Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 10/2009

01-10-2009 | Trauma Surgery

Early results in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with a polyaxial locking plate

Authors: Johannes B. Erhardt, G. Roderer, K. Grob, T. N. Forster, K. Stoffel, M. S. Kuster

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 10/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

We report early results using a second generation locking plate, non-contact bridging plate (NCB PH®, Zimmer Inc. Warsaw, IN, USA), for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The NCB PH® combines conventional plating technique with polyaxial screw placement and angular stability.

Design

Prospective case series.

Setting

A single level-1 trauma center.

Patients

A total of 50 patients with proximal humeral fractures were treated from May 2004 to December 2005.

Intervention

Surgery was performed in open technique in all cases.

Main outcome measures

Implant-related complications, clinical parameters (duration of surgery, range of motion, Constant–Murley Score, subjective patient satisfaction, complications) and radiographic evaluation [union, implant loosening, implant-related complications and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head] at 6, 12 and 24 weeks.

Results

All fractures available to follow-up (48 of 50) went to union within the follow-up period of 6 months. One patient was lost to follow-up, one patient died of a cause unrelated to the trauma, four patients developed AVN with cutout, one patient had implant loosening, three patients experienced cutout and one patient had an axillary nerve lesion (onset unknown). The average age- and gender-related Constant Score (n = 35) was 76.

Conclusions

The NCB PH® combines conventional plating technique with polyaxial screw placement and angular stability. Although the complication rate was 19%, with a reoperation rate of 12%, the early results show that the NCB PH® is a safe implant for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bathis H, Tingart M, Bouillon B, Tiling T (2001) Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Is the T-plate still adequate osteosynthesis procedure? Zentralbl Chir 126(3):211–216. doi:10.1055/s-2001-12498 PubMedCrossRef Bathis H, Tingart M, Bouillon B, Tiling T (2001) Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Is the T-plate still adequate osteosynthesis procedure? Zentralbl Chir 126(3):211–216. doi:10.​1055/​s-2001-12498 PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Charalambous CP, Siddique I, Valluripalli K, Kovacevic M, Panose P, Srinivasan M, Marynissen H (2007) Proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(3):205–210. doi:10.1007/s00402-006-0256-9 PubMedCrossRef Charalambous CP, Siddique I, Valluripalli K, Kovacevic M, Panose P, Srinivasan M, Marynissen H (2007) Proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(3):205–210. doi:10.​1007/​s00402-006-0256-9 PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Constant CR (1997) An evaluation of the Constant–Murley shoulder assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79(4):695–696PubMed Constant CR (1997) An evaluation of the Constant–Murley shoulder assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79(4):695–696PubMed
4.
go back to reference Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164PubMed Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164PubMed
5.
go back to reference Edwards SL, Wilson NA, Zhang LQ, Flores S, Merk BR (2006) Two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. A biomechanical evaluation of two fixation techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(10):2258–2264. doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00757 PubMedCrossRef Edwards SL, Wilson NA, Zhang LQ, Flores S, Merk BR (2006) Two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. A biomechanical evaluation of two fixation techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(10):2258–2264. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​E.​00757 PubMedCrossRef
7.
11.
go back to reference Hente R, Kampshoff J, Kinner B, Fuchtmeier B, Nerlich M (2004) Treatment of dislocated 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus with an angle-stabilizing fixation plate. Unfallchirurg 107(9):769–782. doi:10.1007/s00113-004-0818-7 PubMedCrossRef Hente R, Kampshoff J, Kinner B, Fuchtmeier B, Nerlich M (2004) Treatment of dislocated 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus with an angle-stabilizing fixation plate. Unfallchirurg 107(9):769–782. doi:10.​1007/​s00113-004-0818-7 PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hessmann M, Baumgaertel F, Gehling H, Klingelhoeffer I, Gotzen L (1999) Plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures with indirect reduction: surgical technique and results utilizing three shoulder scores. Injury 30(7):453–462. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(99)00111-4 PubMedCrossRef Hessmann M, Baumgaertel F, Gehling H, Klingelhoeffer I, Gotzen L (1999) Plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures with indirect reduction: surgical technique and results utilizing three shoulder scores. Injury 30(7):453–462. doi:10.​1016/​S0020-1383(99)00111-4 PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kettler M, Biberthaler P, Braunstein V, Zeiler C, Kroetz M, Mutschler W (2006) Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the PHILOS angular stable plate: presentation of 225 cases of dislocated fractures. Unfallchirurg 109(12):1032–1040. doi:10.1007/s00113-006-1165-7 PubMedCrossRef Kettler M, Biberthaler P, Braunstein V, Zeiler C, Kroetz M, Mutschler W (2006) Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the PHILOS angular stable plate: presentation of 225 cases of dislocated fractures. Unfallchirurg 109(12):1032–1040. doi:10.​1007/​s00113-006-1165-7 PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lill H, Hepp P, Korner J, Kassi JP, Verheyden AP, Josten C, Duda GN (2003) Proximal humeral fractures: how stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123(2–3):74–81PubMed Lill H, Hepp P, Korner J, Kassi JP, Verheyden AP, Josten C, Duda GN (2003) Proximal humeral fractures: how stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123(2–3):74–81PubMed
18.
22.
go back to reference Robinson CM, Page RS (2004) Severely impacted valgus proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 1(Pt 2)):143–155PubMed Robinson CM, Page RS (2004) Severely impacted valgus proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 1(Pt 2)):143–155PubMed
23.
go back to reference Roderer G, Gebhard F, Erhardt J, Abouelsoud M, Kinzl L (2007) The non-contact bridging plate: a new fixed-angle device for the minimally-invasive treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus—technique and preliminary results. Unfallchirurg 110(6):505–512PubMedCrossRef Roderer G, Gebhard F, Erhardt J, Abouelsoud M, Kinzl L (2007) The non-contact bridging plate: a new fixed-angle device for the minimally-invasive treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus—technique and preliminary results. Unfallchirurg 110(6):505–512PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Early results in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with a polyaxial locking plate
Authors
Johannes B. Erhardt
G. Roderer
K. Grob
T. N. Forster
K. Stoffel
M. S. Kuster
Publication date
01-10-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 10/2009
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0924-7

Other articles of this Issue 10/2009

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 10/2009 Go to the issue