Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-11-2021 | Original Article

Exploring STR sequencing for forensic DNA intelligence databasing using the Austrian National DNA Database as an example

Authors: Petra Hölzl-Müller, Martin Bodner, Burkhard Berger, Walther Parson

Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine | Issue 6/2021

Abstract

Here, we present the results from a population study that evaluated the performance of massively parallel sequencing (MPS) of short tandem repeats (STRs) with a particular focus on DNA intelligence databasing purposes. To meet this objective, 247 randomly selected reference samples, earlier being processed with conventional capillary electrophoretic (CE) STR sizing from the Austrian National DNA Database, were reanalyzed with the PowerSeq 46Y kit (Promega). This sample set provides MPS-based population data valid for the Austrian population to increase the body of sequence-based STR variation. The study addressed forensically relevant parameters, such as concordance and backward compatibility to extant amplicon-based genotypes, sequence-based stutter ratios, and relative marker performance. Of the 22 autosomal STR loci included in the PowerSeq 46GY panel, 99.98% of the allele calls were concordant between MPS and CE. Moreover, 25 new sequence variants from 15 markers were found in the Austrian dataset that are yet undescribed in the STRSeq online catalogue and were submitted for inclusion. Despite the high degree of concordance between MPS and CE derived genotypes, our results demonstrate the need for a harmonized allele nomenclature system that is equally applicable to both technologies, but at the same time can take advantage of the increased information content of MPS. This appears to be particularly important with regard to database applications in order to prevent false exclusions due to varying allele naming based on different analysis platforms and ensures backward compatibility.

Available only for authorised users

Jobling MA, Gill P (2004) Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis. Nat Rev Genet 5:739–751. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1455CrossRefPubMed

Churchill JD, Schmedes SE, King JL, Budowle B (2016) Evaluation of the Illumina Beta Version ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit for use in genetic profiling. Forensic Sci Int Genet 20:20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.09.009CrossRefPubMed

Just RS, Moreno LI, Smerick JB, Irwin JA (2017) Performance and concordance of the ForenSeq system for autosomal and Y chromosome short tandem repeat sequencing of reference-type specimens. Forensic Sci Int Genet 28:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.01.001CrossRefPubMed

Guo F, Zhou Y, Liu F et al (2016) Evaluation of the Early Access STR Kit v1 on the Ion Torrent PGM platform. Forensic Sci Int Genet 23:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.04.004CrossRefPubMed

Xavier C, Parson W (2017) Evaluation of the Illumina ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit-MPS forensic application for the MiSeq FGx benchtop sequencer. Forensic Sci Int Genet 28:188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.02.018CrossRefPubMed

van der Gaag KJ, de Leeuw RH, Hoogenboom J et al (2016) Massively parallel sequencing of short tandem repeats—population data and mixture analysis results for the PowerSeq system. Forensic Sci Int Genet 24:86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.05.016CrossRefPubMed

Alonso A, Barrio PA, Müller P et al (2018) Current state-of-art of STR sequencing in forensic genetics. Electrophoresis. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.20180003010.1002/elps.201800030CrossRefPubMed

Hollard C, Ausset L, Chantrel Y et al (2019) Automation and developmental validation of the ForenSeq DNA Signature Preparation kit for high-throughput analysis in forensic laboratories. Forensic Sci Int Genet 40:37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.01.010CrossRefPubMed

Bodner M, Parson W (2020) The STRidER report on two years of quality control of autosomal STR population datasets. Genes 11:901CrossRefPubMedCentral

10.

Gettings KB, Borsuk LA, Ballard D et al (2017) STRSeq: a catalog of sequence diversity at human identification short tandem repeat loci. Forensic Sci Int Genet 31:111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.08.017CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R (1991) Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 10:506–513PubMed

12.

Walker JA, Hedges DJ, Perodeau BP et al (2005) Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for simultaneous quantitation of human nuclear, mitochondrial, and male Y-chromosome DNA: application in human identification. Anal Biochem 337:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2004.09.036CrossRefPubMed

13.

Niederstätter H, Köchl S, Grubwieser P, Pavlic M, Steinlechner M, Parson W (2007) A modular real-time PCR concept for determining the quantity and quality of human nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Forensic Sci Int Genet 1:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2006.10.007CrossRefPubMed

14.

Bauer CM, Niederstätter H, McGlynn G, Stadler H, Parson W (2013) Comparison of morphological and molecular genetic sex-typing on mediaeval human skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int Genet 7:581–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.05.005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Thermo Fisher Scientific (2014) Applied Biosystems AmpFlSTR NGM SElect Express PCR Amplification Kit, Manual (Rev. C)

16.

Promega (2016) PowerPlex 16 System, Technical Manual (Revised 5/16)

17.

Schneider PM (2009) Expansion of the European Standard Set of DNA Database Loci—the current situation. Profiles in DNA: 6–7

18.

Gill P, Fereday L, Morling N, Schneider PM (2006) The evolution of DNA databases—recommendations for new European STR loci. Forensic Sci Int 156:242–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.05.036CrossRefPubMed

19.

Hares DR (2012) Expanding the CODIS core loci in the United States. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6:e52–e54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.04.012CrossRefPubMed

20.

Hares DR (2015) Selection and implementation of expanded CODIS core loci in the United States. Forensic Sci Int Genet 17:33–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.03.006CrossRefPubMed

21.

Moreno LI, Moretti TR (2019) Short tandem repeat genotypes of samples from eleven populations comprising the FBI’s population database. Forensic Sci Int Rep 1:100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2019.100041CrossRef

22.

Promega (2017) PowerSeq 46GY System, Technical Manual (Revised 8/17)

23.

Promega (2016) PowerSeq Systems Prototype, Instructions for Use (Revised 6/16)

24.

Illumina Inc. (2015) TruSeq DNA PCR-Free Library Prep Reference Guide (Part # 15036187, Rev. D)

25.

Thermo Fisher Scientific (2010) NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer V3.8 User´s Manual

26.

Kapa Biosystems (2014) KAPA Library Quantification Technical Guide, v1.14

27.

Verogen (2021) MiSeq FGx Sequencing System Reference Guide (Document # VD2018006 Rev. F)

28.

Illumina inc. (2018) MiSeq System Guide-Denature and Dilute Libraries (Document # 15027617, v01)

29.

Illumina Inc. (2014) Sequencing Analysis Viewer Software (#15020619 Rev F).

30.

King JL, Wendt FR, Sun J, Budowle B (2017) STRait Razor v2s: advancing sequence-based STR allele reporting and beyond to other marker systems. Forensic Sci Int Genet 29:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.03.013CrossRefPubMed

31.

King JL (2017) STRait Razor Analysis Manual

32.

Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A et al (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (2019) Addendum to “SWGDAM Interpretation Guidelines for Autosomal STR Typing by Forensic DNA Testing Laboratories” to Address Next Generation Sequencing. 25

34.

Corp IBM (2016) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 240. IBM Corp, Armonk

35.

GraphPad Prism Software. GraphPad Prism version 8.4.3 for Windows. 8.4.3 for Windows ed

36.

Gouy A, Zieger M (2017) STRAF—a convenient online tool for STR data evaluation in forensic genetics. Forensic Sci Int Genet 30:148–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.07.007CrossRefPubMed

37.

Illumina Inc. (2019) Cluster optimization, overview guide

38.

Illumina Inc. (2011) Quality scores of next-generation sequencing, technical note

39.

Illumina Inc. (2014) Understanding Illumina quality scores, technical note

40.

Devesse L, Ballard D, Davenport L, Riethorst I, Mason-Buck G, Syndercombe Court D (2017) Concordance of the ForenSeq system and characterisation of sequence-specific autosomal STR alleles across two major population groups. Forensic Sci Int Genet 34:57–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.10.012CrossRefPubMed

41.

Devesse L, Davenport L, Borsuk L et al (2020) Classification of STR allelic variation using massively parallel sequencing and assessment of flanking region power. Forensic Sci Int Genet 48:102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102356CrossRefPubMed

42.

Barrio PA, Martin P, Alonso A et al (2019) Massively parallel sequence data of 31 autosomal STR loci from 496 Spanish individuals revealed concordance with CE-STR technology and enhanced discrimination power. Forensic Sci Int Genet 42:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.06.009CrossRefPubMed

43.

Tucker VC, Hopwood AJ, Sprecher CJ et al (2012) Developmental validation of the PowerPlex ESX 16 and PowerPlex ESX 17 Systems. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6:124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.03.009CrossRefPubMed

44.

Hill CR, Duewer DL, Kline MC et al (2011) Concordance and population studies along with stutter and peak height ratio analysis for the PowerPlex ESX 17 and ESI 17 Systems. Forensic Sci Int Genet 5:269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.03.014CrossRefPubMed

45.

Müller P, Alonso A, Barrio PA et al (2018) Systematic evaluation of the early access applied biosystems precision ID Globalfiler mixture ID and Globalfiler NGS STR panels for the ion S5 system. Forensic Sci Int Genet 36:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.06.016CrossRefPubMed

46.

Green RL, Lagacé RE, Oldroyd NJ, Hennessy LK, Mulero JJ (2012) Developmental validation of the AmpFLSTR NGM SElect PCR Amplification Kit: a next-generation STR multiplex with the SE33 locus. Forensic Sci Int Genet

47.

Ensenberger MG, Thompson J, Hill B et al (2010) Developmental validation of the PowerPlex 16 HS System: an improved 16-locus fluorescent STR multiplex. Forensic Sci Int Genet 4:257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.10.007CrossRefPubMed

48.

Zeng X, King J, Hermanson S, Patel J, Storts DR, Budowle B (2015) An evaluation of the PowerSeq Auto System: a multiplex short tandem repeat marker kit compatible with massively parallel sequencing. Forensic Sci Int Genet 19:172–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.07.015CrossRefPubMed

49.

Silva DSBS, Scheible MK, Bailey SF et al (2020) Sequence-based autosomal STR characterization in four US populations using PowerSeq™ Auto/Y system. Forensic Sci Int Genet 48:102311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102311CrossRefPubMed

50.

Verogen (2018) ForenSeq Universal Analysis Software Guide (Document # VD2018007, Rev. A)

51.

Müller P, Sell C, Hadrys T et al (2019) Inter-laboratory study on standardized MPS libraries: evaluation of performance, concordance, and sensitivity using mixtures and degraded DNA. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02201-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Jäger AC, Alvarez ML, Davis CP et al (2017) Developmental validation of the MiSeq FGx forensic genomics system for targeted next generation sequencing in forensic DNA casework and database laboratories. Forensic Sci Int Genet 28:52–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.01.011CrossRefPubMed

53.

Guo F, Yu J, Zhang L, Li J (2017) Massively parallel sequencing of forensic STRs and SNPs using the Illumina ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit on the MiSeq FGx Forensic Genomics System. Forensic Sci Int Genet 31:135–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.09.003CrossRefPubMed

54.

Silvia AL, Shugarts N, Smith J (2017) A preliminary assessment of the ForenSeq FGx System: next generation sequencing of an STR and SNP multiplex. Int J Legal Med 131:73–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1457-6CrossRefPubMed

55.

Almalki N, Chow HY, Sharma V, Hart K, Siegel D, Wurmbach E (2017) Systematic assessment of the performance of Illumina’s MiSeq FGx forensic genomics system. Electrophoresis 38:846–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201600511CrossRefPubMed

56.

Phillips C, Gettings KB, King JL et al (2018) “The devil’s in the detail”: release of an expanded, enhanced and dynamically revised forensic STR Sequence Guide. Forensic Sci Int Genet 34:162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.02.017CrossRefPubMed

57.

Krenke BE, Tereba A, Anderson SJ et al (2002) Validation of a 16-locus fluorescent multiplex system. J Forensic Sci 47:773–785CrossRefPubMed

58.

Kwok S, Kellogg DE, McKinney N et al (1990) Effects of primer-template mismatches on the polymerase chain reaction: human immunodeficiency virus type 1 model studies. Nucleic Acids Res 18:999–1005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Christopherson C, Sninsky J, Kwok S (1997) The effects of internal primer-template mismatches on RT-PCR: HIV-1 model studies. Nucleic Acids Res 25:654–658. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.3.654CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

60.

Walsh PS, Fildes NJ, Reynolds R (1996) Sequence analysis and characterization of stutter products at the tetranucleotide repeat locus vWA. Nucleic Acids Res 24:2807–2812CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Woerner AE, King JL, Budowle B (2019) Compound stutter in D2S1338 and D12S391. Forensic Sci Int Genet 39:50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.12.001CrossRefPubMed

62.

Brookes C, Bright JA, Harbison S, Buckleton J (2012) Characterising stutter in forensic STR multiplexes. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6:58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.02.001CrossRefPubMed

63.

Ensenberger MG, Hill CR, McLaren RS, Sprecher CJ, Storts DR (2014) Developmental validation of the PowerPlex 21 System. Forensic Sci Int Genet 9:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.12.005CrossRefPubMed

64.

Aponte RA, Gettings KB, Duewer DL, Coble MD, Vallone PM (2015) Sequence-based analysis of stutter at STR loci: characterization and utility. Forensic Sci Int Gen 5:E456–E458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.09.181CrossRef

65.

Li R, Wu R, Li H et al (2020) Characterizing stutter variants in forensic STRs with massively parallel sequencing. Forensic Sci Int Genet 45:102225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102225CrossRefPubMed

66.

Moura-Neto R, King JL, Mello I et al (2021) Evaluation of Promega PowerSeq™ Auto/Y systems prototype on an admixed sample of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: population data, sensitivity, stutter and mixture studies. Forensic Sci Int Genet 53:102516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102516CrossRefPubMed

67.

Bright J-A, Buckleton JS, Taylor D, Fernando MACSS, Curran JM (2014) Modeling forward stutter: toward increased objectivity in forensic DNA interpretation. Electrophoresis 35:3152–3157. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201400044CrossRefPubMed

68.

Bodner M, Bastisch I, Butler JM et al (2016) Recommendations of the DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) on quality control of autosomal short tandem repeat allele frequency databasing (STRidER). Forensic Sci Int Genet 24:97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.06.008CrossRefPubMed

69.

Gettings KB, Borsuk LA, Steffen CR, Kiesler KM, Vallone PM (2018) Sequence-based U.S. population data for 27 autosomal STR loci. Forensic Sci Int Genet 37:106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.013CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Hussing C, Bytyci R, Huber C, Morling N, Børsting C (2019) The Danish STR sequence database: duplicate typing of 363 Danes with the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit. Int J Legal Med 133:325–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1854-0CrossRefPubMed

71.

Phillips C, Devesse L, Ballard D et al (2018) Global patterns of STR sequence variation: sequencing the CEPH human genome diversity panel for 58 forensic STRs using the Illumina ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit. Electrophoresis 39:2708–2724. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201800117CrossRefPubMed

72.

Novroski NMM, King JL, Churchill JD, Seah LH, Budowle B (2016) Characterization of genetic sequence variation of 58 STR loci in four major population groups. Forensic Sci Int Genet 25:214–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.09.007CrossRefPubMed

73.

Parson W, Ballard D, Budowle B et al (2016) Massively parallel sequencing of forensic STRs: considerations of the DNA commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) on minimal nomenclature requirements. Forensic Sci Int Genet 22:54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.01.009CrossRefPubMed

74.

Churchill JD, Novroski NMM, King JL, Seah LH, Budowle B (2017) Population and performance analyses of four major populations with Illumina’s FGx Forensic Genomics System. Forensic Sci Int Genet 30:81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.06.004CrossRefPubMed

75.

Amigo J, Phillips C, Salas T, Formoso LF, Carracedo Á, Lareu M (2009) pop.STR—an online population frequency browser for established and new forensic STRs. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser 2:361–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2009.08.178CrossRef

76.

Ruitberg CM, Reeder DJ, Butler JM (2001) STRBase: a short tandem repeat DNA database for the human identity testing community. Nucleic Acids Res 29:320–322CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

77.

Hatzer-Grubwieser P, Berger B, Niederwieser D, Steinlechner M (2012) Allele frequencies and concordance study of 16 STR loci—including the new European Standard Set (ESS) loci—in an Austrian population sample. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6:e50–e51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.04.006CrossRefPubMed

78.

Gettings KB, Ballard D, Bodner M et al (2019) Report from the STRAND Working Group on the 2019 STR sequence nomenclature meeting. Forensic Sci Int Genet 43:102165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102165CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: Exploring STR sequencing for forensic DNA intelligence databasing using the Austrian National DNA Database as an example
Authors: Petra Hölzl-Müller
Martin Bodner
Burkhard Berger
Walther Parson
Publication date: 01-11-2021
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0937-9827
Electronic ISSN: 1437-1596
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-021-02685-x

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Exploring STR sequencing for forensic DNA intelligence databasing using the Austrian National DNA Database as an example

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Feasibility of using probabilistic methods to analyse microRNA quantitative data in forensically relevant body fluids: a proof-of-principle study

Reliability of phenotype estimation and extended classification of ancestry using decedent samples

Identification of antemortem and postmortem fractures in a complex environment by FTIR spectroscopy based on a rabbit tibial fracture self-control model

Internal validation and improvement of mitochondrial genome sequencing using the Precision ID mtDNA Whole Genome Panel

Intra-bone nuclear DNA variability and STR typing success in Second World War first ribs

Practical application of synthetic head models in real ballistic cases