Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2016

01-11-2016 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Single-knot versus multiple-knot technique of perineal repair: a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Dan O. Selo-Ojeme, Chukwunwendu Anthony Okonkwo, Chukwuemeka Atuanya, Kingsley Ndukwu

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

An important factor influencing the outcome of perineal repair is the repair technique. This study was done to determine if there is a difference in post perineal repair pain scores following the use of the standard multiple-knot technique (MKT) of perineal repair and a single-knot technique (SKT).

Methods

We randomised 260 women who sustained a second-degree perineal tear at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria and had perineal repair using either a SKT or a MKT between 1 July 2014 and 28 February 2015. Primary outcome measure was pain assessed with a numerical rating scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) on day two, day 10 and at 3 months. Secondary outcome measures were pain scores during basic activities of daily living, analgesia use, dyspareunia and patient satisfaction.

Results

Mean pain scores were significantly lower in the SKT group on day two (2.8 versus 5.6; P < 0.001) and day 10 (1.8 versus 3.3; P < 0.001). Significantly fewer women in the SKT group reported pain on day two (90/126, 71.4 % versus 122/128, 95.3 %; Relative Risk [RR] 0.6, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 0.6–0.8; P < 0.001), and day 10 (69/126, 54.8 % versus 107/128, 83.6 %; RR 0.7, 95 % CI 0.5–0.7; P < 0.001)]. Women in the SKT group were more likely to be satisfied with outcome of repair at three months (RR 1.4, 95 % CI 1.2–1.5; P < 0.001). No difference in pain scores and dyspareunia at 3 months.

Conclusions

SKT of perineal repair is associated with significantly less pain in the first 10 days postdelivery and a higher patient satisfaction rate at 3 months.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hospital Episode Statistics: NHS Maternity Statistics 2012–13 (2013) Hospital episode statistics analysis. Health and Social Care Information Centre, London Hospital Episode Statistics: NHS Maternity Statistics 2012–13 (2013) Hospital episode statistics analysis. Health and Social Care Information Centre, London
2.
go back to reference McCandlish R, Bowler U, van Asten H, Berridge G, Winter C, Sames L et al (1998) A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:1262–1272CrossRefPubMed McCandlish R, Bowler U, van Asten H, Berridge G, Winter C, Sames L et al (1998) A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:1262–1272CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Macarthur AJ, Macarthur C (2004) Incidence, severity and determinants of perineal pain after vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(4):1199–1204CrossRefPubMed Macarthur AJ, Macarthur C (2004) Incidence, severity and determinants of perineal pain after vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(4):1199–1204CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P, Darby L, Gray R, Johanson R (2002) Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359:2217–2223CrossRefPubMed Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P, Darby L, Gray R, Johanson R (2002) Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359:2217–2223CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Pincus T, Summey JA, Soraci SA, Wallston KA, Hummon NP (1983) Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified stanford health assessment questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 26(11):1346–1353CrossRefPubMed Pincus T, Summey JA, Soraci SA, Wallston KA, Hummon NP (1983) Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified stanford health assessment questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 26(11):1346–1353CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Signorello L, Harlow B, Chekos A, Repke J (2001) Postpartum sexual functioning and its relationship to perineal trauma: a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184(5):881–890CrossRefPubMed Signorello L, Harlow B, Chekos A, Repke J (2001) Postpartum sexual functioning and its relationship to perineal trauma: a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184(5):881–890CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ten years of maternity claims: an analysis of NHS Litigation Authority Data (2012). NHS litigation Authority, London Ten years of maternity claims: an analysis of NHS Litigation Authority Data (2012). NHS litigation Authority, London
8.
go back to reference Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists (2004) Methods and materials used in perineal repair. Guideline No. 23. RCOG Press, London Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists (2004) Methods and materials used in perineal repair. Guideline No. 23. RCOG Press, London
9.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2007) NICE clinical guideline 55: Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. London National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2007) NICE clinical guideline 55: Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. London
11.
go back to reference Ismail KMK, Israfilbayli F, Toozs-Hobson P, Kettle C (2013) Suturing versus alternative closure techniques for repair of episiotomy or second degree perineal tears (Protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010486 Ismail KMK, Israfilbayli F, Toozs-Hobson P, Kettle C (2013) Suturing versus alternative closure techniques for repair of episiotomy or second degree perineal tears (Protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4). doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD010486
12.
go back to reference Kettle C, Dowswell T, Ismail KM (2010) Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (6):CD000006. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000006 Kettle C, Dowswell T, Ismail KM (2010) Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (6):CD000006. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD000006
13.
go back to reference Hale RW, Ling FW (2007) Episiotomy: procedure and repair techniques. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, ACOG Press, Washington DC Hale RW, Ling FW (2007) Episiotomy: procedure and repair techniques. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, ACOG Press, Washington DC
14.
15.
go back to reference Selo-Ojeme D, Ojutiku D, Ikomi A (2009) Impact of a structured, hands-on, surgical skills training program for midwives performing perineal repair. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 106(3):239–241CrossRefPubMed Selo-Ojeme D, Ojutiku D, Ikomi A (2009) Impact of a structured, hands-on, surgical skills training program for midwives performing perineal repair. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 106(3):239–241CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Zafar S (2008) Comparison of a single-knot versus three layered technique of perineal repair after vaginal women requiring episiotomy: a double blind randomized controlled trial. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 9(3):129–133 Zafar S (2008) Comparison of a single-knot versus three layered technique of perineal repair after vaginal women requiring episiotomy: a double blind randomized controlled trial. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 9(3):129–133
17.
go back to reference Jordan K, Ong BN, Croft P (1998) Questionnaire design: mastering statistics—a guide for health service professionals and researchers. Stanley Thorpes, Cheltenham Jordan K, Ong BN, Croft P (1998) Questionnaire design: mastering statistics—a guide for health service professionals and researchers. Stanley Thorpes, Cheltenham
18.
go back to reference Bijur PE, Latimer CT, Gallagher EJ (2003) Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 10(4):390–392CrossRefPubMed Bijur PE, Latimer CT, Gallagher EJ (2003) Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 10(4):390–392CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Breivik EK, Bjo¨rnsson GA, Skovlund E (2000) A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain 16:22–28CrossRefPubMed Breivik EK, Bjo¨rnsson GA, Skovlund E (2000) A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain 16:22–28CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals BEK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A (2008) Assessment of pain Br J Anaesth 101(1):17–24CrossRefPubMed Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals BEK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A (2008) Assessment of pain Br J Anaesth 101(1):17–24CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Valenzuela P, Saiz Puente M, Valero J, Azorı´n R, Ortega R, Guijarro R (2009) Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second-degree perineal tears: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 116:436–441CrossRefPubMed Valenzuela P, Saiz Puente M, Valero J, Azorı´n R, Ortega R, Guijarro R (2009) Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second-degree perineal tears: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 116:436–441CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ et al (2010) CONSORT 2010 Statement: update guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 340:c869CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ et al (2010) CONSORT 2010 Statement: update guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 340:c869CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Brown S, Lumley J (1998) Maternal health after childbirth: results of an Australian population based survey. Brit J Obstet Gynaec 105:156–161CrossRefPubMed Brown S, Lumley J (1998) Maternal health after childbirth: results of an Australian population based survey. Brit J Obstet Gynaec 105:156–161CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2006) NICE clinical guideline number 37: routine postnatal care for women and their babies. NICE Clin Guidel, London National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2006) NICE clinical guideline number 37: routine postnatal care for women and their babies. NICE Clin Guidel, London
27.
go back to reference Elharmeel SM(1), Chaudhary Y, Tan S, Scheermeyer E, Hanafy A, van Driel ML (2011) Surgical repair of spontaneous perineal tears that occur during childbirth versus no intervention. Cochrane Database Syst Rev;(8):CD008534. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008534.pub2 Elharmeel SM(1), Chaudhary Y, Tan S, Scheermeyer E, Hanafy A, van Driel ML (2011) Surgical repair of spontaneous perineal tears that occur during childbirth versus no intervention. Cochrane Database Syst Rev;(8):CD008534. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD008534.​pub2
28.
go back to reference Fleming VE, Hagen S, Niven (2003) Does perineal suturing make a difference? SUNS Trial BJOG 110(7):684–689PubMed Fleming VE, Hagen S, Niven (2003) Does perineal suturing make a difference? SUNS Trial BJOG 110(7):684–689PubMed
29.
go back to reference Gordon B, Mackrodt C, Fern E, Truesdale A, Ayers S, Grant A (1998) The Ipswich childbirth study: 1. A randomised evaluation of two stage postpartum perineal repair leaving the skin unsutured. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105(4):435–440CrossRefPubMed Gordon B, Mackrodt C, Fern E, Truesdale A, Ayers S, Grant A (1998) The Ipswich childbirth study: 1. A randomised evaluation of two stage postpartum perineal repair leaving the skin unsutured. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105(4):435–440CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Oboro VO, Tabowei TO, Loto OM, Bosah JO (2003) A multicentre evaluation of the two-layered repair of postpartum perineal trauma. J Obstet Gynaecol 23(1):5–8CrossRefPubMed Oboro VO, Tabowei TO, Loto OM, Bosah JO (2003) A multicentre evaluation of the two-layered repair of postpartum perineal trauma. J Obstet Gynaecol 23(1):5–8CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Kettle C, Johanson RB (2000). Absorbable synthetic versus catgut suture material for perineal repair Cochrane Database Syst Rev;(2):CD000006 Kettle C, Johanson RB (2000). Absorbable synthetic versus catgut suture material for perineal repair Cochrane Database Syst Rev;(2):CD000006
33.
go back to reference Upton A, Roberts CL, Ryan M, Faulkner M, Reynolds M, Raynes-Greenow C (2002) A randomised trial, conducted by midwives, of perineal repairs comparing a polyglycolic suture material and chromic catgut. Midwifery 18(3):223–229CrossRefPubMed Upton A, Roberts CL, Ryan M, Faulkner M, Reynolds M, Raynes-Greenow C (2002) A randomised trial, conducted by midwives, of perineal repairs comparing a polyglycolic suture material and chromic catgut. Midwifery 18(3):223–229CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Mackrodt C, Gordon B, Fern E, Ayers S, Truesdale A, Grant A (1998) The Ipswich childbirth study: 2. A randomised comparison of polyglactin 910 with chromic catgut for postpartum perineal repair. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105(4):441–445CrossRefPubMed Mackrodt C, Gordon B, Fern E, Ayers S, Truesdale A, Grant A (1998) The Ipswich childbirth study: 2. A randomised comparison of polyglactin 910 with chromic catgut for postpartum perineal repair. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105(4):441–445CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Leroux N, Bujold E (2006) Impact of chromic catgut versus polyglactin 910 versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 sutures for perineal repair: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(6):1585–1590 (discussion 1590. Epub 2006 Apr 21) CrossRefPubMed Leroux N, Bujold E (2006) Impact of chromic catgut versus polyglactin 910 versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 sutures for perineal repair: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(6):1585–1590 (discussion 1590. Epub 2006 Apr 21) CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P, Darby L, Gray R, Johanson R (2002) Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359(9325):2217–2223CrossRefPubMed Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P, Darby L, Gray R, Johanson R (2002) Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359(9325):2217–2223CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Hasanpoor S, Bani S, Shahgole R, Gojazadeh M (2012) The effects of continuous and interrupted episiotomy repair on pain severity and rate of perineal repair: a controlled randomized clinical trial. J Caring Sci 1(3):165–171. doi:10.5681/jcs.2012.024 PubMedPubMedCentral Hasanpoor S, Bani S, Shahgole R, Gojazadeh M (2012) The effects of continuous and interrupted episiotomy repair on pain severity and rate of perineal repair: a controlled randomized clinical trial. J Caring Sci 1(3):165–171. doi:10.​5681/​jcs.​2012.​024 PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Imarengiaye CO, Andet AB (2008) Postpartum perineal pain among Nigerian women. West Afr J Med 27(3):148–151PubMed Imarengiaye CO, Andet AB (2008) Postpartum perineal pain among Nigerian women. West Afr J Med 27(3):148–151PubMed
40.
go back to reference Williamson A, Hoggart B (2005) Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs 14(7):798–804CrossRefPubMed Williamson A, Hoggart B (2005) Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs 14(7):798–804CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Single-knot versus multiple-knot technique of perineal repair: a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Dan O. Selo-Ojeme
Chukwunwendu Anthony Okonkwo
Chukwuemeka Atuanya
Kingsley Ndukwu
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4101-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2016 Go to the issue