Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2014

01-08-2014 | General Gynecology

The outcome of Manchester–Fotergill operation for uterine decensus repair: a single center experience

Authors: İsmet alkış, Erbil Karaman, Ağahan Han, Bekir Gülaç, Hasan Cemal Ark

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics, peri- and post-operative outcomes, and clinical effectiveness of the Manchester–Fothergill (MF) procedure for uterine descensus as a uterine-sparing surgery.

Methods

In this study, 49 patients underwent the MF procedure as a uterine-sparing surgery for uterine descensus during 2008–2012 in the Department of Urogynecology at Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Research and Teaching Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Results

Medical records and follow-up data were collected from 24 of the 49 patients (48.9 %). The mean age was 49.3 ± 9.1 years, and parity 3.6 ± 1.5; 41.6 % were post-menopausal; 6 patients (25 %) had grade II, and 18 (75 %) had grade III uterine prolapse; 95.8 % had associated cystoceles, and 79.1 % had associated rectoceles; 66.6 % complained of urinary incontinence. On follow-up examination, the cervical stumps were satisfactorily situated in 23 of 24 patients, and recurrent prolapse was seen in 1 patient (4.1 %). Bladder perforation was repaired at the time of the operation in 1 patient, and one complained of post-operative urinary retention.

Conclusion

The MF procedure is a viable option to surgically correct uterine descent while preserving the uterus to treat recurrent prolapse with a low complication rate and low morbidity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference DeLancey J, Richardson A (1992) Anatomy of genital support. In: Benson J (ed) Female pelvic floor disorders. Norton Medical Books, New York DeLancey J, Richardson A (1992) Anatomy of genital support. In: Benson J (ed) Female pelvic floor disorders. Norton Medical Books, New York
2.
go back to reference Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506PubMedCrossRef Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svardsudd KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:299–305PubMedCrossRef Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svardsudd KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:299–305PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference van Brummen HJ, van de Pol G, Aalders CI, Heintz AP, van der Vaart CH (2003) Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as primary surgical treatment for a descensus uteri: effects on urinary symptoms. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14:350–355PubMedCrossRef van Brummen HJ, van de Pol G, Aalders CI, Heintz AP, van der Vaart CH (2003) Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as primary surgical treatment for a descensus uteri: effects on urinary symptoms. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14:350–355PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ayhan A, Esin S, Guven S, Salman C, Ozyuncu O (2006) The Manchester operation for uterine prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 92:228–233PubMedCrossRef Ayhan A, Esin S, Guven S, Salman C, Ozyuncu O (2006) The Manchester operation for uterine prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 92:228–233PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Diwan A, Rardin CR, Kohli N (2004) Uterine preservation during surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: a review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15:286–292PubMed Diwan A, Rardin CR, Kohli N (2004) Uterine preservation during surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: a review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15:286–292PubMed
7.
go back to reference Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178CrossRef Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Costantini E, Mearini L, Bini V, Zucchi A, Mearini E, Porena M (2005) Uterus preservation in surgical correction of urogenital prolapse. Eur Urol 48(4):642–649PubMedCrossRef Costantini E, Mearini L, Bini V, Zucchi A, Mearini E, Porena M (2005) Uterus preservation in surgical correction of urogenital prolapse. Eur Urol 48(4):642–649PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Altman D, Granath F, Cnattingius S, Falconer C (2007) Hysterectomy and risk of stress-urinary-incontinence surgery: nationwide cohort study. Lancet 370:1494–1499PubMedCrossRef Altman D, Granath F, Cnattingius S, Falconer C (2007) Hysterectomy and risk of stress-urinary-incontinence surgery: nationwide cohort study. Lancet 370:1494–1499PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tipton RH, Atkin PF (1970) Uterine disease after the Manchester repair operation. J Obstet Gyneacol Br Commonw 77:852–853CrossRef Tipton RH, Atkin PF (1970) Uterine disease after the Manchester repair operation. J Obstet Gyneacol Br Commonw 77:852–853CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hopkins MP, Devine JB, De Lancey JO (1997) Uterine problems discovered after presumed hysterectomy: the Manchester operation revisited. Obstet Gynecol 89:846–848PubMedCrossRef Hopkins MP, Devine JB, De Lancey JO (1997) Uterine problems discovered after presumed hysterectomy: the Manchester operation revisited. Obstet Gynecol 89:846–848PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zucchi A, Lazzeri M, Porena M, Mearini L, Costantini E (2010) Uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Nat Rev Urol 7:626–633PubMedCrossRef Zucchi A, Lazzeri M, Porena M, Mearini L, Costantini E (2010) Uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Nat Rev Urol 7:626–633PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Conger GT, Keettel WC (1958) The Manchester–Fothergill operation, its place in gynecology: a review of 960 cases at University Hospitals. Iowa City, Iowa Conger GT, Keettel WC (1958) The Manchester–Fothergill operation, its place in gynecology: a review of 960 cases at University Hospitals. Iowa City, Iowa
14.
go back to reference Thomas AG, Brodman ML, Dottino PR, Bodian C, Friedman F, Bogursky E (1995) Manchester procedure vs. vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse: a comparison. J Reprod Med 40:299–304PubMed Thomas AG, Brodman ML, Dottino PR, Bodian C, Friedman F, Bogursky E (1995) Manchester procedure vs. vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse: a comparison. J Reprod Med 40:299–304PubMed
15.
go back to reference Thys SD, Coolen AL, Martens IR et al (2011) A comparison of long-term outcome between Manchester Fothergill and vaginal hysterectomy as treatment for uterine descent. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 22(9):1171–1178CrossRef Thys SD, Coolen AL, Martens IR et al (2011) A comparison of long-term outcome between Manchester Fothergill and vaginal hysterectomy as treatment for uterine descent. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 22(9):1171–1178CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Basic E, Kozaric H, Kozaric M, Suko A (2010) Conization as treatment of choice for precancerous changes and university cervical cancer at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Clinical Center of Sarajevo University in 2009. J Med Arh. 64(3):171–174 Basic E, Kozaric H, Kozaric M, Suko A (2010) Conization as treatment of choice for precancerous changes and university cervical cancer at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Clinical Center of Sarajevo University in 2009. J Med Arh. 64(3):171–174
Metadata
Title
The outcome of Manchester–Fotergill operation for uterine decensus repair: a single center experience
Authors
İsmet alkış
Erbil Karaman
Ağahan Han
Bekir Gülaç
Hasan Cemal Ark
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3200-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2014 Go to the issue