Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 3/2005

01-03-2005 | Clinical Investigation

Integrated visual fields: a new approach to measuring the binocular field of view and visual disability

Authors: David P. Crabb, Ananth C. Viswanathan

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 3/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We have developed a method of quantifying the central binocular visual field by merging results from monocular fields (Integrated visual field). This study aims to compare the new measure with the binocular Esterman visual field test in identifying patients with self-reported visual disability.

Methods

Forty-eight patients with glaucoma each recorded Humphrey 24-2 fields for both eyes and an Esterman on the same day, and each completed a binary forced-choice questionnaire relating to perceived visual disability. Computer software merged sensitivity values from monocular fields to generate an integrated visual field and a related score of the number of defects at the <10 dB and <20 dB level. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the integrated visual field score and the Esterman disability score with individual responses to the questions on perceived difficulty with visual tasks.

Results

Comparison of areas under ROC curves revealed that a score based on the integrated visual field was generally better (median area: 0.79) than Esterman scores (median area: 0.70) in classifying patients with or without a self-reported perceived difficulty with visual tasks.

Conclusions

The integrated visual field offers a rapid assessment of a glaucoma patient’s binocular visual field without extra perimetric testing. As compared to an actual binocular field test (Esterman), the integrated visual field provides a better prediction of a glaucoma patient’s perceived inability to perform certain visual tasks.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Altman DG, Bland M (1994) Statistics notes: diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic plots. Br Med J 309:188 Altman DG, Bland M (1994) Statistics notes: diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic plots. Br Med J 309:188
2.
go back to reference Crabb DP, Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA (1998) Simulating binocular visual field status in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 82:1236–1241PubMed Crabb DP, Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA (1998) Simulating binocular visual field status in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 82:1236–1241PubMed
3.
go back to reference Esterman B (1982) Functional scoring of the binocular field. Ophthalmology 89:1226–1234PubMed Esterman B (1982) Functional scoring of the binocular field. Ophthalmology 89:1226–1234PubMed
4.
go back to reference Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, Poinoosawmy D, McNaught AI, Crabb DP (1996) Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 80:40–48PubMed Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, Poinoosawmy D, McNaught AI, Crabb DP (1996) Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 80:40–48PubMed
5.
go back to reference Friedman SM, Munoz B, Rubin GS, West SK, Bandeen-Roche K, Fried LP (1999) Characteristics of discrepancies between self-reported visual function and measured reading speed. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project Team. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:858–864PubMed Friedman SM, Munoz B, Rubin GS, West SK, Bandeen-Roche K, Fried LP (1999) Characteristics of discrepancies between self-reported visual function and measured reading speed. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project Team. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:858–864PubMed
6.
go back to reference Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839–843PubMed Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839–843PubMed
7.
go back to reference Harris ML, Jacobs NA (1995) Is the Esterman binocular field sensitive enough? In: Mills RP, Wall M (eds) Perimetry Update 1994/95. Kugler, Amsterdam, pp 13–24 Harris ML, Jacobs NA (1995) Is the Esterman binocular field sensitive enough? In: Mills RP, Wall M (eds) Perimetry Update 1994/95. Kugler, Amsterdam, pp 13–24
8.
go back to reference Hoeymans N, Feskens EJ, van den Bos GA, Kromhout D (1996) Measuring functional status: cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between performance and self-report (Zutphen Elderly Study 1990–1993). J Clin Epidemiol 49:1103–1110 Hoeymans N, Feskens EJ, van den Bos GA, Kromhout D (1996) Measuring functional status: cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between performance and self-report (Zutphen Elderly Study 1990–1993). J Clin Epidemiol 49:1103–1110
9.
go back to reference Iester M, Zingirian M (2002) Quality of life in patients with early, moderate and advanced glaucoma. Eye 16:44–49CrossRefPubMed Iester M, Zingirian M (2002) Quality of life in patients with early, moderate and advanced glaucoma. Eye 16:44–49CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Jampel HD, Friedman DS, Quigley H, Miller R (2002) Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis 43:1059–1067 Jampel HD, Friedman DS, Quigley H, Miller R (2002) Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis 43:1059–1067
11.
go back to reference Jampel HD, Schwartz A, Pollack I, Abrams D, Weiss H, Miller R (2002) Glaucoma patients’ assessment of their visual function and quality of life. J Glaucoma 11:154–163CrossRefPubMed Jampel HD, Schwartz A, Pollack I, Abrams D, Weiss H, Miller R (2002) Glaucoma patients’ assessment of their visual function and quality of life. J Glaucoma 11:154–163CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mills RP, Drance SM (1986) Esterman disability rating in severe glaucoma. Ophthalmology 93:371–378PubMed Mills RP, Drance SM (1986) Esterman disability rating in severe glaucoma. Ophthalmology 93:371–378PubMed
13.
go back to reference Nelson, P, Aspinall P, Papasouliotis O, Worton B, O’Brien C (2003) Quality of life in glaucoma and its relationship with visual function. J Glaucoma 12:139–150CrossRefPubMed Nelson, P, Aspinall P, Papasouliotis O, Worton B, O’Brien C (2003) Quality of life in glaucoma and its relationship with visual function. J Glaucoma 12:139–150CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Nelson-Quigg JM, Cello K, Johnson CA (2000) Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:2212–2221PubMed Nelson-Quigg JM, Cello K, Johnson CA (2000) Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:2212–2221PubMed
15.
go back to reference Noe G, Ferraro J, Lamoureux E, Rait J, Keeffe JE (2003) Associations between glaucomatous visual field loss and participation in activities of daily living. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 31:482–486 Noe G, Ferraro J, Lamoureux E, Rait J, Keeffe JE (2003) Associations between glaucomatous visual field loss and participation in activities of daily living. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 31:482–486
16.
go back to reference Parrish RK, Gedde SJ, Scott IU, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC, Mangione CM, Montenegro-Piniella A (1997) Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 115:1447–1455PubMed Parrish RK, Gedde SJ, Scott IU, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC, Mangione CM, Montenegro-Piniella A (1997) Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 115:1447–1455PubMed
17.
go back to reference Scott IU, Feuer WJ, Jacko JA (2002) Impact of graphical user interface screen features on computer task accuracy and speed in a cohort of patients with age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 134:857–862CrossRefPubMed Scott IU, Feuer WJ, Jacko JA (2002) Impact of graphical user interface screen features on computer task accuracy and speed in a cohort of patients with age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 134:857–862CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Smith TL (1985) The effects of regression towards the mean on visual disability ratings. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 42:537–547 Smith TL (1985) The effects of regression towards the mean on visual disability ratings. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 42:537–547
19.
go back to reference Turano KA, Rubin GS, Quigley HA (1999) Mobility performance in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:2803–2809PubMed Turano KA, Rubin GS, Quigley HA (1999) Mobility performance in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:2803–2809PubMed
20.
go back to reference Viswanathan AC, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA (1997) Early detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of PROGRESSOR and Statpac 2. Br J Ophthalmol 81:1037–1042PubMed Viswanathan AC, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA (1997) Early detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of PROGRESSOR and Statpac 2. Br J Ophthalmol 81:1037–1042PubMed
21.
go back to reference Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosawmy D, Fontana L, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA (1999) Severity and stability of glaucoma: patient perception compared with objective measurement. Arch Ophthalmol 117:450–454PubMed Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosawmy D, Fontana L, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA (1999) Severity and stability of glaucoma: patient perception compared with objective measurement. Arch Ophthalmol 117:450–454PubMed
Metadata
Title
Integrated visual fields: a new approach to measuring the binocular field of view and visual disability
Authors
David P. Crabb
Ananth C. Viswanathan
Publication date
01-03-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 3/2005
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-0984-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2005

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 3/2005 Go to the issue