Top

Pediatric Surgery International

Published in:

01-09-2015 | Original Article

Rectal suction biopsy for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and complications

Authors: Florian Friedmacher, Prem Puri

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 9/2015

Abstract

Purpose

Rectal suction biopsy (RSB) combined with acetylcholinesterase (AChE) staining is currently the gold standard for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease (HD). However, some pathologists are still reluctant to diagnose HD in RSBs as it requires thick submucosal tissue to confirm the absence of ganglion cells. Furthermore, insufficient specimens and adverse events have been reported. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy and incidence of complications of RSBs in patients suspected of HD based on a systematic review of the published literature.

Methods

A literature-based search for relevant publications was conducted using multiple online databases. Staining for AChE/hematoxylin and eosin should have been used to evaluate RSBs. The number of true-positive, false-positive, true-negative and false-negative results was recorded and data on RSB-related complications was extracted. Pooled incidence rates and odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using standardized statistical methodology.

Results

Fifty-eight studies met defined inclusion criteria, reporting a total of 14,053 RSBs. The median cohort size consisted of 72 patients (range 1–766) with a median age of 14.4 months (range 1 day–66 years) at time of biopsy. In 89.93 % (CI 89.11–90.70 %), RSB provided adequate tissue for the diagnosis of HD. Insufficient specimens were obtained in 10.07 % (CI 9.30–10.89 %) and in 8.46 % (CI 7.55–9.46 %) RSB was repeated. The incidence of HD was 19.13 % (CI 18.25–20.03 %). Mean sensitivity of RSB was 96.84 % (CI 95.57–97.47 %) and mean specificity was 99.42 % (CI 99.17–99.57 %). The overall complication rate was 0.65 % (CI 0.46–0.91 %) with persistent rectal bleeding requiring blood transfusion in 0.53 % (CI 0.36–0.77 %), bowel perforation in 0.06 % (CI 0.02–0.18 %) and pelvic sepsis in 0.06 % (CI 0.02–0.18 %). Complications were significantly more frequent in newborns and infants compared to older children (OR 9.00 [CI 4.75–17.07], p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

RSB combined with AChE staining is a simple, safe and accurate method for the diagnosis of HD. The risk for RSB-related complications is higher in newborns and infants.

Best KE, Addor MC, Arriola L et al (2014) Hirschsprung’s disease prevalence in Europe: a register based study. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 100(9):695–702CrossRefPubMed

Best KE, Glinianaia SV, Bythell M et al (2012) Hirschsprung’s disease in the North of England: prevalence, associated anomalies, and survival. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 94(6):477–480CrossRefPubMed

Martucciello G (2008) Hirschsprung’s disease, one of the most difficult diagnoses in pediatric surgery: a review of the problems from clinical practice to the bench. Eur J Pediatr Surg 18(3):140–149CrossRefPubMed

Barshack I, Fridman E, Goldberg I et al (2004) The loss of calretinin expression indicates aganglionosis in Hirschsprung’s disease. J Clin Pathol 57(7):712–716PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

Meier-Ruge W, Lutterbeck PM, Herzog B et al (1972) Acetylcholinesterase activity in suction biopsies of the rectum in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 7(1):11–17CrossRefPubMed

Dobbins WO 3rd, Bill AH Jr (1965) Diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease excluded by rectal suction biopsy. Engl J Med. 272(13):990–993CrossRef

Noblett HR (1969) A rectal suction biopsy tube for use in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 4(4):406–409CrossRefPubMed

Martucciello G, Pini Prato A, Puri P et al (2005) Controversies concerning diagnostic guidelines for anomalies of the enteric nervous system: a report from the fourth International Symposium on Hirschsprung’s disease and related neurocristopathies. J Pediatr Surg 40(10):1527–1531CrossRefPubMed

Qualman SJ, Jaffe R, Bove KE et al (1999) Diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease using the rectal biopsy: multi-institutional survey. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2(6):588–596CrossRefPubMed

10.

Knowles CH, De Giorgio R, Kapur RP et al (2010) The London Classification of gastrointestinal neuromuscular pathology: report on behalf of the Gastro 2009 International Working Group. Gut 59(7):882–887CrossRefPubMed

11.

Hall NJ, Kufeji D, Keshtgar A (2009) Out with the old and in with the new: a comparison of rectal suction biopsies with traditional and modern biopsy forceps. J Pediatr Surg 44(2):395–398CrossRefPubMed

12.

Rees BI, Azmy A, Nigam M et al (1983) Complications of rectal suction biopsy. J Pediatr Surg 18(3):273–275CrossRefPubMed

13.

Alizai NK, Batcup G, Dixon MF et al (1998) Rectal biopsy for Hirschsprung’s disease: what is the optimum method? Pediatr Surg Int 13(2–3):121–124CrossRefPubMed

14.

Campbell PE, Noblett HR (1969) Experience with rectal suction biopsy in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 4(4):410–415CrossRefPubMed

15.

Elema JD, de Vries JA, Vos LJ (1973) Intensity and proximal extension of acetylcholinesterase activity in the mucosa of the rectosigmoid in Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 8(3):361–368CrossRefPubMed

16.

Yunis EJ, Dibbins AW, Sherman FE (1976) Rectal suction biopsy in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease in infants. Arch Pathol Lab Med 100(6):329–333PubMed

17.

Weintraub WH, Heidelberger KP, Coran AG (1977) A simplified approach to diagnostic rectal biopsy in infants and children. Am J Surg 134(2):307–310CrossRefPubMed

18.

Chow CW, Chan WC, Yue PC (1977) Histochemical criteria for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease in rectal suction biopsies by acetylcholinesterase activity. J Pediatr Surg 12(5):675–680CrossRefPubMed

19.

Toorman J, Bots GT, Vio PM (1977) Acetylcholinesterase-activity in rectal mucosa of children with obstipation. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 376(2):159–164CrossRefPubMed

20.

Lake BD, Puri P, Nixon HH et al (1978) Hirschsprung’s disease: an appraisal of histochemically demonstrated acetylcholinesterase activity in suction rectal biopsy specimens as an aid to diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 102(5):244–247PubMed

21.

Almoyna CM, Claver M, Monereo J et al (1978) Histochemical criteria for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease in rectal suction biopsies by acetylcholinesterase activity. J Pediatr Surg 13(3):351–352CrossRefPubMed

22.

Andrassy RJ, Isaacs H, Weitzman JJ (1981) Rectal suction biopsy for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease. Ann Surg 193(4):419–424PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

23.

Huntley CC, Shaffner LD, Challa VR et al (1982) Histochemical diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease. Pediatrics 69(6):755–761PubMed

24.

Wakely PE Jr, McAdams AJ (1984) Acetylcholinesterase histochemistry and the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease: a 31/2-year experience. Pediatr Pathol. 2(1):35–46CrossRefPubMed

25.

Goto S, Ikeda K, Toyohara T (1984) Histochemical confirmation of the acetylcholinesterase-activity in rectal suction biopsy from neonates with Hirschsprung’s disease. Z Kinderchir 39(4):246–249PubMed

26.

Loening-Baucke V, Pringle KC, Ekwo EE (1985) Anorectal manometry for the exclusion of Hirschsprung’s disease in neonates. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 4(4):596–603CrossRefPubMed

27.

Barr LC, Booth J, Filipe MI et al (1985) Clinical evaluation of the histochemical diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease. Gut 26(4):393–399PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

28.

Polley TZ Jr, Coran AG, Heidelberger KP et al (1986) Suction rectal biopsy in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease and chronic constipation. Pediatr Surg Int 1(2):84–89CrossRef

29.

Kurer MH, Lawson JO, Pambakian H (1986) Suction biopsy in Hirschsprung’s disease. Arch Dis Child 61(1):83–84PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

30.

Yaxiong S, Chengren S (1986) Clinical evaluation of diagnostic methods for Hirschsprung’s disease. Pediatr Surg Int 1(4):218–222CrossRef

31.

Taxman TL, Yulish BS, Rothstein FC (1986) How useful is the barium enema in the diagnosis of infantile Hirschsprung’s disease? Am J Dis Child 140(9):881–884PubMed

32.

Wells FE, Addison GM (1986) Acetylcholinesterase activity in rectal biopsies: an assessment of its diagnostic value in Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 5(6):912–919CrossRefPubMed

33.

Bonham JR, Dale G, Scott DJ et al (1987) A 7-year study of the diagnostic value of rectal mucosal acetylcholinesterase measurement in Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 22(2):150–152CrossRefPubMed

34.

de Brito IA, Maksoud JG (1987) Evolution with age of the acetylcholinesterase activity in rectal suction biopsy in Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 22(5):425–430CrossRefPubMed

35.

Chen CL, Hsu HC, Chen CC et al (1987) Acetylcholinesterase activity in rectal suction biopsy for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease. Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi 86(7):723–727PubMed

36.

Jani BR, Brereton RJ, Dillon MJ (1989) Peripheral limb gangrene following rectal biopsy. Treatment with prostacyclin and exchange transfusion. Clin Pediatr 28(12):585–588CrossRef

37.

Athow AC, Filipe MI, Drake DP (1990) Problems and advantages of acetylcholinesterase histochemistry of rectal suction biopsies in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 25(5):520–526CrossRefPubMed

38.

Schofield DE, Devine W, Yunis EJ (1990) Acetylcholinesterase-stained suction rectal biopsies in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 11(2):221–228CrossRefPubMed

39.

Smith GHH, Cass D (1991) Infantile Hirschsprung’s disease—is barium enema useful? Pediatr Surg Int 6(4–5):318–321

40.

Park WH, Choi SO, Kwon KY et al (1992) Acetylcholinesterase histochemistry of rectal suction biopsies in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease. J Korean Med Sci 7(4):353–359PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

41.

Cusick EL, Buick RG (1995) Injury to the common iliac artery during suction rectal biopsy. J Pediatr Surg 30(1):111–112CrossRefPubMed

42.

Schmittenbecher PP, Schmidt A, Meier-Ruge W et al (1995) Rectal suction biopsy: can it be sufficient to diagnose neuronal intestinal dysplasia? Eur J Pediatr Surg 5(5):277–279CrossRefPubMed

43.

Freeman JK (1997) A new instrument for suction rectal biopsy in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease. Pediatr Surg Int 12(1):76–77CrossRefPubMed

44.

Ghosh A, Griffiths DM (1998) Rectal biopsy in the investigation of constipation. Arch Dis Child 79(3):266–268PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

45.

Pini Prato A, Martucciello G, Jasonni V (2001) Solo-RBT: a new instrument for rectal suction biopsies in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 36(9):1364–1366CrossRefPubMed

46.

Kobayashi H, Li Z, Yamataka A et al (2002) Rectal biopsy: what is the optimal procedure? Pediatr Surg Int 18(8):753–756PubMed

47.

Khan AR, Vujanic GM, Huddart S (2003) The constipated child: how likely is Hirschsprung’s disease? Pediatr Surg Int 19(6):439–442CrossRefPubMed

48.

De Lorijn F, Reitsma JB, Voskuijl WP et al (2005) Diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease: a prospective, comparative accuracy study of common tests. J Pediatr 146(6):787–792CrossRefPubMed

49.

Gugelmin ES, Torres LFB (2005) The accuracy of acetylcholinesterase reaction in rectal suction biopsy in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease. J Bras Pathol Med Lab. 4(6):431–436

50.

Pini-Prato A, Martucciello G, Jasonni V (2006) Rectal suction biopsy in the diagnosis of intestinal dysganglionoses: 5-year experience with Solo-RBT in 389 patients. J Pediatr Surg 41(6):1043–1048CrossRefPubMed

51.

Ali AE, Morecroft JA, Bowen JC et al (2006) Wall or machine suction rectal biopsy for Hirschsprung’s disease: a simple modified technique can improve the adequacy of biopsy. Pediatr Surg Int 22(8):681–682CrossRefPubMed

52.

Barlas M (2006) A new instrument for rectal suction biopsy in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease: triple rectal suction biopsy. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 11(4):253–254CrossRef

53.

Pini-Prato A, Avanzini S, Gentilino V et al (2007) Rectal suction biopsy in the workup of childhood chronic constipation: indications and diagnostic value. Pediatr Surg Int 23(2):117–122CrossRefPubMed

54.

Croffie JM, Davis MM, Faught PR et al (2007) At what age is a suction rectal biopsy less likely to provide adequate tissue for identification of ganglion cells? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 44(2):198–202CrossRefPubMed

55.

Santos MM, Tannuri U, Coelho MC (2008) Study of acetylcholinesterase activity in rectal suction biopsy for diagnosis of intestinal dysganglionoses: 17-year experience of a single center. Pediatr Surg Int 24(6):715–719CrossRefPubMed

56.

Montedonico S, Piotrowska AP, Rolle U et al (2008) Histochemical staining of rectal suction biopsies as the first investigation in patients with chronic constipation. Pediatr Surg Int 24(7):785–792CrossRefPubMed

57.

Rahman N, Chouhan J, Gould S et al (2010) Rectal biopsy for Hirschsprung’s disease–are we performing too many? Eur J Pediatr Surg 20(2):95–97CrossRefPubMed

58.

Noviello C, Cobellis G, Romano M et al (2010) Diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s Disease: an age-related approach in children below or above one year. Colorectal Dis 12(10):1044–1048CrossRefPubMed

59.

Pini-Prato A, Carlini C, Pesce F et al (2011) Massive bleeding after rectal suction biopsy: uncommon and unexpected delayed onset. World J Pediatr 7(1):83–85CrossRefPubMed

60.

Campeotto F, Barbet PJ, Kalach N et al (2011) Deeper rectal biopsies and better yield of neuronal structures with Scheye vs Noblett forceps–preliminary results. J Pediatr Surg 46(3):478–481CrossRefPubMed

61.

Skerritt C, Rees C, Lakhoo K (2011) Audit of adequacy of rectal suction biopsies using a new rectal biopsy gun. OJCA 3(2):1

62.

Hayes CE, Kawatu D, Mangray S et al (2012) Rectal suction biopsy to exclude the diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 55(3):268–271CrossRefPubMed

63.

Sharp NE, Pettiford-Cunningham J, Shah SR et al (2013) The prevalence of Hirschsprung disease in premature infants after suction rectal biopsy. J Surg Res 184(1):374–377CrossRefPubMed

64.

Dahshan A (2014) Serious rectal bleeding complicating suction rectal biopsy in a child. W V Med J 110(2):34–35PubMed

65.

de Lorijn F, Kremer LC, Reitsma JB et al (2006) Diagnostic tests in Hirschsprung disease: a systematic review. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 42(5):496–505CrossRefPubMed

66.

Lewis NA, Levitt MC, Zallen GS et al (2003) Diagnosing Hirschsprung’s disease: increasing the odds of a positive rectal biopsy result. J Pediatr Surg 38(3):412–416CrossRefPubMed

67.

Simpson BB, Ryan DP, Schnitzer JJ et al (1996) Surgical evaluation and management of refractory constipation in older children. J Pediatr Surg 31(8):1040–1042CrossRefPubMed

68.

Wheatley MJ, Wesley JR, Coran AG et al (1990) Hirschsprung’s disease in adolescents and adults. Dis Colon Rectum 33(7):622–629CrossRefPubMed

Title: Rectal suction biopsy for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and complications
Authors: Florian Friedmacher
Prem Puri
Publication date: 01-09-2015
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-015-3742-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Rectal suction biopsy for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and complications

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 9/2015

VACTERL association in anorectal malformation: effect on the outcome

Pancreatic tumours in children: diagnosis, treatment and outcome

The management of anorectal malformation with congenital vestibular fistula: a single-stage modified anterior sagittal anorectoplasty

Review of: “Children’s surgery a worldwide history” by John G. Raffensberger

Anorectal injuries in children: a 20-year experience in two centers

Intussusception patients older than 1 year tend to have early recurrence after pneumatic enema reduction