Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2009

01-03-2009 | Original Article

Lymph node examination as a predictor of long-term outcome in Dukes B colon cancer

Authors: Ryash Vather, Tarik Sammour, Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari, Patricia Metcalf, Andrew Connolly, Andrew Hill

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Mortality from cancer recurrence in Dukes B patients is approximately 25–30%. Outcome in Dukes B patients improves in direct relation to the number of lymph nodes examined. Examining fewer lymph nodes risks understaging and also such patients are less likely to receive chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the number of lymph nodes examined on recurrence and mortality in Dukes B colon cancers.

Materials and methods

A retrospective database was constructed of 328 consecutive patients who underwent resection for Dukes B colorectal cancer between January 1993 and December 2001 at Middlemore Hospital. Patients with incomplete data, previous colorectal cancer, or perioperative deaths were excluded as were cases of rectal cancer. Data for the remaining 216 patients was subjected to multivariate and logistic regression analysis with ‘patient death’ or ‘cancer recurrence’ (CRec5) within 5 years as endpoints. A graph was constructed depicting CRec5 as broken down by lymph node strata. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for mortality and CRec5.

Results

The mean number of lymph nodes examined was 16.0 (median 14; range 2–48). The mean number of lymph nodes examined in those who died within 5 years was 12.8 vs. 17.5 in those who remained alive (p = 0.0027). The mean number of lymph nodes examined in those with evidence of recurrence within 5 years was 11.8 vs. 17.1 in those without recurrence (p = 0.0007). Analysis at various lymph node strata showed a sharp and statistically significant drop in the recurrence rate after the 16the node mark. The ROC curve for CRec5 showed that examination of 12 lymph nodes provided maximum sensitivity (0.60) and specificity (0.64).

Conclusion

Examination of more than 16 lymph nodes is associated with a significant reduction in cancer recurrence. This supports the current clinical practice of harvesting and analysing as many nodes as possible during surgical resection and pathological analysis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schottenfeld D, Winawer SJ (1996) Cancers of the large intestine. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, Second edition. Oxford University Press, New York Schottenfeld D, Winawer SJ (1996) Cancers of the large intestine. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, Second edition. Oxford University Press, New York
2.
go back to reference Compton CC, Fielding LP, Burgart LJ, Conley B, Cooper HS, Hamilton SR, Hammond ME, Henson DE, Hutter RV, Nagle RB, Nielsen ML, Sargent DJ, Taylor CR, Welton M, Willett C (2000) Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer: College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:979–994PubMed Compton CC, Fielding LP, Burgart LJ, Conley B, Cooper HS, Hamilton SR, Hammond ME, Henson DE, Hutter RV, Nagle RB, Nielsen ML, Sargent DJ, Taylor CR, Welton M, Willett C (2000) Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer: College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:979–994PubMed
3.
go back to reference Figueredo A, Fine S, Maroun J, Walker-Dilks C, Wong S (1997) Adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer after complete resection. Cancer Prev Control 1(4):304–319PubMed Figueredo A, Fine S, Maroun J, Walker-Dilks C, Wong S (1997) Adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer after complete resection. Cancer Prev Control 1(4):304–319PubMed
4.
go back to reference Wang Y, Jatkoe T, Zhang Y, Mutch MG, Talantov D, Jiang J, McLeod HL, Atkins D (2004) Gene expression profiles and molecular markers to predict recurrence of Dukes’ B colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:1564–1571PubMedCrossRef Wang Y, Jatkoe T, Zhang Y, Mutch MG, Talantov D, Jiang J, McLeod HL, Atkins D (2004) Gene expression profiles and molecular markers to predict recurrence of Dukes’ B colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:1564–1571PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Goldstein NS, Sanford W, Coffey M, Layfield LJ (1996) Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered. Am J Clin Pathol 106:209–216PubMed Goldstein NS, Sanford W, Coffey M, Layfield LJ (1996) Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered. Am J Clin Pathol 106:209–216PubMed
6.
go back to reference Hernanz F, Revuelta S, Redondo C, Madrazo C, Castillo J, Gomez-Fleitas M (1994) Colorectal adenocarcinoma: quality of the assessment of lymph node metastases. Dis Colon Rectum 37:373–377PubMedCrossRef Hernanz F, Revuelta S, Redondo C, Madrazo C, Castillo J, Gomez-Fleitas M (1994) Colorectal adenocarcinoma: quality of the assessment of lymph node metastases. Dis Colon Rectum 37:373–377PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, Bland KI (2003) The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol 10:65–71PubMedCrossRef Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, Bland KI (2003) The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol 10:65–71PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wong JH, Severino R, Honnebier MB, Tom P, Namiki TS (1999) Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 17:2896–2900PubMed Wong JH, Severino R, Honnebier MB, Tom P, Namiki TS (1999) Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 17:2896–2900PubMed
9.
go back to reference Census of population and dwellings, Statistics New Zealand Census of population and dwellings, Statistics New Zealand
10.
go back to reference SAS Institute Inc (2004) SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC SAS Institute Inc (2004) SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC
11.
go back to reference Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36PubMed Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36PubMed
12.
go back to reference Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA (2007) Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(6):433–441PubMedCrossRef Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA (2007) Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(6):433–441PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wong S, Ji H, Hollenbeck B, Morris A, Baser O (2007) Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer. JAMA 298(18):2149–2154PubMedCrossRef Wong S, Ji H, Hollenbeck B, Morris A, Baser O (2007) Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer. JAMA 298(18):2149–2154PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fielding LP, Arsenault PA, Chapuis PH, Dent O, Gathright B, Hardcastle JD, Hermanek P, Jass JR, Newland RC (1991) Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: an International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT). J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:325–344PubMedCrossRef Fielding LP, Arsenault PA, Chapuis PH, Dent O, Gathright B, Hardcastle JD, Hermanek P, Jass JR, Newland RC (1991) Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: an International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT). J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:325–344PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Baxter NN, Virnig DJ, Rothenberger DA, Morris AM, Jessurun J, Virnig BA (2005) Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(3):219–225PubMedCrossRef Baxter NN, Virnig DJ, Rothenberger DA, Morris AM, Jessurun J, Virnig BA (2005) Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(3):219–225PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wright FC, Law CH, Last L, Khalifa M, Arnaout A, Naseer Z, Klar N, Gallinger S, Smith AJ (2003) Lymph node retrieval and assessment in stage II colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 10:903–909PubMedCrossRef Wright FC, Law CH, Last L, Khalifa M, Arnaout A, Naseer Z, Klar N, Gallinger S, Smith AJ (2003) Lymph node retrieval and assessment in stage II colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 10:903–909PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Goldstein NS (2002) Lymph node recoveries from 2427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol 26:179–189PubMedCrossRef Goldstein NS (2002) Lymph node recoveries from 2427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol 26:179–189PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Evans MD, Barton K, Rees A, Stamatakis JD, Karandikar SS (2008) The impact of surgeon and pathologist on lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer and its impact on survival for patients with Dukes’ stage B disease. Colorectal Dis 10(2):157–164PubMed Evans MD, Barton K, Rees A, Stamatakis JD, Karandikar SS (2008) The impact of surgeon and pathologist on lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer and its impact on survival for patients with Dukes’ stage B disease. Colorectal Dis 10(2):157–164PubMed
Metadata
Title
Lymph node examination as a predictor of long-term outcome in Dukes B colon cancer
Authors
Ryash Vather
Tarik Sammour
Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari
Patricia Metcalf
Andrew Connolly
Andrew Hill
Publication date
01-03-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-008-0540-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2009 Go to the issue