Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 11/2010

01-11-2010 | Original Article

An enhanced recovery programme reduces length of stay after rectal surgery

Authors: Graham Branagan, Lynn Richardson, Archana Shetty, Helen S. Chave

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 11/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Enhanced Recovery Programmes (ERP) result in shorter hospital stay after colonic resection with no increase in complication, mortality or readmission rates. There is little data regarding the use of an ERP after rectal resection. We investigated the effect of introducing laparoscopic surgery and the ERP on outcomes in our unit.

Methods

From February 2007, elective patients undergoing rectal resection (laparoscopic or open) under the care of two colorectal surgeons were placed into the ERP. Length of stay (LOS) was recorded as total LOS, including readmissions. Comparison was made with a cohort of patients from 2004–2005 before the onset of laparoscopic surgery/ERP.

Results

Forty patients in the ERP group were compared with 42 patients from 2004–2005. Morbidity and mortality rates were similar. LOS was shorter in the ERP group cf. the retrospective group (median 7 days vs. 11 days; p = 0.002). Median LOS was shorter in both laparoscopic ERP patients (6 days cf. 11 days; p = 0.004) and open ERP patients (7 days cf. 11 days; p = 0.014) cf. the retrospective group.

Conclusion

Patients having rectal resections benefit from a multimodal approach to surgery with significant reductions in LOS, but no change in morbidity or mortality.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Andersen J, Hjort-Jakobsen D, Christiansen PS, Kehlet H (2007) Readmission rates after a planned hospital stay of 2 versus 3 days in fast-track colonic surgery. Br J Surg 94(7):890–893CrossRefPubMed Andersen J, Hjort-Jakobsen D, Christiansen PS, Kehlet H (2007) Readmission rates after a planned hospital stay of 2 versus 3 days in fast-track colonic surgery. Br J Surg 94(7):890–893CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A, Xynos E, Tekkis PP (2009) Fast-track vs. standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(10):1119–1131, Epub 2009 May 5CrossRefPubMed Gouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A, Xynos E, Tekkis PP (2009) Fast-track vs. standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(10):1119–1131, Epub 2009 May 5CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Spatz H, Zülke C, Beham A, Agha A, Bolder U, Krenz D, Fürst A, Lattermann R, Gröppner G, Hemmerich B, Piso P, Schlitt H (2006) “Fast track” for laparoscopic assisted rectum resection—what can be achieved? First results of a feasibility study. Zentralbl Chir 131(5):383–387, GermanCrossRefPubMed Spatz H, Zülke C, Beham A, Agha A, Bolder U, Krenz D, Fürst A, Lattermann R, Gröppner G, Hemmerich B, Piso P, Schlitt H (2006) “Fast track” for laparoscopic assisted rectum resection—what can be achieved? First results of a feasibility study. Zentralbl Chir 131(5):383–387, GermanCrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schwenk W, Neudecker J, Raue W, Haase O, Müller JM (2006) “Fast-track” rehabilitation after rectal cancer resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 21(6):547–553, Epub 2005 Nov 9CrossRefPubMed Schwenk W, Neudecker J, Raue W, Haase O, Müller JM (2006) “Fast-track” rehabilitation after rectal cancer resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 21(6):547–553, Epub 2005 Nov 9CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lindsetmo RO, Champagne B, Delaney CP (2009) Laparoscopic rectal resections and fast-track surgery: what can be expected? Am J Surg 197(3):408–412CrossRefPubMed Lindsetmo RO, Champagne B, Delaney CP (2009) Laparoscopic rectal resections and fast-track surgery: what can be expected? Am J Surg 197(3):408–412CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484, 7CrossRefPubMed Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484, 7CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P, Darzi AW, Heriot AG (2006) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 13(3):413–424, Epub 2006 Feb 1CrossRefPubMed Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P, Darzi AW, Heriot AG (2006) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 13(3):413–424, Epub 2006 Feb 1CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Yamamoto S, Fukunaga M, Miyajima N, Okuda J, Konishi F (2009) Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Impact of conversion on surgical outcomes after laparoscopic operation for rectal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 1, 073 patients. J Am Coll Surg 208(3):383–389CrossRefPubMed Yamamoto S, Fukunaga M, Miyajima N, Okuda J, Konishi F (2009) Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Impact of conversion on surgical outcomes after laparoscopic operation for rectal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 1, 073 patients. J Am Coll Surg 208(3):383–389CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Agha A, Fürst A, Iesalnieks I, Fichtner-Feigl S, Ghali N, Krenz D, Anthuber M, Jauch KW, Piso P, Schlitt HJ (2008) Conversion rate in 300 laparoscopic rectal resections and its influence on morbidity and oncological outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis 23(4):409–417CrossRefPubMed Agha A, Fürst A, Iesalnieks I, Fichtner-Feigl S, Ghali N, Krenz D, Anthuber M, Jauch KW, Piso P, Schlitt HJ (2008) Conversion rate in 300 laparoscopic rectal resections and its influence on morbidity and oncological outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis 23(4):409–417CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Andersen J, Kessels AG, Revhaug A, Kehlet H, Ljungqvist O, Fearon KC, von Meyenfeldt MF (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94(2):224–231CrossRefPubMed Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Andersen J, Kessels AG, Revhaug A, Kehlet H, Ljungqvist O, Fearon KC, von Meyenfeldt MF (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94(2):224–231CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
An enhanced recovery programme reduces length of stay after rectal surgery
Authors
Graham Branagan
Lynn Richardson
Archana Shetty
Helen S. Chave
Publication date
01-11-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 11/2010
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1032-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2010

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 11/2010 Go to the issue