Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2005

01-01-2005 | Original Article

Dynamic graciloplasty for total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection for rectal tumour

Authors: K. S. Ho, F. Seow-Choen

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 1/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim

To review the results of dynamic graciloplasty for total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer.

Patients and methods

Chart reviews were done on 17 patients who had dynamic graciloplasty following abdominoperineal resection and details of post-operative complications, bowel functions and recurrences were obtained.

Results

Seventeen patients (12 males) had dynamic graciloplasty after APR for low rectal tumours. The median age was 58.5 years (range 33–78). Three patients from overseas were lost to follow-up, and three still have not had the defunctioning stoma closed. Only 11 patients were available for evaluation of function. The median time from graciloplasty to continence to solids and liquids is 15.7 months (range 0.4–21.9 months). Six patients had defecatory problems, requiring daily irrigation to evacuate. Nine patients were continent without need for gracilis stimulation. Only two patients needed gracilis stimulation to maintain continence. Fifty percent of rectal carcinoma patients had developed a recurrence.

Conclusion

Dynamic graciloplasty had a high morbidity and did not always bring about normal defecatory function. Gracilis stimulation was not needed to achieve continence in all cases. Conversely, dynamic graciloplasty may lead to defecatory difficulties in a large number of patients. Graciloplasty should only be considered three years after the initial APR to avoid performing the procedure in a patient who may develop recurrence as well as to select patients who are psychologically prepared for the surgery and its complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cavina E, Seccia M, Banti P, Zocco G (1998) Anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection. Experience with double-wrap graciloplasty supported by low-frequency electrostimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1010–1016PubMed Cavina E, Seccia M, Banti P, Zocco G (1998) Anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection. Experience with double-wrap graciloplasty supported by low-frequency electrostimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1010–1016PubMed
2.
go back to reference Geerdes BP, Zoetmulder FA, Heineman E, Vos EJ, Rongen MJ, Baeten CG (1997) Total anorectal reconstruction with a double dynamic graciloplasty after abdominoperineal reconstruction for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 40:698–705PubMed Geerdes BP, Zoetmulder FA, Heineman E, Vos EJ, Rongen MJ, Baeten CG (1997) Total anorectal reconstruction with a double dynamic graciloplasty after abdominoperineal reconstruction for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 40:698–705PubMed
3.
go back to reference Rosen HR, Novi G, Zoech G, Feil W, Urbarz C, Schiessel R (1998) Restoration of anal sphincter function by single-stage dynamic graciloplasty with a modified (split sling) technique. Am J Surg 175:187–193CrossRefPubMed Rosen HR, Novi G, Zoech G, Feil W, Urbarz C, Schiessel R (1998) Restoration of anal sphincter function by single-stage dynamic graciloplasty with a modified (split sling) technique. Am J Surg 175:187–193CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Seccia M, Menconi C, Balestri R, Cavina E (1994) Study protocols and functional results in 86 electrostimulated graciloplasties. Dis Colon Rectum 37:897–904 Seccia M, Menconi C, Balestri R, Cavina E (1994) Study protocols and functional results in 86 electrostimulated graciloplasties. Dis Colon Rectum 37:897–904
5.
go back to reference Chapman AE, Geerdes B, Hewett P, Young J, Eyers T, Kiroff G et al (2002) Systematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 89:138–153CrossRefPubMed Chapman AE, Geerdes B, Hewett P, Young J, Eyers T, Kiroff G et al (2002) Systematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 89:138–153CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Pannarale OC, Memeo V (1997) Electrostimulated gracilis neosphincter for faecal incontinence and in total anorectal reconstruction: still an experimental procedure? Int J Colorectal Dis 12:308–312CrossRefPubMed Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Pannarale OC, Memeo V (1997) Electrostimulated gracilis neosphincter for faecal incontinence and in total anorectal reconstruction: still an experimental procedure? Int J Colorectal Dis 12:308–312CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cavina E (1996) Outcome of restorative perineal graciloplasty with simultaneous excision of the anus and rectum for cancer. A ten-year experience with 81 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:182–190PubMed Cavina E (1996) Outcome of restorative perineal graciloplasty with simultaneous excision of the anus and rectum for cancer. A ten-year experience with 81 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:182–190PubMed
8.
go back to reference Rongen MJ, Dekker FA, Geerdes BP, Heineman E, Baeten CG (1999) Secondary coloperineal pull-through and double dynamic graciloplasty after Miles resection—feasible, but with a high morbidity. Dis Colon Rectum 42:776–780; discussion 781PubMed Rongen MJ, Dekker FA, Geerdes BP, Heineman E, Baeten CG (1999) Secondary coloperineal pull-through and double dynamic graciloplasty after Miles resection—feasible, but with a high morbidity. Dis Colon Rectum 42:776–780; discussion 781PubMed
9.
go back to reference Rouanet P, Senesse P, Bouamrirene D, Toureille E, Veyrac M, Astre C et al (1999) Anal sphincter reconstruction by dynamic graciloplasty after abdominoperineal resection for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42:451–456PubMed Rouanet P, Senesse P, Bouamrirene D, Toureille E, Veyrac M, Astre C et al (1999) Anal sphincter reconstruction by dynamic graciloplasty after abdominoperineal resection for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42:451–456PubMed
10.
go back to reference Rullier E, ZerbibF, Laurent C, Caudry M, Saric J (2000) Morbidity and functional outcome after double dynamic graciloplasty for anorectal reconstruction. Br J Surg 87:909–913CrossRefPubMed Rullier E, ZerbibF, Laurent C, Caudry M, Saric J (2000) Morbidity and functional outcome after double dynamic graciloplasty for anorectal reconstruction. Br J Surg 87:909–913CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Beets-Tan RG (2003) MRI in rectal cancer: the T stage and circumferential resection margin. Colorectal Dis 5:392–395CrossRefPubMed Beets-Tan RG (2003) MRI in rectal cancer: the T stage and circumferential resection margin. Colorectal Dis 5:392–395CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL (2003) Rectal cancer: how accurate can imaging predict the T stage and the circumferential resection margin? Int J Colorectal Dis 18:385–391CrossRefPubMed Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL (2003) Rectal cancer: how accurate can imaging predict the T stage and the circumferential resection margin? Int J Colorectal Dis 18:385–391CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kraemer M, Wiratkapun S, Seow-Choen F, Ho YH, Eu KW, Nyam D (2001) Stratifying risk factors for follow-up: a comparison of recurrent and nonrecurrent colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 44:815–821PubMed Kraemer M, Wiratkapun S, Seow-Choen F, Ho YH, Eu KW, Nyam D (2001) Stratifying risk factors for follow-up: a comparison of recurrent and nonrecurrent colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 44:815–821PubMed
Metadata
Title
Dynamic graciloplasty for total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection for rectal tumour
Authors
K. S. Ho
F. Seow-Choen
Publication date
01-01-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 1/2005
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-004-0622-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2005

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2005 Go to the issue

Announcements

January 2005