Top

Published in:

Open Access 27-09-2023 | Telemedicine | General Gynecology

Status quo and future directions of digitalization in gynecology and obstetrics in Germany: a survey of the commission Digital Medicine of the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics

Authors: André Pfob, Christoph Hillen, Katharina Seitz, Sebastian Griewing, Sven Becker, Christian Bayer, Uwe Wagner, Peter Fasching, Markus Wallwiener, For the Kommission Digitale Medizin, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Gebursthilfe (DGGG)

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 1/2024

Abstract

Purpose

Digitalization plays a critical role and is beginning to impact every part of the patient journey, from drug discovery and data collection to treatment and patient-reported outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the status quo and future directions of digital medicine in the specialty of gynecology and obstetrics in Germany.

Methods

An anonymous questionnaire was distributed via the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics newsletter in December 2022. The questionnaire covered the domains baseline demographic information, telemedicine, digital health applications (DIGAs), and future expectations.

Results

In all, 91 participants completed the survey. Median age was 34 years; 67.4% (60 of 89) were female and 32.6% (29 of 89) were male. About 10% (9 of 88) have prescribed DIGAs to date and 14% (12 of 86) offer telemedical appointments. Among those who do not use digital medicine, very few plan to do so in the near future. Reasons include missing software interfaces, lack of time to try out new things, lack of knowledge, lack of monetary compensation (66.3%), and employee concerns. A majority agreed that digitalization will help to save time and improve patient care and that intelligent algorithms will aid clinicians in providing patient care to women.

Conclusions

The status quo and future directions of digital medicine in gynecology and obstetrics in Germany are characterized by contradicting expectations regarding the benefits of digital medicine and its actual implementation in clinical routine. This represents an important call to action to meet the requirements of modern patient care.

Available only for authorised users

Gomes B, Ashley EA (2023) Artificial intelligence in molecular medicine. N Engl J Med 388:2456–2465. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMRA2204787CrossRefPubMed

Rajpurkar P, Lungren MP (2023) The current and future state of AI interpretation of medical images. N Engl J Med 388:1981–1990. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMRA2301725CrossRefPubMed

Brownstein JS, Rader B, Astley CM, Tian H (2023) Advances in artificial intelligence for infectious-disease surveillance. N Engl J Med 388:1597–1607. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMRA2119215CrossRefPubMed

Yu KH, Beam AL, Kohane IS (2018) Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nat Biomed Eng 2:719–731. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0305-zCrossRefPubMed

Pfob A, Mehrara BJ, Nelson JA et al (2023) Towards patient-centered decision-making in breast cancer surgery: machine learning to predict individual patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Ann Surg 277:E144–E152. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004862CrossRefPubMed

Pfob A, Heil J (2023) Artificial intelligence to de-escalate loco-regional breast cancer treatment. Breast 68:201–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2023.02.009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J et al (2018) Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer 18:500–510. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-018-0016-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Beam AL, Kohane IS (2016) Translating artificial intelligence into clinical care. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 316:2368–2369CrossRef

Wilkinson J, Arnold KF, Murray EJ et al (2020) Time to reality check the promises of machine learning-powered precision medicine. Lancet Digit Heal. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30200-4CrossRef

10.

McKinney SM, Sieniek M, Godbole V et al (2020) International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature 577:89–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6CrossRefPubMed

11.

Pantanowitz L, Quiroga-Garza GM, Bien L et al (2020) An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study. Lancet Digit Heal 2:e407–e416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30159-XCrossRef

12.

Baxi V, Edwards R, Montalto M, Saha S (2022) Digital pathology and artificial intelligence in translational medicine and clinical practice. Mod Pathol 35:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41379-021-00919-2CrossRefPubMed

13.

Telemedicine Market Size & Share | Statistics report, 2023–2032. https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/telemedicine-market. Accessed 2 July 2023

14.

Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C et al (2017) Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8775CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Pfob A, Sidey-Gibbons C, Schuessler M et al (2021) Contrast of digital and health literacy between IT and Health Care Specialists highlights the importance of multidisciplinary teams for digital health—a pilot study. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 5:734–745. https://doi.org/10.1200/cci.21.00032CrossRefPubMed

16.

Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (2023) Digitalisierungsstrategie für das Gesundheitswesen und die Pflege GEMEINSAM DIGITAL

17.

Deutsche Krankenhausgesellschaft (2023) Kliniken unterstützen Digitalisierungsstrategie, fordern aber nachhaltige Finanzierung. https://www.dkgev.de/dkg/presse/details/kliniken-unterstuetzen-digitalisierungsstrategie-fordern-aber-nachhaltige-finanzierung/. Accessed 27 June 2023

18.

Haldane V, De Foo C, Abdalla SM et al (2021) Health systems resilience in managing the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from 28 countries. Nat Med 27:964–980. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41591-021-01381-YCrossRefPubMed

19.

Statistisches Bundesamt Gesundheitsausgaben im Jahr 2020 auf über 440 Milliarden Euro gestiegen. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2022/04/PD22_153_236.html. Accessed 2 July 2023

20.

OECD (2021) Health at a Glance 2021. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-at-a-glance-2021_ae3016b9-en. Accessed 27 June 2023

21.

Basch E, Deal AM, Dueck AC et al (2017) Overall survival results of a trial assessing patient-reported outcomes for symptom monitoring during routine cancer treatment. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 318:197–198CrossRef

22.

Denis F, Basch E, Septans AL et al (2019) Two-year survival comparing web-based symptom monitoring vs routine surveillance following treatment for lung cancer. JAMA 321:306–307. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2018.18085CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG et al (2016) Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 34:557–565. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830CrossRefPubMed

24.

Zhao Y, Li Y, Xing L et al (2022) The performance of artificial intelligence in cervical colposcopy: a retrospective data analysis. J Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4370851CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Pfob A, Sidey-Gibbons C, Rauch G et al (2022) Intelligent vacuum-assisted biopsy to identify breast cancer patients with pathologic complete response (ypT0 and ypN0) after neoadjuvant systemic treatment for omission of breast and axillary surgery. J Clin Oncol 40:1903–1915. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02439CrossRefPubMed

26.

Murugesu S, Galazis N, Jones BP et al (2020) Evaluating the use of telemedicine in gynaecological practice: a systematic review. BMJ Open 10:e039457. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJOPEN-2020-039457CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Lee P, Bubeck S, Petro J (2023) Benefits, limits, and risks of GPT-4 as an AI chatbot for medicine. N Engl J Med 388:1233–1239. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMSR2214184/SUPPL_FILE/NEJMSR2214184_DISCLOSURES.PDFCrossRefPubMed

28.

(2023) Will ChatGPT transform healthcare? Nat Med 293(29):505–506. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02289-5

29.

Ayers JW, Poliak A, Dredze M et al (2023) Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social media forum. JAMA Intern Med. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMAINTERNMED.2023.1838CrossRefPubMed

Title: Status quo and future directions of digitalization in gynecology and obstetrics in Germany: a survey of the commission Digital Medicine of the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics
Authors: André Pfob
Christoph Hillen
Katharina Seitz
Sebastian Griewing
Sven Becker
Christian Bayer
Uwe Wagner
Peter Fasching
Markus Wallwiener
For the Kommission Digitale Medizin, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Gebursthilfe (DGGG)
Publication date: 27-09-2023
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords: Telemedicine
Artificial Intelligence
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07222-2

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Status quo and future directions of digitalization in gynecology and obstetrics in Germany: a survey of the commission Digital Medicine of the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Molecular insights into placental iron transfer mechanisms and maternofetal regulation

Dietary intakes of iron, folate, and vitamin B12 during pregnancy and correlation with maternal hemoglobin and fetal growth: findings from the ROLO longitudinal birth cohort study

Effects of timing of umbilical cord clamping for mother and newborn: a narrative review

“Time is on my side”. Disease trajectory of vulvodynia: a systematic review with a narrative synthesis

Apical prolapse correction by unilateral pectineal suspension

Correction: Nd:YAG/Er:YAG dual laser vs. topical steroid to treat vulvar lichen sclerosus: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial