Top

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Published in:

01-02-2016 | Handsurgery

Early Passive Movement in flexor tendon injuries of the hand

Authors: S. Quadlbauer, Ch. Pezzei, J. Jurkowitsch, P. Reb, T. Beer, M. Leixnering

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 2/2016

Abstract

Introduction

Flexor tendon injuries are underestimated considering their anatomical function in the hand. According to the publications of Kleinert, Verdan and Kessler, primary suturing of the flexor tendon combined with immediate postoperative physiotherapy in terms of “Early Passive Movement” became the standard form of therapy following acute flexor tendon injuries of the hand.

Materials and methods

In a study between 2007 and 2009, a total of 115 flexor tendon injuries were analysed retrospectively. All patients were treated using a two-strand repair technique according to Zechner. They received physiotherapy from the first postoperative day according to the Viennese flexor tendon rehabilitation protocol. For statistical purposes, the factors: age, gender, range of motion (ROM), follow up interval, affected flexor tendon and zone were analysed. The time between injury and surgery was also determined, classified into groups and included in the study. On the basis of the range of motion AROM, the Buck-Gramcko and modified Strickland Score was calculated.

Results

The mean follow-up interval was 7 months. Using the Buck-Gramcko and Strickland Score an “excellent” overall result was achieved. Complications occurred in 3.5 %, one secondary rupture (0.9 %), two tendon adhaesions requiring tenolysis (1.7 %) and one case of infection (0.9 %). The time interval between injury and operation, gender, affected zone, flexor tendon and affected finger nerve had no influence on the Buck-Gramcko and Strickland Score.

Conclusions

Using Zechner’s core suture technique as the primary treatment, combined with immediate postoperative physiotherapy in terms of “Early Passive Movement” according to the Viennese flexor tendon rehabilitation programme, an excellent clinical outcome and low complication rate was acchieved.

Level of evidence

IV: case series.

Wittemann M, Jung A, Hornung R (1994) Die sog. „kleine Handverletzung“und ihre sozioökonomischen Folgen. Chirurg 65:1005–1007

Verdan C (1972) Half a century of flexor tendon surgery. Current status and changing philosophies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54(3):472–491PubMed

Kleinert HE, Schepel S, Gill T (1981) Flexor tendon injuries. Surg Clin North Am 61(2):267–286PubMed

Bunnell S (1918) Repair of tendons in the fingers and description of two new instruments. Surg Gynecol Obstet 26:103–110

Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH (eds) (2010) Green’s operative hand surgery, 6th edn. Elsevier Churchill, Philadelphia

Verdan C (1960) Primary repair of flexor tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Am 42:647–657PubMed

Kleinert HE, Kutz JE, Atasoy E, Stormo A (1973) Primary repair of flexor tendons. Orthop Clin North Am 4:865–876PubMed

Kessler I, Nissim F (1996) Primary repair without immobilization of flexor tendon division within the digital sheath. An experimental and clinical study. Acta Othop Scand 40:587–601CrossRef

Kleinert HE, Spokevicius S, Papas NH (1995) History of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am 20(3 Pt 2):S46–S52CrossRefPubMed

10.

Young RES, Harmon JM (1960) Repair of tendon injuries of the hand. Arm Surg 151:552–566

11.

Leixnering M, Hintringer W (2003) Current treatments for primary injuries of the flexor and extensor tendons. Eur Surg 35(3):143–147CrossRef

12.

Kleinert HE, Kutz JE, AshbeU TS et al (1967) Primary repair of lacerated flexor tendon in no man’s land (abstract). J Bone Joint Surg 49A:577

13.

Werdin F, Schaller HE (2008) Combined flexor tendon and nerve injury of the hand. Der Orthopäde 37(12):1202–1209CrossRefPubMed

14.

Strickland JW (2005) The scientific basis for advances in flexor tendon surgery. J Hand Ther 18:94–110CrossRefPubMed

15.

Woo S, Gelberman RH, Cobb NG, Amiel D et al (1981) The importance of controlled passive mobilization on flexor tendon healing: a biomechanical study. Acta Orthop 52:615–622CrossRef

16.

Boyer MI (2005) Flexor tendon biology. Hand Clin 21(2):159–166CrossRefPubMed

17.

Griffin M, Hindocha S, Jordan D, Saleh M, Khan W (2012) An overview of the management of flexor tendon injuries. Open Orthop J 6:28e35

18.

Barrie KA, Tomak SL, Cholewicki J, Wolfe SW (2000) The role of multiple strands and locking sutures on gap formation of flexor tendon repairs during cyclical loading. J Hand Surg Am 25(4):714e720CrossRef

19.

Matheson G, Nicklin S, Gianoutsous MP, Walsh WR (2005) Comparison of zone II flexor tendon repairs using an in vitro linear cyclic testing protocol. Clin Biomech 20(7):718e722CrossRef

20.

Dy CJ, Hernandez-Soria A, Ma Y, Roberts TR, Daluiski A (2012) Complications after flexor tendon repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Am 37(3):543–551CrossRefPubMed

21.

Aoki M, Manske PR, Pruitt DL, Larson BJ (1995) Work of flexion after tendon repair with various suture methods. A human cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Br 20(3):310e313CrossRef

22.

Hardwicke JT, Tan JJ, Foster MA, Titley OG (2014) A systematic review of 2-strand versus multistrand core suture techniques and functional outcome after digital flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am 39(4):686–695CrossRefPubMed

23.

Brushart TM (1999) Nerve repair and grafting. In: Green DP, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC (eds) Green’s operative hand surgery, 4th edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 1381–1403

24.

Miller EM (1921) An experimental study to determine the strength of the suture line. Arch Surg 2:167–175CrossRef

25.

Malczewski MC, Zamboni WA, Haws MJ, Johnson RM, Smoot EC, Russell RC (1995) Effect of motion on digital nerve repair in a fresh cadaver model. Plast Reconstr Surg 96(7):1672–1675CrossRefPubMed

26.

Chao RP, Braün SA, Ta KT, Palesty JA, Mine R, Syed SA, Chang DJ, Thomson JG (2001) Early passive mobilization after digital nerve repair and grafting in a fresh cadaver. Plast Reconstr Surg 108(2):386–391CrossRefPubMed

27.

Henry FP, Farkhad RI, Butt FS, O’Shaughnessy M, O’Sullivan ST (2012) A comparison between complete immobilisation and protected active mobilisation in sensory nerve recovery following isolated digital nerve injury. J Hand Surg Eur 37(5):422–426CrossRef

28.

Clare TD, de Haviland Mee S, Belcher HJ (2004) Rehabilitation of digital nerve repair: is splinting necessary? J Hand Surg Br 29(6):552–556CrossRefPubMed

29.

Yu RS, Catalano LW 3rd, Barron OA, Johnson C, Glickel SZ (2004) Limited, protected postsurgical motion does not affect the results of digital nerve repair. J Hand Surg Am 29(2):302–306CrossRefPubMed

30.

Jabir S, Iwuagwu FC (2014) Postoperative mobilization regimens following digital nerve repair: a systematic review. Eplasty 17:14

31.

Zechner W, Buck-Gramcko D, Lohmann H, Goth D, Stock W (1985) Improvement of suture technic in flexor tendon injuries. Clinical and experimental study. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 17(1):8–13PubMed

32.

Buck-Gramcko D (1976) A new method for evaluation of results in flexor tendon repair. Handchirurgie 8(2):65–69PubMed

33.

Strickland JW (1985) Results of flexor tendon surgery in zone II. Hand Clin 1:167–179PubMed

34.

Rust RA, Eckersley R (2008) Twenty questions on tendon injuries in the hand. Curr Orthop 22:17–24CrossRef

35.

Grobbelaar AO, Hudson DA (1994) Flexor tendon injuries in children. J Hand Surg Br 19(6):696–698CrossRefPubMed

36.

Small JO, Brennen MD, Colville J (1989) Early active mobilisation following flexor tendon repair in zone 2. J Hand Surg Brit 14(4):383–391CrossRef

37.

Boyer MI, Strickland JW, Engles DR, Sachar K, Leversedge FJ (2002) Flexor tendon repair and rehabilitation, state of the art in 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(9):1684–1706

38.

Chesney A, Chauhan A, Kattan A, Farrokhyar F, Thoma A (2011) Systematic review of flexor tendon rehabilitation protocols in zone II of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(4):1583–1592CrossRefPubMed

39.

Starr HM, Snoddy M, Hammond KE, Seiler JG 3rd (2013) Flexor tendon repair rehabilitation protocols: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am 38(9):1712–1717CrossRefPubMed

40.

Frueh FS, Kunz VS, Gravestock IJ, Held L, Haefeli M, Giovanoli P, Calcagni M (2014) Primary flexor tendon repair in zones 1 and 2: early passive mobilization versus controlled active motion. J Hand Surg Am 39(7):1344–1350CrossRefPubMed

41.

Betz C, Schleicher P, Winkel R, Hoffmann R (2013) Biomechanical investigation of the tensile strength of tendon sutures—locking sutures increase stability. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 45(1):20–25CrossRefPubMed

42.

Wu YF, Tang JB (2014) Recent developments in flexor tendon repair techniques and factors influencing strength of the tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur 39(1):6–19CrossRef

43.

Tanaka T, Amadio PC, Zhao C, Zobitz ME, An KN (2005) Flexor digitorum profundus tendon tension during finger manipulation. J Hand Ther 18(3):330–338PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

44.

Lee HI, Lee JS, Kim TH, Chang SH, Park MJ, Lee GJ (2015) Comparison of flexor tendon suture techniques including 1 using 10 strands. J Hand Surg Am 40(7):1369–1376CrossRefPubMed

45.

Moriya T, Zhao C, Yamashita T, An KN, Amadio PC (2010) Effect of core suture technique and type on the gliding resistance during cyclic motion following flexor tendon repair: a cadaveric study. J Orthop Res 28(11):1475–1481PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

Title: Early Passive Movement in flexor tendon injuries of the hand
Authors: S. Quadlbauer
Ch. Pezzei
J. Jurkowitsch
P. Reb
T. Beer
M. Leixnering
Publication date: 01-02-2016
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2362-z

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Early Passive Movement in flexor tendon injuries of the hand

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of evidence

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of evidence

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Treatment strategies for partial chronic instability of the distal syndesmosis: an arthroscopic grading scale and operative staging concept

Validation of the German Forgotten Joint Score (G-FJS) according to the COSMIN checklist: does a reduction in joint awareness indicate clinical improvement after arthroplasty of the knee?

S3-Guideline non-traumatic adult femoral head necrosis

Effect of preemptive intra-articular morphine and ketamine on pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study

Technical errors and complications in orthopaedic trauma surgery

Is there really a relevant difference between tenotomy and tenodesis for tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps?