Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 12/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Article

A comparison of laparoscopic and open D3 lymphadenectomy for transverse colon cancer

Authors: Han Deok Kwak, Jae Kyun Ju, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Young Jin Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The type of surgery or surgical approach for transverse colon cancer treatment largely depends on the tumor location or surgeon’s preference. However, extensive lymphadenectomy appears to improve the long-term outcomes of locally advanced colon cancers. This study was designed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes after surgery via the laparoscopic or open approach with radical D3 lymph node dissection in patients with stage II and III transverse colon cancer.

Methods

Patients were treated for stage II and III transverse colon cancer between May 2006 and December 2014. This retrospective study evaluated data collected prospectively at a tertiary teaching hospital. Radical D3 lymphadenectomy included the principal middle colic artery nodes.

Results

The study included 144 patients among whom 118 (81.9%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. Significantly more patients in the laparoscopic group underwent extended right hemicolectomy compared with the open group (90.7 vs. 65.4%, p = 0.005). The operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group (151.3 vs. 131.2 min, p = 0.021), and the open group had a greater estimated blood loss volume (160.8 vs. 289.3 ml, p = 0.011). Although the groups differed in terms of tumor size (5.8 vs 7.9 cm, p = 0.007), other pathologic outcomes did not differ. The groups did not differ regarding postoperative parameters or disease-free, overall, and cancer-specific survivals.

Conclusion

Despite differences in surgical methods and related factors, no long-term differences in outcomes were observed between laparoscopic and open approaches to radical D3 lymphadenectomy in patients with stage II and III transverse colon cancer.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer J (2008) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treat Rev 34:498–504CrossRefPubMed Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer J (2008) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treat Rev 34:498–504CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation–technical notes and outcome. Color Dis 11:354–364CrossRef Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation–technical notes and outcome. Color Dis 11:354–364CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Heald R (1995) Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer: a Scandinavian consensus. Brit J Surg 82:1297–1299CrossRefPubMed Heald R (1995) Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer: a Scandinavian consensus. Brit J Surg 82:1297–1299CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y, Tanaka S, Ito Y, Ajioka Y, Hamaguchi T, Hyodo I, Igarashi M, Ishida H (2015) Japanese Society for cancer of the colon and rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 20:207–239CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y, Tanaka S, Ito Y, Ajioka Y, Hamaguchi T, Hyodo I, Igarashi M, Ishida H (2015) Japanese Society for cancer of the colon and rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 20:207–239CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference West NP, Kobayashi H, Takahashi K, Perrakis A, Weber K, Hohenberger W, Sugihara K, Quirke P (2012) Understanding optimal colonic cancer surgery: comparison of Japanese D3 resection and European complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation. J Clin Oncol 30:1763–1769CrossRefPubMed West NP, Kobayashi H, Takahashi K, Perrakis A, Weber K, Hohenberger W, Sugihara K, Quirke P (2012) Understanding optimal colonic cancer surgery: comparison of Japanese D3 resection and European complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation. J Clin Oncol 30:1763–1769CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Group COoSTS (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004:2050–2059 Group COoSTS (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004:2050–2059
9.
go back to reference Group CCLoORS (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRef Group CCLoORS (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, Group mCT (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, Group mCT (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST study group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–664CrossRefPubMed Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST study group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–664CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC trial group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC trial group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, Frampton CM, Frizelle FA, Rieger NA, Smith JS, Solomon MJ, Stephens JH, Stevenson AR (2008) Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248:728–738CrossRefPubMed Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, Frampton CM, Frizelle FA, Rieger NA, Smith JS, Solomon MJ, Stephens JH, Stevenson AR (2008) Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248:728–738CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop W, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop W, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Jayne D, Thorpe H, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown J, Guillou P (2010) Five-year follow-up of the medical research council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Brit J Surg 97:1638–1645CrossRefPubMed Jayne D, Thorpe H, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown J, Guillou P (2010) Five-year follow-up of the medical research council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Brit J Surg 97:1638–1645CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, Mizusawa J, Etoh T, Konishi F, Sugihara K, Watanabe M, Moriya Y, Kitano S (2014) Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan clinical oncology group study JCOG 0404. Ann Surg 260:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000000499 CrossRefPubMed Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, Mizusawa J, Etoh T, Konishi F, Sugihara K, Watanabe M, Moriya Y, Kitano S (2014) Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan clinical oncology group study JCOG 0404. Ann Surg 260:23–30. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​sla.​0000000000000499​ CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sheng W, Zhang B, Chen W, Gu D, Gao W (2015) Laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer: comparative analysis of short-and long-term outcomes. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:16029PubMedPubMedCentral Sheng W, Zhang B, Chen W, Gu D, Gao W (2015) Laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer: comparative analysis of short-and long-term outcomes. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:16029PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Kim JW, Kim JY, Kang BM, Lee BH, Kim BC, Park JH (2016) Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery vs open surgery for transverse colon cancer: a retrospective multicenter study. Onco Targets Ther 9:2203CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim JW, Kim JY, Kang BM, Lee BH, Kim BC, Park JH (2016) Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery vs open surgery for transverse colon cancer: a retrospective multicenter study. Onco Targets Ther 9:2203CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Agarwal S, Gincherman M, Birnbaum E, Fleshman JW, Mutch M (2015) Comparison of long-term follow up of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for transverse colon cancer. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 28:296–299 Agarwal S, Gincherman M, Birnbaum E, Fleshman JW, Mutch M (2015) Comparison of long-term follow up of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for transverse colon cancer. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 28:296–299
Metadata
Title
A comparison of laparoscopic and open D3 lymphadenectomy for transverse colon cancer
Authors
Han Deok Kwak
Jae Kyun Ju
Soo Young Lee
Chang Hyun Kim
Young Jin Kim
Hyeong Rok Kim
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2890-9

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 12/2017 Go to the issue