Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 4/2015

01-04-2015 | Otology

Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty in the treatment of dry central perforated chronic otitis media as an effective and time-saving procedure

Authors: Mehmet Haksever, Davut Akduman, Fevzi Solmaz, Ercan Gündoğdu

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the inlay butterfly transcanal cartilage tympanoplasty with the conventional underlay tympanoplasty. Operation time, pre- and postoperative hearing levels, successful closure rate of tympanic membrane (take rate) and long-term re-perforation in dry perforated chronic otitis media were evaluated. The study design consists of case series with a chart review. The study settings are tertiary referral center. Of the 72 patients (age range 14–57 years) with dry perforated chronic otitis media, 29 patients underwent inlay butterfly transcanal cartilage tympanoplasty (group 1) and 43 patients underwent conventional underlay tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy (group 2) between January 2010 and June 2012. The outcome measures were the duration of surgery, “take rate” at the 30th postoperative day and the audiometric results at the 45th postoperative day. Long-term re-perforation was evaluated at least postoperative 1 year. The graft take rate was 96.5 % in group 1 and 90.7 % in group 2 at the 30th postoperative day (p > 0.05). Mean air-bone gap was improved from 18.8 ± 8.09 to 11.9 ± 7.12 dB in group 1 and from 21.9 ± 7.32 to 11.6 ± 8.43 dB in group 2. The improvement of air-bone gap in both groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05) but the improvement between the groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The average duration of the surgery was 29.9 ± 5.38 min for inlay tympanoplasty group and 58.9 ± 12.1 min for underlay tympanoplasty group (p < 0.05). Two patients in group 2 had re-perforations after an initial take of the graft in 1-year follow-up period. Inlay butterfly transcanal cartilage tympanoplasty is a good choice in selected cases. Although this technique has the similar take rate and audiological results with conventional underlay tympanoplasty, it is a time-saving procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zollner F (1995) The principles of plastic surgery of the sound conducting apparatus. J Laryngol Otol 69:657–659 Zollner F (1995) The principles of plastic surgery of the sound conducting apparatus. J Laryngol Otol 69:657–659
2.
go back to reference Wullstein HL (1952) FunkionelleOperationenimMittelohrmitHilfe des FreinSpaltlappentransplantates. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 161:422–435CrossRef Wullstein HL (1952) FunkionelleOperationenimMittelohrmitHilfe des FreinSpaltlappentransplantates. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 161:422–435CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rizer FM (1997) Overlay versus underlay tympanoplasty. Part II: the study. Laryngoscope 107:26–36CrossRefPubMed Rizer FM (1997) Overlay versus underlay tympanoplasty. Part II: the study. Laryngoscope 107:26–36CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Postic WP, Winawer MR, Marsh RR (1996) Tympanoplasty for the anterior posterior perforation in children. Am J Otol 17:115–118 Postic WP, Winawer MR, Marsh RR (1996) Tympanoplasty for the anterior posterior perforation in children. Am J Otol 17:115–118
5.
6.
7.
go back to reference Gross CW, Bassila M, Lazar RH, Long TE, Stagner S (1989) Adipose tissue plug myringoplasty: an alternative to formal myringoplasty techniques in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 101:617–620PubMed Gross CW, Bassila M, Lazar RH, Long TE, Stagner S (1989) Adipose tissue plug myringoplasty: an alternative to formal myringoplasty techniques in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 101:617–620PubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Ghanem MA, Monroy A, Alizade FS, Nicolau Y, Eavey RD (2006) Butterfly cartilage graft inlay tympanoplasty for large perforations. Laryngoscope 116(10):1813–1816CrossRefPubMed Ghanem MA, Monroy A, Alizade FS, Nicolau Y, Eavey RD (2006) Butterfly cartilage graft inlay tympanoplasty for large perforations. Laryngoscope 116(10):1813–1816CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference LubiancaNeto JF (2000) Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty (Eavey technique) modified for adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:492–494CrossRef LubiancaNeto JF (2000) Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty (Eavey technique) modified for adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:492–494CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rizer FM (1997) Tympanoplasty. Part I: a historical review and a comparison of techniques. Laryngoscope 107:1–25CrossRefPubMed Rizer FM (1997) Tympanoplasty. Part I: a historical review and a comparison of techniques. Laryngoscope 107:1–25CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mauri M, LubiancaNeto JF, Fuchs SC (2001) Evaluation of inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Laryngoscope 111(8):1479–1485CrossRefPubMed Mauri M, LubiancaNeto JF, Fuchs SC (2001) Evaluation of inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Laryngoscope 111(8):1479–1485CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wang WH, Lin YC (2008) Minimally invasive inlay and underlay tympanoplasty. Am J Otolaryngol 29(6):363–366CrossRefPubMed Wang WH, Lin YC (2008) Minimally invasive inlay and underlay tympanoplasty. Am J Otolaryngol 29(6):363–366CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Effat KG, Kamal G (2005) Results of inlay cartilage myringoplasty in terms of closure of central tympanic membrane perforations. J Laryngol Otol 119(8):611–613PubMed Effat KG, Kamal G (2005) Results of inlay cartilage myringoplasty in terms of closure of central tympanic membrane perforations. J Laryngol Otol 119(8):611–613PubMed
15.
go back to reference Anand TS, Kathuria G, Kumar S et al (2002) Butterfly inlay tympanoplasty: a study in Indian scenario. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 54:11–13PubMedPubMedCentral Anand TS, Kathuria G, Kumar S et al (2002) Butterfly inlay tympanoplasty: a study in Indian scenario. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 54:11–13PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Couloigner V, Baculard F, El Bakkouri W et al (2005) Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty in children. Otol Neurotol 26(2):247–251CrossRefPubMed Couloigner V, Baculard F, El Bakkouri W et al (2005) Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty in children. Otol Neurotol 26(2):247–251CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gerber MJ, Mason JC, Lambert PR (2000) Hearing results after primary cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 110:1994–1999CrossRefPubMed Gerber MJ, Mason JC, Lambert PR (2000) Hearing results after primary cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 110:1994–1999CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Yu MS, Yoon TH (2010) Bilateral same-day surgery for bilateral perforated chronic otitis media: inlay butterfly cartilage myringoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery 143:669–672CrossRef Yu MS, Yoon TH (2010) Bilateral same-day surgery for bilateral perforated chronic otitis media: inlay butterfly cartilage myringoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery 143:669–672CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty in the treatment of dry central perforated chronic otitis media as an effective and time-saving procedure
Authors
Mehmet Haksever
Davut Akduman
Fevzi Solmaz
Ercan Gündoğdu
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-2889-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 4/2015 Go to the issue