Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2006

01-07-2006 | Case Report

Family members serving the gestational carrier needs of women lacking a uterus: a report of two cases

Authors: Suzanne M. Kavic, Mark V. Sauer

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Case report: In two instances, a designated relative served as a gestational carrier for a woman who no longer had a uterus. In the first case, a 38-year-old woman underwent an emergency cesarean hysterectomy due to worsening fatty degeneration of the liver in the third trimester, culminating in massive hemorrhage, consumptive coagulopathy and the loss of twins at 28 weeks gestation following successful in vitro fertilization. In the second case, a 28-year-old had congenital absence of the uterus and vagina. Both surrogates volunteered for service and were carefully screened medically, reproductively, and psychosocially prior to proceeding. All parties were required to execute informed consent and contracts with private attorneys before entry. Both gestational carriers conceived following the initial embryo transfer; one as the result of previously cryopreserved embryos, the other from embryos obtained following the synchronized in vitro fertilization of newly aspirated oocytes. Gestational carriers were prescribed oral estradiol and vaginal progesterone to prepare the uterus for implantation, and maintained this regimen throughout the first trimester of pregnancy. The pregnancies proceeded uneventfully and resulted in the delivery of singleton births at term. Both infants were formally adopted after delivery by the genetic parents in compliance with the advice of counsel under New York State law. Conclusion: Family members serving as gestational carriers provide women with functional ovaries but no uterus, the opportunity to have genetic offspring, while avoiding much of the high cost and social uncertainty of commercial surrogates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (2001) Assisted reproductive technology success rates. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (2001) Assisted reproductive technology success rates. Department of Health and Human Services
2.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (2002) Assisted reproductive technology success rates. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (2002) Assisted reproductive technology success rates. Department of Health and Human Services
3.
4.
5.
go back to reference Leeton J, King C, Harman J (1988) Sister–Sister in vitro fertilization surrogate pregnancy with donor sperm: the case for surrogate gestational pregnancy. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 5(5):245–248CrossRefPubMed Leeton J, King C, Harman J (1988) Sister–Sister in vitro fertilization surrogate pregnancy with donor sperm: the case for surrogate gestational pregnancy. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 5(5):245–248CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference McDonald v. McDonald (1994) 608 N.Y.S.2d 477 McDonald v. McDonald (1994) 608 N.Y.S.2d 477
7.
go back to reference New York State Task Force on Life and Health Law (1987) New York State Task Force on Life and Health Law (1987)
Metadata
Title
Family members serving the gestational carrier needs of women lacking a uterus: a report of two cases
Authors
Suzanne M. Kavic
Mark V. Sauer
Publication date
01-07-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2006
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0115-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2006

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2006 Go to the issue