Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 6/2009

01-06-2009 | Rhinology

Endoscopic outcomes of resorbable nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study

Authors: Marco Berlucchi, Paolo Castelnuovo, Andrea Vincenzi, Bruno Morra, Ernesto Pasquini

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 6/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Nasal packings can aid in control of postoperative bleeding and healing following functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), but traditional non-resorbable stents have several inherent drawbacks. We performed a randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial to assess efficacy of resorbable nasal packing in patients undergoing FESS for chronic rhinosinusitis. A total of 66 patients for 88 nasal cavities were randomized to receive either hyaluronan resorbable packing (MeroGel®) or standard non-resorbable nasal dressing after FESS. All underwent preoperative rhinoscopy, CT of sinuses, and, after surgery, were reassessed by rhinoscopy at 2, 4, and 12 weeks in blinded fashion. A total of 44 nasal cavities (MeroGel®-group) received resorbable packing, whereas the remaining 44 were packed with non-resorbable nasal dressing. At follow-up endoscopic visit, the presence of nasal synechia was evaluated as primary outcome. Moreover, the tolerability and surgical handling properties of MeroGel® and its comfort were assessed by surgeons and patients. Preoperative severity of rhinosinusitis was similar in both groups. No significant adverse events were observed in all patients. Follow-up endoscopy showed a lower proportion of nasal adhesions in MeroGel®-group at both 4 (P = 0.041) and 12 weeks (P < 0.001). Moreover, an improvement of other endoscopic nasal findings such as re-epithelialization, presence of granulation tissue, and appearance of nasal mucosa of nasal cavities after FESS was observed in the MeroGel®-group. Tolerability and surgical handling properties of MeroGel® were positively rated by clinicians and the overall patient judged comfort of MeroGel® was favorable. In conclusion, MeroGel® can be considered a valid alternative to standard non-resorbable nasal dressings. It is safe, well-accepted, well-tolerated, and has significant advantage of being resorbable. Moreover, it may favor improved healing in patients undergoing FESS and reduce formation of adhesions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Christmas DA Jr, Krouse JH (1996) Powered instrumentation in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. I: Surgical technique. Ear Nose Throat J 75:33–36PubMed Christmas DA Jr, Krouse JH (1996) Powered instrumentation in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. I: Surgical technique. Ear Nose Throat J 75:33–36PubMed
3.
go back to reference Slack R, Bates G (1998) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Am Fam Physician 58:707–718PubMed Slack R, Bates G (1998) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Am Fam Physician 58:707–718PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kuhn FA, Citardi MJ (1997) Advances in postoperative care following functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 30:479–490PubMed Kuhn FA, Citardi MJ (1997) Advances in postoperative care following functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 30:479–490PubMed
5.
go back to reference May M, Levine HL, Mester SJ et al (1994) Complications of endoscopic sinus surgery: analysis of 2108 patients: incidence and prevention. Laryngoscope 104:1080–1083PubMed May M, Levine HL, Mester SJ et al (1994) Complications of endoscopic sinus surgery: analysis of 2108 patients: incidence and prevention. Laryngoscope 104:1080–1083PubMed
6.
go back to reference Benninger MS, Schmidt JL, Crissman JD et al (1991) Mucociliary function following sinus mucosal regeneration. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 105:641–648PubMed Benninger MS, Schmidt JL, Crissman JD et al (1991) Mucociliary function following sinus mucosal regeneration. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 105:641–648PubMed
7.
go back to reference Benninger MS, Sebek BA, Levine HL (1989) Mucosal regeneration of the maxillary sinus after surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 101:33–37PubMed Benninger MS, Sebek BA, Levine HL (1989) Mucosal regeneration of the maxillary sinus after surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 101:33–37PubMed
10.
go back to reference Samad I, Stevens HE, Maloney A (1992) The efficacy of nasal septal surgery. J Otolaryngol 21:88–91PubMed Samad I, Stevens HE, Maloney A (1992) The efficacy of nasal septal surgery. J Otolaryngol 21:88–91PubMed
14.
go back to reference Rastrelli A, Beccaro M, Biviano F et al (1990) Hyaluronic acid esters, a new class of semisynthetic biopolymers: chemical and physicochemical characterization. Clin Implant Mater 9:199–205 Rastrelli A, Beccaro M, Biviano F et al (1990) Hyaluronic acid esters, a new class of semisynthetic biopolymers: chemical and physicochemical characterization. Clin Implant Mater 9:199–205
18.
19.
go back to reference Martini A, Morra B, Aimoni C et al (2000) Use of a hyaluronan-based biomembrane in the treatment of chronic cholesteatomatous otitis media. Am J Otol 21:468–473PubMed Martini A, Morra B, Aimoni C et al (2000) Use of a hyaluronan-based biomembrane in the treatment of chronic cholesteatomatous otitis media. Am J Otol 21:468–473PubMed
20.
go back to reference Caravaggi C, De Giglio R, Pritelli C et al (2003) HYAFF 11-based autologous dermal and epidermal grafts in the treatment of noninfected diabetic plantar and dorsal foot ulcers: a prospective, multicenter, controlled, randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care 26:2853–2859. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.10.2853 PubMedCrossRef Caravaggi C, De Giglio R, Pritelli C et al (2003) HYAFF 11-based autologous dermal and epidermal grafts in the treatment of noninfected diabetic plantar and dorsal foot ulcers: a prospective, multicenter, controlled, randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care 26:2853–2859. doi:10.​2337/​diacare.​26.​10.​2853 PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Colletta V, Dioguardi D, Di Lonardo A et al (2003) A trial to assess the efficacy and tolerability of Hyalofill-F in non-healing venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care 12:357–360PubMed Colletta V, Dioguardi D, Di Lonardo A et al (2003) A trial to assess the efficacy and tolerability of Hyalofill-F in non-healing venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care 12:357–360PubMed
22.
go back to reference Pavesio A, Abatangelo G, Borrione A, et al (2003) Hyaluronan-based scaffolds (Hyalograft C) in the treatment of knee cartilage defects: preliminary clinical findings. In: Novartis Foundation Symposium No. 249. Tissue Engineering of cartilage and bone. Wiley, Chichester, pp 203–217 Pavesio A, Abatangelo G, Borrione A, et al (2003) Hyaluronan-based scaffolds (Hyalograft C) in the treatment of knee cartilage defects: preliminary clinical findings. In: Novartis Foundation Symposium No. 249. Tissue Engineering of cartilage and bone. Wiley, Chichester, pp 203–217
23.
go back to reference Xu G, Chen HX, Wen WP et al (2003) Clinical evaluation of local application of Merogel after endoscopic sinus surgery. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 38:95–97PubMed Xu G, Chen HX, Wen WP et al (2003) Clinical evaluation of local application of Merogel after endoscopic sinus surgery. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 38:95–97PubMed
24.
go back to reference Miller RS, Steward DL, Tami TA et al (2003) The clinical effects of hyaluronic acid ester nasal dressing (Merogel) on intranasal wound healing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:862–869. doi:10.1016/S0194-5998(03)00460-1 PubMedCrossRef Miller RS, Steward DL, Tami TA et al (2003) The clinical effects of hyaluronic acid ester nasal dressing (Merogel) on intranasal wound healing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:862–869. doi:10.​1016/​S0194-5998(03)00460-1 PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lund VJ, Mackay IS (1993) Staging in rhinosinusitus. Rhinology 31:183–184PubMed Lund VJ, Mackay IS (1993) Staging in rhinosinusitus. Rhinology 31:183–184PubMed
27.
go back to reference Wormald PJ, Boustred RN, Le T et al (2006) A prospective single-blind randomized controlled study of use of hyaluronic acid nasal packs in patients after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 20:7–10PubMed Wormald PJ, Boustred RN, Le T et al (2006) A prospective single-blind randomized controlled study of use of hyaluronic acid nasal packs in patients after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 20:7–10PubMed
29.
go back to reference Szczygielski K, Rapiejko P, Wojdas A et al (2007) Comparison of dissolvable sinus dressings in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Pol 61:852–856PubMed Szczygielski K, Rapiejko P, Wojdas A et al (2007) Comparison of dissolvable sinus dressings in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Pol 61:852–856PubMed
Metadata
Title
Endoscopic outcomes of resorbable nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study
Authors
Marco Berlucchi
Paolo Castelnuovo
Andrea Vincenzi
Bruno Morra
Ernesto Pasquini
Publication date
01-06-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0841-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2009

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 6/2009 Go to the issue