinne F, Liem AT, Hendrikse F (2007) Scleral buckling surgery after macula-off retinal detachment: worse visual outcome after more than 6 days. Ophthalmology 114:705–709PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yang CH, Lin HY, Huang JS, Ho TC, Lin CP, Chen MS, Yang CM (2004) Visual outcome in primary macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treated with scleral buckling. J Formos Med Assoc 103:212–217PubMed Yang CH, Lin HY, Huang JS, Ho TC, Lin CP, Chen MS, Yang CM (2004) Visual outcome in primary macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treated with scleral buckling. J Formos Med Assoc 103:212–217PubMed
7.
go back to reference Sagong M, Chang W (2010) Learning curve of the scleral buckling operation: lessons from the first 97 cases. Ophthalmologica 224:22–29PubMedCrossRef Sagong M, Chang W (2010) Learning curve of the scleral buckling operation: lessons from the first 97 cases. Ophthalmologica 224:22–29PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hartz AJ, Burton TC, Gottlieb MS, McCarty DJ, Williams DF, Prescott A, Klein P (1992) Outcome and cost analysis of scheduled versus emergency scleral buckling surgery. Ophthalmology 99:1358–1363PubMed Hartz AJ, Burton TC, Gottlieb MS, McCarty DJ, Williams DF, Prescott A, Klein P (1992) Outcome and cost analysis of scheduled versus emergency scleral buckling surgery. Ophthalmology 99:1358–1363PubMed
9.
go back to reference Ramsay MA (2000) Physician fatigue. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 13:148–150 Ramsay MA (2000) Physician fatigue. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 13:148–150
10.
go back to reference Weinger MB, Englund CE (1990) Ergonomic and human factors affecting anesthetic vigilance and monitoring performance in the operating room environment. Anesthesiology 73:995–1021PubMedCrossRef Weinger MB, Englund CE (1990) Ergonomic and human factors affecting anesthetic vigilance and monitoring performance in the operating room environment. Anesthesiology 73:995–1021PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Thelen U, Amler S, Osada N, Gerding H (2010) Outcome of surgery after macula-off retinal detachment — results from MUSTARD, one of the largest databases on buckling surgery in Europe: results from a large German case series. Acta Ophthalmol 1 June [Epub ahead of print] Thelen U, Amler S, Osada N, Gerding H (2010) Outcome of surgery after macula-off retinal detachment — results from MUSTARD, one of the largest databases on buckling surgery in Europe: results from a large German case series. Acta Ophthalmol 1 June [Epub ahead of print]
12.
go back to reference Hassan TS, Sarrafizadeh R, Ruby AJ, Garretson BR, Kuczynski B, Williams GA (2002) The effect of duration of macular detachment on results after the scleral buckle repair of primary, macula-off retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 109:146–152PubMedCrossRef Hassan TS, Sarrafizadeh R, Ruby AJ, Garretson BR, Kuczynski B, Williams GA (2002) The effect of duration of macular detachment on results after the scleral buckle repair of primary, macula-off retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 109:146–152PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Henrich PB, Priglinger S, Klaessen D, Kono-Kono JO, Maier M, Schotzau A, Meyer P, Josifova T, Schneider U, Flammer J, Haritoglou C (2009) Macula-off retinal detachment—a matter of time? Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 226:289–293PubMedCrossRef Henrich PB, Priglinger S, Klaessen D, Kono-Kono JO, Maier M, Schotzau A, Meyer P, Josifova T, Schneider U, Flammer J, Haritoglou C (2009) Macula-off retinal detachment—a matter of time? Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 226:289–293PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lai MM, Khan N, Weichel ED, Berinstein DM (2011) Anatomic and visual outcomes in early versus late macula-on primary retinal detachment repair. Retina 31:93–98PubMedCrossRef Lai MM, Khan N, Weichel ED, Berinstein DM (2011) Anatomic and visual outcomes in early versus late macula-on primary retinal detachment repair. Retina 31:93–98PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Haritoglou C, Brandlhuber U, Kampik A, Priglinger SG (2010) Anatomic success of scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment–a retrospective study of 524 cases. Ophthalmologica 224:312–318PubMedCrossRef Haritoglou C, Brandlhuber U, Kampik A, Priglinger SG (2010) Anatomic success of scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment–a retrospective study of 524 cases. Ophthalmologica 224:312–318PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Goezinne F, La Heij EC, Berendschot TT, Kessels AG, Liem AT, Diederen RM, Hendrikse F (2010) Incidence of redetachment 6 months after scleral buckling surgery. Acta Ophthalmol 88:199–206PubMedCrossRef Goezinne F, La Heij EC, Berendschot TT, Kessels AG, Liem AT, Diederen RM, Hendrikse F (2010) Incidence of redetachment 6 months after scleral buckling surgery. Acta Ophthalmol 88:199–206PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Campo RV, Sipperley JO, Sneed SR, Park DW, Dugel PU, Jacobsen J, Flindall RJ (1999) Pars plana vitrectomy without scleral buckle for pseudophakic retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 106:1811–1815, discussion 1816PubMedCrossRef Campo RV, Sipperley JO, Sneed SR, Park DW, Dugel PU, Jacobsen J, Flindall RJ (1999) Pars plana vitrectomy without scleral buckle for pseudophakic retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 106:1811–1815, discussion 1816PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N, Weiss C, Hilgers RD, Foerster MH (2007) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 114:2142–2154PubMedCrossRef Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N, Weiss C, Hilgers RD, Foerster MH (2007) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 114:2142–2154PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Falkner-Radler CI, Myung JS, Moussa S, Chan RV, Smretschnig E, Kiss S, Graf A, D'amico DJ, Binder S (2011) Trends in primary retinal detachment surgery: results of a Bicenter Study. Retina 31:928–936PubMedCrossRef Falkner-Radler CI, Myung JS, Moussa S, Chan RV, Smretschnig E, Kiss S, Graf A, D'amico DJ, Binder S (2011) Trends in primary retinal detachment surgery: results of a Bicenter Study. Retina 31:928–936PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Success rates of retinal detachment surgery: routine versus emergency setting
Authors
Konrad R. Koch
Manuel M. Hermann
Bernd Kirchhof
Sascha Fauser
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 12/2012
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2007-7

Other articles of this Issue 12/2012

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 12/2012 Go to the issue