Published in:
01-01-2016 | Gynecologic Oncology
Primary debulking surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 1/2016
Login to get accessAbstract
Objectives
To compare the survival of patients with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) or primary debulking surgery (PDS), and to investigate how to improve the survival of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
Method
We retrospectively reviewed 339 patients with stage IIIC or IV EOC from January 2005 to December 2010 treated at West China Women’s and Children’s Hospital wherein 114 and 225 patients underwent NAC followed by IDS and PDS, respectively.
Results
No difference was observed in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between NAC group and PDS group (PFS: 11 vs. 10 months, p = 0.629; OS: 25 vs. 25 months, p = 0.992). Patients with residual tumors that measured 0.1–1 cm at IDS following NAC had a statistically significant lower median OS compared to patients with no residual tumor, but comparable to that with residual tumors that measured >1 cm at IDS following NAC. The independent predictors of OS are size of residual tumor (p < 0.001), FIGO stage (p < 0.001), and age (p = 0.003).
Conclusions
NAC followed by IDS provides equal survival compared with PDS. Debulking to small residual tumors with a maximum diameter of less than 1 cm provides a smaller but still significant benefit for patients with PDS but a relatively minor effect with IDS following NAC. To improve the survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer, the definition of “optimal” in IDS following NAC should be defined as no residual tumor.