Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2013

01-09-2013 | Otology

Combined posterior tympanotomy/endomeatal access in cochlear implantation

Authors: Antonio Della Volpe, Italo Cantore, Gerardo Nolè, Paola Valente, Alfonso Maria Varricchio, Michela Santandrea, Valentina Santandrea, Rocco Cantore

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 10/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Alternative techniques for cochlear implant surgery have been described, such as endomeatal- and suprameatal-alone approaches, without traditional posterior tympanotomy. A combined posterior tympanotomy/endomeatal approach is proposed as a way to enhance surgical safety and effectiveness. 64 patients, 34 men and 30 women, mean age 28 (range 1–81 years), 26 pre-verbal and 38 post-verbal, were submitted to cochlear implantation, 32 by means of the described combined posterior tympanotomy/endomeatal approach and 32 with traditional posterior tympanotomy-alone approach. Good anatomic and functional results were observed, with intraoperative improvements in visibility and accessibility of cochleostomy site in difficult cases without any complication, such as tympanic membrane perforation, external canal skin lesions, or extrusion at 12 months. No significant differences were found with traditional technique complication rates excepting for partial insertion data, with statistically significant better results with combined access. The combined posterior tympanotomy/endomeatal approach facilitates the array insertion in conditions of bad exposition/accessibility of promontory and round window. Moreover, this double-way access hinders an incomplete or incorrect positioning. It should be always considered as an alternative to the traditional posterior tympanotomy of one-way access.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Clark GM, Pyman BC, Bailey QR (1979) The surgery for multiple electrode cochlear implantations. J Laryngol Otol 93:215–223PubMedCrossRef Clark GM, Pyman BC, Bailey QR (1979) The surgery for multiple electrode cochlear implantations. J Laryngol Otol 93:215–223PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Di Nardo W, Cantore I, Melillo P, Cianfrone F, Scorpecci A, Paludetti G (2007) Residual hearing in cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Head Neck 264(8):855–860CrossRef Di Nardo W, Cantore I, Melillo P, Cianfrone F, Scorpecci A, Paludetti G (2007) Residual hearing in cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Head Neck 264(8):855–860CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hoffman RA, Cohen NL (1995) Complications of cochlear implant surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166:420–422PubMed Hoffman RA, Cohen NL (1995) Complications of cochlear implant surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166:420–422PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kronenberg J, Baumgartner W, Migirov L, Dagan T, Hildesheimer M (2004) The suprameatal approach: an alternative surgical approach to cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 25:41–44PubMedCrossRef Kronenberg J, Baumgartner W, Migirov L, Dagan T, Hildesheimer M (2004) The suprameatal approach: an alternative surgical approach to cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 25:41–44PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Slavutsky V, Nicenboim L (2009) Preliminary results in cochlear implant surgery without antromastoidectomy and with atraumatic electrode insertion: the endomeatal approach. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:481–488PubMedCrossRef Slavutsky V, Nicenboim L (2009) Preliminary results in cochlear implant surgery without antromastoidectomy and with atraumatic electrode insertion: the endomeatal approach. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:481–488PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yin S, Chen Z, Wu Y, Wang L, Zhang J, Zhou W et al (2008) Suprameatal approach for cochlear implantation in 45 Chinese children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 72:397–403PubMedCrossRef Yin S, Chen Z, Wu Y, Wang L, Zhang J, Zhou W et al (2008) Suprameatal approach for cochlear implantation in 45 Chinese children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 72:397–403PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hausler R (2002) Cochlear implantation without mastoidectomy: the pericanal electrode insertion technique. Acta Otolaryngol 122:715–719PubMedCrossRef Hausler R (2002) Cochlear implantation without mastoidectomy: the pericanal electrode insertion technique. Acta Otolaryngol 122:715–719PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kiratzidis T (2000) ‘Veria operation’: cochlear implantation without a mastoidectomy and a posterior tympanotomy. A new surgical technique. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 57:127–130PubMed Kiratzidis T (2000) ‘Veria operation’: cochlear implantation without a mastoidectomy and a posterior tympanotomy. A new surgical technique. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 57:127–130PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kronenberg J, Migirov L, Dagan T (2001) Suprameatal approach: new surgical approach for cochlear implantation. J Laryngol Otol 115:283–285PubMedCrossRef Kronenberg J, Migirov L, Dagan T (2001) Suprameatal approach: new surgical approach for cochlear implantation. J Laryngol Otol 115:283–285PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Guevara N, Bailleux S, Santini J, Castillo L, Gahide I (2010) Cochlear implantation surgery without posterior tympanotomy: can we still improve it? Acta Otolaryngol 130:37–41PubMedCrossRef Guevara N, Bailleux S, Santini J, Castillo L, Gahide I (2010) Cochlear implantation surgery without posterior tympanotomy: can we still improve it? Acta Otolaryngol 130:37–41PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lavinsky L, Lavinsky-Wolff M, Lavinsky J (2010) Transcanal cochleostomy in cochlear implantation: experience with 50 cases. Cochlear Implant Int 11(4):228–232 Lavinsky L, Lavinsky-Wolff M, Lavinsky J (2010) Transcanal cochleostomy in cochlear implantation: experience with 50 cases. Cochlear Implant Int 11(4):228–232
12.
go back to reference Lavinsky-Wolff M, Lavinsky L, Dall’Igna C, Lavinsky J, Setogutti E, Viletti MC (2012) Transcanal cochleostomy in cochlear implant surgery: long-term results of a cohort study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 78(2):118–123PubMedCrossRef Lavinsky-Wolff M, Lavinsky L, Dall’Igna C, Lavinsky J, Setogutti E, Viletti MC (2012) Transcanal cochleostomy in cochlear implant surgery: long-term results of a cohort study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 78(2):118–123PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Balkany TJ, Whitley M, Shapira Y, Angeli SI, Brown K, Eter E, Van De Water T, Telischi FF, Eshraghi AA, Treaba C (2009) The temporalis pocket technique for cochlear implantation: an anatomic and clinical study. Otol Neurotol 30(7):903–907PubMedCrossRef Balkany TJ, Whitley M, Shapira Y, Angeli SI, Brown K, Eter E, Van De Water T, Telischi FF, Eshraghi AA, Treaba C (2009) The temporalis pocket technique for cochlear implantation: an anatomic and clinical study. Otol Neurotol 30(7):903–907PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bruschini L, Forli F, Giannarelli M, Bruschini P, Berrettini S (2009) Exclusive transcanal surgical approach for vibrant soundbridge implantation: surgical and functional results. Otol Neurotol 30:950–955PubMedCrossRef Bruschini L, Forli F, Giannarelli M, Bruschini P, Berrettini S (2009) Exclusive transcanal surgical approach for vibrant soundbridge implantation: surgical and functional results. Otol Neurotol 30:950–955PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Combined posterior tympanotomy/endomeatal access in cochlear implantation
Authors
Antonio Della Volpe
Italo Cantore
Gerardo Nolè
Paola Valente
Alfonso Maria Varricchio
Michela Santandrea
Valentina Santandrea
Rocco Cantore
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 10/2013
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2297-8

Other articles of this Issue 10/2013

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2013 Go to the issue