Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2014

01-01-2014 | Otology

The effects of cochlear implantation on quality of life in the elderly

Authors: W. Di Nardo, R. Anzivino, S. Giannantonio, L. Schinaia, G. Paludetti

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefits of unilateral cochlear implant (CI) in patients over 60 on speech perception and quality of life, comparing the results obtained with a control group of younger CI recipients. Twenty CI users (mean age 72 years), postlingually deafened, were included in this study. Audiological performance was evaluated using bisyllabic words and sentences recognition tests in a quiet and a noise environment. Moreover, we administered two questionnaires to evaluate the health status (SF-36), CI-related effects on daily activities and personal satisfaction (Questionnaire for self-evaluation of CI benefit with SADL scale modification). Performance measures of the geriatric population showed a significant benefit on speech recognition tests compared to pre-implantation condition, even if younger CI users scored significantly better in both bisyllabic words and sentences recognition test. All study patients reported being able to have a normal conversation with an acquaintance. No significant difference was found between the study and control group in physical and mental health status, conversation with an outsider, use of TV and phone. A significant difference (p < 0.05) was noticed, instead, between elderly and younger adult patients about the overall satisfaction derived from CI. Our findings confirm the indisputable utility of CI and provide evidence that elderly patients derive a substantial benefit from it on quality of life, as demonstrated by health status, success in the common activities of daily living and perceived satisfaction after this procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bond M, Mealing S, Anderson R et al (2009) The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 13(44):1–330 Bond M, Mealing S, Anderson R et al (2009) The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 13(44):1–330
2.
go back to reference Bond M, Elston J, Mealing S, Anderson R et al (2010) Systematic reviews of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multi-channel unilateral cochlear implants for adults. Clin Otolaryngol 35(2):87–96PubMedCrossRef Bond M, Elston J, Mealing S, Anderson R et al (2010) Systematic reviews of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multi-channel unilateral cochlear implants for adults. Clin Otolaryngol 35(2):87–96PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Di Nardo W, Scorpecci A, Giannantonio S, Cianfrone F, Paludetti G (2011) Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(1):27–39PubMedCrossRef Di Nardo W, Scorpecci A, Giannantonio S, Cianfrone F, Paludetti G (2011) Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(1):27–39PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Shallop JK, Sydlowski SA (2010) Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy. Ear Hear 31(2):186–194PubMedCrossRef Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Shallop JK, Sydlowski SA (2010) Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy. Ear Hear 31(2):186–194PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Carlson ML, Breen JT, Gifford RH et al (2010) Cochlear Implantation in the octogenarian and nonagenarian. Otol Neurotol 31(8):1343–1349PubMedCrossRef Carlson ML, Breen JT, Gifford RH et al (2010) Cochlear Implantation in the octogenarian and nonagenarian. Otol Neurotol 31(8):1343–1349PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Smeeth L, Fletcher AE, Ng ES et al (2002) Reduced hearing, ownership, and use of hearing aids in elderly people in the UK—the MRC trial of the assessment and management of older people in the community: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 359(9316):1466–1470PubMedCrossRef Smeeth L, Fletcher AE, Ng ES et al (2002) Reduced hearing, ownership, and use of hearing aids in elderly people in the UK—the MRC trial of the assessment and management of older people in the community: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 359(9316):1466–1470PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hogan A, O’Loughlin K, Miller P, Kendig H (2009) The health impact of a hearing disability on older people in Australia. J Aging Health 21(8):1098–1111PubMedCrossRef Hogan A, O’Loughlin K, Miller P, Kendig H (2009) The health impact of a hearing disability on older people in Australia. J Aging Health 21(8):1098–1111PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mulrow CD, Aguilar C, Endicott JE et al (1990) Association between hearing impairment and the quality of life of elderly individuals. J Am Geriatr Soc 38(1):45–50PubMed Mulrow CD, Aguilar C, Endicott JE et al (1990) Association between hearing impairment and the quality of life of elderly individuals. J Am Geriatr Soc 38(1):45–50PubMed
11.
go back to reference Kelsall DC, Shallop JK, Burnelli T (1995) Cochlear implantation in the elderly. Am J Otol 16(5):609–615PubMed Kelsall DC, Shallop JK, Burnelli T (1995) Cochlear implantation in the elderly. Am J Otol 16(5):609–615PubMed
12.
go back to reference Labadie RF, Carrasco VN, Gilmer CH, Pillsbury HC 3rd (2000) Cochlear implant performance in senior citizens. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(4):419–424PubMedCrossRef Labadie RF, Carrasco VN, Gilmer CH, Pillsbury HC 3rd (2000) Cochlear implant performance in senior citizens. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(4):419–424PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chatelin V, Kim EJ, Driscoll C, Larky J et al (2004) Cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly. Otol Neurotol 25(3):298–301PubMedCrossRef Chatelin V, Kim EJ, Driscoll C, Larky J et al (2004) Cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly. Otol Neurotol 25(3):298–301PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Haensel J, Ilgner J, Chen YS, Thuermer C, Westhofen M (2005) Speech perception in elderly patients following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 125(12):1272–1276PubMedCrossRef Haensel J, Ilgner J, Chen YS, Thuermer C, Westhofen M (2005) Speech perception in elderly patients following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 125(12):1272–1276PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Berrettini S, Baggiani A, Bruschini L et al (2011) Systematic review of the literature on the clinical effectiveness of the cochlear implant procedure in adult patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 31(5):299–310PubMedCentralPubMed Berrettini S, Baggiani A, Bruschini L et al (2011) Systematic review of the literature on the clinical effectiveness of the cochlear implant procedure in adult patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 31(5):299–310PubMedCentralPubMed
17.
go back to reference Luxford WM Ad Hoc subcommittee of the committee on hearing and equilibrium of the American academy of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (2001) Minimum speech test battery for postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124(2):125–126CrossRef Luxford WM Ad Hoc subcommittee of the committee on hearing and equilibrium of the American academy of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (2001) Minimum speech test battery for postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124(2):125–126CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Vermeire K, Brokx JP, Wuyts FL et al (2005) Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly. Otol Neurotol 26(2):188–195PubMedCrossRef Vermeire K, Brokx JP, Wuyts FL et al (2005) Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly. Otol Neurotol 26(2):188–195PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, de Sarriá MJ, Gavilán J (2006) Quality of life in postlingually deaf patients following cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263(3):267–270PubMedCrossRef Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, de Sarriá MJ, Gavilán J (2006) Quality of life in postlingually deaf patients following cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263(3):267–270PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Noble W, Tyler RS, Dunn CC, Bhullar N (2009) Younger- and older-age adults with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants: speech and spatial hearing self-ratings and performance. Otol Neurotol 30(7):921–929PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Noble W, Tyler RS, Dunn CC, Bhullar N (2009) Younger- and older-age adults with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants: speech and spatial hearing self-ratings and performance. Otol Neurotol 30(7):921–929PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Olze H, Gräbel S, Förster U, Zirke N, Huhnd LE, Haupt H, Mazurek B (2011) Elderly patients benefit from cochlear implantation regarding auditory rehabilitation, quality of life, tinnitus, and stress. Laryngoscope 122(1):196–203. doi:10.1002/lary.22356 PubMedCrossRef Olze H, Gräbel S, Förster U, Zirke N, Huhnd LE, Haupt H, Mazurek B (2011) Elderly patients benefit from cochlear implantation regarding auditory rehabilitation, quality of life, tinnitus, and stress. Laryngoscope 122(1):196–203. doi:10.​1002/​lary.​22356 PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Apolone G, Mosconi P (1998) The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1025–1036PubMedCrossRef Apolone G, Mosconi P (1998) The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1025–1036PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) I Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483PubMedCrossRef Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) I Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Questionnaire for self-assessment of cochlear implant benefit (1996) Acta Phoniatr Latina 18(3) Questionnaire for self-assessment of cochlear implant benefit (1996) Acta Phoniatr Latina 18(3)
25.
go back to reference Cox RM, Alexander GC (1999) Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: the SADL scale. Ear Hear 20(4):306–320PubMedCrossRef Cox RM, Alexander GC (1999) Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: the SADL scale. Ear Hear 20(4):306–320PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Leung J, Wang NY, Yeagle JD et al (2005) Predictive models for cochlear implantation in elderly candidates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(12):1049–1054PubMedCrossRef Leung J, Wang NY, Yeagle JD et al (2005) Predictive models for cochlear implantation in elderly candidates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(12):1049–1054PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Keithley EM, Croskrey KL (1990) Spiral ganglion cell endings in the cochlear nucleus of young and old rats. Hear Res 49(1–3):169–177PubMedCrossRef Keithley EM, Croskrey KL (1990) Spiral ganglion cell endings in the cochlear nucleus of young and old rats. Hear Res 49(1–3):169–177PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bohne BA, Gruner MM, Harding GW (1990) Morphological correlates of aging in the chinchilla cochlea. Hear Res 48(1–2):79–91PubMedCrossRef Bohne BA, Gruner MM, Harding GW (1990) Morphological correlates of aging in the chinchilla cochlea. Hear Res 48(1–2):79–91PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Maillet CJ, Tyler RS, Jordan HN (1995) Change in the quality of life of adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (Suppl) 165:31–48 Maillet CJ, Tyler RS, Jordan HN (1995) Change in the quality of life of adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (Suppl) 165:31–48
31.
go back to reference Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, Van Den Broek P (2000) Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(6):756–765PubMedCrossRef Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, Van Den Broek P (2000) Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(6):756–765PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Hirschfelder A, Gräbel S, Olze H (2008) The impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life: the role of audiologic performance and variables. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138(3):357–362PubMedCrossRef Hirschfelder A, Gräbel S, Olze H (2008) The impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life: the role of audiologic performance and variables. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138(3):357–362PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Oyanguren V, Gomes MV, Tsuji RK, Bento RF, Brito Neto R (2010) Auditory results from cochlear implants in elderly people. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 76(4):450–453PubMedCrossRef Oyanguren V, Gomes MV, Tsuji RK, Bento RF, Brito Neto R (2010) Auditory results from cochlear implants in elderly people. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 76(4):450–453PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The effects of cochlear implantation on quality of life in the elderly
Authors
W. Di Nardo
R. Anzivino
S. Giannantonio
L. Schinaia
G. Paludetti
Publication date
01-01-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2396-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2014 Go to the issue