Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 11/2022

06-09-2022 | Original Article

Fluoroscopy screening time and radiation dose during complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Authors: Siavash Falahatkar, Purya Haghjoo, Samaneh Esmaeili, Ehsan Kazemnezhad

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 11/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is procedure of choice for treatment of large urinary tract calculi. This study aimed to investigate the affecting factors on fluoroscopy screening time (FST) and radiation dose (RD) of patients undergoing complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (csPCNL).

Methods

Analytic cross-sectional study was performed on 355 patients who underwent csPCNL. The correlation between the FST and RD and patients’ demographics, stone characteristics, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative parameters were assessed. Multivariate regression analysis was used to explore various parameters which affect FST and RD.

Results

Of all 355 patients, 191 (54.65%) were male and 161 were (45.35%) female with mean age of 48.29 ± 12.38 (16–82) years. BMI was 27.61 ± 4.53 (16.61–39.00) kg/m2. The mean operative time was 45.87 ± 18.29 min with mean FST of 101.72 ± 62.00 s. BMI, operative time, success rate, complications, stone number, and tract number had a significant relationship with FST and RD (P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, BMI, tract number and success rate were found to be independent predictors for FST and RD. Age, gender, operation side, GFR, target calyx, lithotripsy history, stone opacity, size and site, stone configuration and distribution, and hydronephrosis did not have any correlation with FST and RD (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

BMI, success rate and tract number can be significant predictor for FST and RD during csPCNL. Identifying the affecting factors on FST and RD can help the surgeon to minimize the danger of radiation exposure by predicting and preoperative planning.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69:468–474CrossRef Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69:468–474CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Brannen GE, Bush WH, Correa RJ, Gibbons RP, Elder JS (1985) Kidney stone removal: percutaneous versus surgical lithotomy. J Urol 133(1):6–12CrossRef Brannen GE, Bush WH, Correa RJ, Gibbons RP, Elder JS (1985) Kidney stone removal: percutaneous versus surgical lithotomy. J Urol 133(1):6–12CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Patel RM, Okhunov Z, Clayman RV, Landman J (2017) Prone versus supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is your position? Curr Urol Rep 18(4):26CrossRef Patel RM, Okhunov Z, Clayman RV, Landman J (2017) Prone versus supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is your position? Curr Urol Rep 18(4):26CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Falahatkar S, Moghaddam AA, Salehi M, Nikpour S, Esmaili F, Khaki N (2008) Complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy comparison with the prone standard technique. J Endourol 22(11):2513–2517CrossRef Falahatkar S, Moghaddam AA, Salehi M, Nikpour S, Esmaili F, Khaki N (2008) Complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy comparison with the prone standard technique. J Endourol 22(11):2513–2517CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Falahatkar S, Mokhtari G, Teimoori M (2016) An update on supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urol J 13(5):2814–2822 Falahatkar S, Mokhtari G, Teimoori M (2016) An update on supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urol J 13(5):2814–2822
6.
go back to reference Yuan D, Liu Y, Rao H, Cheng T, Sun Z, Wang Y, Liu J, Chen W, Zhong W, Zhu J (2016) Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a meta-analysis. J Endourol 30(7):754–763CrossRef Yuan D, Liu Y, Rao H, Cheng T, Sun Z, Wang Y, Liu J, Chen W, Zhong W, Zhu J (2016) Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a meta-analysis. J Endourol 30(7):754–763CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Li J, Gao L, Li Q, Zhang Y, Jiang Q (2019) Supine versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 66:62–71CrossRef Li J, Gao L, Li Q, Zhang Y, Jiang Q (2019) Supine versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 66:62–71CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Falahatkar S, Allahkhah A, Soltanipour S (2011) Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: pro. Urol J 8(4):257–264 Falahatkar S, Allahkhah A, Soltanipour S (2011) Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: pro. Urol J 8(4):257–264
9.
go back to reference Majidpour HS (2010) Risk of radiation exposure during PCNL. Urol J 7(2):87–89 Majidpour HS (2010) Risk of radiation exposure during PCNL. Urol J 7(2):87–89
10.
go back to reference Ozbir S, Atalay HA, Canat HL, Culha MG, Cakır SS, Can O, Otunctemur A (2019) Factors affecting fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact of stone volume distribution in renal collecting system. Int Braz J Urol 45(6):1153–1160CrossRef Ozbir S, Atalay HA, Canat HL, Culha MG, Cakır SS, Can O, Otunctemur A (2019) Factors affecting fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact of stone volume distribution in renal collecting system. Int Braz J Urol 45(6):1153–1160CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tepeler A, Binbay M, Yuruk E, Sari E, Kaba M, Muslumanoglu AY, Tefekli A (2009) Factors affecting the fluoroscopic screening time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 23(11):1825–1829CrossRef Tepeler A, Binbay M, Yuruk E, Sari E, Kaba M, Muslumanoglu AY, Tefekli A (2009) Factors affecting the fluoroscopic screening time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 23(11):1825–1829CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Balaji SS, Vijayakumar M, Singh AG, Ganpule AP, Sabnis RB, Desai MR (2019) Analysis of factors affecting radiation exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. BJU Int 124(3):514–521CrossRef Balaji SS, Vijayakumar M, Singh AG, Ganpule AP, Sabnis RB, Desai MR (2019) Analysis of factors affecting radiation exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. BJU Int 124(3):514–521CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mancini JG, Raymundo EM, Lipkin M, Zilberman D, Yong D, Banez LL et al (2010) Factors affecting patient radiation exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 184:2373–2377CrossRef Mancini JG, Raymundo EM, Lipkin M, Zilberman D, Yong D, Banez LL et al (2010) Factors affecting patient radiation exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 184:2373–2377CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Noureldin YA, Elkoushy MA, Andonian S (2015) Predictors of fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact of postgraduate urology trainees and S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry score. J Endourol 29:542–547CrossRef Noureldin YA, Elkoushy MA, Andonian S (2015) Predictors of fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact of postgraduate urology trainees and S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry score. J Endourol 29:542–547CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Falahatkar R, Shahraki T, Falahatkar S, Esmaeili S, Mashouf P (2021) Evaluating outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn vs multiple non-staghorn renal stones: a 10-year study. World J Urol 39(8):3071–3077CrossRef Falahatkar R, Shahraki T, Falahatkar S, Esmaeili S, Mashouf P (2021) Evaluating outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn vs multiple non-staghorn renal stones: a 10-year study. World J Urol 39(8):3071–3077CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Falahatkar S, Esmaeili S, Rastjou Herfeh N, Kazemnezhad E, Falahatkar R, Yeganeh M, Jafari A (2022) The safety of continued low dose aspirin therapy during Complete Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (csPCNL). Prog Urol 32(6):458–464CrossRef Falahatkar S, Esmaeili S, Rastjou Herfeh N, Kazemnezhad E, Falahatkar R, Yeganeh M, Jafari A (2022) The safety of continued low dose aspirin therapy during Complete Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (csPCNL). Prog Urol 32(6):458–464CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Falahatkar S, Mokhtari G, Amin A, Kazemnezhad E, Esmaeili S, Herfeh NR, Falahatkar R (2017) Comparison of the outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with radiopaque and radiolucent kidney stones. Turk J Urol 43(4):490–496CrossRef Falahatkar S, Mokhtari G, Amin A, Kazemnezhad E, Esmaeili S, Herfeh NR, Falahatkar R (2017) Comparison of the outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with radiopaque and radiolucent kidney stones. Turk J Urol 43(4):490–496CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Basiri A, Ziaee SA, Nasseh H, Kamranmanesh M, Masoudy P, Heidary F et al (2008) Totally ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the flank position. J Endourol 22(7):1453–1457CrossRef Basiri A, Ziaee SA, Nasseh H, Kamranmanesh M, Masoudy P, Heidary F et al (2008) Totally ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the flank position. J Endourol 22(7):1453–1457CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Watterson JD, Soon S, Jana K (2006) Access related complications during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: urology versus radiology at a single academic institution. J Urol 176(1):142–145CrossRef Watterson JD, Soon S, Jana K (2006) Access related complications during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: urology versus radiology at a single academic institution. J Urol 176(1):142–145CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chen TT, Wang C, Ferrandino MN, Scales CD, Yoshizumi TT, Preminger GM, Lipkin ME (2015) Radiation exposure during the evaluation and management of nephrolithiasis. J Urol 194(4):878–885CrossRef Chen TT, Wang C, Ferrandino MN, Scales CD, Yoshizumi TT, Preminger GM, Lipkin ME (2015) Radiation exposure during the evaluation and management of nephrolithiasis. J Urol 194(4):878–885CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kumar P (2008) Radiation safety issues in fluoroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol J 5(1):15–23 Kumar P (2008) Radiation safety issues in fluoroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol J 5(1):15–23
22.
go back to reference Sfoungaristos S, Gofrit ON, Yutkin V, Landau EH, Pode D, Duvdevani M (2015) Evaluating parameters affecting fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: focus on the predictive role of Guy’s, S.T.O.N.E., and CROES scoring systems. J Endourol 29(12):1366–1370CrossRef Sfoungaristos S, Gofrit ON, Yutkin V, Landau EH, Pode D, Duvdevani M (2015) Evaluating parameters affecting fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: focus on the predictive role of Guy’s, S.T.O.N.E., and CROES scoring systems. J Endourol 29(12):1366–1370CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Zampini AM, Bamberger JN, Gupta K, Gallante B, Atallah WM, Gupta M (2021) Factors affecting patient radiation exposure during prone and supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 35(10):1448–1453CrossRef Zampini AM, Bamberger JN, Gupta K, Gallante B, Atallah WM, Gupta M (2021) Factors affecting patient radiation exposure during prone and supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 35(10):1448–1453CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Vollstedt A, Ingimarsson J, Dagrosa L, Pais V (2019) Increasing stone complexity does not affect fluoroscopy time in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Ther Adv Urol 11:1756287219840218CrossRef Vollstedt A, Ingimarsson J, Dagrosa L, Pais V (2019) Increasing stone complexity does not affect fluoroscopy time in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Ther Adv Urol 11:1756287219840218CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Carter HB, Näslund EB, Riehle RA Jr (1987) Variables influencing radiation exposure during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Review of 298 treatments. Urology 30(6):546–550CrossRef Carter HB, Näslund EB, Riehle RA Jr (1987) Variables influencing radiation exposure during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Review of 298 treatments. Urology 30(6):546–550CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sourial MW, Todd AM, Palettas MS, Knudsen BE (2019) Reducing fluoroscopy time in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 33(5):369–374CrossRef Sourial MW, Todd AM, Palettas MS, Knudsen BE (2019) Reducing fluoroscopy time in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 33(5):369–374CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lipkin ME, Mancini JG, Toncheva G, Wang AJ, Anderson-Evans C, Simmons WN, Ferrandino MN, Yoshizumi TT, Preminger GM (2012) Organ-specific radiation dose rates and effective dose rates during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 26(5):439–443CrossRef Lipkin ME, Mancini JG, Toncheva G, Wang AJ, Anderson-Evans C, Simmons WN, Ferrandino MN, Yoshizumi TT, Preminger GM (2012) Organ-specific radiation dose rates and effective dose rates during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 26(5):439–443CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Fluoroscopy screening time and radiation dose during complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Authors
Siavash Falahatkar
Purya Haghjoo
Samaneh Esmaeili
Ehsan Kazemnezhad
Publication date
06-09-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 11/2022
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04138-5

Other articles of this Issue 11/2022

World Journal of Urology 11/2022 Go to the issue