Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 6/2014

01-06-2014 | Laryngology

The value of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a measure of dysphonia severity in subjects speaking different languages

Authors: Youri Maryn, Marc De Bodt, Ben Barsties, Nelson Roy

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) is a relatively new clinical method to quantify dysphonia severity. Since it partially relies on continuous speech, its performance may vary with voice-related phonetic differences and thus across languages. The present investigation therefore assessed the AVQI’s performance in English, Dutch, German, and French. Fifty subjects were recorded reading sentences in the four languages, as well as producing a sustained vowel. These recordings were later edited to calculate the AVQI. The samples were also perceptually rated on overall dysphonia severity by three experienced voice clinicians. The AVQI’s cross-linguistic concurrent validity and diagnostic precision were assessed. The results support earlier data, and confirm good cross-linguistic validity and diagnostic accuracy. Although no statistical differences were observed between languages, the AVQI performed better in English and German and less well in French. These results validate the AVQI as a potentially robust and objective dysphonia severity measure across languages.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Askenfelt AG, Hammarberg B (1986) Speech waveform perturbation analysis: a perceptual-acoustical comparison of seven measures. J Speech Hear Res 29:50–64PubMed Askenfelt AG, Hammarberg B (1986) Speech waveform perturbation analysis: a perceptual-acoustical comparison of seven measures. J Speech Hear Res 29:50–64PubMed
2.
go back to reference Parsa V, Jamieson DG (2001) Acoustic discrimination of pathological voice: sustained vowels versus continuous speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 44:327–339PubMedCrossRef Parsa V, Jamieson DG (2001) Acoustic discrimination of pathological voice: sustained vowels versus continuous speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 44:327–339PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Zraick RI, Wendel K, Smith-Olinde L (2005) The effect of speaking task on perceptual judgment of the severity of dysphonic voice. J Voice 19:574–581PubMedCrossRef Zraick RI, Wendel K, Smith-Olinde L (2005) The effect of speaking task on perceptual judgment of the severity of dysphonic voice. J Voice 19:574–581PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Maryn Y, Corthals P, Van Cauwenberge P, Roy N, De Bodt M (2010) Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels. J Voice 24:540–555PubMedCrossRef Maryn Y, Corthals P, Van Cauwenberge P, Roy N, De Bodt M (2010) Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels. J Voice 24:540–555PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Maryn Y, De Bodt M, Roy N (2010) The Acoustic Voice Quality Index: toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders. J Commun Disord 43:161–174PubMedCrossRef Maryn Y, De Bodt M, Roy N (2010) The Acoustic Voice Quality Index: toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders. J Commun Disord 43:161–174PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yiu E, Worrall L, Longland J, Mitchell C (2000) Analysing vocal quality of connected speech using Kay’s computerized speech lab: a preliminary finding. Clin Linguist Phon 14:295–305CrossRef Yiu E, Worrall L, Longland J, Mitchell C (2000) Analysing vocal quality of connected speech using Kay’s computerized speech lab: a preliminary finding. Clin Linguist Phon 14:295–305CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ladefoged P (1983) The linguistic use of different phonation types. In: Bless D, Abbs J (eds) Vocal fold physiology: contemporary research and clinical issues. College-Hill Press, San Diego, pp 351–360 Ladefoged P (1983) The linguistic use of different phonation types. In: Bless D, Abbs J (eds) Vocal fold physiology: contemporary research and clinical issues. College-Hill Press, San Diego, pp 351–360
8.
9.
go back to reference Higgins MB, Netsell R, Schulte L (1998) Vowel-related differences in laryngeal articulatory and phonatory function. J Speech Lang Hear Res 41:712–724PubMed Higgins MB, Netsell R, Schulte L (1998) Vowel-related differences in laryngeal articulatory and phonatory function. J Speech Lang Hear Res 41:712–724PubMed
10.
go back to reference Dromey C, Ramig LO (1998) Intentional changes in sound pressure level and rate: their impact on measures of respiration, phonation, and articulation. J Speech Lang Hear Res 41:1003–1018PubMed Dromey C, Ramig LO (1998) Intentional changes in sound pressure level and rate: their impact on measures of respiration, phonation, and articulation. J Speech Lang Hear Res 41:1003–1018PubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference McClean MD, Tasko SM (2002) Association of orofacial with laryngeal and respiratory motor output during speech. Exp Brain Res 146:481–489PubMedCrossRef McClean MD, Tasko SM (2002) Association of orofacial with laryngeal and respiratory motor output during speech. Exp Brain Res 146:481–489PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Reynolds V, Buckland A, Bailey J, Lipscombe J, Nathan E, Vijayasekaran S, Kelly R, Maryn Y, French N (2012) Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the Acoustic Voice Quality Index. J Voice 26:672.e1–672.e7CrossRef Reynolds V, Buckland A, Bailey J, Lipscombe J, Nathan E, Vijayasekaran S, Kelly R, Maryn Y, French N (2012) Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the Acoustic Voice Quality Index. J Voice 26:672.e1–672.e7CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Barsties B, Maryn Y (2012) Der Acoustic Voice Quality Index in Deutsch: ein Messverfahren zur allgemeinen Stimmqualität [The Acoustic Voice Quality Index: toward expanded measurement of dysphonia severity in German subjects]. HNO 60:715–720PubMedCrossRef Barsties B, Maryn Y (2012) Der Acoustic Voice Quality Index in Deutsch: ein Messverfahren zur allgemeinen Stimmqualität [The Acoustic Voice Quality Index: toward expanded measurement of dysphonia severity in German subjects]. HNO 60:715–720PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hirano M (1981) Psycho-acoustic evaluation of voice. In: Arnold GE, Winckel F, Wyke BD (eds) Disorders of human communication 5, clinical examination of voice. Springer, Vienna, pp 81–84 Hirano M (1981) Psycho-acoustic evaluation of voice. In: Arnold GE, Winckel F, Wyke BD (eds) Disorders of human communication 5, clinical examination of voice. Springer, Vienna, pp 81–84
16.
go back to reference Chan KM, Yiu EM (2002) The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation. J Speech Lang Hear Res 45:111–126PubMedCrossRef Chan KM, Yiu EM (2002) The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation. J Speech Lang Hear Res 45:111–126PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Portney LG, Watkins MP (2000) Foundations of clinical research, applications to practice, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River Portney LG, Watkins MP (2000) Foundations of clinical research, applications to practice, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
18.
go back to reference Sheskin DJ (1997) Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton Sheskin DJ (1997) Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton
19.
go back to reference Dollaghan CA (2007) The handbook for evidence-based practice in communication disorders. MD Brookes, Baltimore Dollaghan CA (2007) The handbook for evidence-based practice in communication disorders. MD Brookes, Baltimore
20.
go back to reference Awan SN, Roy N, Dromey C (2009) Estimating dysphonia severity in continuous speech: application of a multi-parameter spectral/cepstral model. Clin Linguist Phon 23:825–841PubMedCrossRef Awan SN, Roy N, Dromey C (2009) Estimating dysphonia severity in continuous speech: application of a multi-parameter spectral/cepstral model. Clin Linguist Phon 23:825–841PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lowell SY, Colton RH, Kelley RT, Hahn YC (2011) Spectral- and cepstral-based measures during continuous speech: capacity to distinguish dysphonia and consistency within a speaker. J Voice 25:e223–e232PubMedCrossRef Lowell SY, Colton RH, Kelley RT, Hahn YC (2011) Spectral- and cepstral-based measures during continuous speech: capacity to distinguish dysphonia and consistency within a speaker. J Voice 25:e223–e232PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hartelius L, Theodoros D, Cahill L, Lillvik M (2003) Comparability of perceptual analysis of speech characteristics in Australian and Swedish speakers with multiple sclerosis. Folia Phoniatr Logop 55:177–188PubMedCrossRef Hartelius L, Theodoros D, Cahill L, Lillvik M (2003) Comparability of perceptual analysis of speech characteristics in Australian and Swedish speakers with multiple sclerosis. Folia Phoniatr Logop 55:177–188PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ghio A, Weisz F, Baracca G, Cantarella G, Robert D, Woisard V, Fussi F, Giovanni A (2011) Is the perception of voice quality language-dependant? A comparison of French and Italian listeners and dysphonic speakers. In: Proceedings of interspeech 2011, pp 525–528 Ghio A, Weisz F, Baracca G, Cantarella G, Robert D, Woisard V, Fussi F, Giovanni A (2011) Is the perception of voice quality language-dependant? A comparison of French and Italian listeners and dysphonic speakers. In: Proceedings of interspeech 2011, pp 525–528
Metadata
Title
The value of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a measure of dysphonia severity in subjects speaking different languages
Authors
Youri Maryn
Marc De Bodt
Ben Barsties
Nelson Roy
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2730-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 6/2014 Go to the issue