Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 5/2012

01-05-2012 | Rhinology

Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: how to achieve optimal results with simple punch technique

Authors: Mohsen Naraghi, Sayed Ziaeddin Tabatabaii Mohammadi, Alain Fabrice Sontou, Armin Farajzadeh Deroee, Masoud Boroojerdi

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EEDCR) has been popularized as a minimally invasive technique. Although preliminary reports revealed less success in comparison with external approaches, recent endonasal endoscopic surgeries on various types of DCR have preserved advantages of this technique while diminishing the failures. We described our experience on EEDCR, including the main advantages and disadvantages of it. Hundred consecutive cases of lachrymal problems underwent EEDCR utilizing simple punch removal of bone, instead of powered instrumentation or lasers. The medial aspect of the sac was removed in all of patients, while preserving normal mucosa around the sac. Hundred cases of EEDCR were performed on 81 patients, with 19 bilateral procedures. Nine procedures were performed under local anesthesia. Based on a mean 14 months follow-up, 95 cases were free of symptoms, revealing 95% success rate. The punch technique diminishes the expenses of powered or laser instrumentation with comparable results. It seems that preserving normal tissues and creating a patent rhinostomy with least surgical trauma and less subsequent scar, plays the most important role in achieving desirable results.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Rosen N, Sharir M, Moverman DC, Rosner M (1989) Dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone tubes: evaluation of 233 cases. Ophthalmic Surg 20:115–119PubMed Rosen N, Sharir M, Moverman DC, Rosner M (1989) Dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone tubes: evaluation of 233 cases. Ophthalmic Surg 20:115–119PubMed
3.
go back to reference Ibrahim HA, Batterbury M, Banhegyi G, McGalliard J (2001) Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy outcome profile in a general ophthalmic service unit: a comparative retrospective study. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 32:220–227PubMed Ibrahim HA, Batterbury M, Banhegyi G, McGalliard J (2001) Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy outcome profile in a general ophthalmic service unit: a comparative retrospective study. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 32:220–227PubMed
4.
go back to reference Caldwell GW (1893) Two new operations for obstruction of the nasal duct with preservation of the canaliculi, and incidental description of a new lachrymal probe. NY Med J 57:581 Caldwell GW (1893) Two new operations for obstruction of the nasal duct with preservation of the canaliculi, and incidental description of a new lachrymal probe. NY Med J 57:581
5.
go back to reference Massaro BM, Gonnering RS, Harris GJ (1990) Endolaser laser dacryocystorhinostomy: a new approach to nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Arch Ophthalmol 108:1172–1176PubMedCrossRef Massaro BM, Gonnering RS, Harris GJ (1990) Endolaser laser dacryocystorhinostomy: a new approach to nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Arch Ophthalmol 108:1172–1176PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Woog JJ, Metson R, Puliafito CA (1993) Holmium: YAG endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol 116:1–10PubMed Woog JJ, Metson R, Puliafito CA (1993) Holmium: YAG endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol 116:1–10PubMed
7.
go back to reference Boush GA, Lemke BN, Dortzbach RK (1994) Results of endonasal laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology 101:955–959PubMed Boush GA, Lemke BN, Dortzbach RK (1994) Results of endonasal laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology 101:955–959PubMed
8.
go back to reference Dolman PJ (2003) Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with nonlaser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology 110(1):78–84PubMedCrossRef Dolman PJ (2003) Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with nonlaser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology 110(1):78–84PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ajalloueyan M, Fartookzadeh M, Parhizgar H (2007) Use of laser for dacrocystorhinostomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133(4):340–343PubMedCrossRef Ajalloueyan M, Fartookzadeh M, Parhizgar H (2007) Use of laser for dacrocystorhinostomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133(4):340–343PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gonnering RS, Lyon DB, Fisher JC (1991) Endoscopic laserassisted lacrimal surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 111:152–157PubMed Gonnering RS, Lyon DB, Fisher JC (1991) Endoscopic laserassisted lacrimal surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 111:152–157PubMed
11.
go back to reference Ben Simon GJ, Joseph J, Lee S et al (2005) External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquiered nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmology 112:1463–1468PubMedCrossRef Ben Simon GJ, Joseph J, Lee S et al (2005) External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquiered nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmology 112:1463–1468PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tsirbas A, Davis G, Wormald PJ (2005) Revision dacryocystorhinostomy: a comparison of endoscopic and external techniques. Am J Rhinol 19:322–325PubMed Tsirbas A, Davis G, Wormald PJ (2005) Revision dacryocystorhinostomy: a comparison of endoscopic and external techniques. Am J Rhinol 19:322–325PubMed
13.
go back to reference Metson R, Woog JJ, Puliafito CA (1994) Endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 104:269–274PubMed Metson R, Woog JJ, Puliafito CA (1994) Endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 104:269–274PubMed
14.
go back to reference Gurler B, San I (2004) Long-term follow-up outcomes of nonlaser intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: how suitable and useful are conventional surgical instruments? Eur J Ophthalmol 14:453–460PubMed Gurler B, San I (2004) Long-term follow-up outcomes of nonlaser intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: how suitable and useful are conventional surgical instruments? Eur J Ophthalmol 14:453–460PubMed
15.
go back to reference Naraghi M, Kashfi A et al (2002) Endonasal endoscopic laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Media Iranica 40(3):140–145 Naraghi M, Kashfi A et al (2002) Endonasal endoscopic laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Media Iranica 40(3):140–145
16.
go back to reference Nayak DR, Hazarika P et al (2005) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy vs KTP 532 laser endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Ind J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 57:278–282 Nayak DR, Hazarika P et al (2005) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy vs KTP 532 laser endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Ind J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 57:278–282
17.
go back to reference Toti A (1904) Nuovo metodo conservatore di cura radicale delle suppurazioni croniche del sacco lacrimale (dacriostorinostomia). Clin Mod Pisa 10:385–387 Toti A (1904) Nuovo metodo conservatore di cura radicale delle suppurazioni croniche del sacco lacrimale (dacriostorinostomia). Clin Mod Pisa 10:385–387
18.
go back to reference Watkins LM, Janfaza P, Rubin PA (2003) The evolution of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Surv Ophthalmol 48(1):73–84PubMedCrossRef Watkins LM, Janfaza P, Rubin PA (2003) The evolution of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Surv Ophthalmol 48(1):73–84PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Anijeet D, Dolan L, Macewen CJ (2011) Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Cocrhrane Database Syst Rev 19(1):CD007097 Anijeet D, Dolan L, Macewen CJ (2011) Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Cocrhrane Database Syst Rev 19(1):CD007097
20.
go back to reference Eichhorn K, Harrison AR (2010) External vs. endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: six of one, a half dozen of the other? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 21(5):396–403PubMedCrossRef Eichhorn K, Harrison AR (2010) External vs. endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: six of one, a half dozen of the other? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 21(5):396–403PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rahman SH, Tarafder KH, Ahmed MS, Saha KL, Tariq A (2011) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Mymensingh Med J 20(1):28–32PubMed Rahman SH, Tarafder KH, Ahmed MS, Saha KL, Tariq A (2011) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Mymensingh Med J 20(1):28–32PubMed
22.
go back to reference Malhotra R, Wright M, Olver JM (2003) A consideration of the time taken to do dacryo-cystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery. Eye 17:691–696PubMedCrossRef Malhotra R, Wright M, Olver JM (2003) A consideration of the time taken to do dacryo-cystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery. Eye 17:691–696PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Yasar C, Cem E, Hamdi ER (2000) Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results of 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:488–491CrossRef Yasar C, Cem E, Hamdi ER (2000) Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results of 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:488–491CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sprekelsen MB, Barberan MT (1996) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: Surgical technique and results. Laryngoscope 106:187–189PubMedCrossRef Sprekelsen MB, Barberan MT (1996) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: Surgical technique and results. Laryngoscope 106:187–189PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mortimore S, Banhegyi GY et al (1999) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without silicon stenting. J R Coll Surg Edinb 44:371–373PubMed Mortimore S, Banhegyi GY et al (1999) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without silicon stenting. J R Coll Surg Edinb 44:371–373PubMed
26.
go back to reference Rudolf H, Marco C, Marc J (1999) External dacryocystorhinostomy versus endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy: a letter to editor. Ophthalmology 106:647–648 Rudolf H, Marco C, Marc J (1999) External dacryocystorhinostomy versus endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy: a letter to editor. Ophthalmology 106:647–648
Metadata
Title
Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: how to achieve optimal results with simple punch technique
Authors
Mohsen Naraghi
Sayed Ziaeddin Tabatabaii Mohammadi
Alain Fabrice Sontou
Armin Farajzadeh Deroee
Masoud Boroojerdi
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1825-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 5/2012 Go to the issue