Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2016

01-02-2016 | General Gynecology

Cervical screening program and the psychological impact of an abnormal Pap smear: a self-assessment questionnaire study of 590 patients

Authors: Fabinshy Thangarajah, Thomas Einzmann, Florian Bergauer, Jan Patzke, Silke Schmidt-Petruschkat, Monika Theune, Katja Engel, Julian Puppe, Lisa Richters, Peter Mallmann, Verena Kirn

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Invasive cervical cancer is today the fourth most common cancer of women in western civilization. Screening programs have led to a continuously decrease. Nevertheless, both screening and a positive test result are known to be associated with a negative psychological impact. Screening programs in European countries differ and thus psychological impact might as well. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychological impact of women with an abnormal Pap smear in a German cohort.

Methods

Between July 2013 and May 2014, a self-assessment questionnaire was distributed to 595 patients that were referred to a special clinic for cervical dysplasia for further evaluation of an abnormal Pap smear. Patients were recruited in five different centers.

Results

Most patients (45.9 %) were informed about the test result via phone call by their doctor. 68.8 % of the patients felt anxious and 26.3 % even felt panic. After having talked to their physician, 51.4 % of our cohort still felt worried and only 24.4 % felt reassured. Concerning disease management, 48.4 % underwent a control Pap smear in 6 months. The preferred information source was the physician (63.9 %). Compared to the results in other European countries, our study cohort showed differences concerning age distribution, patients living in a partnership, number of children and especially disease management.

Conclusion

Cancer screening itself and abnormal test results have an impact on patient’s feelings. To reduce the psychological impact, patients need to be better informed about the risks and benefits of cancer screening programs and in case of cervical cancer screening about the meaning of an abnormal test result. Our results underline the importance of a trustful physician–patient relationship in that matter.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Björk S, Hagström HG (2001) Vad betyder cellförändringarna? Dålig information om avvikande cytologprov skapar onödig oro (Of what significance is abnormal result of smear test? Anxiety because of insufficient information in connection with abnormal result of cervical smear test). Lakartidningen 98(23):2796–2800PubMed Björk S, Hagström HG (2001) Vad betyder cellförändringarna? Dålig information om avvikande cytologprov skapar onödig oro (Of what significance is abnormal result of smear test? Anxiety because of insufficient information in connection with abnormal result of cervical smear test). Lakartidningen 98(23):2796–2800PubMed
4.
go back to reference Cox JT (1995) Epidemiology of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the role of human papillomavirus. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 9(1):1–37PubMedCrossRef Cox JT (1995) Epidemiology of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the role of human papillomavirus. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 9(1):1–37PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dominiak-Felden G, Cohet C, Atrux-Tallau S, Gilet H, Tristram A, Fiander A (2013) Impact of human papillomavirus-related genital diseases on quality of life and psychosocial wellbeing: results of an observational, health-related quality of life study in the UK. BMC Public Health 13:1065. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-1065 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Dominiak-Felden G, Cohet C, Atrux-Tallau S, Gilet H, Tristram A, Fiander A (2013) Impact of human papillomavirus-related genital diseases on quality of life and psychosocial wellbeing: results of an observational, health-related quality of life study in the UK. BMC Public Health 13:1065. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2458-13-1065 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Drolet M, Brisson M, Maunsell E, Franco EL, Coutlée F, Ferenczy A, Fisher W, Mansi JA (2012) The psychosocial impact of an abnormal cervical smear result. Psychooncology 21(10):1071–1081. doi:10.1002/pon.2003 PubMedCrossRef Drolet M, Brisson M, Maunsell E, Franco EL, Coutlée F, Ferenczy A, Fisher W, Mansi JA (2012) The psychosocial impact of an abnormal cervical smear result. Psychooncology 21(10):1071–1081. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​2003 PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
12.
go back to reference Gath DH, Hallam N, Mynors-Wallis L, Day A, Bond SA (1995) Emotional reactions in women attending a UK colposcopy clinic. J Epidemiol Comm Health 49(1):79–83CrossRef Gath DH, Hallam N, Mynors-Wallis L, Day A, Bond SA (1995) Emotional reactions in women attending a UK colposcopy clinic. J Epidemiol Comm Health 49(1):79–83CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Geyer S, Jaunzeme J, Hillemanns P (2015) Cervical cancer screening in Germany: group-specific participation rates in the state of Niedersachsen (Lower Saxony). A study with health insurance data. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291(3):623–629. doi:10.1007/s00404-014-3421-3 PubMedCrossRef Geyer S, Jaunzeme J, Hillemanns P (2015) Cervical cancer screening in Germany: group-specific participation rates in the state of Niedersachsen (Lower Saxony). A study with health insurance data. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291(3):623–629. doi:10.​1007/​s00404-014-3421-3 PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ideström M, Milsom I, Andersson-Ellström A (2003) Women’s experience of coping with a positive Pap smear: a register-based study of women with two consecutive Pap smears reported as CIN 1. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82(8):756–761PubMedCrossRef Ideström M, Milsom I, Andersson-Ellström A (2003) Women’s experience of coping with a positive Pap smear: a register-based study of women with two consecutive Pap smears reported as CIN 1. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82(8):756–761PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kirn V, Geiger P, Riedel C, Bergauer F, Friese K, Kainer F, Knabl J (2015) Cervical conisation and the risk of preterm delivery: a retrospective matched pair analysis of a German cohort. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291(3):599–603. doi:10.1007/s00404-014-3463-6 PubMedCrossRef Kirn V, Geiger P, Riedel C, Bergauer F, Friese K, Kainer F, Knabl J (2015) Cervical conisation and the risk of preterm delivery: a retrospective matched pair analysis of a German cohort. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291(3):599–603. doi:10.​1007/​s00404-014-3463-6 PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lerman CE, Rimer BK (1993) Psychosocial impact of cancer screening. Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.) 7(4):67–72 (discussion 72, 75, 79) Lerman CE, Rimer BK (1993) Psychosocial impact of cancer screening. Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.) 7(4):67–72 (discussion 72, 75, 79)
21.
22.
go back to reference Monsonego J, Cortes J, da Silva Daniel, Pereira Jorge AF, Klein P (2011) Psychological impact, support and information needs for women with an abnormal Pap smear: comparative results of a questionnaire in three European countries. BMC Womens Health 11:18. doi:10.1186/1472-6874-11-18 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Monsonego J, Cortes J, da Silva Daniel, Pereira Jorge AF, Klein P (2011) Psychological impact, support and information needs for women with an abnormal Pap smear: comparative results of a questionnaire in three European countries. BMC Womens Health 11:18. doi:10.​1186/​1472-6874-11-18 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Robert Koch Institut (2014) Mitteilung der Ständigen Impfkommission am Robert Koch-Institut (RKI) Empfehlungen der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) am Robert Koch-Institut/Stand: August 2014. Epidemiologisches Bulletin (34):305–340 Robert Koch Institut (2014) Mitteilung der Ständigen Impfkommission am Robert Koch-Institut (RKI) Empfehlungen der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) am Robert Koch-Institut/Stand: August 2014. Epidemiologisches Bulletin (34):305–340
25.
go back to reference Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, Killackey M, Kulasingam SL, Cain J, Garcia Francisco A R, Moriarty AT, Waxman AG, Wilbur DC, Wentzensen N, Downs LS, Spitzer M, Moscicki A, Franco EL, Stoler MH, Schiffman M, Castle PE, Myers ER (2012) American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 62(3):147–172. doi:10.3322/caac.21139 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, Killackey M, Kulasingam SL, Cain J, Garcia Francisco A R, Moriarty AT, Waxman AG, Wilbur DC, Wentzensen N, Downs LS, Spitzer M, Moscicki A, Franco EL, Stoler MH, Schiffman M, Castle PE, Myers ER (2012) American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 62(3):147–172. doi:10.​3322/​caac.​21139 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Schaffer P, Sancho-Garnier H, Fender M, Dellenbach P, Carbillet JP, Monnet E, Gauthier GP, Garnier A (2000) Cervical cancer screening in France. Eur J Cancer 36(17):2215–2220PubMedCrossRef Schaffer P, Sancho-Garnier H, Fender M, Dellenbach P, Carbillet JP, Monnet E, Gauthier GP, Garnier A (2000) Cervical cancer screening in France. Eur J Cancer 36(17):2215–2220PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Vesco KK, Whitlock EP, Eder M, Lin J, Burda BU, Senger CA, Holmes RS, Fu R, Zuber S (2011) Screening for cervical cancer. a systematic evidence review for the U.S. preventive services task force. Lancet Oncol 12(7):663–672CrossRef Vesco KK, Whitlock EP, Eder M, Lin J, Burda BU, Senger CA, Holmes RS, Fu R, Zuber S (2011) Screening for cervical cancer. a systematic evidence review for the U.S. preventive services task force. Lancet Oncol 12(7):663–672CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cervical screening program and the psychological impact of an abnormal Pap smear: a self-assessment questionnaire study of 590 patients
Authors
Fabinshy Thangarajah
Thomas Einzmann
Florian Bergauer
Jan Patzke
Silke Schmidt-Petruschkat
Monika Theune
Katja Engel
Julian Puppe
Lisa Richters
Peter Mallmann
Verena Kirn
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3821-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2016 Go to the issue