Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2014

01-02-2014 | Reproductive Medicine

Cesarean deliveries among Nepalese mothers: changes over time 2001–2011 and determinants

Authors: K. C. Prakash, Subas Neupane

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To examine the most recent trends of cesarean delivery in Nepal and the association with socio-demographic characteristics of mothers.

Methods

Nationally representative cross-sectional data was used from three Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in Nepal in 2001 (N = 4,745), 2006 (N = 4,066) and 2011 (N = 4,148). Cesarean section delivery was measured in two categories with yes and no responses for the delivery in their latest pregnancy. Data on socio-demographic variables was obtained by interviewing the participants. The data was analysed using logistic regression models.

Results

The prevalence of cesarean section delivery was increased by more than 4 times from 2001 to 2011 both among rural and urban residents. After adjusting for mother’s age, number of births in last 5 years and mother’s education the prevalence of cesarean section delivery among all mothers was 1.71 times higher in 2006 (OR = 1.71, 95 % CI 1.23–2.37) and increased further in 2011 (OR = 2.42, 95 % CI 1.78–3.30) compared with year 2001. When adjusted for all the variables simultaneously, all variables except births in last 5 years remained significantly associated with cesarean section delivery of the mother. Older age, urban resident, being educated, having educated partners and being rich according to wealth index were associated with cesarean section delivery.

Conclusions

The prevalence of cesarean section delivery continues to rise but still lower than the World Health Organization recommended rates. More studies are needed to examine the non-medical reason of increasing rates of cesarean section deliveries and their effect in maternal and infant morbidity and mortality in Nepal.
Literature
2.
go back to reference WHO (1985) Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 2:436–437 WHO (1985) Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 2:436–437
3.
go back to reference Gibbons L, Belizan JM, Lauer JA, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F (2012) Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206(331):e1–e19PubMed Gibbons L, Belizan JM, Lauer JA, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F (2012) Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206(331):e1–e19PubMed
4.
go back to reference Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P et al (2007) Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 21:98–113PubMedCrossRef Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P et al (2007) Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 21:98–113PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Volpe FM (2011) Correlation of cesarean rates to maternal and infant mortality rates: an ecologic study of official international data. Pan Am J Public Health (Rev Panam Salud Pública) 29:303–308CrossRef Volpe FM (2011) Correlation of cesarean rates to maternal and infant mortality rates: an ecologic study of official international data. Pan Am J Public Health (Rev Panam Salud Pública) 29:303–308CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Subedi S (2012) Rising rate of cesarean section: a year review. J Nobel Med Coll 2:72–76 Subedi S (2012) Rising rate of cesarean section: a year review. J Nobel Med Coll 2:72–76
7.
go back to reference Dobson R (2001) Caesarean section rate in England and Wales hits 21 %. Br Med J 323:951CrossRef Dobson R (2001) Caesarean section rate in England and Wales hits 21 %. Br Med J 323:951CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Khawaja M, Kabakian-Khasholian T, Jurdi R (2004) Determinants of caesarean section in Egypt: evidence from the demographic and health survey. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 69:273–281CrossRef Khawaja M, Kabakian-Khasholian T, Jurdi R (2004) Determinants of caesarean section in Egypt: evidence from the demographic and health survey. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 69:273–281CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bogg L, Huang K, Long Q, Shen Y, Hemminki E (2010) Dramatic increase of cesarean deliveries in the midst of health reforms in rural China. Soc Sci Med 70:1544–1549PubMedCrossRef Bogg L, Huang K, Long Q, Shen Y, Hemminki E (2010) Dramatic increase of cesarean deliveries in the midst of health reforms in rural China. Soc Sci Med 70:1544–1549PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wilkes P, Wolf D, Kronbach D, Kunze M, Gibbs R (2003) Risk factors for cesarean delivery at presentation of nulliparous patients in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 102:1352–1357 Wilkes P, Wolf D, Kronbach D, Kunze M, Gibbs R (2003) Risk factors for cesarean delivery at presentation of nulliparous patients in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 102:1352–1357
11.
go back to reference Flores PL, González PG, Trejo FJ, Vega LG, Cabrera PC, Campos A et al (2008) Risk factors in cesarean section (abstract). Ginecol Obstet Mex 76:392–397 Flores PL, González PG, Trejo FJ, Vega LG, Cabrera PC, Campos A et al (2008) Risk factors in cesarean section (abstract). Ginecol Obstet Mex 76:392–397
12.
go back to reference Maharlouei N, Moalaee M, Ajdari S, Zarei M, Lankarani K (2013) Cesarean delivery in South-Western Iran: trends and determinants in a community-based survey. Med Princ Pract 22:184–188PubMedCrossRef Maharlouei N, Moalaee M, Ajdari S, Zarei M, Lankarani K (2013) Cesarean delivery in South-Western Iran: trends and determinants in a community-based survey. Med Princ Pract 22:184–188PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Khawaja M, Nsour MA (2007) Trends in the prevalence and determinants of caesarean section delivery in Jordan: evidence from three demographic and health surveys, 1990–2002. World Health Popul 9:17–28PubMedCrossRef Khawaja M, Nsour MA (2007) Trends in the prevalence and determinants of caesarean section delivery in Jordan: evidence from three demographic and health surveys, 1990–2002. World Health Popul 9:17–28PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Klemetti R, Che X, Gao Y (2010) Cesarean section delivery among primiparous women in rural China: an emerging epidemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:1–6CrossRef Klemetti R, Che X, Gao Y (2010) Cesarean section delivery among primiparous women in rural China: an emerging epidemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:1–6CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mishra US, Ramanathan M (2002) Delivery-related complications and determinants of caesarean section rates in India. Health Policy Planning 17:90–98PubMedCrossRef Mishra US, Ramanathan M (2002) Delivery-related complications and determinants of caesarean section rates in India. Health Policy Planning 17:90–98PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ford J, Grewal J, Mikolajczyk R, Meikle S, Zhang J (2008) Primary cesarean delivery among the parous women in the United States, 1990–2003. Obstet Gyenecol 112(1235):1241 Ford J, Grewal J, Mikolajczyk R, Meikle S, Zhang J (2008) Primary cesarean delivery among the parous women in the United States, 1990–2003. Obstet Gyenecol 112(1235):1241
17.
go back to reference Gossman GL, Joesch JM, Tanfer K (2006) Trends in maternal request cesarean delivery from 1991 to 2004. Obstet Gynecol 108:1506–1516PubMedCrossRef Gossman GL, Joesch JM, Tanfer K (2006) Trends in maternal request cesarean delivery from 1991 to 2004. Obstet Gynecol 108:1506–1516PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cesarean deliveries among Nepalese mothers: changes over time 2001–2011 and determinants
Authors
K. C. Prakash
Subas Neupane
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2976-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2014 Go to the issue