Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 8/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Paper

Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as treatment for major depression: study design and methodology of a multicenter triple blind randomized placebo controlled trial (DepressionDC)

Authors: Frank Padberg, Ulrike Kumpf, Ulrich Mansmann, Ulrich Palm, Christian Plewnia, Berthold Langguth, Peter Zwanzger, Andreas Fallgatter, Jana Nolden, Max Burger, Daniel Keeser, Rainer Rupprecht, Peter Falkai, Alkomiet Hasan, Silvia Egert, Malek Bajbouj

Published in: European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed as novel treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) based on clinical pilot studies as well as randomized controlled monocentric trials. The DepressionDC trial is a triple-blind (blinding of rater, operator and patient), randomized, placebo controlled multicenter trial investigating the efficacy and safety of prefrontal tDCS used as additive treatment in MDD patients who have not responded to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI). At 5 study sites, 152 patients with MDD receive a 6-weeks treatment with active tDCS (anode F3 and cathode F4, 2 mA intensity, 30 min/day) or sham tDCS add-on to a stable antidepressant medication with an SSRI. Follow-up visits are at 3 and 6 months after the last tDCS session. The primary outcome measure is the change of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores at week 6 post-randomisation compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints also cover other psychopathological domains, and a comprehensive safety assessment includes measures of cognition. Patients undergo optional investigations comprising genetic testing and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of structural and functional connectivity. The study uses also an advanced tDCS technology including standard electrode positioning and recording of technical parameters (current, impedance, voltage) in every tDCS session. Aside reporting the study protocol here, we present a novel approach for monitoring technical parameters of tDCS which will allow quality control of stimulation and further analysis of the interaction between technical parameters and clinical outcome. The DepressionDC trial will hopefully answer the important clinical question whether prefrontal tDCS is a safe and effective antidepressant intervention in patients who have not sufficiently responded to SSRIs.
Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT0253016.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Murray C, Lopez A (1996) The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020, ed. H.S.o.P. Health. Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge Murray C, Lopez A (1996) The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020, ed. H.S.o.P. Health. Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge
2.
go back to reference Greden JF (2001) The burden of recurrent depression: causes, consequences, and future prospects. J Clin Psychiatry 62(Suppl 22)5–9 Greden JF (2001) The burden of recurrent depression: causes, consequences, and future prospects. J Clin Psychiatry 62(Suppl 22)5–9
3.
go back to reference Bschor T (2008) Definition, klinisches Bild und Epidemiologie. In: Behandlungsmanual therapieresistente Depression. Pharmakotherapie—Somatische Therapieverfahren—Psychotherapie. Kohlhammer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 11–16 Bschor T (2008) Definition, klinisches Bild und Epidemiologie. In: Behandlungsmanual therapieresistente Depression. Pharmakotherapie—Somatische Therapieverfahren—Psychotherapie. Kohlhammer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 11–16
4.
go back to reference Trivedi MH et al (2006) Factors associated with health-related quality of life among outpatients with major depressive disorder: a STAR*D report. J Clin Psychiatry 67(2):185–195CrossRefPubMed Trivedi MH et al (2006) Factors associated with health-related quality of life among outpatients with major depressive disorder: a STAR*D report. J Clin Psychiatry 67(2):185–195CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rush AJ et al (2006) Bupropion-SR, sertraline, or venlafaxine-XR after failure of SSRIs for depression. N Engl J Med 354(12):1231–1242CrossRefPubMed Rush AJ et al (2006) Bupropion-SR, sertraline, or venlafaxine-XR after failure of SSRIs for depression. N Engl J Med 354(12):1231–1242CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Boggio PS et al (2008) A randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 11(2):249–254CrossRefPubMed Boggio PS et al (2008) A randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 11(2):249–254CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Brunoni AR et al (2011) Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in unipolar vs. bipolar depressive disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 35(1):96–101CrossRefPubMed Brunoni AR et al (2011) Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in unipolar vs. bipolar depressive disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 35(1):96–101CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Dell’Osso B et al (2012) Transcranial direct current stimulation for the outpatient treatment of poor-responder depressed patients. Eur Psychiatry 27(7):513–517CrossRefPubMed Dell’Osso B et al (2012) Transcranial direct current stimulation for the outpatient treatment of poor-responder depressed patients. Eur Psychiatry 27(7):513–517CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ferrucci R et al (2009) Transcranial direct current stimulation in severe, drug-resistant major depression. J Affect Disord 118(1–3):215–219CrossRefPubMed Ferrucci R et al (2009) Transcranial direct current stimulation in severe, drug-resistant major depression. J Affect Disord 118(1–3):215–219CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Fregni F et al (2006) Treatment of major depression with transcranial direct current stimulation. Bipolar Disord 8(2):203–204CrossRefPubMed Fregni F et al (2006) Treatment of major depression with transcranial direct current stimulation. Bipolar Disord 8(2):203–204CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Martin DM et al (2011) Fronto-extracephalic transcranial direct current stimulation as a treatment for major depression: an open-label pilot study. J Affect Disord 134(1–3):459–463CrossRefPubMed Martin DM et al (2011) Fronto-extracephalic transcranial direct current stimulation as a treatment for major depression: an open-label pilot study. J Affect Disord 134(1–3):459–463CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Insel T et al (2010) Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry 167(7):748–751CrossRefPubMed Insel T et al (2010) Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry 167(7):748–751CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bikson M et al (2016) Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence based update 2016. Brain Stimul Bikson M et al (2016) Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence based update 2016. Brain Stimul
15.
go back to reference De Raedt R, Vanderhasselt MA, Baeken C (2015) Neurostimulation as an intervention for treatment resistant depression: From research on mechanisms towards targeted neurocognitive strategies. Clin Psychol Rev 41:61–69CrossRefPubMed De Raedt R, Vanderhasselt MA, Baeken C (2015) Neurostimulation as an intervention for treatment resistant depression: From research on mechanisms towards targeted neurocognitive strategies. Clin Psychol Rev 41:61–69CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Plewnia C, Schroeder PA, Wolkenstein L (2015) Targeting the biased brain: non-invasive brain stimulation to ameliorate cognitive control. Lancet Psychiatry 2(4):351–356CrossRefPubMed Plewnia C, Schroeder PA, Wolkenstein L (2015) Targeting the biased brain: non-invasive brain stimulation to ameliorate cognitive control. Lancet Psychiatry 2(4):351–356CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Mayberg HS et al (1999) Reciprocal limbic-cortical function and negative mood: converging PET findings in depression and normal sadness. Am J Psychiatry 156(5):675–682PubMed Mayberg HS et al (1999) Reciprocal limbic-cortical function and negative mood: converging PET findings in depression and normal sadness. Am J Psychiatry 156(5):675–682PubMed
18.
go back to reference Bench CJ et al (1992) The anatomy of melancholia–focal abnormalities of cerebral blood flow in major depression. Psychol Med 22(3):607–615CrossRefPubMed Bench CJ et al (1992) The anatomy of melancholia–focal abnormalities of cerebral blood flow in major depression. Psychol Med 22(3):607–615CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Soares JC, Mann JJ (1997) The functional neuroanatomy of mood disorders. J Psychiatr Res 31(4):393–432CrossRefPubMed Soares JC, Mann JJ (1997) The functional neuroanatomy of mood disorders. J Psychiatr Res 31(4):393–432CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Baxter LR Jr., et al (1989) Reduction of prefrontal cortex glucose metabolism common to three types of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 46(3):243–250CrossRefPubMed Baxter LR Jr., et al (1989) Reduction of prefrontal cortex glucose metabolism common to three types of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 46(3):243–250CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ishizaki J et al (2008) Changes in regional cerebral blood flow following antidepressant treatment in late-life depression. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 23(8):805–811CrossRefPubMed Ishizaki J et al (2008) Changes in regional cerebral blood flow following antidepressant treatment in late-life depression. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 23(8):805–811CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Berlim MT et al (2014) Response, remission and drop-out rates following high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials. Psychol Med 44(2):225–239CrossRefPubMed Berlim MT et al (2014) Response, remission and drop-out rates following high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials. Psychol Med 44(2):225–239CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Padberg F, George MS (2009) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in depression. Exp Neurol 219(1):2–13CrossRefPubMed Padberg F, George MS (2009) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in depression. Exp Neurol 219(1):2–13CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2000) Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 527(3):633–639 Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2000) Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 527(3):633–639
25.
go back to reference Pathak Y et al (2013) The role of electrode location and stimulation polarity in patient response to cortical stimulation for major depressive disorder. Brain Stimul 6(3):254–260CrossRefPubMed Pathak Y et al (2013) The role of electrode location and stimulation polarity in patient response to cortical stimulation for major depressive disorder. Brain Stimul 6(3):254–260CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Price JL, Drevets WC (2012) Neural circuits underlying the pathophysiology of mood disorders. Trends Cogn Sci 16(1):61–71CrossRefPubMed Price JL, Drevets WC (2012) Neural circuits underlying the pathophysiology of mood disorders. Trends Cogn Sci 16(1):61–71CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Grimm S et al (2008) Imbalance between left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in major depression is linked to negative emotional judgment: an fMRI study in severe major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry 63(4):369–376CrossRefPubMed Grimm S et al (2008) Imbalance between left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in major depression is linked to negative emotional judgment: an fMRI study in severe major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry 63(4):369–376CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Brunoni AR et al (2013) The sertraline vs. electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study: results from a factorial, randomized, controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatry 70(4):383–391CrossRefPubMed Brunoni AR et al (2013) The sertraline vs. electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study: results from a factorial, randomized, controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatry 70(4):383–391CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Palm U et al (2012) Transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment resistant depression: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Brain Stimul 5(3):242–251CrossRefPubMed Palm U et al (2012) Transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment resistant depression: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Brain Stimul 5(3):242–251CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Bai S et al (2014) A computational modelling study of transcranial direct current stimulation montages used in depression. Neuroimage 87:332–344CrossRefPubMed Bai S et al (2014) A computational modelling study of transcranial direct current stimulation montages used in depression. Neuroimage 87:332–344CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Bikson M et al (2010) Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: role of “return” electrode’s position and size. Clin Neurophysiol 121(12):1976–1978CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bikson M et al (2010) Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: role of “return” electrode’s position and size. Clin Neurophysiol 121(12):1976–1978CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Shiozawa P et al (2014) Transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 17(9):1443–1452CrossRefPubMed Shiozawa P et al (2014) Transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 17(9):1443–1452CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Brunoni AR et al (2016) Transcranial direct current stimulation for acute major depressive episodes: meta-analysis of individual patient data. Br J Psychiatry 208(6):522–531CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brunoni AR et al (2016) Transcranial direct current stimulation for acute major depressive episodes: meta-analysis of individual patient data. Br J Psychiatry 208(6):522–531CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Kalu UG et al (2012) Transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 42(9):1791–1800CrossRefPubMed Kalu UG et al (2012) Transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 42(9):1791–1800CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Meron D et al (2015) Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 57:46–62CrossRefPubMed Meron D et al (2015) Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 57:46–62CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Berlim MT, Van den Eynde F, Daskalakis ZJ (2013) Clinical utility of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for treating major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials. J Psychiatr Res 47(1):1–7CrossRefPubMed Berlim MT, Van den Eynde F, Daskalakis ZJ (2013) Clinical utility of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for treating major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials. J Psychiatr Res 47(1):1–7CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Loo CK et al (2012) Transcranial direct current stimulation for depression: 3-week, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 200(1):52–59CrossRefPubMed Loo CK et al (2012) Transcranial direct current stimulation for depression: 3-week, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 200(1):52–59CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Loo CK et al (2010) A double-blind, sham-controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 13(1):61–69CrossRefPubMed Loo CK et al (2010) A double-blind, sham-controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 13(1):61–69CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Blumberger DM et al (2012) A randomized double-blind sham-controlled study of transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment-resistant major depression. Front Psychiatry 3:74CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Blumberger DM et al (2012) A randomized double-blind sham-controlled study of transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment-resistant major depression. Front Psychiatry 3:74CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Segrave RA et al (2014) Concurrent cognitive control training augments the antidepressant efficacy of tDCS: a pilot study. Brain Stimul 7(2):325–331CrossRefPubMed Segrave RA et al (2014) Concurrent cognitive control training augments the antidepressant efficacy of tDCS: a pilot study. Brain Stimul 7(2):325–331CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Bennabi D et al (2015) Pilot study of feasibility of the effect of treatment with tDCS in patients suffering from treatment-resistant depression treated with escitalopram. Clin Neurophysiol 126(6):1185–1189CrossRefPubMed Bennabi D et al (2015) Pilot study of feasibility of the effect of treatment with tDCS in patients suffering from treatment-resistant depression treated with escitalopram. Clin Neurophysiol 126(6):1185–1189CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Nitsche MA et al (2009) Serotonin affects transcranial direct current-induced neuroplasticity in humans. Biol Psychiatry 66(5):503–508CrossRefPubMed Nitsche MA et al (2009) Serotonin affects transcranial direct current-induced neuroplasticity in humans. Biol Psychiatry 66(5):503–508CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Kuo HI et al (2016) Chronic enhancement of serotonin facilitates excitatory transcranial direct current stimulation-induced neuroplasticity. Neuropsychopharmacology 41(5):1223–1230CrossRefPubMed Kuo HI et al (2016) Chronic enhancement of serotonin facilitates excitatory transcranial direct current stimulation-induced neuroplasticity. Neuropsychopharmacology 41(5):1223–1230CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Brunoni AR et al (2014) Differential improvement in depressive symptoms for tDCS alone and combined with pharmacotherapy: an exploratory analysis from the sertraline vs. electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 17(1):53–61CrossRefPubMed Brunoni AR et al (2014) Differential improvement in depressive symptoms for tDCS alone and combined with pharmacotherapy: an exploratory analysis from the sertraline vs. electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 17(1):53–61CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Brunoni AR et al (2013) Impact of 5-HTTLPR and BDNF polymorphisms on response to sertraline versus transcranial direct current stimulation: implications for the serotonergic system. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 23(11):1530–1540CrossRefPubMed Brunoni AR et al (2013) Impact of 5-HTTLPR and BDNF polymorphisms on response to sertraline versus transcranial direct current stimulation: implications for the serotonergic system. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 23(11):1530–1540CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Levkovitz Y et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. World. Psychiatry 14(1):64–73 Levkovitz Y et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. World. Psychiatry 14(1):64–73
47.
go back to reference Palm U et al (2014) The role of contact media at the skin-electrode interface during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimul 7(5):762–764CrossRefPubMed Palm U et al (2014) The role of contact media at the skin-electrode interface during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimul 7(5):762–764CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Derogatis L (1993) BSI brief symptom inventory: administration, scoring, and procedure manual, 4th edn. National Computer Systems, Minneapolis, MN Derogatis L (1993) BSI brief symptom inventory: administration, scoring, and procedure manual, 4th edn. National Computer Systems, Minneapolis, MN
49.
go back to reference Bernstein DP, Fink L (1998) CTQ Childhood Trauma questionnaire. A retrospective self-report. Manual. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio Bernstein DP, Fink L (1998) CTQ Childhood Trauma questionnaire. A retrospective self-report. Manual. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio
50.
51.
go back to reference Fuge P et al (2014) Assessment of age-related changes in cognitive functions using EmoCogMeter, a novel tablet-computer based approach. J Vis Exp 84:e50942 Fuge P et al (2014) Assessment of age-related changes in cognitive functions using EmoCogMeter, a novel tablet-computer based approach. J Vis Exp 84:e50942
52.
go back to reference Keeser D et al (2011) Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting-state networks during fMRI. J Neurosci 31(43):15284–15293CrossRefPubMed Keeser D et al (2011) Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting-state networks during fMRI. J Neurosci 31(43):15284–15293CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Keeser D et al (2011) Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: a standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study. Neuroimage 55(2):644–657CrossRefPubMed Keeser D et al (2011) Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: a standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study. Neuroimage 55(2):644–657CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Bundesen C, Habekost T, Kyllingsbaek S (2005) A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychol Rev 112(2):291–328CrossRefPubMed Bundesen C, Habekost T, Kyllingsbaek S (2005) A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychol Rev 112(2):291–328CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Desimone R, Duncan J (1995) Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 18:193–222CrossRefPubMed Desimone R, Duncan J (1995) Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 18:193–222CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Chechlacz M et al (2015) Structural variability within frontoparietal networks and individual differences in attentional functions: an approach using the theory of visual attention. J Neurosci 35(30):10647–10658CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chechlacz M et al (2015) Structural variability within frontoparietal networks and individual differences in attentional functions: an approach using the theory of visual attention. J Neurosci 35(30):10647–10658CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
58.
go back to reference Smoller JW (2015) The genetics of stress-related disorders: PTSD, depression, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology Smoller JW (2015) The genetics of stress-related disorders: PTSD, depression, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology
59.
go back to reference Gong Q, Y. He, Depression (2015) neuroimaging and connectomics: a selective overview. Biol Psychiatry 77(3):223–235CrossRefPubMed Gong Q, Y. He, Depression (2015) neuroimaging and connectomics: a selective overview. Biol Psychiatry 77(3):223–235CrossRefPubMed
60.
go back to reference Won E, Ham BJ (2016) Imaging genetics studies on monoaminergic genes in major depressive disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 64:311–319CrossRefPubMed Won E, Ham BJ (2016) Imaging genetics studies on monoaminergic genes in major depressive disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 64:311–319CrossRefPubMed
61.
go back to reference Nieratschker V et al (2015) The COMT Val/Met polymorphism modulates effects of tDCS on response inhibition. Brain Stimul 8(2):283–288CrossRefPubMed Nieratschker V et al (2015) The COMT Val/Met polymorphism modulates effects of tDCS on response inhibition. Brain Stimul 8(2):283–288CrossRefPubMed
62.
go back to reference Lockwood LE, Su S, Youssef NA (2015) The role of epigenetics in depression and suicide: A platform for gene-environment interactions. Psychiatry Res 228(3):235–242CrossRefPubMed Lockwood LE, Su S, Youssef NA (2015) The role of epigenetics in depression and suicide: A platform for gene-environment interactions. Psychiatry Res 228(3):235–242CrossRefPubMed
63.
64.
go back to reference Perahia DG et al (2009) Switching to duloxetine in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor non- and partial-responders: effects on painful physical symptoms of depression. J Psychiatr Res 43(5):512–518CrossRefPubMed Perahia DG et al (2009) Switching to duloxetine in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor non- and partial-responders: effects on painful physical symptoms of depression. J Psychiatr Res 43(5):512–518CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as treatment for major depression: study design and methodology of a multicenter triple blind randomized placebo controlled trial (DepressionDC)
Authors
Frank Padberg
Ulrike Kumpf
Ulrich Mansmann
Ulrich Palm
Christian Plewnia
Berthold Langguth
Peter Zwanzger
Andreas Fallgatter
Jana Nolden
Max Burger
Daniel Keeser
Rainer Rupprecht
Peter Falkai
Alkomiet Hasan
Silvia Egert
Malek Bajbouj
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0940-1334
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-017-0769-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 8/2017 Go to the issue