Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 3/2007

01-03-2007 | Rhinology

Normative data for the “Sniffin’ Sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects

Authors: T. Hummel, G. Kobal, H. Gudziol, A. Mackay-Sim

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 3/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

“Sniffin’ Sticks” is a test of nasal chemosensory function that is based on pen-like odor dispensing devices, introduced some 10 years ago by Kobal and co-workers. It consists of tests for odor threshold, discrimination, and identification. Previous work established its test-retest reliability and validity. Results of the test are presented as “TDI score”, the sum of results obtained for threshold, discrimination, and identification measures. While normative data have been established they are based on a relatively small number of subjects, especially with regard to subjects older than 55 years where data from only 30 healthy subjects have been used. The present study aimed to remedy this situation. Now data are available from 3,282 subjects as compared to data from 738 subjects published previously. Disregarding sex-related differences, the TDI score at the tenth percentile was 24.9 in subjects younger than 15 years, 30.3 for ages from 16 to 35 years, 27.3 for ages from 36 to 55 years, and 19.6 for subjects older than 55 years. Because the tenth percentile has been defined to separate hyposmia from normosmia, these data can be used as a guide to estimate individual olfactory ability in relation to subject’s age. Absolute hyposmia was defined as the tenth percentile score of 16–35 year old subjects. Other than previous reports the present norms are also sex-differentiated with women outperforming men in the three olfactory tests. Further, the present data suggest specific changes of individual olfactory functions in relation to age, with odor thresholds declining most dramatically compared to odor discrimination and odor identification.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Almkvist O, Berglund B, Nordin S (1992) Odor detectability in successfully aged elderly and young adults. Reports from the Dept. of Psychology, Stockholm University 744:1–12 Almkvist O, Berglund B, Nordin S (1992) Odor detectability in successfully aged elderly and young adults. Reports from the Dept. of Psychology, Stockholm University 744:1–12
2.
go back to reference Betchen SA, Doty RL (1998) Bilateral detection thresholds in dextrals and sinistrals reflect the more sensitive side of the nose, which is not lateralized. Chem Senses 23:453–457PubMedCrossRef Betchen SA, Doty RL (1998) Bilateral detection thresholds in dextrals and sinistrals reflect the more sensitive side of the nose, which is not lateralized. Chem Senses 23:453–457PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Brand G, Millot JL (2001) Sex differences in human olfaction: between evidence and enigma. Q J Exp Psychol B 54:259–270PubMedCrossRef Brand G, Millot JL (2001) Sex differences in human olfaction: between evidence and enigma. Q J Exp Psychol B 54:259–270PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cain WS, Gent JF (1991) Olfactory sensitivity: reliability, generality, and association with aging. J Exp Psychol 17:382–391 Cain WS, Gent JF (1991) Olfactory sensitivity: reliability, generality, and association with aging. J Exp Psychol 17:382–391
5.
go back to reference Cain WS, Gent JF, Goodspeed RB, Leonard G (1988) Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (CCCRC). Laryngoscope 98:83–88PubMedCrossRef Cain WS, Gent JF, Goodspeed RB, Leonard G (1988) Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (CCCRC). Laryngoscope 98:83–88PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Corwin J, Loury M, Gilbert AN (1995) Workplace, age, and sex as mediators of olfactory function: data from the National Geographic Smell Survey. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 50:P179–186PubMed Corwin J, Loury M, Gilbert AN (1995) Workplace, age, and sex as mediators of olfactory function: data from the National Geographic Smell Survey. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 50:P179–186PubMed
7.
go back to reference Dalton P, Doolittle N, Breslin PA (2002) Gender-specific induction of enhanced sensitivity to odors. Nat Neurosci 5:199–200PubMedCrossRef Dalton P, Doolittle N, Breslin PA (2002) Gender-specific induction of enhanced sensitivity to odors. Nat Neurosci 5:199–200PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Doty RL (1986) Gender and endocrine-related influences on human olfactory perception. In: Meiselman R (ed) Clinical measurement of taste and smell. MacMillan, New York, pp 377–413 Doty RL (1986) Gender and endocrine-related influences on human olfactory perception. In: Meiselman R (ed) Clinical measurement of taste and smell. MacMillan, New York, pp 377–413
9.
go back to reference Doty RL, Applebaum SL, Zusho H, Settle RG (1985) A cross-cultural study on sex differences in odor identification ability. Neuropsychologia 23:667–672PubMedCrossRef Doty RL, Applebaum SL, Zusho H, Settle RG (1985) A cross-cultural study on sex differences in odor identification ability. Neuropsychologia 23:667–672PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Doty RL, Kerr KL (2005) Episodic odor memory: influences of handedness, sex, and side of nose. Neuropsychologia 43:1749–1753PubMedCrossRef Doty RL, Kerr KL (2005) Episodic odor memory: influences of handedness, sex, and side of nose. Neuropsychologia 43:1749–1753PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Doty RL, Marcus A, Lee WW (1996) Development of the 12-item cross-cultural smell identification test (CC-SIT). Laryngoscope 106:353–356PubMedCrossRef Doty RL, Marcus A, Lee WW (1996) Development of the 12-item cross-cultural smell identification test (CC-SIT). Laryngoscope 106:353–356PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Frasnelli J, Livermore A, Soiffer A, Hummel T (2002) Comparison of lateralized and binasal olfactory thresholds. Rhinology 40:129–134PubMed Frasnelli J, Livermore A, Soiffer A, Hummel T (2002) Comparison of lateralized and binasal olfactory thresholds. Rhinology 40:129–134PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hornung DE, Kurtz DB, Bradshaw CB, Seipel DM, Kent PF, Blair DC, Emko P (1998) The olfactory loss that accompanies an HIV infection. Physiol Behav 15:549–556CrossRef Hornung DE, Kurtz DB, Bradshaw CB, Seipel DM, Kent PF, Blair DC, Emko P (1998) The olfactory loss that accompanies an HIV infection. Physiol Behav 15:549–556CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hummel T, Barz S, Pauli E, Kobal G (1998) Chemosensory event-related potentials change as a function of age. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108:208–217PubMedCrossRef Hummel T, Barz S, Pauli E, Kobal G (1998) Chemosensory event-related potentials change as a function of age. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108:208–217PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hummel T, Heilmann S, Murphy C (2002) Age-related changes of chemosensory functions. In: Rouby C, Schaal B, Dubois D, Gervais R, Holley A (eds) Olfaction, taste and cognition. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 441–456 Hummel T, Heilmann S, Murphy C (2002) Age-related changes of chemosensory functions. In: Rouby C, Schaal B, Dubois D, Gervais R, Holley A (eds) Olfaction, taste and cognition. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 441–456
16.
go back to reference Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf S, Pauli E, Kobal G (1997) “Sniffin’ Sticks”: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 22:39–52PubMedCrossRef Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf S, Pauli E, Kobal G (1997) “Sniffin’ Sticks”: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 22:39–52PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hüttenbrink KB (1997) [Disorders of smell and taste. Standard and recent methods in diagnosis and therapy]. Laryngorhinootologie 76:506–514PubMed Hüttenbrink KB (1997) [Disorders of smell and taste. Standard and recent methods in diagnosis and therapy]. Laryngorhinootologie 76:506–514PubMed
18.
go back to reference Jones-Gotman M, Zatorre RJ (1988) Olfactory identification deficits in patients with focal cerebral excision. Neuropsychologia 26:387–400PubMedCrossRef Jones-Gotman M, Zatorre RJ (1988) Olfactory identification deficits in patients with focal cerebral excision. Neuropsychologia 26:387–400PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kobal G, Hummel T, Sekinger B, Barz S, Roscher S, Wolf S (1996) “Sniffin’ Sticks”: screening of olfactory performance. Rhinology 34:222–226PubMed Kobal G, Hummel T, Sekinger B, Barz S, Roscher S, Wolf S (1996) “Sniffin’ Sticks”: screening of olfactory performance. Rhinology 34:222–226PubMed
20.
go back to reference Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M, Gudziol H, Temmel A, Owen CM, Seeber H, Pauli E, Hummel T (2000) Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 257:205–211PubMedCrossRef Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M, Gudziol H, Temmel A, Owen CM, Seeber H, Pauli E, Hummel T (2000) Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 257:205–211PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Koelega HS, Köster EP (1974) Some experiments on sex differences in odor perception. Ann NY Acad Sci 237:234–246PubMedCrossRef Koelega HS, Köster EP (1974) Some experiments on sex differences in odor perception. Ann NY Acad Sci 237:234–246PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Larsson M, Lövdén M, Nilsson L-G (2003) Sex differences in recollective experience for olfactory and verbal information. Acta Psychol 112:89–103CrossRef Larsson M, Lövdén M, Nilsson L-G (2003) Sex differences in recollective experience for olfactory and verbal information. Acta Psychol 112:89–103CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lotsch J, Hummel T (2006) The clinical significance of electrophysiological measures of olfactory function. Behav Brain Res 170:78–83PubMedCrossRef Lotsch J, Hummel T (2006) The clinical significance of electrophysiological measures of olfactory function. Behav Brain Res 170:78–83PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lundstrom JN, Frasnelli J, Larsson M, Hummel T (2005) Sex differentiated responses to intranasal trigeminal stimuli. Int J Psychophysiol 57:181–186PubMedCrossRef Lundstrom JN, Frasnelli J, Larsson M, Hummel T (2005) Sex differentiated responses to intranasal trigeminal stimuli. Int J Psychophysiol 57:181–186PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mackay-Sim A, Grant L, Owen C, Chant D, Silburn P (2004) Australian norms for a quantitative olfactory function test. J Clin Neurosci 11:874–879PubMedCrossRef Mackay-Sim A, Grant L, Owen C, Chant D, Silburn P (2004) Australian norms for a quantitative olfactory function test. J Clin Neurosci 11:874–879PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Moberg PJ, Agrin R, Gur RE, Gur RC, Turetsky BI, Doty RL (1999) Olfactory dysfunction in schizophrenia: a qualitative and quantitative review. Neuropsychopharmacology 21:325–340PubMedCrossRef Moberg PJ, Agrin R, Gur RE, Gur RC, Turetsky BI, Doty RL (1999) Olfactory dysfunction in schizophrenia: a qualitative and quantitative review. Neuropsychopharmacology 21:325–340PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Murphy C (1983) Age-related effects on the threshold, psychophysical function, and pleasantness of menthol. J Gerontol 38:217–222PubMed Murphy C (1983) Age-related effects on the threshold, psychophysical function, and pleasantness of menthol. J Gerontol 38:217–222PubMed
28.
go back to reference Murphy C, Schubert CR, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Nondahl DM (2002) Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. JAMA 288:2307–2312PubMedCrossRef Murphy C, Schubert CR, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Nondahl DM (2002) Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. JAMA 288:2307–2312PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Nakashima T, Kimmelman CP, Snow JB Jr, (1984) Structure of human fetal and adult olfactory neuroepithelium. Arch Otolaryngol 110:641–646PubMed Nakashima T, Kimmelman CP, Snow JB Jr, (1984) Structure of human fetal and adult olfactory neuroepithelium. Arch Otolaryngol 110:641–646PubMed
30.
go back to reference Larsson M, Nilsson LG, Olofsson JK, Nordin S (2004) Demographic and cognitive predictors of cued odor identification: evidence from a population-based study. Chem Senses 29:547–54PubMedCrossRef Larsson M, Nilsson LG, Olofsson JK, Nordin S (2004) Demographic and cognitive predictors of cued odor identification: evidence from a population-based study. Chem Senses 29:547–54PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Rawson NE, Gomez G, Cowart B, Brand JG, Lowry LD, Pribitkin EA, Restrepo D (1997) Selectivity and response characteristics of human olfactory neurons. J Neurophysiol 77:1606–1613PubMed Rawson NE, Gomez G, Cowart B, Brand JG, Lowry LD, Pribitkin EA, Restrepo D (1997) Selectivity and response characteristics of human olfactory neurons. J Neurophysiol 77:1606–1613PubMed
32.
go back to reference Rosli Y, Breckenridge LJ, Smith RA (1999) An ultrastructural study of age-related changes in mouse olfactory epithelium. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 48:77–84 Rosli Y, Breckenridge LJ, Smith RA (1999) An ultrastructural study of age-related changes in mouse olfactory epithelium. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 48:77–84
33.
go back to reference Schaal B, Hummel T, Soussignan R (2004) Olfaction in the fetal and premature infant: functional status and clinical implications. Clin Perinatol 31:261–285PubMedCrossRef Schaal B, Hummel T, Soussignan R (2004) Olfaction in the fetal and premature infant: functional status and clinical implications. Clin Perinatol 31:261–285PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Vaschide N (1904) L’etat de la sensibilite’ olfective dans la vieillesse. Bull Laryngol Otol Rhinol 7:323–333 Vaschide N (1904) L’etat de la sensibilite’ olfective dans la vieillesse. Bull Laryngol Otol Rhinol 7:323–333
35.
go back to reference Venstrom D, Amoore JE (1968) Olfactory threshold in relation to age, sex, or smoking. J Food Sci 33:264–265CrossRef Venstrom D, Amoore JE (1968) Olfactory threshold in relation to age, sex, or smoking. J Food Sci 33:264–265CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Wolfensberger M, Schnieper I, Welge-Lussen A (2000) Sniffin’Sticks: a new olfactory test battery. Acta Otolaryngol 120:303–306PubMedCrossRef Wolfensberger M, Schnieper I, Welge-Lussen A (2000) Sniffin’Sticks: a new olfactory test battery. Acta Otolaryngol 120:303–306PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Yousem DM, Maldjian J, Siddiqi F, Hummel T, Alsop D, Geckle RJ, Bilker WB, Doty RL (1998) Gender-effects on odor-stimulated functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Res 818:480–487CrossRef Yousem DM, Maldjian J, Siddiqi F, Hummel T, Alsop D, Geckle RJ, Bilker WB, Doty RL (1998) Gender-effects on odor-stimulated functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Res 818:480–487CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Yousem DM, Maldjian JA, Hummel T, Alsop DC, Geckle RJ, Kraut MA, Doty RL (1999) The effect of age on odor-stimulated functional MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 20:600–608PubMed Yousem DM, Maldjian JA, Hummel T, Alsop DC, Geckle RJ, Kraut MA, Doty RL (1999) The effect of age on odor-stimulated functional MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 20:600–608PubMed
39.
go back to reference Mackay-Sim A, Johnston AN, Owen C, Burne TH (2006) Olfactory ability in the healthy population: reassessing presbyosmia. Chem Senses (Epub ahead of print) Mackay-Sim A, Johnston AN, Owen C, Burne TH (2006) Olfactory ability in the healthy population: reassessing presbyosmia. Chem Senses (Epub ahead of print)
Metadata
Title
Normative data for the “Sniffin’ Sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects
Authors
T. Hummel
G. Kobal
H. Gudziol
A. Mackay-Sim
Publication date
01-03-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 3/2007
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0173-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2007

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 3/2007 Go to the issue