Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Pediatric Surgery International
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Original Article

Are paediatric operations evidence based? A prospective analysis of general surgery practice in a teaching paediatric hospital

Authors: Elke Zani-Ruttenstock, Augusto Zani, Emma Bullman, Eveline Lapidus-Krol, Agostino Pierro

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background/Aim

Paediatric surgical practice should be based upon solid scientific evidence. A study in 1998 (Baraldini et al., Pediatr Surg Int) indicated that only a quarter of paediatric operations were supported by the then gold standard of evidence based medicine (EBM) which was defined by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The aim of the current study was to re-evaluate paediatric surgical practice 16 years after the previous study in a larger cohort of patients.

Methods

A prospective observational study was performed in a tertiary level teaching hospital for children. The study was approved by the local research ethics board. All diagnostic and therapeutic procedures requiring a general anaesthetic carried out over a 4-week period (24 Feb 2014–22 Mar 2014) under the general surgery service or involving a general paediatric surgeon were included in the study. Pubmed and EMBASE were used to search in the literature for the highest level of evidence supporting the recorded procedures. Evidence was classified according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (OCEBM) 2009 system as well as according to the classification used by Baraldini et al. Results was compared using Χ 2 test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

During the study period, 126 operations (36 different types) were performed on 118 patients. According to the OCEBM classification, 62 procedures (49 %) were supported by systematic reviews of multiple homogeneous RCTs (level 1a), 13 (10 %) by individual RCTs (level 1b), 5 (4 %) by systematic reviews of cohort studies (level 2a), 11 (9 %) by individual cohort studies, 1 (1 %) by systematic review of case–control studies (level 3a), 14 (11 %) by case–control studies (level 3b), 9 (7 %) by case series (type 4) and 11 procedures (9 %) were based on expert opinion or deemed self-evident interventions (type 5). High level of evidence (OCEBM level 1a or 1b or level I according to Baraldini et al. PSI 1998) supported 75 (60 %) operations in the current study compared to 18 (26 %) in the study of 1998 (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The present study shows that nowadays a remarkable number of paediatric surgical procedures are supported by high level of evidence. Despite this improvement in evidence-based paediatric surgical practice, more than a third of the procedures still lack sufficient evidence-based literature support. More RCTs are warranted to support and direct paediatric surgery practice according to the principals of EBM.
Literature
1.
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 13:71–72CrossRef
2.
Baraldini V, Spitz L, Pierro A (1998) Evidence-based operations in paediatric surgery. Pediatr Surg Int 13:331–335CrossRefPubMed
3.
Hardin WD Jr, Stylianos S, Lally KP (1999) Evidence-based practice in pediatric surgery. J Pediatr Surg 34:908–912CrossRefPubMed
4.
Ostlie DJ, St Peter SD (2010) The current state of evidence-based pediatric surgery. J Pediatr Surg 45:1940–1946CrossRefPubMed
5.
Dingemann J, Ure BM (2013) Systematic review of level 1 evidence for laparoscopic pediatric surgery: do our procedures comply with the requirements of evidence-based medicine? Eur J Pediatr Surg 23:474–479CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
Xu AM, Huang L, Li TJ (2014) Single-incision versus three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 25106718
8.
Svensson JF, Patkova B, Almström M, et al (2014) Nonoperative treatment with antibiotics versus surgery for acute nonperforated appendicitis in children: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 25072441
9.
Liu ZH, Li C, Zhang XW, Kang L et al (2014) Meta-analysis of the therapeutic effects of antibiotic versus appendicectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis. Exp Ther Med 7:1181–1186PubMedCentralPubMed
10.
Yang C, Zhang H, Pu J et al (2011) Laparoscopic vs open herniorrhaphy in the management of pediatric inguinal hernia: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 46:1824–1834CrossRefPubMed
11.
Alzahem A (2011) Laparoscopic versus open inguinal herniotomy in infants and children: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 27:605–612CrossRefPubMed
12.
Jia WQ, Tian JH, Yang KH et al (2011) Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Pediatr Surg 21:77–81CrossRefPubMed
13.
Sola JE, Neville HL (2009) Laparoscopic vs open pyloromyotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 44:1631–1637CrossRefPubMed
14.
St Peter SD, Holcomb GW III, Calkins CM et al (2006) Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 244:363–370PubMedCentralPubMed
15.
Friedrich JO, Adhikari NK, Beyene J (2007) Inclusion of zero total event trials in meta-analyses maintains analytic consistency and incorporates all available data. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:5CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
16.
Greason KL, Allshouse MJ, Thompson WR et al (1997) A prospective, randomized evaluation of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy in the treatment of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Pediatri Endosurg Innov Tech 1:175–179CrossRef
17.
St. Peter SD, Holcomb GW III, Calkins CM et al (2006) Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 244:363–370PubMedCentralPubMed
18.
Leclair MD, Plattner V, Mirallie E et al (2007) Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Surg 42:692–698CrossRefPubMed
19.
Hall NJ, Pacilli M, Eaton S et al (2009) Recovery after open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 373:390–398CrossRefPubMed
20.
Raval MV, Hall NJ, Pierro A, Moss RL (2013) Evidence-based prevention and surgical treatment of necrotizing enterocolitis—a review of randomized controlled trials. Semin Pediatr Surg 22:117–121CrossRefPubMed
21.
Bohnhorst B, Muller S, Dordelmann M et al (2003) Early feeding after necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. J Pediatr 143:484–487CrossRefPubMed
22.
Moss RL, Dimmitt RA, Barnhart DC et al (2006) Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis and perforation. N Engl J Med 354:2225–2234CrossRefPubMed
23.
Rees CM, Eaton S, Kiely EM et al (2008) Peritoneal drainage or laparotomy for neonatal bowel perforation? A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 248:44–51CrossRefPubMed
24.
Shehata SM (2009) Prospective long-term functional and cosmetic results of ASARP versus PASRP in treatment of intermediate anorectal malformations in girls. Pediatr Surg Int 25:863–868CrossRefPubMed
25.
Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC et al (2011) Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:1695–1702CrossRefPubMed
26.
Rosenmuller MH, Thoren Ornberg M, Myrnas T et al (2013) Expertise-based randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus small-incision open cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 100:886–894CrossRefPubMed
27.
Abolyosr A (2006) Laproscopic versus open orchidopexy in the management of abdominal testis; a descriptive study. Int J Urol 13:1421–1424CrossRefPubMed
28.
Kollin C, Karpe B, Hesser U et al (2007) Surgical treatment of unilaterally undescended testes: testicular growth after randomization to orchiopexy at age 9 months or 3 years. J Urol 178:1589–1593CrossRefPubMed
29.
Guo J, Liang Z, Zhang H et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open orchiopexy for non-palpable undescended testes in children: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 27:943–952CrossRefPubMed
30.
Ferro F, Spagnoli A, Zaccara A et al (1999) Is preoperative laparoscopy useful for impalpable testis? J Urol 162:995–996CrossRefPubMed
31.
Lansdale N, Alam S, Losty PD et al (2010) Neonatal endosurgical congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252:20–26CrossRefPubMed
32.
Moyer V, Moya F, Tibboel R, et al (2002). Late versus early surgical correction for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD001695
33.
Keller RL, Hawgood S, Neuhaus JM et al (2004) Infant pulmonary function in a randomized trial of fetal tracheal occlusion for severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Res 56:818–825CrossRefPubMed
34.
De La Hunt MN, Madden N, Scott JES et al (1996) Is delayed surgery really better for congenital diaphragmatic hernia? A prospective randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr Surg 31:1554–1556CrossRefPubMed
35.
Harrison MR, Albanese CT, Hawgood SB et al (2001) Fetoscopic temporary tracheal occlusion by means of detachable balloon for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:730–733CrossRefPubMed
36.
Harrison MR, Sydorak RM, Farrell JA et al (2003) Fetoscopic temporary tracheal occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: prelude to a randomized, controlled trial. J Pediatr Surg 38:1012–1020CrossRefPubMed
37.
Harrison MR, Langer JC, Adzick NS et al (1990) Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero, V. Initial clinical experience. J Pediatr Surg 25:47–55CrossRefPubMed
38.
Harrison MR, Adzick NS, Flake AW et al (1993) Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero: VI. Hard-earned lessons. J Pediatr Surg 28:1411–1417CrossRefPubMed
39.
Harrison MR, Keller RL, Hawgood SB et al (2003) A randomized trial of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion for severe fetal congenital diaphragmatic hernia. N Engl J Med 349:1916–1924CrossRefPubMed
40.
41.
Ponten JE, Leenders BJ, Charbon JA et al (2014) Mesh Or Patch for Hernia on Epigastric and Umbilical Sites (MORPHEUS trial): study protocol for a multi-centre patient blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Surg 14:33CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
42.
Bensaadi H, Paolino L, Valenti A et al (2014) Intraperitoneal tension-free repair of a small midline ventral abdominal wall hernia: randomized study with a mean follow-up of 3 years. Am Surg 80:57–65PubMed
43.
Bishay M, Giacomello L, Retrosi G et al (2013) Hypercapnia and acidosis during open and thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and esophageal atresia: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 258:895–900CrossRefPubMed
44.
Buskens CJ, Sahami S, Tanis PJ et al (2014) The potential benefits and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: a review of current evidence. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 28:19–27CrossRefPubMed
45.
Polle SW, Dunker MS, Slors JF et al (2007) Body image, cosmesis, quality of life, and functional outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy: long-term results of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 21:1301–1307CrossRefPubMed
46.
Hall NJ, Ron O, Eaton S et al (2011) Surgery for hydrocele in children-an avoidable excess? J Pediatr Surg 46:2401–2405CrossRefPubMed
47.
Chen Z, Amos EB, Luo H et al (2012) Comparative pulmonary functional recovery after Nuss and Ravitch procedures for pectus excavatum repair: a meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg 7:101CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
48.
Jayaramakrishnan K, Wotton R, Bradley A et al (2013) Does repair of pectus excavatum improve cardiopulmonary function? Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 16:865–870CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
49.
Galluzzi F, Pignataro L, Gaini RM et al (2013) Risk of recurrence in children operated for thyroglossal duct cysts: a systematic review. J Pediat Surg 48:222–227CrossRefPubMed
50.
Batool T, Akhtar J, Ahmed S (2005) Management of idiopathic rectal prolapse in children. J Coll Physician Surg Pak 15:628–630
51.
52.
Nakajima Y, Sakata H, Yamaguchi T et al (2013) Successful treatment of a 14-year-old patient with intestinal malrotation with laparoscopic Ladd procedure: case report and literature review. World J Emerg Surg 8:19CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
53.
Sinha CK, Paramalingam S, Patel S et al (2009) Feasibility of complex minimally invasive surgery in neonates. Pediatr Surg Int 25:217–221CrossRefPubMed
54.
Hsiao M, Langer JC (2011) Value of laparoscopy in children with a suspected rotation abnormality on imaging. J Pediatr Surg 46:1347–1352CrossRefPubMed
55.
Spilde TL, St Peter SD, Keckler SJ et al (2008) Open vs laparoscopic repair of congenital duodenal obstructions: a concurrent series. J Pediatr Surg 43:1002–1005CrossRefPubMed
56.
Lee J, Tashjian DB, Moriarty KP (2012) Surgical management of pediatric adhesive bowel obstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:917–920CrossRefPubMed
57.
Nah SA, Narayanaswamy B, Eaton S et al (2010) Gastrostomy insertion in children: percutaneous endoscopic or percutaneous image-guided? J Pediatr Surg 45:1153–1158CrossRefPubMed
58.
Baker L, Emil S, Baird R (2013) A comparison of techniques for laparoscopic gastrostomy placement in children. J Surg Res 184:392–396CrossRefPubMed
59.
Liu R, Jiwane A, Varjavandi A et al (2013) Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic, laparoscopic and open gastrostomy insertion in children. Pediatr Surg Int 29:613–621CrossRefPubMed
60.
Malek MM, Mollen KP, Kane TD et al (2010) Thoracic neuroblastoma: a retrospective review of our institutional experience with comparison of the thoracoscopic and open approaches to resection. J Pediatr Surg 45:1622–1626CrossRefPubMed
61.
Petty JK, Bensard DD, Partrick DA et al (2006) Resection of neurogenic tumors in children: is thoracoscopic superior to thoracotomy? J Am Coll Surg 203:699–703CrossRefPubMed
62.
Soyer T, Karnak I, Ciftci AO et al (2006) The results of surgical treatment of chest wall tumors in childhood. Pediatr Surg Int 22:135–139CrossRefPubMed
63.
Masuko T, Uchida H, Kawashima H et al (2013) Laparoscopic excision of urachal remnants is a safe and effective alternative to open surgery in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 23:1016–1019CrossRef
64.
Sun J, Zhu YJ, Shi CR et al (2010) Laparoscopic radical excision of urachal remnants with recurrent infection in infants. J Endourol 24:1329–1332CrossRefPubMed
65.
Na Q, Liu C, Cui H et al (2011) Immediate repair compared with delayed repair of congenital omphalocele: short-term neonatal outcomes in China. J Int Med Res 39:2344–2351CrossRefPubMed
66.
Khank K, Khan MY, Khan MJ et al (2010) Delayed primary closure of giant omphalocele: gradual closed-reduction followed by open fascial closure. J Med Sci 18:4–7
67.
Baird R, Gholoum S, Laberge JM et al (2010) Management of a giant omphalocele with an external skin closure system. J Pediatr Surg 45:E17–E20CrossRefPubMed
68.
Hurley HJ, Knepper BC, Price CS et al (2013) Avoidable antibiotic exposure for uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections in the ambulatory care setting. Am J Med 126:1099–1106CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
69.
Nass A, Ein SH (2011) A pediatric surgeon’s 35-year experience with pilonidal disease in a Canadian children’s hospital. Can J Surg 54:39–42CrossRef
70.
Sebire NJ, Fowler D, Ramsay AD (2004) Sacrococcygeal tumors in infancy and childhood; a retrospective histopathological review of 85 cases. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 23:295–303CrossRefPubMed
71.
Meier JD, Grimmer JF (2014) Evaluation and management of neck masses in children. Am Fam Physician 89:353–358PubMed
72.
Orozco-Covarrubias L, Lara-Carpio R, Saez-De-Ocariz M et al (2013) Dermoid cysts: a report of 75 pediatric patients. Pediatr Dermatol 30:706–711CrossRefPubMed
73.
Tan SY, Stevens MJ, Mueller CM (2013) A novel laparoscopic-assisted approach to the repair of pediatric femoral hernias. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:946–948CrossRefPubMed
74.
Wright MF, Scollay JM, McCabe AJ et al (2011) Paediatric femoral hernia—the diagnostic challenge. Int J Surg 9:472–474CrossRefPubMed
75.
76.
Metadata
Title
Are paediatric operations evidence based? A prospective analysis of general surgery practice in a teaching paediatric hospital
Authors
Elke Zani-Ruttenstock
Augusto Zani
Emma Bullman
Eveline Lapidus-Krol
Agostino Pierro
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3624-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Pediatric Surgery International 1/2015 Go to the issue

Original Article

The quality of guidelines in pediatric surgery: can we all AGREE?

Original Article

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in infants

Case Report

Meso-Rex bypass to manage prehepatic portal hypertension after the failure of an intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunting

Original Article

Long-term expression pattern of melanocyte markers in light- and dark-pigmented dermo-epidermal cultured human skin substitutes

Original Article

Disruption of copper-dependent signaling pathway in the nitrofen-induced congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Original Article

Disorders of sex development in a developing country: perspectives and outcome of surgical management of 39 cases