Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2015

01-06-2015 | Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine

Clinical diagnosis and therapy of uterine scar defects after caesarean section in non-pregnant women

Authors: Neele Schepker, Guillermo-José Garcia-Rocha, Frauke von Versen-Höynck, Peter Hillemanns, Cordula Schippert

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Caesarean delivery (c-section) scar dehiscences may cause bleeding abnormalities, e.g. postmenstrual spotting, dysmenorrhea and abdominal pain, secondary sterility and at worst peripartum uterine rupture. The purpose of this study was firstly to identify the correlation of women’s complaints after c-section with scar-related clinical symptoms. Secondly, the effects of corrective surgery on preoperatively existing complaints were analysed and assessed in the patient population of our clinic.

Methods

We present data of a retrospective study of 13 premenopausal, non-pregnant women with symptomatic c-section scars. In 9 out of 13 patients, a microsurgical uterus reconstruction was performed by mini-laparotomy. The postoperative changes of scar-associated symptoms were assessed by a questionnaire as earliest as 4 months after surgery (N = 5).

Results

The c-section scar was visualised by transvaginal sonography in 12 out of 13 women by a typical U- or V-shaped hypoechoic or anechoic fluid accumulation in the region of former uterotomy and in all 13 patients by hysteroscopy. Bleeding disorders were often accompanied by dysmenorrhea/abdominal pain (38.5 %, N = 5) and secondary sterility (46.2 %, N = 6). Blood residues in the scar pouch and bleeding disorders/postmenstrual spotting were found in 30.8 % of patients (N = 4) and combined with secondary sterility in 38.5 % of patients (N = 5). Reconstructive surgeries resulted in discontinuation of bleeding disorders in all women and a pregnancy in three out of five patients (60 %) with secondary sterility.

Conclusion

Clinical symptoms, e.g. “bleeding disorders” like postmenstrual spotting, “pain/dysmenorrhea” and “secondary sterility” could be specific indicators for the diagnosis of uterine dehiscence after c-section. Scar dehiscences can be diagnosed by obtaining the patients medical history and asking for typical symptoms followed by vaginal sonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy. If a c-section scar defect is confirmed, microsurgical uterus reconstruction can stop postmenstrual spotting, reduce abdominal pain/dysmenorrhea and improve fertility.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice (2006) ACOG Committee Opinion No. 342: induction of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 108(2):465–468CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice (2006) ACOG Committee Opinion No. 342: induction of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 108(2):465–468CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Asakura H, Nakai A, Ishikawa G, Suzuki S, Araki T (2000) Prediction of uterine dehiscence by measuring lower uterine segment thickness prior to the onset of labor: evaluation by transvaginal ultrasonography. J Nippon Med Sch 67(5):352–356CrossRefPubMed Asakura H, Nakai A, Ishikawa G, Suzuki S, Araki T (2000) Prediction of uterine dehiscence by measuring lower uterine segment thickness prior to the onset of labor: evaluation by transvaginal ultrasonography. J Nippon Med Sch 67(5):352–356CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Appleton B, Targett C, Rasmussen M, Readman E, Sale F, Permezel M (2000) Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: an Australian multicentre study. VBAC Study Group. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 40(1):87–91CrossRefPubMed Appleton B, Targett C, Rasmussen M, Readman E, Sale F, Permezel M (2000) Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: an Australian multicentre study. VBAC Study Group. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 40(1):87–91CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe e.V. Leitlinie Schwangerschaftsbetreuung und Geburtseinleitung bei Zustand nach Sectio. AWMF 015/021 (S1). August 2010 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe e.V. Leitlinie Schwangerschaftsbetreuung und Geburtseinleitung bei Zustand nach Sectio. AWMF 015/021 (S1). August 2010
5.
go back to reference Fabres C, Arriagada P, Fernández C, MacKenna A, Zegers F, Fernández E (2005) Surgical treatment and follow-up of women with intermenstrual bleeding due to cesarean section scar defect. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(1):25–28CrossRefPubMed Fabres C, Arriagada P, Fernández C, MacKenna A, Zegers F, Fernández E (2005) Surgical treatment and follow-up of women with intermenstrual bleeding due to cesarean section scar defect. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(1):25–28CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dannecker C, Hübener C, Toth B, Lienemann A, Hepp H, Hasbargen U (2003) Asymptomatic uterine rupture after two spontaneous vaginal deliveries following prior cesarean section. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 43(4):245–249CrossRefPubMed Dannecker C, Hübener C, Toth B, Lienemann A, Hepp H, Hasbargen U (2003) Asymptomatic uterine rupture after two spontaneous vaginal deliveries following prior cesarean section. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 43(4):245–249CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Jastrow N, Antonelli E, Robyr R, Irion O, Boulvain M (2006) Inter- and intraobserver variability in sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment after a previous Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27(4):420–424CrossRefPubMed Jastrow N, Antonelli E, Robyr R, Irion O, Boulvain M (2006) Inter- and intraobserver variability in sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment after a previous Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27(4):420–424CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (1999) ACOG practice bulletin. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Number 5, July 1999 (replaces practice bulletin number 2, October 1998). Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 66(2):197–204CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (1999) ACOG practice bulletin. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Number 5, July 1999 (replaces practice bulletin number 2, October 1998). Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 66(2):197–204CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Haag P, Hanhart N, Müller M (2010) Gynäkologie. Gynäkologie und Urologie. 5th edn. Breisach a.Rh. pp 45–234 Haag P, Hanhart N, Müller M (2010) Gynäkologie. Gynäkologie und Urologie. 5th edn. Breisach a.Rh. pp 45–234
10.
go back to reference Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi JA, Patel S, Malinow AM, Weiner CP (2005) Ruptur of the uterine scar during term labour: contractility or biochemistry? BJOG 186(112):38–42CrossRef Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi JA, Patel S, Malinow AM, Weiner CP (2005) Ruptur of the uterine scar during term labour: contractility or biochemistry? BJOG 186(112):38–42CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EK (2000) Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183(5):1187–1197CrossRefPubMed Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EK (2000) Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183(5):1187–1197CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rath W, Surbek D (2006) Induction of labour after previous caesarean section. Geburtsh Frauenheilkd 66(12):1143–1149CrossRef Rath W, Surbek D (2006) Induction of labour after previous caesarean section. Geburtsh Frauenheilkd 66(12):1143–1149CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ecker JL, Frigoletto FD (2007) Caesarean delivery and the risk-benefit calculus. N Engl J Med 356:885–888CrossRefPubMed Ecker JL, Frigoletto FD (2007) Caesarean delivery and the risk-benefit calculus. N Engl J Med 356:885–888CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Juzi C, Rageth JC (2000) Delivery after previous cesarean section: an evaluation of peripartal risks. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 60(7):345–353 Juzi C, Rageth JC (2000) Delivery after previous cesarean section: an evaluation of peripartal risks. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 60(7):345–353
15.
go back to reference Klemm P, Köhler C, Mangler M, Schneider A (2007) Sonographic detection of late scar dehiscence after caesarean section and its vaginal or laparoscopic-vaginal repair. Gynäkol Prax 31(2):237–244 Klemm P, Köhler C, Mangler M, Schneider A (2007) Sonographic detection of late scar dehiscence after caesarean section and its vaginal or laparoscopic-vaginal repair. Gynäkol Prax 31(2):237–244
16.
go back to reference Monteagudo A, Carreno C, Timor-Tritsch IE (2001) Saline infusion sonohysterography in nonpregnant women with previous cesarean delivery: the “niche” in the scar. J Ultrasound Med 20(10):1105–1115PubMed Monteagudo A, Carreno C, Timor-Tritsch IE (2001) Saline infusion sonohysterography in nonpregnant women with previous cesarean delivery: the “niche” in the scar. J Ultrasound Med 20(10):1105–1115PubMed
17.
go back to reference Ceci O, Cantatore C, Scioscia M, Nardelli C, Ravi M, Vimercati A et al (2012) Ultrasonographic and hysteroscopic outcomes of uterine scar healing after cesarean section: comparison of two types of single-layer suture. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 38(11):1302–1307CrossRefPubMed Ceci O, Cantatore C, Scioscia M, Nardelli C, Ravi M, Vimercati A et al (2012) Ultrasonographic and hysteroscopic outcomes of uterine scar healing after cesarean section: comparison of two types of single-layer suture. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 38(11):1302–1307CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ (2009) Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34(1):85–89CrossRefPubMed Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ (2009) Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34(1):85–89CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Thurmond AS, Harvey WJ, Smith SA (1999) Cesarean section scar as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding: diagnosis by sonohysterography. J Ultrasound Med 18(1):13–16PubMed Thurmond AS, Harvey WJ, Smith SA (1999) Cesarean section scar as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding: diagnosis by sonohysterography. J Ultrasound Med 18(1):13–16PubMed
20.
go back to reference Borges LM, Scapinelli A, de Baptista Depes D, Lippi UG, Coelho Lopes RG (2010) Findings in patients with postmenstrual spotting with prior cesarean section. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(3):361–364CrossRefPubMed Borges LM, Scapinelli A, de Baptista Depes D, Lippi UG, Coelho Lopes RG (2010) Findings in patients with postmenstrual spotting with prior cesarean section. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(3):361–364CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wang CJ, Huang HJ, Chao A, Lin YP, Pan YJ, Horng SG (2011) Challenges in the transvaginal management of abnormal uterine bleeding secondary to cesarean section scar defect. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 154:218–222CrossRefPubMed Wang CJ, Huang HJ, Chao A, Lin YP, Pan YJ, Horng SG (2011) Challenges in the transvaginal management of abnormal uterine bleeding secondary to cesarean section scar defect. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 154:218–222CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Chang Y, Tsai EM, Long CY, Lee CL, Kay N (2009) Resectoscopic treatment combined with sonohysterographic evaluation of women with postmenstrual bleeding as a result of previous cesarean delivery scar defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:370el–370e4CrossRef Chang Y, Tsai EM, Long CY, Lee CL, Kay N (2009) Resectoscopic treatment combined with sonohysterographic evaluation of women with postmenstrual bleeding as a result of previous cesarean delivery scar defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:370el–370e4CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gubbini G, Centini G, Nascetti D, Marra E, Moncini I, Bruni L et al (2011) Surgical hysteroscopic treatment of cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring fertility: prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18:234–237CrossRefPubMed Gubbini G, Centini G, Nascetti D, Marra E, Moncini I, Bruni L et al (2011) Surgical hysteroscopic treatment of cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring fertility: prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18:234–237CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (2005) SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 89:319–331CrossRef Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (2005) SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 89:319–331CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Meyer WR, Castelbaum AJ, Somkuti S, Sagoskin AW, Doyle M, Harris JE et al (1997) Hydrosalpinges adversely affect markers of endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod 12(7):1393–1398CrossRefPubMed Meyer WR, Castelbaum AJ, Somkuti S, Sagoskin AW, Doyle M, Harris JE et al (1997) Hydrosalpinges adversely affect markers of endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod 12(7):1393–1398CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Mukherjee T, Copperman AB, McCaffrey C, Cook CA, Bustillo M, Bacau MF (1996) Hydrosalpinx fluid has embryo toxic effects on marine embryogenesis: a case for prophylactic salpingectomy. Fertil Steril 66(5):851–853PubMed Mukherjee T, Copperman AB, McCaffrey C, Cook CA, Bustillo M, Bacau MF (1996) Hydrosalpinx fluid has embryo toxic effects on marine embryogenesis: a case for prophylactic salpingectomy. Fertil Steril 66(5):851–853PubMed
27.
go back to reference Johnson N, van Voorst S, Sowter MC, Strandell A, Mol BW (2010) Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20(1):CD002125. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002125.pub3 Johnson N, van Voorst S, Sowter MC, Strandell A, Mol BW (2010) Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20(1):CD002125. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD002125.​pub3
28.
go back to reference Voss E, Boldes R, Stark M, Fleming C, Hull M (1996) Impaired implantation after in vitro fertilisation treatment associated with hydrosalpinx. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103(8):851CrossRefPubMed Voss E, Boldes R, Stark M, Fleming C, Hull M (1996) Impaired implantation after in vitro fertilisation treatment associated with hydrosalpinx. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103(8):851CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Eytan O, Azem F, Gull I, Wolman I, Elad D, Jaffa AJ (2001) The mechanism of hydrosalpinx in embryo implantation. Hum Reprod 16(12):2662–2667CrossRefPubMed Eytan O, Azem F, Gull I, Wolman I, Elad D, Jaffa AJ (2001) The mechanism of hydrosalpinx in embryo implantation. Hum Reprod 16(12):2662–2667CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Van Horenbeeck A, Temmerman M, Dhont M (2003) Cesarean scar dehiscence and irregular uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 102(5 Pt. 2):1137–1139CrossRefPubMed Van Horenbeeck A, Temmerman M, Dhont M (2003) Cesarean scar dehiscence and irregular uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 102(5 Pt. 2):1137–1139CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Gubbini G, Casadio P, Marra E (2008) Resectoscopic correction of the “isthmocele” in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(2):172–175CrossRefPubMed Gubbini G, Casadio P, Marra E (2008) Resectoscopic correction of the “isthmocele” in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(2):172–175CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Roberge S, Boutin A, Chaillet N, Moore L, Jastrow N, Demers S et al (2012) Systematic review of cesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant state: imaging techniques and uterine scar defect. Am J Perinatol 29(6):465–471CrossRefPubMed Roberge S, Boutin A, Chaillet N, Moore L, Jastrow N, Demers S et al (2012) Systematic review of cesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant state: imaging techniques and uterine scar defect. Am J Perinatol 29(6):465–471CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Armstrong V, Hansen WF, Van Voorhis BJ, Syrop CH (2003) Detection of cesarean scars by transvaginal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 101:61–65CrossRefPubMed Armstrong V, Hansen WF, Van Voorhis BJ, Syrop CH (2003) Detection of cesarean scars by transvaginal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 101:61–65CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Hayakawa H, Itakura A, Mitsui T et al (2006) Methods from myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85:429–434CrossRefPubMed Hayakawa H, Itakura A, Mitsui T et al (2006) Methods from myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85:429–434CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Menada Valenzano M, Lijoi D, Mistrangelo E, Costantini S, Ragni N (2006) Vaginal ultrasonographic and hysterosonographic evaluation of the low transverse incision after cesarea section: correlation with gynaecological symptoms. Gynecol Obstet Invest 61:216–222CrossRefPubMed Menada Valenzano M, Lijoi D, Mistrangelo E, Costantini S, Ragni N (2006) Vaginal ultrasonographic and hysterosonographic evaluation of the low transverse incision after cesarea section: correlation with gynaecological symptoms. Gynecol Obstet Invest 61:216–222CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Fabres C, Aviles G, De la Jara C, Escalona J, Muñoz JF, Mackenna A et al (2003) The cesarean delivery scar pouch: clinical implications and diagnostic correlation between transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy. J Ultrasound Med 22(7):695–700PubMed Fabres C, Aviles G, De la Jara C, Escalona J, Muñoz JF, Mackenna A et al (2003) The cesarean delivery scar pouch: clinical implications and diagnostic correlation between transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy. J Ultrasound Med 22(7):695–700PubMed
37.
go back to reference Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Philippe HJ, Nisand I (1996) Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet 347(8997):281–284CrossRefPubMed Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Philippe HJ, Nisand I (1996) Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet 347(8997):281–284CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Ceci O, Scioscia M, Vicino M, Pinto L, Pontrelli G, Bettocchi S (2007) Recurrent intermenstrual bleeding secondary to cesarean sectio scari? Fertil Steril 88(3):757CrossRefPubMed Ceci O, Scioscia M, Vicino M, Pinto L, Pontrelli G, Bettocchi S (2007) Recurrent intermenstrual bleeding secondary to cesarean sectio scari? Fertil Steril 88(3):757CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Sen S, Malik S, Salhan S (2004) Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients of previous cesarean section. Int J Gynecol Obstet 87(3):215–219CrossRef Sen S, Malik S, Salhan S (2004) Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients of previous cesarean section. Int J Gynecol Obstet 87(3):215–219CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Erickson SS, Van Voorhis BJ (1999) Intermenstrual bleeding secondary to cesarean scar diverticuli: Report of three cases. Obstet Gynecol 93(5 Pt. 2):802–805CrossRefPubMed Erickson SS, Van Voorhis BJ (1999) Intermenstrual bleeding secondary to cesarean scar diverticuli: Report of three cases. Obstet Gynecol 93(5 Pt. 2):802–805CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Bujold E, Gauthier RJ (2002) Neonatal morbidity associated with uterine rupture: what are the risk factors? Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(2):311–314CrossRefPubMed Bujold E, Gauthier RJ (2002) Neonatal morbidity associated with uterine rupture: what are the risk factors? Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(2):311–314CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Helen Nelson Carcio, Helen A Carcio (eds) (1998) Management of the Infertile Woman. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, ISBN 0781710448 Helen Nelson Carcio, Helen A Carcio (eds) (1998) Management of the Infertile Woman. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, ISBN 0781710448
43.
go back to reference Hamar BD, Saber SB, Cackovic M, Magloire LK, Pettker CM, Abdel-Razeq SS (2007) Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure. Obstet Gynecol 110(4):808–813CrossRefPubMed Hamar BD, Saber SB, Cackovic M, Magloire LK, Pettker CM, Abdel-Razeq SS (2007) Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure. Obstet Gynecol 110(4):808–813CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Marotta ML, Donnez J, Squifflet J, Jadoul P, Darii N, Donnez O (2013) Laparoscopic repair of post-cesarean section uterine scar defects diagnosed in nonpregnant women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(2):386–391CrossRefPubMed Marotta ML, Donnez J, Squifflet J, Jadoul P, Darii N, Donnez O (2013) Laparoscopic repair of post-cesarean section uterine scar defects diagnosed in nonpregnant women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(2):386–391CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Feng YL, Li MX, Liang XQ, Li XM (2012) Hysteroscopic treatment of postcesarean scar defect. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19(4):498–502CrossRefPubMed Feng YL, Li MX, Liang XQ, Li XM (2012) Hysteroscopic treatment of postcesarean scar defect. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19(4):498–502CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Luo L, Niu G, Wang Q, Xie HZ, Yao SZ (2012) Vaginal repair of cesarean section scar diverticuli. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19(4):454–458CrossRefPubMed Luo L, Niu G, Wang Q, Xie HZ, Yao SZ (2012) Vaginal repair of cesarean section scar diverticuli. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19(4):454–458CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical diagnosis and therapy of uterine scar defects after caesarean section in non-pregnant women
Authors
Neele Schepker
Guillermo-José Garcia-Rocha
Frauke von Versen-Höynck
Peter Hillemanns
Cordula Schippert
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3582-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2015 Go to the issue