Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 6/2017

01-06-2017 | Short Communication

A model for lymphocyte activation in open versus laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer patients in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols

Authors: Ana Belén Martínez, J. Longás, J. M. Ramírez

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Given the high mortality and morbidity associated with colon cancer worldwide and the advantages inherent to the use of the laparoscopy technique with respect to open surgery in oncological colorectal surgery, a study was designed to observe and compare the lymphocyte activation model between open surgery (OS) and laparoscopic surgery (LS) for this type of patient as part of an ERAS protocol.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted with 38 patients who underwent surgery due to colorectal disease and were included in an ERAS protocol. The patients were divided into two groups: G1 (patients who had undergone OS; n = 19) and G2 (patients who had undergone LS; n = 19). The lymphocyte activation model was studied at three times: immediately prior to surgery and on post-operative days 1 and 3 (POD0, POD1 and POD3).

Results

The Th lymphocyte activation markers studied (CD25, CD69, HLADR) exhibited a significantly higher mean value on POD0 for CD69 in OS than in LS (p = 0.037) and a significantly lower mean HLADR value on POD3 for OS than for LS (p = 0.040). No statistically significant differences were observed in either the evolution or in the mean values for the intracellular cytokines studied responsible for a Th1, Th2 or Th17 response. A Th1 response pattern was observed in both OS and LS.

Conclusions

The lymphocyte activation model in OS and LS is a Th1 response in both cases. The findings for the Th lymphocyte activation markers could indicate a better preserved immunity in LS with respect to OS.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Decker D, Schondorf M, Bidlingmaier F, Hirner A, von Ruecker AA (1996) Surgical stress induces a shift in the type-1/type-2 T-helper cell balance, suggesting downregulation of cell-mediated and up-regulation of antibody-mediated immunity commensurate to the trauma. Surgery 119(3):316–325CrossRefPubMed Decker D, Schondorf M, Bidlingmaier F, Hirner A, von Ruecker AA (1996) Surgical stress induces a shift in the type-1/type-2 T-helper cell balance, suggesting downregulation of cell-mediated and up-regulation of antibody-mediated immunity commensurate to the trauma. Surgery 119(3):316–325CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kuntz C, Kienle P, Schmeding M, Benner A, Autschbach F, Schwalbach P (2002) Comparison of laparoscopic versus conventional technique in colonic and liver resection in a tumor-bearing small animal model. Surg Endosc 16:1175–1181. doi:10.1007/s00464-001-9159-6 CrossRefPubMed Kuntz C, Kienle P, Schmeding M, Benner A, Autschbach F, Schwalbach P (2002) Comparison of laparoscopic versus conventional technique in colonic and liver resection in a tumor-bearing small animal model. Surg Endosc 16:1175–1181. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-001-9159-6 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Svendsen MN, Werther K, Christensen IJ et al (2005) Influence of open versus laparoscopically assisted colectomy on soluble vascular endothelial growth factor (sVEGF) and its soluble receptor 1 (sVEGFR1). Inflamm Res 54:458. doi:10.1007/s00011-005-1376-3 CrossRefPubMed Svendsen MN, Werther K, Christensen IJ et al (2005) Influence of open versus laparoscopically assisted colectomy on soluble vascular endothelial growth factor (sVEGF) and its soluble receptor 1 (sVEGFR1). Inflamm Res 54:458. doi:10.​1007/​s00011-005-1376-3 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A model for lymphocyte activation in open versus laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer patients in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols
Authors
Ana Belén Martínez
J. Longás
J. M. Ramírez
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2731-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 6/2017 Go to the issue