Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 5/2004

01-06-2004 | Original Article

Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years’ follow-up

Authors: Alexander Schuh, Stefanie Werber, Ulrich Holzwarth, Günther Zeiler

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 5/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

As primary total hip replacements (THRs) become more common in older patients and younger, physically active patients, the number of revision arthroplasties will also increase. Femoral bone loss, joint instability and possible infections are a challenge for a surgeon performing revision arthroplasty of the hip. The severe proximal femoral bone loss indicates the use of revision stems with a distal fixation.

Materials and methods

In this study the clinical and radiological outcomes of 79 cementless stem revisions using the MRP Titan Revision Stem with an average follow-up time of 4 years were prospectively examined.

Results

The Harris Hip Score improved from preoperative 50.8±25.2 to postoperative 86.8±13.2. In all cases healing of bony defects could be found. For stem diameters larger than 17 mm, atrophy of the proximal femur and non-progressive radiolucent lines in zones 1 and 7 according to Gruen were detected. No disadvantages or complications of the Morse taper junctions were observed, and no osteolysis was detected in this region. Primary stable fixation was achieved in all but two cases. Three cases were revised again due to periprosthetic fracture (1) and persisting infection (2).

Conclusion

Given the encouraging results with the MRP Titan Revision Stem, the principle of uncemented diaphyseal fixation appears to solve most of the technical problems in cases of significant bone loss and obviously offers good preconditions for bony restoration.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barrack RL, Burke DW, Cook SD, Skinner HB, Harris WH (1993) Complications related to modularity of total hip components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:688–692PubMed Barrack RL, Burke DW, Cook SD, Skinner HB, Harris WH (1993) Complications related to modularity of total hip components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:688–692PubMed
2.
go back to reference Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip arthroplasty. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632PubMed Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip arthroplasty. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632PubMed
3.
go back to reference Cameron HU (1994) The two- to six-year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions. Clin Orthop 298:47–53PubMed Cameron HU (1994) The two- to six-year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions. Clin Orthop 298:47–53PubMed
4.
go back to reference Cameron HU (2001) Modular shafts in hip prosthesis revision surgery. Orthopäde 30:287–293 Cameron HU (2001) Modular shafts in hip prosthesis revision surgery. Orthopäde 30:287–293
5.
go back to reference Chandler H, Clark J, Murphy S et al (1994) Reconstruction of major segmental loss of the proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 298:67–74PubMed Chandler H, Clark J, Murphy S et al (1994) Reconstruction of major segmental loss of the proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 298:67–74PubMed
6.
go back to reference Chandler HP, Ayres DK, Tan RC, Anderson LC, Vanna AK (1995) Revision total hip replacement using the S-ROM femoral component. Clin Orthop 319:130–140PubMed Chandler HP, Ayres DK, Tan RC, Anderson LC, Vanna AK (1995) Revision total hip replacement using the S-ROM femoral component. Clin Orthop 319:130–140PubMed
7.
go back to reference Christie MJ, DeBoer DK, Tingstad EM et al (2000) Clinical experience with a modular noncemented femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty: 4- to 7-year results. J Arthroplasty 15:840–848 Christie MJ, DeBoer DK, Tingstad EM et al (2000) Clinical experience with a modular noncemented femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty: 4- to 7-year results. J Arthroplasty 15:840–848
8.
go back to reference Collier JP, Mayor MB, Williams IR et al (1995) The tradeoffs associated with modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop 311:91–101PubMed Collier JP, Mayor MB, Williams IR et al (1995) The tradeoffs associated with modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop 311:91–101PubMed
9.
go back to reference Crawford SA, Siney PD, Wroblewski BM (2000) Revision of failed total hip arthroplasty with a proximal femoral modular cemented stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:684–688CrossRefPubMed Crawford SA, Siney PD, Wroblewski BM (2000) Revision of failed total hip arthroplasty with a proximal femoral modular cemented stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:684–688CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Engh CA, Glassman AH, Griffin WL, Mayer JG (1988) Results of cementless revision for failed cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 235:91–110PubMed Engh CA, Glassman AH, Griffin WL, Mayer JG (1988) Results of cementless revision for failed cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 235:91–110PubMed
11.
go back to reference Gilbert JL, Buckley CA, Jacobs JJ (1993) In vivo corrosion of modular hip prosthesis components in mixed and similar metal combinations. The effect of crevice, stress, motion, and alloy coupling. J Biomed Mater Res 27:1533–1544PubMed Gilbert JL, Buckley CA, Jacobs JJ (1993) In vivo corrosion of modular hip prosthesis components in mixed and similar metal combinations. The effect of crevice, stress, motion, and alloy coupling. J Biomed Mater Res 27:1533–1544PubMed
12.
go back to reference Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) Modes of failure of cemented stemtype femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17–27PubMed Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) Modes of failure of cemented stemtype femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17–27PubMed
13.
go back to reference Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755PubMed Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755PubMed
14.
go back to reference McKellop HA, Sarmiento A, Brien W, Park SH (1992) Interface corrosion of a modular head total hip prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 7:291–294 McKellop HA, Sarmiento A, Brien W, Park SH (1992) Interface corrosion of a modular head total hip prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 7:291–294
15.
go back to reference Paprosky WG, Lawrence WJ, Cameron H (1990) Femoral defect classification: clinical application. Orthop Rev [Suppl] 19:9–16 Paprosky WG, Lawrence WJ, Cameron H (1990) Femoral defect classification: clinical application. Orthop Rev [Suppl] 19:9–16
16.
go back to reference Schramm M, Wirtz DC, Holzwarth U, Pitto RP (2000) The morse taper junction in modular revision hip replacement—a biomechanical and retrieval analysis. Biomed Tech (Berl) 45:105–109 Schramm M, Wirtz DC, Holzwarth U, Pitto RP (2000) The morse taper junction in modular revision hip replacement—a biomechanical and retrieval analysis. Biomed Tech (Berl) 45:105–109
17.
go back to reference Smith JA, Dunn HK, Manaster BJ (1997) Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty. 2- to 5-year results with a modular titanium alloy stem. J Arthroplasty 12:194–201PubMed Smith JA, Dunn HK, Manaster BJ (1997) Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty. 2- to 5-year results with a modular titanium alloy stem. J Arthroplasty 12:194–201PubMed
18.
go back to reference Wagner H (1997) Hip prosthesis revision with non-cemented femoral revision stem—10 years experience. Med Orth Tech 117:138–148 Wagner H (1997) Hip prosthesis revision with non-cemented femoral revision stem—10 years experience. Med Orth Tech 117:138–148
19.
go back to reference Wirtz DC, Heller KD, Holzwarth U et al (2000) A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthop 24:134–138CrossRefPubMed Wirtz DC, Heller KD, Holzwarth U et al (2000) A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthop 24:134–138CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Zeiler G (2001) Revisionsarthroplastik des Hüftgelenkes unter Verwendung der Modularen-Revisions-Prothese (MRP-Titan). In: Perka C, Zippel H (eds) Revisionsendoprothetik des Hüftgelenkes. Einhorn-Presse Verlag, Frankfurt, pp 185–192 Zeiler G (2001) Revisionsarthroplastik des Hüftgelenkes unter Verwendung der Modularen-Revisions-Prothese (MRP-Titan). In: Perka C, Zippel H (eds) Revisionsendoprothetik des Hüftgelenkes. Einhorn-Presse Verlag, Frankfurt, pp 185–192
Metadata
Title
Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years’ follow-up
Authors
Alexander Schuh
Stefanie Werber
Ulrich Holzwarth
Günther Zeiler
Publication date
01-06-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 5/2004
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0656-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2004

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 5/2004 Go to the issue