Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2/2015

01-02-2015 | Otology

Are bovine pericardium underlay xenograft and butterfly inlay autograft efficient for transcanal tympanoplasty?

Authors: Clotilde de Dorlodot, Gersende De Bie, Naima Deggouj, Monique Decat, Jean-Marc Gérard

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

To evaluate the success rate and the surgical procedure of two different transcanal myringoplasty techniques using the Tutopatch® (Tutogen Medical, Inc., Alachua, FL, USA), a xenograft produced from bovine pericardium or the butterfly, an inlay tragal cartilage autograft. This is a retrospective study. We studied all cases of transcanal myringoplasty with Tutopatch and butterfly, performed by the same surgeon between April 2005 and May 2013. Perforations were secondary to chronic otitis media without cholesteatoma, perforation post ventilation tube or trauma. They were not exceeding one-third of the tympanic membrane surface for the Tutopatch and one quarter for the butterfly. We evaluated the anatomical success rate, complications and postoperative hearing results in both techniques. A total of 106 myringoplasties were performed: 66 with Tutopatch and 40 with butterfly with a mean follow-up of 16.5 and 5.2 months, respectively. Successful closure rates of Tutopatch and butterfly were 75.8 % (P < 0.0001) and 85.0 % (P < 0.0001), respectively. Myringitis controlled with topical antibiotics treatment occurred in 8 (12.1 %) and 5 (12.5 %) cases. Eighty percent of patients with Tutopatch had a mean residual air-bone gap within 10 dB, compared to 85.0 % in patients with butterfly. When anatomically feasible, a transcanal approach myringoplasty with a Tutopatch® graft or butterfly appears to provide good anatomical and functional results. We show that both techniques provide good anatomical and functional results. The butterfly has the advantage to use an autograft, which is surgically easier because it does not require tympanomeatal flap elevation. We recommend the butterfly technique for non-marginal perforation not exceeding one quarter of the tympanic membrane after excision of the perforation edge and Tutopatch for bigger perforation or when standard autografts are not available. Myringitis is the only described complication without specific incidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference (1994) Viral inactivation study during the Tutoplast allografts manufacturing process. Institut Pasteur texcel. Paris, France (1994) Viral inactivation study during the Tutoplast allografts manufacturing process. Institut Pasteur texcel. Paris, France
2.
go back to reference Filippi R, Schwarz M, Voth D, Reisch R, Grunert P, Perneczky A (2001) Bovine pericardium for duraplasty: clinical results in 32 patients. Neurosurg Rev 24(2–3):103–107CrossRefPubMed Filippi R, Schwarz M, Voth D, Reisch R, Grunert P, Perneczky A (2001) Bovine pericardium for duraplasty: clinical results in 32 patients. Neurosurg Rev 24(2–3):103–107CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Baharuddin A, Go BT, Firdaus MN, Abdullah J (2002) Bovine pericardium for dural graft: clinical results in 22 patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 104(4):342–344CrossRefPubMed Baharuddin A, Go BT, Firdaus MN, Abdullah J (2002) Bovine pericardium for dural graft: clinical results in 22 patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 104(4):342–344CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gupta M, Lyon F, Singh AD, Rundle PA, Rennie IG (2007) Bovine pericardium (Tutopatch) wrap for hydroxyapatite implants. Eye 21:476–479CrossRefPubMed Gupta M, Lyon F, Singh AD, Rundle PA, Rennie IG (2007) Bovine pericardium (Tutopatch) wrap for hydroxyapatite implants. Eye 21:476–479CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Mauri M, Neto JF, Fuchs SD (2001) Evaluation of inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Laryngoscope 111:1479–1485CrossRefPubMed Mauri M, Neto JF, Fuchs SD (2001) Evaluation of inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Laryngoscope 111:1479–1485CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Fiorino F, Barbieri F (2007) Fat graft myringoplasty after unsuccessful tympanic membrane repair. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264(10):1125–1128CrossRefPubMed Fiorino F, Barbieri F (2007) Fat graft myringoplasty after unsuccessful tympanic membrane repair. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264(10):1125–1128CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Thomassin JM, Facon F, Gabert K (2004) The effectiveness of otoendoscopy in myringoplasty using adipose graft. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 121(6):346–349CrossRefPubMed Thomassin JM, Facon F, Gabert K (2004) The effectiveness of otoendoscopy in myringoplasty using adipose graft. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 121(6):346–349CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Saadat D, Ng M, Vadapalli S, Sinsha UK (2001) Office myringoplasty with Alloderm. Laryngoscope 111:181–183CrossRefPubMed Saadat D, Ng M, Vadapalli S, Sinsha UK (2001) Office myringoplasty with Alloderm. Laryngoscope 111:181–183CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gérard JM, Thill MP, Gersdorff M (2003) The art of the tympanoplasty and its clinical illustration. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 120(2):83–93PubMed Gérard JM, Thill MP, Gersdorff M (2003) The art of the tympanoplasty and its clinical illustration. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 120(2):83–93PubMed
11.
go back to reference Albera R, Dagna F, Lacilla M, Canale A (2009) Equine versus bovine pericardium in transmeatal underlay myringoplasty. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 104(4):287–291CrossRef Albera R, Dagna F, Lacilla M, Canale A (2009) Equine versus bovine pericardium in transmeatal underlay myringoplasty. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 104(4):287–291CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gérard JM, Gersdorff M (2006) The Tutopatch graft for transcanal myringoplasty. B-ENT 2(4):177–179PubMed Gérard JM, Gersdorff M (2006) The Tutopatch graft for transcanal myringoplasty. B-ENT 2(4):177–179PubMed
13.
go back to reference Yetiser S, Tosun F, Satar B (2001) Revision myringoplasty with solvent-dehydrated human dura mater (Tutoplast). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124(5):518–521CrossRefPubMed Yetiser S, Tosun F, Satar B (2001) Revision myringoplasty with solvent-dehydrated human dura mater (Tutoplast). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124(5):518–521CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Haid CT (1993) Clinical experiences with dehydrated temporalis fascia in tympanoplasty. Early and late results. HNO 41(4):185–191PubMed Haid CT (1993) Clinical experiences with dehydrated temporalis fascia in tympanoplasty. Early and late results. HNO 41(4):185–191PubMed
15.
go back to reference Sarac S, Gursel B (2002) Use of homograft dehydrated temporal fascia in tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol 23(4):416–421CrossRefPubMed Sarac S, Gursel B (2002) Use of homograft dehydrated temporal fascia in tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol 23(4):416–421CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Are bovine pericardium underlay xenograft and butterfly inlay autograft efficient for transcanal tympanoplasty?
Authors
Clotilde de Dorlodot
Gersende De Bie
Naima Deggouj
Monique Decat
Jean-Marc Gérard
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2855-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2/2015 Go to the issue