Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 8/2013

01-08-2013 | Review

Use of FDG-PET or PET/CT to detect recurrent colorectal cancer in patients with elevated CEA: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Yu-Yu Lu, Jin-Hua Chen, Chun-Ru Chien, William Tzu-Liang Chen, Shih-Chuan Tsai, Wan-Yu Lin, Chia-Hung Kao

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 8/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim

The purpose of the present study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature to assess the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET or PET/CT in the detection of recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC) rising in patients with elevated CEA.

Materials and methods

The authors conducted a systematic MEDLINE search of published articles. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of each study. We estimated pooled sensitivity and specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios, and summary receiver-operating characteristic curves in the detection of recurrent CRC in patients with elevated CEA.

Results

Eleven studies with a total of 510 patients met the inclusion criteria. One hundred and six patients (106/510 = 20.8 %) had true-negative FDG-PET (PET/CT) results in detection of recurrent CRC when rising CEA. The pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios of FDG-PET in the detection of tumor recurrence in CRC patients with elevated CEA were 90.3 % (95 % CI, 85.5–94.0 %), 80.0 % (95 % CI, 67.0–89.6 %), 2.88 (95 % CI, 1.37–6.07), and 0.12 (95 % CI, 0.07–0.20), respectively. The pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios of FDG-PET/CT in the detection of tumor recurrence in CRC patients with elevated CEA were 94.1 % (95 % CI, 89.4–97.1 %), 77.2 % (95 % CI, 66.4–85.9 %), 4.70 (95 % CI, 0.82–12.13), and 0.06 (95 % CI, 0.03–0.13), respectively.

Conclusions

Whole-body FDG-PET and PET/CT are valuable imaging tools for the assessment of patients with suspected CRC tumor recurrence based on the increase of CEA.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O et al (2011) Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin 61:212–236PubMedCrossRef Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O et al (2011) Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin 61:212–236PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Goldberg RM (2006) Intensive surveillance after stage II or III colorectal cancer: is it worth it? J Clin Oncol 24:330–331PubMedCrossRef Goldberg RM (2006) Intensive surveillance after stage II or III colorectal cancer: is it worth it? J Clin Oncol 24:330–331PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Obrand DI, Gordon PH (1997) Incidence and patterns of recurrence following curative resection of colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 40:15–24PubMedCrossRef Obrand DI, Gordon PH (1997) Incidence and patterns of recurrence following curative resection of colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 40:15–24PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vernava AM III, Longo WE, Virgo KS et al (1994) Current follow-up strategies after resection of colon cancer. Results of a survey of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 37:573–583PubMedCrossRef Vernava AM III, Longo WE, Virgo KS et al (1994) Current follow-up strategies after resection of colon cancer. Results of a survey of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 37:573–583PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Carriquiry LA, Pineyro A (1999) Should carcinoembryonic antigen be used in the management of patients with colorectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 42:921–929PubMedCrossRef Carriquiry LA, Pineyro A (1999) Should carcinoembryonic antigen be used in the management of patients with colorectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 42:921–929PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mitchell EP (1998) Role of carcinoembryonic antigen in the management of advanced colorectal cancer. Semin Oncol 25:12–20PubMed Mitchell EP (1998) Role of carcinoembryonic antigen in the management of advanced colorectal cancer. Semin Oncol 25:12–20PubMed
8.
go back to reference Moss AA (1989) Imaging of colorectal carcinoma. Radiology 170:308–310PubMed Moss AA (1989) Imaging of colorectal carcinoma. Radiology 170:308–310PubMed
9.
go back to reference Tempero M, Brand R, Holdeman K et al (1995) New imaging techniques in colorectal cancer. Semin Oncol 22:448–471PubMed Tempero M, Brand R, Holdeman K et al (1995) New imaging techniques in colorectal cancer. Semin Oncol 22:448–471PubMed
10.
go back to reference Ruhlmann J, Schomburg A, Bender H et al (1997) Fluorodeoxyglucose whole-body positron emission tomography in colorectal cancer patients studied in routine daily practice. Dis Colon Rectum 40:1195–1204PubMedCrossRef Ruhlmann J, Schomburg A, Bender H et al (1997) Fluorodeoxyglucose whole-body positron emission tomography in colorectal cancer patients studied in routine daily practice. Dis Colon Rectum 40:1195–1204PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Flanagan FL, Dehdashti F, Ogunbiyi OA et al (1998) Utility of FDG-PET for investigating unexplained plasma CEA elevation in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 227:319–323PubMedCrossRef Flanagan FL, Dehdashti F, Ogunbiyi OA et al (1998) Utility of FDG-PET for investigating unexplained plasma CEA elevation in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 227:319–323PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Flamen P, Stroobants S, Van Cutsem E et al (1999) Additional value of whole-body positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d glucose in recurrent colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:894–901PubMed Flamen P, Stroobants S, Van Cutsem E et al (1999) Additional value of whole-body positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d glucose in recurrent colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:894–901PubMed
13.
go back to reference Zervos EE, Badgwell BD, Burak WE Jr et al (2001) Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as an adjunct to carcinoembryonic antigen in the management of patients with presumed recurrent colorectal cancer and nondiagnostic radiologic workup. Surgery 130:636–643PubMedCrossRef Zervos EE, Badgwell BD, Burak WE Jr et al (2001) Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as an adjunct to carcinoembryonic antigen in the management of patients with presumed recurrent colorectal cancer and nondiagnostic radiologic workup. Surgery 130:636–643PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Simo M, Lomena F, Setoain J et al (2002) FDG-PET improves the management of patients with suspected recurrence of colorectal cancer. Nucl Med Commun 23:975–982PubMedCrossRef Simo M, Lomena F, Setoain J et al (2002) FDG-PET improves the management of patients with suspected recurrence of colorectal cancer. Nucl Med Commun 23:975–982PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Liu FY, Chen JS, Changchien CR et al (2005) Utility of 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in managing patients of colorectal cancer with unexplained carcinoembryonic antigen elevation at different levels. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1900–1912PubMedCrossRef Liu FY, Chen JS, Changchien CR et al (2005) Utility of 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in managing patients of colorectal cancer with unexplained carcinoembryonic antigen elevation at different levels. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1900–1912PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Maldonado A, Sancho F, Cerdan J et al (2000) FDG-PET in the detection of recurrence in colorectal cancer based on rising CEA level: experience in 72 patients. Clin Positron Imaging 3:170PubMedCrossRef Maldonado A, Sancho F, Cerdan J et al (2000) FDG-PET in the detection of recurrence in colorectal cancer based on rising CEA level: experience in 72 patients. Clin Positron Imaging 3:170PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kalff V, Hicks RJ, Ware RE et al (2002) The clinical impact of (18)F-FDG-PET in patients with suspected or confirmed recurrence of colorectal cancer: a prospective study. J Nucl Med 43:492–499PubMed Kalff V, Hicks RJ, Ware RE et al (2002) The clinical impact of (18)F-FDG-PET in patients with suspected or confirmed recurrence of colorectal cancer: a prospective study. J Nucl Med 43:492–499PubMed
18.
go back to reference Chen LB, Tong JL, Song HZ et al (2007) (18)FDG-PET/CT in detection of recurrence and metastasis of colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 13:5025–5029PubMed Chen LB, Tong JL, Song HZ et al (2007) (18)FDG-PET/CT in detection of recurrence and metastasis of colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 13:5025–5029PubMed
19.
go back to reference Chen YK, Yeh CL, Tsui CC et al (2011) F-18 FDG-PET for evaluation of bone marrow involvement in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med 36:553–559PubMedCrossRef Chen YK, Yeh CL, Tsui CC et al (2011) F-18 FDG-PET for evaluation of bone marrow involvement in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med 36:553–559PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Moses LE, Shapiro D, Littenberg B (1993) Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. Stat Med 12:1293–1316PubMedCrossRef Moses LE, Shapiro D, Littenberg B (1993) Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. Stat Med 12:1293–1316PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A et al (2006) Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol 6:31PubMedCrossRef Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A et al (2006) Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol 6:31PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Imdahl A, Reinhardt MJ, Nitzsche EU et al (2000) Impact of 18F-FDG-positron emission tomography for decision making in colorectal cancer recurrences. Langenbecks Arch Surg 385:129–134PubMedCrossRef Imdahl A, Reinhardt MJ, Nitzsche EU et al (2000) Impact of 18F-FDG-positron emission tomography for decision making in colorectal cancer recurrences. Langenbecks Arch Surg 385:129–134PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Staib L, Schirrmeister H, Reske SN et al (2000) Is (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in recurrent colorectal cancer a contribution to surgical decision making? Am J Surg 180:1–5PubMedCrossRef Staib L, Schirrmeister H, Reske SN et al (2000) Is (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in recurrent colorectal cancer a contribution to surgical decision making? Am J Surg 180:1–5PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hung GU, Shiau YC, Tsai SC et al (2001) Value of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of recurrent colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 21:1375–1378PubMed Hung GU, Shiau YC, Tsai SC et al (2001) Value of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of recurrent colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 21:1375–1378PubMed
25.
go back to reference Imbriaco M, Akhurst T, Hilton S et al (2000) Whole-body FDG-PET in patients with recurrent colorectal carcinoma. A comparative study with CT. Clin Positron Imaging 3:107–114PubMedCrossRef Imbriaco M, Akhurst T, Hilton S et al (2000) Whole-body FDG-PET in patients with recurrent colorectal carcinoma. A comparative study with CT. Clin Positron Imaging 3:107–114PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Choi MY, Lee KM, Chung JK et al (2005) Correlation between serum CEA level and metabolic volume as determined by FDG-PET in postoperative patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Ann Nucl Med 19:123–129PubMedCrossRef Choi MY, Lee KM, Chung JK et al (2005) Correlation between serum CEA level and metabolic volume as determined by FDG-PET in postoperative patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Ann Nucl Med 19:123–129PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lee JH, Park SG, Jee KN et al (2010) Performance of FDG-PET/CT in postoperative colorectal cancer patients with a suspected recurrence and a normal CEA level. Nucl Med Commun 31:576–582PubMed Lee JH, Park SG, Jee KN et al (2010) Performance of FDG-PET/CT in postoperative colorectal cancer patients with a suspected recurrence and a normal CEA level. Nucl Med Commun 31:576–582PubMed
28.
go back to reference Sarikaya I, Bloomston M, Povoski SP et al (2007) FDG-PET scan in patients with clinically and/or radiologically suspicious colorectal cancer recurrence but normal CEA. World J Surg Oncol 5:64–71PubMedCrossRef Sarikaya I, Bloomston M, Povoski SP et al (2007) FDG-PET scan in patients with clinically and/or radiologically suspicious colorectal cancer recurrence but normal CEA. World J Surg Oncol 5:64–71PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Flamen P, Hoekstra OS, Homans F et al (2001) Unexplained rising carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the postoperative surveillance of colorectal cancer: the utility of positron emission tomography (PET). Eur J Cancer 37:862–869PubMedCrossRef Flamen P, Hoekstra OS, Homans F et al (2001) Unexplained rising carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the postoperative surveillance of colorectal cancer: the utility of positron emission tomography (PET). Eur J Cancer 37:862–869PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Libutti SK, Alexander HR Jr, Choyke P et al (2001) A prospective study of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose/positron emission tomography scan, 99mTc-labeled arcitumomab (CEA-scan), and blind second-look laparotomy for detecting colon cancer recurrence in patients with increasing carcinoembryonic antigen levels. Ann Surg Oncol 8:779–786PubMedCrossRef Libutti SK, Alexander HR Jr, Choyke P et al (2001) A prospective study of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose/positron emission tomography scan, 99mTc-labeled arcitumomab (CEA-scan), and blind second-look laparotomy for detecting colon cancer recurrence in patients with increasing carcinoembryonic antigen levels. Ann Surg Oncol 8:779–786PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Shen YY, Liang JA, Chen YK et al (2006) Clinical impact of 18F-FDG-PET in the suspicion of recurrent colorectal cancer based on asymptomatically elevated serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in Taiwan. Hepatogastroenterology 53:348–350PubMed Shen YY, Liang JA, Chen YK et al (2006) Clinical impact of 18F-FDG-PET in the suspicion of recurrent colorectal cancer based on asymptomatically elevated serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in Taiwan. Hepatogastroenterology 53:348–350PubMed
32.
go back to reference Kyoto Y, Momose M, Kondo C et al (2010) Ability of 18F-FDG-PET/CT to diagnose recurrent colorectal cancer in patients with elevated CEA concentrations. Ann Nucl Med 24:395–401PubMedCrossRef Kyoto Y, Momose M, Kondo C et al (2010) Ability of 18F-FDG-PET/CT to diagnose recurrent colorectal cancer in patients with elevated CEA concentrations. Ann Nucl Med 24:395–401PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Metser U, You J, McSweeney S et al (2010) Assessment of tumor recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen level: FDG-PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT of the chest and abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:766–771PubMedCrossRef Metser U, You J, McSweeney S et al (2010) Assessment of tumor recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen level: FDG-PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT of the chest and abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:766–771PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Mittal BR, Senthil R, Kashyap R et al (2011) 18F-FDG-PET-CT in evaluation of postoperative colorectal cancer patients with rising CEA level. Nucl Med Commun 32:789–793PubMedCrossRef Mittal BR, Senthil R, Kashyap R et al (2011) 18F-FDG-PET-CT in evaluation of postoperative colorectal cancer patients with rising CEA level. Nucl Med Commun 32:789–793PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Ozkan E, Soydal C, Araz M et al (2012) The role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence in patients with elevated CEA levels. Nucl Med Commun 33:395–402PubMedCrossRef Ozkan E, Soydal C, Araz M et al (2012) The role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence in patients with elevated CEA levels. Nucl Med Commun 33:395–402PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Sanli Y, Kuyumcu S, Ozkan ZG, et al. (2012) The utility of FDG-PET/CT as an effective tool for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer regardless of serum CEA levels. Ann Nucl Med 26:551–558 Sanli Y, Kuyumcu S, Ozkan ZG, et al. (2012) The utility of FDG-PET/CT as an effective tool for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer regardless of serum CEA levels. Ann Nucl Med 26:551–558
Metadata
Title
Use of FDG-PET or PET/CT to detect recurrent colorectal cancer in patients with elevated CEA: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Yu-Yu Lu
Jin-Hua Chen
Chun-Ru Chien
William Tzu-Liang Chen
Shih-Chuan Tsai
Wan-Yu Lin
Chia-Hung Kao
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 8/2013
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-013-1659-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2013

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 8/2013 Go to the issue