Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2/2011

01-02-2011 | Cataract

Stereopsis in bilaterally multifocal pseudophakic patients

Authors: Teresa Ferrer-Blasco, David Madrid-Costa, Santiago García-Lázaro, Alejandro Cerviño, Robert Montés-Micó

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate stereoacuity in patients with bilateral implantation of an aspheric bifocal intraocular lens (IOL).

Methods

Thirty patients scheduled for cataract surgery were implanted with the aspheric bifocal AcrySof ReSTOR IOL. Stereoacuity was measured using the vectographic Titmus and Random dot stereotests (fixed disparity) and the Howard–Dolman apparatus (threshold disparity) under photopic conditions (85 cd/m2) after phacoemulsification for cataract surgery in 30 patients with low astigmatism (≤1D). Visual acuity at distance and near was also examined. All patients were examined at 1-year follow-up.

Results

Mean stereoacuity with the Titmus and the Random dot sterereotests was 44.55 ± 1.08 sec arc (range, from 40 to 80) and 41.25 ± 1.12 sec arc (range, from 20 to 70) respectively. The Howard–Dolman method showed a mean value of 18.42 ± 6.10 sec arc, ranging from 11 to 30 sec arc. No statistically significant differences were found between the Titmus and the Random dot sterereotests values (P = 0.189). However, these values differ significantly from that found using the Howard-Dolman method (P = 0.005). Visual acuity at distance and near was 0.04 ± 0.05 and 0.04 ± 0.04 logMAR (about 20/20) respectively.

Conclusions

Despite simultaneous images on the retina after bifocal IOL implantation, patients showed useful stereoacuity. This study confirms that retinal image blur associated with multifocality does not deteriorate stereoacuity. Stereoscopic threshold measurement with a Howard–Dolman apparatus is more accurate than vectographic tests when assessing stereoacuity after IOL surgery.
Literature
1.
4.
go back to reference Reading RE, Tanlamai T (1980) The threshold of stereopsis in the presence of differences in magnification of the ocular images. J Am Optom Assoc 51:593–595PubMed Reading RE, Tanlamai T (1980) The threshold of stereopsis in the presence of differences in magnification of the ocular images. J Am Optom Assoc 51:593–595PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lovasik JV, Szymkiw M (1985) Effects of aniseikonia, anisometropia, accommodation, retinal illuminance, and pupil size on stereopsis. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci 26:741–750 Lovasik JV, Szymkiw M (1985) Effects of aniseikonia, anisometropia, accommodation, retinal illuminance, and pupil size on stereopsis. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci 26:741–750
6.
go back to reference Jani SN (1966) The age factor in stereopsis screening. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 43:653–657PubMed Jani SN (1966) The age factor in stereopsis screening. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 43:653–657PubMed
7.
go back to reference Heckmann T, Schor CM (1989) Is edge information for stereoacuity spatially channelled? Vis Res 29:593–607CrossRefPubMed Heckmann T, Schor CM (1989) Is edge information for stereoacuity spatially channelled? Vis Res 29:593–607CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Greene HA, Madden DJ (1987) Adult age difference in visual acuity, stereopsis, and contrast sensitivity. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 64:749–753PubMed Greene HA, Madden DJ (1987) Adult age difference in visual acuity, stereopsis, and contrast sensitivity. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 64:749–753PubMed
9.
go back to reference Adams AJ, Wong LS, Wong L, Could B (1988) Visual acuity changes with age: some new perspectives. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 65:403–406PubMed Adams AJ, Wong LS, Wong L, Could B (1988) Visual acuity changes with age: some new perspectives. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 65:403–406PubMed
10.
go back to reference Montés-Micó R, Alió JL (2003) Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:703–711CrossRefPubMed Montés-Micó R, Alió JL (2003) Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:703–711CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Montés-Micó R, España E, Bueno I, Charman WN, Menezo JL (2004) Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses: mesopic contrast sensitivity under distance and near conditions. Ophthalmology 111:85–96CrossRefPubMed Montés-Micó R, España E, Bueno I, Charman WN, Menezo JL (2004) Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses: mesopic contrast sensitivity under distance and near conditions. Ophthalmology 111:85–96CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ferrer-Blasco T, Montés-Micó R, Cerviño A, Alfonso JF, González-Méijome JM (2009) Stereoacuity after refractive lens exchange with AcrySof ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation. J Refract Surg 25:1000–1004CrossRefPubMed Ferrer-Blasco T, Montés-Micó R, Cerviño A, Alfonso JF, González-Méijome JM (2009) Stereoacuity after refractive lens exchange with AcrySof ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation. J Refract Surg 25:1000–1004CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Simons K, Reinecke RD (1974) A reconsideration of amblyopia screening and stereopsis. Am J Ophthalmol 78:707–713PubMed Simons K, Reinecke RD (1974) A reconsideration of amblyopia screening and stereopsis. Am J Ophthalmol 78:707–713PubMed
14.
go back to reference Reading RW (1983) Binocular vision. Butterworths, Boston, p 175 Reading RW (1983) Binocular vision. Butterworths, Boston, p 175
15.
go back to reference Knight KK, Apsey DA, Jackson WG, Dennis RJ (1998) A comparison of stereopsis with ANVIS and F4949 night vision goggles. Aviat Space Environ Med 69:99–103PubMed Knight KK, Apsey DA, Jackson WG, Dennis RJ (1998) A comparison of stereopsis with ANVIS and F4949 night vision goggles. Aviat Space Environ Med 69:99–103PubMed
16.
go back to reference Edwards K, Llewellyn R (1988) Optometry, 1st edn. Butterworths, London Edwards K, Llewellyn R (1988) Optometry, 1st edn. Butterworths, London
17.
go back to reference Lehmann OJ, Verity DH, Coombes AGA, Ah-Fat FG, Francis PJ, Ionides ACW (1998) Clinical optics and refraction, 1st edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford Lehmann OJ, Verity DH, Coombes AGA, Ah-Fat FG, Francis PJ, Ionides ACW (1998) Clinical optics and refraction, 1st edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
18.
go back to reference Elkington AR, Frank HJ (1984) Clinical optics, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London Elkington AR, Frank HJ (1984) Clinical optics, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London
19.
go back to reference Clarke WN, Noel LP (1990) Stereoacuity testing in the monofixation syndrome. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 27:161–163PubMed Clarke WN, Noel LP (1990) Stereoacuity testing in the monofixation syndrome. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 27:161–163PubMed
20.
go back to reference Cooper J, Warshowsky J (1977) Lateral displacement as a cue in the Titmus stereotest. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 54:537–541PubMed Cooper J, Warshowsky J (1977) Lateral displacement as a cue in the Titmus stereotest. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 54:537–541PubMed
21.
go back to reference Cooper J, Feldman J, Medlin D (1979) Coparing stereoscopic performance of children using the Titmus, TNO, and Randot stereo test. J Am Optom Assoc 50:821–825PubMed Cooper J, Feldman J, Medlin D (1979) Coparing stereoscopic performance of children using the Titmus, TNO, and Randot stereo test. J Am Optom Assoc 50:821–825PubMed
22.
go back to reference Saladin JJ, Alspaugh DH, Penrod LR (1988) Effect of vision therapy on stereophotogrammetric profiling — a controlled clinical trial. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 65:325–330PubMed Saladin JJ, Alspaugh DH, Penrod LR (1988) Effect of vision therapy on stereophotogrammetric profiling — a controlled clinical trial. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 65:325–330PubMed
23.
go back to reference Westheimer G, McKee SP (1980) Stereoscopic acuity with defocused and spatially filtered retinal images. J Opt Soc Am A 70:772–778CrossRef Westheimer G, McKee SP (1980) Stereoscopic acuity with defocused and spatially filtered retinal images. J Opt Soc Am A 70:772–778CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Simons K (1984) Effect on stereopsis of monocular versus binocular degradation of image contrast. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25:987–989PubMed Simons K (1984) Effect on stereopsis of monocular versus binocular degradation of image contrast. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25:987–989PubMed
26.
go back to reference Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Valcárcel B (2008) Visual performance after AcrySof ReSTOR aspheric intraocular lens implantation. J Optom 1:30–35CrossRef Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Valcárcel B (2008) Visual performance after AcrySof ReSTOR aspheric intraocular lens implantation. J Optom 1:30–35CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Davison JA, Simpson MJ (2006) History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:849–858CrossRefPubMed Davison JA, Simpson MJ (2006) History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:849–858CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Häring G, Gronemeyer A, Hedderich J, de Decker W (1999) Stereoacuity and aniseikonia after unilateral and bilateral implantation of the Array refractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:1151–1156CrossRefPubMed Häring G, Gronemeyer A, Hedderich J, de Decker W (1999) Stereoacuity and aniseikonia after unilateral and bilateral implantation of the Array refractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:1151–1156CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Shoji N, Shimizu K (2002) Binocular function of the patient with the refractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1012–1017CrossRefPubMed Shoji N, Shimizu K (2002) Binocular function of the patient with the refractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1012–1017CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Souza CE, Muccioli C, Soriano ES, Chalita MR, Oliveira F, Freitas LL, Meire LP, Tamaki C, Belfort R Jr (2006) Visual performance of AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective comparative trial. Am J Ophthalmol 141:827–832CrossRefPubMed Souza CE, Muccioli C, Soriano ES, Chalita MR, Oliveira F, Freitas LL, Meire LP, Tamaki C, Belfort R Jr (2006) Visual performance of AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective comparative trial. Am J Ophthalmol 141:827–832CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Chang DF (2008) Prospective functional and clinical comparison of bilateral ReZoom and ReSTOR intraocular lenses in patients 70 years or younger. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:934–941CrossRefPubMed Chang DF (2008) Prospective functional and clinical comparison of bilateral ReZoom and ReSTOR intraocular lenses in patients 70 years or younger. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:934–941CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Cionni RJ, Osher RH, Snyder ME, Nordlund ML (2009) Visual outcome comparison of unilateral versus bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Prospective 6-month study. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1033–1039CrossRefPubMed Cionni RJ, Osher RH, Snyder ME, Nordlund ML (2009) Visual outcome comparison of unilateral versus bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Prospective 6-month study. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1033–1039CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Chen W, Meng Q, Ye H, Liu Y (2010) Reading ability and stereoacuity with combined implantation of refractive and diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Acta Ophthalmol (in press) Chen W, Meng Q, Ye H, Liu Y (2010) Reading ability and stereoacuity with combined implantation of refractive and diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Acta Ophthalmol (in press)
34.
go back to reference de Decker W, Dannheim E, Gockeln R (1995) Fly test calibrated. In: Lennerstrand G (ed) Update on strabismus and pediatric ophthalmology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 77–80 de Decker W, Dannheim E, Gockeln R (1995) Fly test calibrated. In: Lennerstrand G (ed) Update on strabismus and pediatric ophthalmology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 77–80
35.
go back to reference Hayashi K, Hayashi H (2004) Stereopsis in bilaterally pseudophakic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:1466–1470CrossRefPubMed Hayashi K, Hayashi H (2004) Stereopsis in bilaterally pseudophakic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:1466–1470CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Finkelman YM, Ng JQ, Barrett GD (2009) Patient satisfaction and visual function after pseudophakic monovision. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:998–1002CrossRefPubMed Finkelman YM, Ng JQ, Barrett GD (2009) Patient satisfaction and visual function after pseudophakic monovision. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:998–1002CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Stereopsis in bilaterally multifocal pseudophakic patients
Authors
Teresa Ferrer-Blasco
David Madrid-Costa
Santiago García-Lázaro
Alejandro Cerviño
Robert Montés-Micó
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1558-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2/2011 Go to the issue