Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 12/2009

01-12-2009 | Orthopaedic Surgery

Predictive factors influencing fast track rehabilitation following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty

Authors: Michael Schneider, Ikuo Kawahara, Gail Ballantyne, Christine McAuley, Karen MacGregor, Ruth Garvie, Alistair McKenzie, Deborah MacDonald, Steffen J. Breusch

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 12/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Fast track rehabilitation after primary total hip (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) is gaining popularity. We performed a prospective clinical trial to identify predictive factors for successful fast track rehabilitation.

Methods

Between June 2005 and January 2006, 52 THR and 48 TKR were performed on consecutive patients off the local waiting list with no pre-selection or exclusion criteria. Patients underwent a fast track rehabilitation programme within a group-dynamic set-up aiming for discharge day 3 to 5 postoperatively. Demographic, clinical and social factors were analysed.

Results

Eighty-four percent (n = 44) of THR patients and 73% (n = 35) following TKR achieved the target discharge. Average discharge after THR was 5.4 and 5.5 days after TKR. Delayed discharge was mostly related to medical, social and organisational reasons. Age, 3 m-get-up-and-go-test (3 m-TGUGT), home situation and preoperative walking distance were the main predictors for the early discharge after THR; age, diagnosis, ASA class and preoperative pain medication were influential for TKR. Perioperative complication rates were within or below the national average.

Conclusion

Successful fast track rehabilitation is possible without pre-selection and does not seem to compromise clinical safety. However, a good social and physiotherapy community set-up should be available. The identified predictive factors could be helpful to identify candidates for fast track rehabilitation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Coventry M, Beckenbaugh R, Nolan D, Ilstrup D (1974) 2, 012 total hip arthroplasties: a study of post-operative course and early complications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:273–284PubMed Coventry M, Beckenbaugh R, Nolan D, Ilstrup D (1974) 2, 012 total hip arthroplasties: a study of post-operative course and early complications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:273–284PubMed
2.
go back to reference Harris WH, Sledge CB (1990) Total hip and knee replacement. N Engl J Med 323:801–807PubMed Harris WH, Sledge CB (1990) Total hip and knee replacement. N Engl J Med 323:801–807PubMed
3.
go back to reference House of Commons report 2003–2004: hip replacements: an update. 17th report of session 2003–2004, pp 12–13 House of Commons report 2003–2004: hip replacements: an update. 17th report of session 2003–2004, pp 12–13
4.
go back to reference Scottish Arthroplasty Project Annual Report (2008) Appendix 8: pp 14-17 Scottish Arthroplasty Project Annual Report (2008) Appendix 8: pp 14-17
10.
go back to reference O’Brien S, Ogonda L, Dennison J, Doran E, Lawlor M, Humphreys P, Kelly P, Matthews L, Beverland D (2005) Day two post operative ‘fast track’ discharge following primary total hip replacement. J Orthop Nurs 9:140–145. doi:10.1016/j.joon.2005.05.002 CrossRef O’Brien S, Ogonda L, Dennison J, Doran E, Lawlor M, Humphreys P, Kelly P, Matthews L, Beverland D (2005) Day two post operative ‘fast track’ discharge following primary total hip replacement. J Orthop Nurs 9:140–145. doi:10.​1016/​j.​joon.​2005.​05.​002 CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755PubMed Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755PubMed
12.
go back to reference Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:185–190PubMed Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:185–190PubMed
14.
go back to reference Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMed Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMed
15.
go back to reference Mathias S, Nayak U, Isaacs M (1986) Balance in elderly patients: the ‘get-up and go-test’. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67:387–389PubMed Mathias S, Nayak U, Isaacs M (1986) Balance in elderly patients: the ‘get-up and go-test’. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67:387–389PubMed
16.
go back to reference Taylor LJ, Singh G, Schneider M (2005) Outcome with a tapered, polished, anatomic stem. In: Breusch SJ, Malchau H (eds) The well-cemented total hip arhroplasty: theory and practice. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 242–248CrossRef Taylor LJ, Singh G, Schneider M (2005) Outcome with a tapered, polished, anatomic stem. In: Breusch SJ, Malchau H (eds) The well-cemented total hip arhroplasty: theory and practice. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 242–248CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, Lawlor M, Humphreys P, O’Brien S, Beverland D (2005) A minimal-incision tecnique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:701–710. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02645 CrossRefPubMed Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, Lawlor M, Humphreys P, O’Brien S, Beverland D (2005) A minimal-incision tecnique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:701–710. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​D.​02645 CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, Lannin JV, Schurman DJ (2004) Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:1353–1358PubMed Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, Lannin JV, Schurman DJ (2004) Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:1353–1358PubMed
22.
go back to reference Lingard EA, Sledge CB, Learmonth ID (2006) Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United Kingdom and Australia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1201–1207. doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00147 CrossRefPubMed Lingard EA, Sledge CB, Learmonth ID (2006) Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United Kingdom and Australia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1201–1207. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​E.​00147 CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Husted H, Hansen HC, Holm G, Bach-Dal C, Rud K, Andersen KL, Kehlet H (2006) Accelerated versus conventional hospital stay in total hip and knee arthroplasty III: patient satisfaction. Ugeskr Laeger 168(22):2148–2151PubMed Husted H, Hansen HC, Holm G, Bach-Dal C, Rud K, Andersen KL, Kehlet H (2006) Accelerated versus conventional hospital stay in total hip and knee arthroplasty III: patient satisfaction. Ugeskr Laeger 168(22):2148–2151PubMed
Metadata
Title
Predictive factors influencing fast track rehabilitation following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty
Authors
Michael Schneider
Ikuo Kawahara
Gail Ballantyne
Christine McAuley
Karen MacGregor
Ruth Garvie
Alistair McKenzie
Deborah MacDonald
Steffen J. Breusch
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 12/2009
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0825-9

Other articles of this Issue 12/2009

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 12/2009 Go to the issue