Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Dermatological Research 5/2014

01-07-2014 | Concise Communication

Topical non-peptide antagonists of sensory neurotransmitters substance P and CGRP do not modify patch test and prick test reactions: a vehicle-controlled, double-blind pilot study

Authors: Joanna Wallengren, Lars Edvinsson

Published in: Archives of Dermatological Research | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Immunologic responses in the skin can be modulated by such neurotransmitters of sensory nerve fibers as substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). The first-generation receptor antagonists were peptides with large molecules and had to be injected intracutaneously. The aim of this study was to examine the topical effects of non-peptide antagonists to substance P (aprepitant) and CGRP (telcagepant), respectively, on delayed and immediate reactions in the skin and on associated pruritus. A lipophilic formulation of aprepitant 5 % and a hydrophilic formulation of telcagepant 1 % were developed. Their effect on the skin barrier was measured in terms of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) while permeation was calculated using permeation coefficients. Patch tests in patients allergic to nickel and prick test reactions to histamine were used as models. None of the treatments increased TEWL, suggesting there to be no impairment of the skin barrier. Permeation coefficients indicated moderate permeation. Histamine prick tests induced a flare with a mean area of 662 275 mm2 and a weal with a mean volume of 49 11 mm3. These reactions as well as histamine-induced pruritus were not affected significantly by any of the treatments. Treatment with aprepitant and its vehicle alone resulted in a potentiating of the infiltration of nickel reactions compared with test reactions obtained after no treatment (1147 423 mm3 and 1427 566 mm3 vs 683 +202 mm3) (p = 0.03). Telcagepant induced vasoconstriction in the skin but did not change the infiltration of nickel reactions. None of the treatments influenced the nickel patch test induced pruritus. The data suggest that the topical application of non-peptide antagonists penetrates the skin but does not inhibit contact dermatitis or pruritus.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barber ED, Hill T, Schum DB (1995) The percutaneous absorption of hydroquinone (HQ) through rat and human skin in vitro. Toxicol Lett 80:167–172PubMedCrossRef Barber ED, Hill T, Schum DB (1995) The percutaneous absorption of hydroquinone (HQ) through rat and human skin in vitro. Toxicol Lett 80:167–172PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Booken N, Heck M, Nicolay JP, Klemke CD, Goerdt S, Utikal J (2011) Oral aprepitant in the therapy of refractory pruritus in erythrodermic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Br J Dermatol 164:665–667PubMed Booken N, Heck M, Nicolay JP, Klemke CD, Goerdt S, Utikal J (2011) Oral aprepitant in the therapy of refractory pruritus in erythrodermic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Br J Dermatol 164:665–667PubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Edvinsson L, Linde (2010) M.New drugs in migraine treatment and prophylaxis: telcagepant and topiramate. Lancet 376:645–655PubMedCrossRef Edvinsson L, Linde (2010) M.New drugs in migraine treatment and prophylaxis: telcagepant and topiramate. Lancet 376:645–655PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fregert S (1974) Patch testing. In: Fregert S (ed) Manual of contact dermatitis. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, p 53 Fregert S (1974) Patch testing. In: Fregert S (ed) Manual of contact dermatitis. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, p 53
8.
go back to reference Lodén M (1995) Biophysical properties of dry atopic and normal skin with special reference to effects of skin care products. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl 192:1–48 Lodén M (1995) Biophysical properties of dry atopic and normal skin with special reference to effects of skin care products. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl 192:1–48
10.
go back to reference Reich A, Heisig M, Phan NQ, Taneda K, Takamori K, Takeuchi S, Furue M, Blome C, Augustin M, Ständer S, Szepietowski J (2012) Visual Analogue Scale: Evaluation of the Instrument for the Assessment of Pruritus. Acta Derm Venereol 92(5):497–501PubMedCrossRef Reich A, Heisig M, Phan NQ, Taneda K, Takamori K, Takeuchi S, Furue M, Blome C, Augustin M, Ständer S, Szepietowski J (2012) Visual Analogue Scale: Evaluation of the Instrument for the Assessment of Pruritus. Acta Derm Venereol 92(5):497–501PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shah PP, Desai PR, Patel AR, Singh MS (2012) Skin permeating nanogel for the cutaneous co-delivery of two anti-inflammatory drugs. Biomaterials 33:1607–1617PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Shah PP, Desai PR, Patel AR, Singh MS (2012) Skin permeating nanogel for the cutaneous co-delivery of two anti-inflammatory drugs. Biomaterials 33:1607–1617PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shono Y, Jantratid E, Kesisoglou F, Reppas C, Dressman JB (2010) Forecasting in vivo oral absorption and food effect of micronized and nanosized aprepitant formulations in humans. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 76(1):95–104PubMedCrossRef Shono Y, Jantratid E, Kesisoglou F, Reppas C, Dressman JB (2010) Forecasting in vivo oral absorption and food effect of micronized and nanosized aprepitant formulations in humans. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 76(1):95–104PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wallengren J (1991) Substance P antagonist inhibits immediate and delayed type cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions. Br J Dermatol 124:324–328PubMedCrossRef Wallengren J (1991) Substance P antagonist inhibits immediate and delayed type cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions. Br J Dermatol 124:324–328PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wallengren J (1999) Neuropeptides: Their significance in the skin. Drug News & Perspectives 12:401–411CrossRef Wallengren J (1999) Neuropeptides: Their significance in the skin. Drug News & Perspectives 12:401–411CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wallengren J (2000) Dual effects of CGRP-antagonist on allergic contact dermatitis in human skin. Contact Dermatitis 43:137–143PubMedCrossRef Wallengren J (2000) Dual effects of CGRP-antagonist on allergic contact dermatitis in human skin. Contact Dermatitis 43:137–143PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wallengren J (2012) Topical aprepitant does not attenuate clinical or experimental pruritus. Arch Dermatol 148(8):957–959PubMedCrossRef Wallengren J (2012) Topical aprepitant does not attenuate clinical or experimental pruritus. Arch Dermatol 148(8):957–959PubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Wilschut A, ten Berge WF, Robinson PJ, McKone TE (1995) Estimating skin permeation. The validation of five mathematical skin permeation models. Chemosphere 30(7):1275–1296PubMedCrossRef Wilschut A, ten Berge WF, Robinson PJ, McKone TE (1995) Estimating skin permeation. The validation of five mathematical skin permeation models. Chemosphere 30(7):1275–1296PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yosipovitch G, Duque MI, Patel TS, Ishiuji Y, Guzman-Sanchez DA, Dawn AG, Freedman BI, Chan YH, Crumrine D, Elias PM (2007) Skin barrier structure and function and their relationship to pruritus in end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22:3268–3279PubMedCrossRef Yosipovitch G, Duque MI, Patel TS, Ishiuji Y, Guzman-Sanchez DA, Dawn AG, Freedman BI, Chan YH, Crumrine D, Elias PM (2007) Skin barrier structure and function and their relationship to pruritus in end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22:3268–3279PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Topical non-peptide antagonists of sensory neurotransmitters substance P and CGRP do not modify patch test and prick test reactions: a vehicle-controlled, double-blind pilot study
Authors
Joanna Wallengren
Lars Edvinsson
Publication date
01-07-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Dermatological Research / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0340-3696
Electronic ISSN: 1432-069X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-014-1451-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Archives of Dermatological Research 5/2014 Go to the issue