Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 4/2013

01-04-2013 | Orthopaedic Surgery

The protective role of dynamic stabilization on the adjacent disc to a rigid instrumented level. An in vitro biomechanical analysis

Authors: J. Cabello, J. M. Cavanilles-Walker, M. Iborra, M. T. Ubierna, A. Covaro, J. Roca

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the changes of intradiscal pressure at the bridged and at the adjacent levels to a lumbar two-level hybrid instrumentation.

Introduction

The elimination of motion produced by spinal fusion may have potential consequences beyond the index level overloading the juxtaposed spinal motion segments and leading to the appearance of degenerative changes. Degeneration of the segments adjacent to instrumented levels has become a topic of increasing interest in the literature over the last years. In order to prevent degenerative disc changes at the adjacent segments to a fused level, a broad scope of techniques have been developed, one of them is hybrid constructs.

Methods

In 6 human cadaveric lumbosacral specimens, pressure transducers quantified intradiscal pressure changes at three levels (L3–L4, L4–L5 and L5–S1) under axial compression (0–750 N), anterior flexion (+12°) and extension (−12°) in three different situations of spinal stability: intact, L5–S1 rigid rod pedicle screw instrumentation and L4–S1 two-level hybrid instrumentation (rigid at L5–S1 and dynamic at L4–L5).

Results

Once the L5–S1 segment had implanted the rigid instrumentation system (Diapason), the intradiscal pressure at this level decreased by 65 % while the intradiscal pressure at the disc above (L4–L5) increased 20 %. After augmenting the L5–S1 posterior construct with a dynamic stabilization device (Dynesys) at the superior adjacent level, the intradiscal pressure at this level, L4–L5, decreased by 50 % whereas intradiscal pressure at its adjacent level, L3–L4, only experienced a slight increase of 10 %.

Conclusions

The raise of intradiscal pressure at the adjacent segment to a rigid instrumented segment can be reduced when the rigid construct is augmented with a dynamic stabilization device. Hybrid constructs might have a possible protecting role preventing the occurrence of degenerative disc changes at the adjacent segment to a rigid instrumented level. Augmentation with a dynamic stabilization device might protect the disc above a rigid rod pedicle screw construct.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adams MA (1995) Mechanical testing of the spine. An appraisal of methodology, results, and conclusions. Spine 20:2151–2156PubMedCrossRef Adams MA (1995) Mechanical testing of the spine. An appraisal of methodology, results, and conclusions. Spine 20:2151–2156PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Andersen T, Christensen FB, Hansen ES, Bunger C (2004) Pain 5 years after instrumented and non-instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion. Eur Spine J 12:393–399CrossRef Andersen T, Christensen FB, Hansen ES, Bunger C (2004) Pain 5 years after instrumented and non-instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion. Eur Spine J 12:393–399CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Beastall J, Karadimas E, Siddiqui M, Nicol M, Hughes J, Smith F et al (2007) The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings. Spine 32:685–690PubMedCrossRef Beastall J, Karadimas E, Siddiqui M, Nicol M, Hughes J, Smith F et al (2007) The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings. Spine 32:685–690PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chow DH, Luk KD, Evans JH, Leong JC (1996) Effects of short anterior lumbar interbody fusion on biomechanics of neighboring unfused segments. Spine 21:549–555PubMedCrossRef Chow DH, Luk KD, Evans JH, Leong JC (1996) Effects of short anterior lumbar interbody fusion on biomechanics of neighboring unfused segments. Spine 21:549–555PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cunningham BW, Kotani Y, McNulty PS, Cappuccino A, McAfee PC (1997) The effect of spinal destabilization and instrumentation on lumbar intradiscal pressure: an in vitro biomechanical analysis. Spine 122:2655–2663CrossRef Cunningham BW, Kotani Y, McNulty PS, Cappuccino A, McAfee PC (1997) The effect of spinal destabilization and instrumentation on lumbar intradiscal pressure: an in vitro biomechanical analysis. Spine 122:2655–2663CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dolan P, Earley M, Adams MA (1994) Bending and compressive stresses acting on the lumbar spine during lifting activities. J Biomech 27:1237–1248PubMedCrossRef Dolan P, Earley M, Adams MA (1994) Bending and compressive stresses acting on the lumbar spine during lifting activities. J Biomech 27:1237–1248PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Etebar S, Cahill DW (1999) Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability. J Neurosurg 90:163–169PubMed Etebar S, Cahill DW (1999) Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability. J Neurosurg 90:163–169PubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Fritzell P, Hagg O, Nordwall A (2003) Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Eur Spine J 12:178–189PubMed Fritzell P, Hagg O, Nordwall A (2003) Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Eur Spine J 12:178–189PubMed
10.
go back to reference Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A (2002) Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 27:1131–1141PubMedCrossRef Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A (2002) Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 27:1131–1141PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, Hsu WK, Dawson EG (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:1497–1503PubMed Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, Hsu WK, Dawson EG (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:1497–1503PubMed
12.
go back to reference Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, Mannion AF (2005) Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine 30:324–331PubMedCrossRef Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, Mannion AF (2005) Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine 30:324–331PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Guehring T, Omlor GW, Lorenz H, Engelleiter K, Richter W, Carstens C et al (2006) Disc distraction shows evidence of regenerative potential in degenerated intervertebral discs as evaluated by protein expression, magnetic resonance imaging, and messenger ribonucleic acid expression analysis. Spine 31:1658–1665PubMedCrossRef Guehring T, Omlor GW, Lorenz H, Engelleiter K, Richter W, Carstens C et al (2006) Disc distraction shows evidence of regenerative potential in degenerated intervertebral discs as evaluated by protein expression, magnetic resonance imaging, and messenger ribonucleic acid expression analysis. Spine 31:1658–1665PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Handa T, Ishihara H, Ohshima H, Osada R, Tsuji H, Obata K (1997) Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis and matrix metalloproteinase production in the human lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine 22:1085–1091PubMedCrossRef Handa T, Ishihara H, Ohshima H, Osada R, Tsuji H, Obata K (1997) Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis and matrix metalloproteinase production in the human lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine 22:1085–1091PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kroeber M, Unglaub F, Guehring T, Nerlich A, Jadi T, Lotz J et al (2005) Effects of controlled dynamic disc distraction on degenerated intervertebral discs: an in vivo study on the rabbit lumbar spine model. Spine 30:181–187PubMedCrossRef Kroeber M, Unglaub F, Guehring T, Nerlich A, Jadi T, Lotz J et al (2005) Effects of controlled dynamic disc distraction on degenerated intervertebral discs: an in vivo study on the rabbit lumbar spine model. Spine 30:181–187PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Morishita Y, Ohta H, Naito M, Matsumoto Y, Huang G, Tatsumi M et al (2011) Kinematic evaluation of the adjacent segments after lumbar instrumented surgery: a comparison between rigid fusion and dynamic non-fusion stabilization. Eur Spine J 20:1480–1485PubMedCrossRef Morishita Y, Ohta H, Naito M, Matsumoto Y, Huang G, Tatsumi M et al (2011) Kinematic evaluation of the adjacent segments after lumbar instrumented surgery: a comparison between rigid fusion and dynamic non-fusion stabilization. Eur Spine J 20:1480–1485PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mulholland RC, Sengupta DK (2002) Rationale, principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S198–S205PubMed Mulholland RC, Sengupta DK (2002) Rationale, principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S198–S205PubMed
18.
go back to reference Nockels RP (2005) Dynamic stabilization in the surgical Management of painful lumbar spinal disorders. Spine 30:S68–S72PubMedCrossRef Nockels RP (2005) Dynamic stabilization in the surgical Management of painful lumbar spinal disorders. Spine 30:S68–S72PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pihlajamaki H, Myllynen P, Bostman O (1997) Complications of transpedicular lumbosacral fixation for non-traumatic disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:183–189PubMedCrossRef Pihlajamaki H, Myllynen P, Bostman O (1997) Complications of transpedicular lumbosacral fixation for non-traumatic disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:183–189PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rahm MD, Hall BB (1996) Adjacent-segment degeneration alter lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. J Spinal Disord 9:392–400PubMedCrossRef Rahm MD, Hall BB (1996) Adjacent-segment degeneration alter lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. J Spinal Disord 9:392–400PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rao RD, David KS, Wang M (2005) Biomechanical changes at adjacent segments following anterior lumbar interbody fusion using tapered cages. Spine 30:2772–2776PubMedCrossRef Rao RD, David KS, Wang M (2005) Biomechanical changes at adjacent segments following anterior lumbar interbody fusion using tapered cages. Spine 30:2772–2776PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schilling C, Krüger S, Grupp TM, Duda GM, Blöme W, Rohlmann A et al (2011) The effect of design parameters of dynamic pedicle screw systems on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study. Eur Spine J 20:297–307PubMedCrossRef Schilling C, Krüger S, Grupp TM, Duda GM, Blöme W, Rohlmann A et al (2011) The effect of design parameters of dynamic pedicle screw systems on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study. Eur Spine J 20:297–307PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schmoelz W, Huber JF, Nydegger T, Claes L, Wilke HJ (2006) Influence of a dynamic stabilisation system on load bearing of a bridged disc: an in vitro study of intradiscal pressure. Eur Spine J 15:1276–1285PubMedCrossRef Schmoelz W, Huber JF, Nydegger T, Claes L, Wilke HJ (2006) Influence of a dynamic stabilisation system on load bearing of a bridged disc: an in vitro study of intradiscal pressure. Eur Spine J 15:1276–1285PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sengupta DK (2004) Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am 35:43–56PubMedCrossRef Sengupta DK (2004) Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am 35:43–56PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Weinhoffer SL, Guyer RD, Herbert M, Griffith SL (1995) Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study. Spine 20(5):526–531PubMedCrossRef Weinhoffer SL, Guyer RD, Herbert M, Griffith SL (1995) Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study. Spine 20(5):526–531PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE (1999) New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 24:755–762PubMedCrossRef Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE (1999) New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 24:755–762PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The protective role of dynamic stabilization on the adjacent disc to a rigid instrumented level. An in vitro biomechanical analysis
Authors
J. Cabello
J. M. Cavanilles-Walker
M. Iborra
M. T. Ubierna
A. Covaro
J. Roca
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1685-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 4/2013 Go to the issue