Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 7/2015

Open Access 01-07-2015 | Original Article

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for detecting uni- and bilateral extraprostatic disease in patients with prostate cancer

Authors: Erik Rud, Dagmar Klotz, Kristin Rennesund, Eduard Baco, Truls Erik Bjerklund Johansen, Lien My Diep, Aud Svindland, Lars Magne Eri, Heidi B. Eggesbø

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 7/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The objective of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting uni- and bilateral extraprostatic disease (T3) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa).

Materials and methods

This prospective study included 199 patients with biopsy-proven PCa who underwent MRI prior to radical prostatectomy from December 2009 to July 2012. Extraprostatic extension and seminal vesicle invasion represented T3 disease, and was classified as uni- (right or left) or bilateral. MRI detection of T3 disease was assessed by descriptive statistics and odds ratio (OR). Whole-mount histopathology was used as the reference standard.

Results

The overall prevalence of pT3 was 105/199 (53 %), unilateral in 81/105 (77 %) and bilateral in 24/105 (23 %). The sensitivity of MRI for predicting pT3 was 76/105 (72 %), specificity 61/94 (65 %), accuracy 137/199 (69 %), and OR 4.8 (95 % CI 2.7–8.8). A complete match with respect to the laterality of pT3 was found in 52/105 (50 %), and the side-specific accuracy was 113/199 (57 %). When unilateral pT3 was found, MRI falsely suggested contralateral T3 in 4/81 (5 %) and bilateral in 8/81 (10 %). When bilateral pT3 was found, MRI falsely suggested unilateral T3 in 12/24 (50 %).

Conclusion

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected 72 % of all patients with T3 disease, and the accuracy dropped from 69 to 57 % when considering the laterality of T3. Thus far, the MRI technique is not yet adequate to meet the increasing demands of accurate diagnosis of locally advanced disease, and the contemporary MRI staging should be careful.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Obek C, Louis P, Civantos F, Soloway MS (1999) Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen. JURO 161:494–8, discussion 498–9 Obek C, Louis P, Civantos F, Soloway MS (1999) Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen. JURO 161:494–8, discussion 498–9
2.
go back to reference Flanigan RC, Catalona WJ, Richie JP et al (1994) Accuracy of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in localizing prostate cancer. JURO 152:1506–1509 Flanigan RC, Catalona WJ, Richie JP et al (1994) Accuracy of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in localizing prostate cancer. JURO 152:1506–1509
3.
go back to reference Delongchamps NB, Rouanne M, Flam T et al (2010) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: combination of T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging. BJU Int 107:1411–1418PubMedCrossRef Delongchamps NB, Rouanne M, Flam T et al (2010) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: combination of T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging. BJU Int 107:1411–1418PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hegde JV, Chen MH, Mulkern RV et al (2013) Preoperative 3-Tesla multiparametric endorectal magnetic resonance imaging findings and the odds of upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85:101–107 Hegde JV, Chen MH, Mulkern RV et al (2013) Preoperative 3-Tesla multiparametric endorectal magnetic resonance imaging findings and the odds of upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85:101–107
5.
go back to reference Somford DM, Hamoen EH, Fütterer JJ et al (2013) The predictive value of endorectal 3 tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. J Urol 190:1728–1734PubMedCrossRef Somford DM, Hamoen EH, Fütterer JJ et al (2013) The predictive value of endorectal 3 tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. J Urol 190:1728–1734PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Brajtbord JS, Lavery HJ, Nabizada-Pace F et al (2011) Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging has limited clinical ability to preoperatively predict pT3 prostate cancer. BJU Int 107:1419–1424PubMedCrossRef Brajtbord JS, Lavery HJ, Nabizada-Pace F et al (2011) Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging has limited clinical ability to preoperatively predict pT3 prostate cancer. BJU Int 107:1419–1424PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rosenkrantz AB, Chandarana H, Gilet A et al (2013) Prostate cancer: utility of diffusion-weighted imaging as a marker of side-specific risk of extracapsular extension. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:312–319PubMedCrossRef Rosenkrantz AB, Chandarana H, Gilet A et al (2013) Prostate cancer: utility of diffusion-weighted imaging as a marker of side-specific risk of extracapsular extension. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:312–319PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kim B, Breau RH, Papadatos D et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of surface coil magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for local staging of elevated risk prostate cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 4:257–262PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kim B, Breau RH, Papadatos D et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of surface coil magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for local staging of elevated risk prostate cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 4:257–262PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Graser A, Heuck A, Sommer B et al (2007) Per-sextant localization and staging of prostate cancer: correlation of imaging findings with whole-mount step section histopathology. Am J Roentgenol 188:84–90CrossRef Graser A, Heuck A, Sommer B et al (2007) Per-sextant localization and staging of prostate cancer: correlation of imaging findings with whole-mount step section histopathology. Am J Roentgenol 188:84–90CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hricak H, Choyke PL, Eberhardt SC et al (2007) Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective. Radiology 243:28–53PubMedCrossRef Hricak H, Choyke PL, Eberhardt SC et al (2007) Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective. Radiology 243:28–53PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rud E, Klotz D, Rennesund K et al (2014) Detection of the index tumor and tumor volume in prostate cancer using T2w and DW MRI alone. BJU Int. doi:10.1111/bju.12637 Rud E, Klotz D, Rennesund K et al (2014) Detection of the index tumor and tumor volume in prostate cancer using T2w and DW MRI alone. BJU Int. doi:10.​1111/​bju.​12637
12.
go back to reference Cornud F, Rouanne M, Beuvon F et al (2011) Endorectal 3D T2-weighted 1 mm-slice thickness MRI for prostate cancer staging at 1.5Tesla: should we reconsider the indirects signs of extracapsular extension according to the D’Amico tumor risk criteria?. Eur J Radiol 1–7 Cornud F, Rouanne M, Beuvon F et al (2011) Endorectal 3D T2-weighted 1 mm-slice thickness MRI for prostate cancer staging at 1.5Tesla: should we reconsider the indirects signs of extracapsular extension according to the D’Amico tumor risk criteria?. Eur J Radiol 1–7
14.
go back to reference Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R et al (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22:746–757 Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R et al (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22:746–757
15.
go back to reference Magi-Galluzzi C, Evans AJ, Delahunt B et al (2010) International society of urological pathology (isup) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease. Mod Pathol 24:26–38PubMedCrossRef Magi-Galluzzi C, Evans AJ, Delahunt B et al (2010) International society of urological pathology (isup) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease. Mod Pathol 24:26–38PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Berney DM, Wheeler TM, Grignon DJ et al (2010) International society of urological pathology (isup) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Working group 4: seminal vesicles and lymph nodes. Mod Pathol 24:39–47PubMedCrossRef Berney DM, Wheeler TM, Grignon DJ et al (2010) International society of urological pathology (isup) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Working group 4: seminal vesicles and lymph nodes. Mod Pathol 24:39–47PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB et al (2001) Predicting prostate specific antigen outcome preoperatively in the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol 166:2185–2188PubMedCrossRef D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB et al (2001) Predicting prostate specific antigen outcome preoperatively in the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol 166:2185–2188PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference McClure TD, Margolis DJA, Reiter RE et al (2012) Use of MR imaging to determine preservation of the neurovascular bundles at robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Radiology 262:874–883PubMedCrossRef McClure TD, Margolis DJA, Reiter RE et al (2012) Use of MR imaging to determine preservation of the neurovascular bundles at robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Radiology 262:874–883PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hricak H, Wang L, Wei DC et al (2004) The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 100:2655–2663PubMedCrossRef Hricak H, Wang L, Wei DC et al (2004) The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 100:2655–2663PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Roethke MC, Lichy MP, Kniess M et al (2012) Accuracy of preoperative endorectal MRI in predicting extracapsular extension and influence on neurovascular bundle sparing in radical prostatectomy. World J Urol Roethke MC, Lichy MP, Kniess M et al (2012) Accuracy of preoperative endorectal MRI in predicting extracapsular extension and influence on neurovascular bundle sparing in radical prostatectomy. World J Urol
21.
go back to reference Brown JA, Rodin DM, Harisinghani M, Dahl DM (2010) Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate. URO 27:174–179 Brown JA, Rodin DM, Harisinghani M, Dahl DM (2010) Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate. URO 27:174–179
23.
go back to reference Futterer JJ, Engelbrecht MR, Jager GJ et al (2007) Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging. Eur Radiol 17:1055–1065PubMedCrossRef Futterer JJ, Engelbrecht MR, Jager GJ et al (2007) Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging. Eur Radiol 17:1055–1065PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference van der Kwast TH, Amin MB, Billis A et al (2007) Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume. Mod Pathol 24:16–25CrossRef van der Kwast TH, Amin MB, Billis A et al (2007) Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume. Mod Pathol 24:16–25CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for detecting uni- and bilateral extraprostatic disease in patients with prostate cancer
Authors
Erik Rud
Dagmar Klotz
Kristin Rennesund
Eduard Baco
Truls Erik Bjerklund Johansen
Lien My Diep
Aud Svindland
Lars Magne Eri
Heidi B. Eggesbø
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1362-x

Other articles of this Issue 7/2015

World Journal of Urology 7/2015 Go to the issue