Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 5/2013

01-05-2013 | Orthopaedic Surgery

Multilingual cross-cultural adaptation of the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) into Czech, French, Hungarian, Italian, Portuguese (Brazil), Russian and Ukrainian

Authors: Jörg Goldhahn, Tamas Shisha, Joy C. Macdermid, Sabine Goldhahn

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The use of patient-reported outcome questionnaires is recommended in studies of the orthopaedic field. Reliable, validated tools are necessary to ensure the comparability of results across different studies, centers, and countries. The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) is a widely accepted and commonly used outcome measure in the self-evaluation after distal radius fractures. The cross-cultural adaptation of PRWE was performed according to international guidelines, following prescribed six stages: translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert committee review, pre-testing, and submission of documentation. PRWE versions were achieved without any substantive difficulty in all seven languages. Cross-cultural adaptation aims “to attain semantic, idiomatic, experiential and conceptual equivalence between the source and target questionnaires”. The present paper provides such adaptation of the PRWE in seven different languages, making this tool available for an additional nearly half a billion potential users.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Karnezis IA, Panagiotopoulos E, Tyllianakis M, Megas P, Lambiris E (2005) Correlation between radiological parameters and patient-rated wrist dysfunction following fractures of the distal radius. Injury 36(12):1435–1439PubMedCrossRef Karnezis IA, Panagiotopoulos E, Tyllianakis M, Megas P, Lambiris E (2005) Correlation between radiological parameters and patient-rated wrist dysfunction following fractures of the distal radius. Injury 36(12):1435–1439PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tsukazaki T, Takagi K, Iwasaki K (1993) Poor correlation between functional results and radiographic findings in Colles’ fracture. J Hand Surg [Br] 18(5):588–591CrossRef Tsukazaki T, Takagi K, Iwasaki K (1993) Poor correlation between functional results and radiographic findings in Colles’ fracture. J Hand Surg [Br] 18(5):588–591CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Grewal R, MacDermid JC, Pope J, Chesworth BM (2007) Baseline predictors of pain and disability one year following extra-articular distal radius fractures. Hand (NY) 2(3):104–111CrossRef Grewal R, MacDermid JC, Pope J, Chesworth BM (2007) Baseline predictors of pain and disability one year following extra-articular distal radius fractures. Hand (NY) 2(3):104–111CrossRef
4.
go back to reference MacDermid JC, Donner A, Richards RS, Roth JH (2002) Patient versus injury factors as predictors of pain and disability six months after a distal radius fracture. J Clin Epidemiol 55(9):849–854PubMedCrossRef MacDermid JC, Donner A, Richards RS, Roth JH (2002) Patient versus injury factors as predictors of pain and disability six months after a distal radius fracture. J Clin Epidemiol 55(9):849–854PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference MacDermid JC, Roth JH, McMurtry R (2007) Predictors of time lost from work following a distal radius fracture. J Occup Rehabil 17(1):47–62PubMedCrossRef MacDermid JC, Roth JH, McMurtry R (2007) Predictors of time lost from work following a distal radius fracture. J Occup Rehabil 17(1):47–62PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Goldhahn S, Hoang-Kim A, Nakamura N, Goldhahn J (2011) Outcome measures in multicenter studies. Arthroscopy 27(4):S83–S91 Goldhahn S, Hoang-Kim A, Nakamura N, Goldhahn J (2011) Outcome measures in multicenter studies. Arthroscopy 27(4):S83–S91
7.
go back to reference Kraemer HC (2000) Pitfalls of multisite randomized clinical trials of efficacy and effectiveness. Schizophr Bull 26(3):533–541PubMedCrossRef Kraemer HC (2000) Pitfalls of multisite randomized clinical trials of efficacy and effectiveness. Schizophr Bull 26(3):533–541PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hemelaers L, Angst F, Drerup S, Simmen BR, Wood-Dauphinee S (2008) Reliability and validity of the German version of “the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE)” as an outcome measure of wrist pain and disability in patients with acute distal radius fractures. J Hand Ther 21(4):366–376PubMedCrossRef Hemelaers L, Angst F, Drerup S, Simmen BR, Wood-Dauphinee S (2008) Reliability and validity of the German version of “the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE)” as an outcome measure of wrist pain and disability in patients with acute distal radius fractures. J Hand Ther 21(4):366–376PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wilcke MT, Abbaszadegan H, Adolphson PY (2009) Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 43(2):94–101PubMedCrossRef Wilcke MT, Abbaszadegan H, Adolphson PY (2009) Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 43(2):94–101PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Donner A, Bellamy N, Roth JH (2000) Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am 25(2):330–340PubMedCrossRef MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Donner A, Bellamy N, Roth JH (2000) Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am 25(2):330–340PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Goldhahn J, Little D, Mitchell P et al (2010) Evidence for anti-osteoporosis therapy in acute fracture situations–recommendations of a multidisciplinary workshop of the international society for fracture repair. Bone 46(2):267–271PubMedCrossRef Goldhahn J, Little D, Mitchell P et al (2010) Evidence for anti-osteoporosis therapy in acute fracture situations–recommendations of a multidisciplinary workshop of the international society for fracture repair. Bone 46(2):267–271PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lippuner K, Johansson H, Kanis JA, Rizzoli R (2009) Remaining lifetime and absolute 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture in Swiss men and women. Osteoporos Int 20(7):1131–1140PubMedCrossRef Lippuner K, Johansson H, Kanis JA, Rizzoli R (2009) Remaining lifetime and absolute 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture in Swiss men and women. Osteoporos Int 20(7):1131–1140PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference MacDermid JC, Tottenham V (2004) Responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. J Hand Ther 17(1):18–23PubMedCrossRef MacDermid JC, Tottenham V (2004) Responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. J Hand Ther 17(1):18–23PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bhandari M, Tornetta P 3rd, Ellis T et al (2004) Hierarchy of evidence: differences in results between non-randomized studies and randomized trials in patients with femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124(1):10–16PubMedCrossRef Bhandari M, Tornetta P 3rd, Ellis T et al (2004) Hierarchy of evidence: differences in results between non-randomized studies and randomized trials in patients with femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124(1):10–16PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, Beadle M, Roth JH (1998) Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma 12(8):577–586PubMedCrossRef MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, Beadle M, Roth JH (1998) Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma 12(8):577–586PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hemelaers L, Angst F, Drerup S, Simmen BR, Wood-Dauphinee S (2008) Reliability and validity of the German version of “the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE)” as an outcome measure of wrist pain and disability in patients with acute distal radius fractures. J Hand Ther 21(4):366–376PubMedCrossRef Hemelaers L, Angst F, Drerup S, Simmen BR, Wood-Dauphinee S (2008) Reliability and validity of the German version of “the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE)” as an outcome measure of wrist pain and disability in patients with acute distal radius fractures. J Hand Ther 21(4):366–376PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mellstrand NC, Ponzer S, Tornkvist H, Ahrengart L, Bergstrom G (2011) Measuring outcome after wrist injury: translation and validation of the Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE-Swe). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:171CrossRef Mellstrand NC, Ponzer S, Tornkvist H, Ahrengart L, Bergstrom G (2011) Measuring outcome after wrist injury: translation and validation of the Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE-Swe). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:171CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Voche P, Dubert T, Laffargue C, Gosp-Server A (2003) Patient-rated wrist questionnaire: preliminary report on a proposed French version of a North American questionnaire designed to assess wrist pain and function. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 89(5):443–448PubMed Voche P, Dubert T, Laffargue C, Gosp-Server A (2003) Patient-rated wrist questionnaire: preliminary report on a proposed French version of a North American questionnaire designed to assess wrist pain and function. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 89(5):443–448PubMed
19.
go back to reference Imaeda T, Uchiyama S, Wada T et al (2010) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation. J Orthop Sci 15(4):509–517PubMedCrossRef Imaeda T, Uchiyama S, Wada T et al (2010) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation. J Orthop Sci 15(4):509–517PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Harris JE, MacDermid JC, Roth J (2005) The international classification of functioning as an explanatory model of health after distal radius fracture: a cohort study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 3:73PubMedCrossRef Harris JE, MacDermid JC, Roth J (2005) The international classification of functioning as an explanatory model of health after distal radius fracture: a cohort study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 3:73PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25(24):3186–3191PubMedCrossRef Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25(24):3186–3191PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wah JW, Wang MK, Ping CL (2006) Construct validity of the Chinese version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire (PRWE-Hong Kong Version). J Hand Ther 19(1):18–26, (quiz 27) Wah JW, Wang MK, Ping CL (2006) Construct validity of the Chinese version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire (PRWE-Hong Kong Version). J Hand Ther 19(1):18–26, (quiz 27)
23.
go back to reference Brink SM, Voskamp EG, Houpt P, Emmelot CH (2009) Psychometric properties of the patient rated wrist/hand evaluation—Dutch language version (PRWH/E-DLV). J Hand Surg Eur Vol 34(4):556–557PubMedCrossRef Brink SM, Voskamp EG, Houpt P, Emmelot CH (2009) Psychometric properties of the patient rated wrist/hand evaluation—Dutch language version (PRWH/E-DLV). J Hand Surg Eur Vol 34(4):556–557PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mehta S, MacDermid JC (2011) Cross-cultural validation of the patient-rated wrist evaluation into Hindi. J Hand Ther (In press) Mehta S, MacDermid JC (2011) Cross-cultural validation of the patient-rated wrist evaluation into Hindi. J Hand Ther (In press)
26.
go back to reference Brena SF, Sanders SH, Motoyama H (1990) American and Japanese chronic low back pain patients: cross-cultural similarities and differences. Clin J Pain 6(2):118–124PubMedCrossRef Brena SF, Sanders SH, Motoyama H (1990) American and Japanese chronic low back pain patients: cross-cultural similarities and differences. Clin J Pain 6(2):118–124PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Multilingual cross-cultural adaptation of the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) into Czech, French, Hungarian, Italian, Portuguese (Brazil), Russian and Ukrainian
Authors
Jörg Goldhahn
Tamas Shisha
Joy C. Macdermid
Sabine Goldhahn
Publication date
01-05-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1694-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 5/2013 Go to the issue