Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 1/2008

01-01-2008 | Clinical Investigation

Performance of a new, 3D-monitor based random-dot stereotest for children under 4 years of age

Authors: Birgitta Kriegbaum-Stehberger, Xiaoyi Jiang, Daniel S. Mojon

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to determine the performance of a new, 3D-monitor based, objective stereotest in children under the age of four.

Methods

Random-dot circles (diameter 10 cm, crossed, disparity of 0.34°) randomly changing their position were presented on an 3D-monitor while eye movements were monitored by infrared photo-oculography. If ≥3 consecutive stimuli were seen, a positive response was assumed. One hundred thirty-four normal children aged 2 months to 4 years (average 17±15.3 months) were examined.

Results

Below the age of 12 months, we were not able to obtain a response to the 3D stimulus. For older children the following rates of positive responses were found: 12–18 months 25%, 18–24 months 10%, 24–30 months 16%, 30–36 months 57%, 36–42 months 100%, and 42–48 months 91%. Multiple linear logistic regression showed a significant influence on stimulus recognition of the explanatory variables age (p<0.00001) and child cooperation (p<0.001), but not of gender (p>0.1).

Conclusions

This 3D-monitor based stereotest allows an objective measurement of random-dot stereopsis in younger children. It might open new ways to screen children for visual abnormalities and to study the development of stereovision. However, the current experimental setting does not allow determining random-dot stereopsis in children younger than 12 months.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Birch E, Petrig B (1996) FPL and VEP measures of fusion, stereopsis and stereoacuity in normal infants. Vision Res 36:1321–1327PubMedCrossRef Birch E, Petrig B (1996) FPL and VEP measures of fusion, stereopsis and stereoacuity in normal infants. Vision Res 36:1321–1327PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Birch EE, Gwiazda J, Held R (1982) Stereoacuity development for crossed and uncrossed disparities in human infants. Vision Res 22:507–513PubMedCrossRef Birch EE, Gwiazda J, Held R (1982) Stereoacuity development for crossed and uncrossed disparities in human infants. Vision Res 22:507–513PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Birch EE, Shimojo S, Held R (1985) Preferential-looking assessment of fusion and stereopsis in infants aged 1–6 months. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26:366–370PubMed Birch EE, Shimojo S, Held R (1985) Preferential-looking assessment of fusion and stereopsis in infants aged 1–6 months. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26:366–370PubMed
5.
go back to reference Birch EE, Salomao S (1998) Infant random dot stereoacuity cards. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 35:86–90PubMed Birch EE, Salomao S (1998) Infant random dot stereoacuity cards. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 35:86–90PubMed
6.
go back to reference Breyer A, Jiang X, Rütsche A, Mojon DS (2006) A new 3D monitor based random-dot stereotest for children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:4842–4846PubMedCrossRef Breyer A, Jiang X, Rütsche A, Mojon DS (2006) A new 3D monitor based random-dot stereotest for children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:4842–4846PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Breyer A, Jiang X, Rutsche A, Mojon DS (2003) A new objective test for random-dot stereopsis in preverbal children. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 220:96–98PubMedCrossRef Breyer A, Jiang X, Rutsche A, Mojon DS (2003) A new objective test for random-dot stereopsis in preverbal children. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 220:96–98PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Buquet C, Charlier JR (1994) Quantitative assessment of the static properties of the oculomotor system with the photo-oculographic technique. Med Biol Eng Comput 32:97–204CrossRef Buquet C, Charlier JR (1994) Quantitative assessment of the static properties of the oculomotor system with the photo-oculographic technique. Med Biol Eng Comput 32:97–204CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Charlier J, Buquet C, Desmidt A, Querleu D (1993) Application de la technique photo-oculographique à l’étude de la poursuite visuelle au cours des premiers mois de la vie. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr 11:973–978 Charlier J, Buquet C, Desmidt A, Querleu D (1993) Application de la technique photo-oculographique à l’étude de la poursuite visuelle au cours des premiers mois de la vie. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr 11:973–978
10.
go back to reference Eizenman M, Westall CA, Geer I et al (1999) Electrophysiological evidence of cortical fusion in children with early-onset esotropia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:354–362PubMed Eizenman M, Westall CA, Geer I et al (1999) Electrophysiological evidence of cortical fusion in children with early-onset esotropia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:354–362PubMed
11.
go back to reference Held R, Birch E, Gwiazda J (1980) Stereoacuity of human infants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:5572–5574PubMedCrossRef Held R, Birch E, Gwiazda J (1980) Stereoacuity of human infants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:5572–5574PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Julesz B, Kropfl W, Petrig B (1980) Large evoked potentials to dynamic random-dot correlograms and stereograms permit quick determination of stereopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:2348–2351PubMedCrossRef Julesz B, Kropfl W, Petrig B (1980) Large evoked potentials to dynamic random-dot correlograms and stereograms permit quick determination of stereopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:2348–2351PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mulvihill A, MacCann A, Flitcroft I, O’Keefe M (2000) Outcome in refractive accommodative esotropia. Br J Ophthalmol 84:746–749PubMedCrossRef Mulvihill A, MacCann A, Flitcroft I, O’Keefe M (2000) Outcome in refractive accommodative esotropia. Br J Ophthalmol 84:746–749PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Noorden GK, Campos EC (2002) Binocular vision and ocular motility. Examination of the patient-V. Depth perception. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 298–307 Noorden GK, Campos EC (2002) Binocular vision and ocular motility. Examination of the patient-V. Depth perception. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 298–307
15.
go back to reference Petrig B, Julesz B, Kropfl W et al (1981) Development of stereopsis and cortical binocularity in human infants: electrophysiological evidence. Science 213:1402–1405PubMedCrossRef Petrig B, Julesz B, Kropfl W et al (1981) Development of stereopsis and cortical binocularity in human infants: electrophysiological evidence. Science 213:1402–1405PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ruetsche A, Baumann A, Jiang X, Mojon DS (2003) Automated analysis of eye tracking movements. Ophthalmologica 217:320–324PubMedCrossRef Ruetsche A, Baumann A, Jiang X, Mojon DS (2003) Automated analysis of eye tracking movements. Ophthalmologica 217:320–324PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Simonsz HJ, Kolling GH, Unnebrink K (2005) Final report of the early vs. late infantile strabismus surgery study (ELISSS), a controlled, prospective, multicenter study. Strabismus 13:169–199PubMedCrossRef Simonsz HJ, Kolling GH, Unnebrink K (2005) Final report of the early vs. late infantile strabismus surgery study (ELISSS), a controlled, prospective, multicenter study. Strabismus 13:169–199PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vital-Durand F, Atkinson J, Braddick OJ (1996) Infant vision. In: Buquet C, Charlier JR (eds) Evaluation of sensory visual development based on measures of oculomotor responses. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 291–306 Vital-Durand F, Atkinson J, Braddick OJ (1996) Infant vision. In: Buquet C, Charlier JR (eds) Evaluation of sensory visual development based on measures of oculomotor responses. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 291–306
Metadata
Title
Performance of a new, 3D-monitor based random-dot stereotest for children under 4 years of age
Authors
Birgitta Kriegbaum-Stehberger
Xiaoyi Jiang
Daniel S. Mojon
Publication date
01-01-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0632-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 1/2008 Go to the issue