Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2016

01-12-2016 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Recurrent shoulder dystocia: is it predictable?

Authors: Vered Kleitman, Roi Feldman, Asnat Walfisch, Ronen Toledano, Eyal Sheiner

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To examine the course and outcome of deliveries occurring in women who previously experienced shoulder dystocia. In addition, recurrent shoulder dystocia risk factors were assessed.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis comparing all singleton deliveries with and without shoulder dystocia in their preceding delivery was conducted. Independent predictors of recurrent shoulder dystocia were investigated using a multiple logistic regression model.

Results

Of the 201,422 deliveries included in the analysis, 307 occurred in women with a previous shoulder dystocia (0.015 %). Women with a history of shoulder dystocia were more likely to be older, experienced higher rates of gestational diabetes mellitus, polyhydramnios, prolonged second stage, operative delivery and macrosomia (>4000 g) in the following delivery. Previous shoulder dystocia was found to be an independent risk factor for recurrent shoulder dystocia (OR = 6.1, 95 % CI 3.2–11.8, p value <0.001) in the multivariable regression analysis.

Conclusions

Shoulder dystocia is an independent risk factor for recurrent shoulder dystocia. Deliveries in women with a history of shoulder dystocia are characterized by higher rates of operative delivery, prolonged second stage of labor and macrosomia.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Spong CY, Beall M, Rodrigues D, Ross MG (1995) An objective definition of shoulder dystocia: prolonged head-to-body delivery intervals and/or the use of ancillary obstetric maneuvers. Obstet Gynecol 86(3):433–436CrossRefPubMed Spong CY, Beall M, Rodrigues D, Ross MG (1995) An objective definition of shoulder dystocia: prolonged head-to-body delivery intervals and/or the use of ancillary obstetric maneuvers. Obstet Gynecol 86(3):433–436CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gherman RB (2002) Shoulder dystocia: an evidence-based evaluation of the obstetric nightmare. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45(2):345–362CrossRefPubMed Gherman RB (2002) Shoulder dystocia: an evidence-based evaluation of the obstetric nightmare. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45(2):345–362CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Gherman RB, Ouzounian JG, Goodwin TM (1999) Brachial plexus palsy: an in utero injury? Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(5):1303–1307CrossRefPubMed Gherman RB, Ouzounian JG, Goodwin TM (1999) Brachial plexus palsy: an in utero injury? Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(5):1303–1307CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Chauhan SP (2014) Shoulder dystocia and neonatal brachial plexus palsy: eliminating the nightmare. Semin Perinatol 38(4):183CrossRefPubMed Chauhan SP (2014) Shoulder dystocia and neonatal brachial plexus palsy: eliminating the nightmare. Semin Perinatol 38(4):183CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Coroneos CJ, Voineskos SH, Coroneos MK, Alolabi N, Goekjian SR, Willoughby LI, Farrokhyar F, Thoma A, Bain JR, Brouwers MC (2015) Obstetrical brachial plexus injury: burden in a publicly funded, universal healthcare system. J Neurosurg Pediatr 23:1–8 Coroneos CJ, Voineskos SH, Coroneos MK, Alolabi N, Goekjian SR, Willoughby LI, Farrokhyar F, Thoma A, Bain JR, Brouwers MC (2015) Obstetrical brachial plexus injury: burden in a publicly funded, universal healthcare system. J Neurosurg Pediatr 23:1–8
6.
go back to reference Leung TY, Stuart O, Suen SSH, Sahota DS, Lau TK, Lao TT (2011) Comparison of perinatal outcomes of shoulder dystocia alleviated by different type and sequence of manoeuvres: a retrospective review. BJOG 118(8):985–990CrossRefPubMed Leung TY, Stuart O, Suen SSH, Sahota DS, Lau TK, Lao TT (2011) Comparison of perinatal outcomes of shoulder dystocia alleviated by different type and sequence of manoeuvres: a retrospective review. BJOG 118(8):985–990CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Meyers JA (2008) Reducing obstetric litigation through alterations in practice patterns. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1279–1283CrossRefPubMed Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Meyers JA (2008) Reducing obstetric litigation through alterations in practice patterns. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1279–1283CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tsur A, Sergienko R, Wiznitzer A, Zlotnik A, Sheiner E (2012) Critical analysis of risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(5):1225–1229CrossRefPubMed Tsur A, Sergienko R, Wiznitzer A, Zlotnik A, Sheiner E (2012) Critical analysis of risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(5):1225–1229CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hope P, Breslin S, Lamont L et al (1998) Fatal shoulder dystocia: a review of 56 cases reported to the confidential enquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105(12):1256–1261CrossRefPubMed Hope P, Breslin S, Lamont L et al (1998) Fatal shoulder dystocia: a review of 56 cases reported to the confidential enquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105(12):1256–1261CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Secher AL, Bytoft B, Tabor ANN, Damm P, Mathiesen ER (2015) Fetal sonographic characteristics associated with shoulder dystocia in pregnancies of women with type 1 diabetes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 94(10):1105–1111CrossRefPubMed Secher AL, Bytoft B, Tabor ANN, Damm P, Mathiesen ER (2015) Fetal sonographic characteristics associated with shoulder dystocia in pregnancies of women with type 1 diabetes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 94(10):1105–1111CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Boulvain M, Senat M-V, Perrotin F et al (2015) Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 385(9987):2600–2605CrossRefPubMed Boulvain M, Senat M-V, Perrotin F et al (2015) Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 385(9987):2600–2605CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sheiner E, Levy A, Hershkovitz R et al (2006) Determining factors associated with shoulder dystocia: a population-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 126(1):11–15CrossRefPubMed Sheiner E, Levy A, Hershkovitz R et al (2006) Determining factors associated with shoulder dystocia: a population-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 126(1):11–15CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Chauhan SP, Laye MR, Lutgendorf M et al (2014) A multicenter assessment of 1,177 cases of shoulder dystocia: lessons learned. Am J Perinatol 31(5):401–406CrossRefPubMed Chauhan SP, Laye MR, Lutgendorf M et al (2014) A multicenter assessment of 1,177 cases of shoulder dystocia: lessons learned. Am J Perinatol 31(5):401–406CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Klein J, Charach R, Sheiner E (2015) Treating diabetes during pregnancy. Expert Opin Pharmacother 16(3):357–368 Klein J, Charach R, Sheiner E (2015) Treating diabetes during pregnancy. Expert Opin Pharmacother 16(3):357–368
15.
go back to reference Levy A, Sheiner E, Hammel RD et al (2006) Shoulder dystocia: a comparison of patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Arch Gynecol Obstet 273(4):203–206CrossRefPubMed Levy A, Sheiner E, Hammel RD et al (2006) Shoulder dystocia: a comparison of patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Arch Gynecol Obstet 273(4):203–206CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Usta IM, Hayek S, Yahya F, Abu-Musa A, Nassar AH (2008) Shoulder dystocia: what is the risk of recurrence? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87(10):992–997CrossRefPubMed Usta IM, Hayek S, Yahya F, Abu-Musa A, Nassar AH (2008) Shoulder dystocia: what is the risk of recurrence? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87(10):992–997CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ouzounian JG, Gherman RB, Chauhan S, Battista LR, Lee RH (2012) Recurrent shoulder dystocia: analysis of incidence and risk factors. Am J Perinatol 29(7):515–518PubMed Ouzounian JG, Gherman RB, Chauhan S, Battista LR, Lee RH (2012) Recurrent shoulder dystocia: analysis of incidence and risk factors. Am J Perinatol 29(7):515–518PubMed
18.
go back to reference Bingham J, Chauhan SP, Hayes E, Gherman R, Lewis D (2010) Recurrent shoulder dystocia: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 65(3):183–188CrossRefPubMed Bingham J, Chauhan SP, Hayes E, Gherman R, Lewis D (2010) Recurrent shoulder dystocia: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 65(3):183–188CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Overland EA, Spydslaug A, Nielsen CS, Eskild A (2009) Risk of shoulder dystocia in second delivery: does a history of shoulder dystocia matter? Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(5):506.e1–506.e6CrossRef Overland EA, Spydslaug A, Nielsen CS, Eskild A (2009) Risk of shoulder dystocia in second delivery: does a history of shoulder dystocia matter? Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(5):506.e1–506.e6CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Osterman MJK, Martin JA (2014) Trends in low-risk cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990–2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 63(6):1–16 Osterman MJK, Martin JA (2014) Trends in low-risk cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990–2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 63(6):1–16
21.
go back to reference Faschingbauer F, Dammer U, Raabe E, Schneider M, Faschingbauer C, Schmid M, Schild RL, Beckmann MW, Kehl S, Mayr A (2015) Intrapartum sonographic weight estimation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292(4):805–811 Faschingbauer F, Dammer U, Raabe E, Schneider M, Faschingbauer C, Schmid M, Schild RL, Beckmann MW, Kehl S, Mayr A (2015) Intrapartum sonographic weight estimation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292(4):805–811
22.
go back to reference Froehlich R, Simhan HN, Larkin JC (2015) An evidence-based approach to defining fetal macrosomia. Am J Perinatol 33(5):456–462CrossRefPubMed Froehlich R, Simhan HN, Larkin JC (2015) An evidence-based approach to defining fetal macrosomia. Am J Perinatol 33(5):456–462CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Cordero L, Paetow P, Landon MB, Nankervis CA (2015) Neonatal outcomes of macrosomic infants of diabetic and non-diabetic mothers. J Neonatal Perinat Med 8(2):105–112CrossRef Cordero L, Paetow P, Landon MB, Nankervis CA (2015) Neonatal outcomes of macrosomic infants of diabetic and non-diabetic mothers. J Neonatal Perinat Med 8(2):105–112CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ginsberg NA, Moisidis C (2001) How to predict recurrent shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184(7):1427–1429 (discussion 1429–1430) CrossRefPubMed Ginsberg NA, Moisidis C (2001) How to predict recurrent shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184(7):1427–1429 (discussion 1429–1430) CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Lewis DF, Raymond RC, Perkins MB, Brooks GG, Heymann AR (1995) Recurrence rate of shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172(5):1369–1371CrossRefPubMed Lewis DF, Raymond RC, Perkins MB, Brooks GG, Heymann AR (1995) Recurrence rate of shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172(5):1369–1371CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Langer O, Berkus MD, Huff RW, Samueloff A (1991) Shoulder dystocia: should the fetus weighing greater than or equal to 4000 g be delivered by cesarean section? Am J Obstet Gynecol 165(4 Pt 1):831–837CrossRefPubMed Langer O, Berkus MD, Huff RW, Samueloff A (1991) Shoulder dystocia: should the fetus weighing greater than or equal to 4000 g be delivered by cesarean section? Am J Obstet Gynecol 165(4 Pt 1):831–837CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Hansen A, Chauhan SP (2014) Shoulder dystocia: definitions and incidence. Semin Perinatol 38:184–188CrossRefPubMed Hansen A, Chauhan SP (2014) Shoulder dystocia: definitions and incidence. Semin Perinatol 38:184–188CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Mehta SH, Sokol RJ (2014) Shoulder dystocia: risk factors, predictability, and preventability. Semin Perinatol 38(4):189–193CrossRefPubMed Mehta SH, Sokol RJ (2014) Shoulder dystocia: risk factors, predictability, and preventability. Semin Perinatol 38(4):189–193CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Ouzounian JG (2014) Risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Semin Perinatol 38(4):219–221CrossRefPubMed Ouzounian JG (2014) Risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Semin Perinatol 38(4):219–221CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Gemer O, Bergman M, Segal S (1999) Labor abnormalities as a risk factor for shoulder dystocia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78:735–736CrossRefPubMed Gemer O, Bergman M, Segal S (1999) Labor abnormalities as a risk factor for shoulder dystocia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78:735–736CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference McFarland M, Hod M, Piper JM, Xenakis EM-J, Langer O (1995) Are labor abnormalities more common in shoulder dystocia? Am J Obstet Gynecol 173(4):1211–1214CrossRefPubMed McFarland M, Hod M, Piper JM, Xenakis EM-J, Langer O (1995) Are labor abnormalities more common in shoulder dystocia? Am J Obstet Gynecol 173(4):1211–1214CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Recurrent shoulder dystocia: is it predictable?
Authors
Vered Kleitman
Roi Feldman
Asnat Walfisch
Ronen Toledano
Eyal Sheiner
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4139-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2016 Go to the issue