Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 4/2014

01-08-2014 | Editorial

Prostate imaging—the future is now: current concepts and future potentials

Authors: Felix K.-H. Chun, Thomas R. W. Herrmann

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

Due to its high prevalence, prostate cancer represents worldwide the leading and consequently the most debated oncologic entity within the field of Urology. Traditionally, back in the days ruling in prostate cancer represented more or less the major goal of early detection or screening activities. Conversely, today based on the growing prospectively derived evidence, multiple relevant aspects prior to an individual prostatic biopsy recommendation need to be considered. The main drivers within this ongoing debate are mainly dominated by the keywords: potential “overdiagnosis” and consequential “overtreatment.” In fact, this ongoing debate includes not only a clinical but a health-economical/health-political level, respectively [13]. It is of note that urologic key opinion leaders suggest within a NCCN symposium a new terminology for indolent and precancerous disorders stating that “… prostate cancer is probably the tumor with the greatest risk for overdiagnosis and overtreatment …” as recently published in Lancet Oncology [4]. As a consequence, to improve prostate biopsy indication, technique and treatment strategies, multiple novel diagnostic as well as therapeutic concepts are being developed and promoted. With these notions in mind, the aim of the current WJU issue was to give clinicians an update on these much debated aspects in prostate biopsy by inviting state-of-the-art reviews as well as selecting adequate original articles related to prostate biopsy. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hugosson J, Carlsson S (2014) Overdetection in screening for prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 24(3):256–263PubMedCrossRef Hugosson J, Carlsson S (2014) Overdetection in screening for prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 24(3):256–263PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Loeb S, Bjurlin MA, Nicholson J, Tammela TL, Penson DF, Carter HB, Carroll P, Etzioni R (2014) Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 65(6):1046–1055PubMedCrossRef Loeb S, Bjurlin MA, Nicholson J, Tammela TL, Penson DF, Carter HB, Carroll P, Etzioni R (2014) Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 65(6):1046–1055PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Vickers AJ, Sjoberg DD, Ulmert D, Vertosick E, Roobol MJ, Thompson I, Heijnsdijk EA, De Koning H, Atoria-Swartz C, Scardino PT et al (2014) Empirical estimates of prostate cancer overdiagnosis by age and prostate-specific antigen. BMC Med 12:26PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Vickers AJ, Sjoberg DD, Ulmert D, Vertosick E, Roobol MJ, Thompson I, Heijnsdijk EA, De Koning H, Atoria-Swartz C, Scardino PT et al (2014) Empirical estimates of prostate cancer overdiagnosis by age and prostate-specific antigen. BMC Med 12:26PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Esserman LJ, Thompson IM, Reid B, Nelson P, Ransohoff DF, Welch HG, Hwang S, Berry DA, Kinzler KW, Black WC et al (2014) Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change. Lancet Oncol 15(6):e234–e242PubMedCrossRef Esserman LJ, Thompson IM, Reid B, Nelson P, Ransohoff DF, Welch HG, Hwang S, Berry DA, Kinzler KW, Black WC et al (2014) Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change. Lancet Oncol 15(6):e234–e242PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V, Eggener S, Emberton M, Futterer JJ, Gill IS, Grubb Iii RL, Hadaschik B, Klotz L, Margolis DJ et al (2013) Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group. Eur Urol 64(4):544–552 Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V, Eggener S, Emberton M, Futterer JJ, Gill IS, Grubb Iii RL, Hadaschik B, Klotz L, Margolis DJ et al (2013) Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group. Eur Urol 64(4):544–552
6.
go back to reference Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, Rouviere O, Logager V, Futterer JJ (2012) European society of urogenital R: ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22(4):746–757PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, Rouviere O, Logager V, Futterer JJ (2012) European society of urogenital R: ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22(4):746–757PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rastinehad AR, Turkbey B, Salami SS, Yaskiv O, George AK, Fakhoury M, Beecher K, Vira MA, Kavoussi LR, Siegel DN, Villani R, Ben-Levi E (2013) Improving detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy. J Urol. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.12.007 Rastinehad AR, Turkbey B, Salami SS, Yaskiv O, George AK, Fakhoury M, Beecher K, Vira MA, Kavoussi LR, Siegel DN, Villani R, Ben-Levi E (2013) Improving detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy. J Urol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​juro.​2013.​12.​007
8.
go back to reference Sonn GA, Chang E, Natarajan S, Margolis DJ, Macairan M, Lieu P, Huang J, Dorey FJ, Reiter RE, Marks LS (2014) Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Eur Urol 65(4):809–815PubMedCrossRef Sonn GA, Chang E, Natarajan S, Margolis DJ, Macairan M, Lieu P, Huang J, Dorey FJ, Reiter RE, Marks LS (2014) Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Eur Urol 65(4):809–815PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chun FK, Haese A, Ahyai SA, Walz J, Suardi N, Capitanio U, Graefen M, Erbersdobler A, Huland H, Karakiewicz PI (2008) Critical assessment of tools to predict clinically insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy in contemporary men. Cancer 113(4):701–709PubMedCrossRef Chun FK, Haese A, Ahyai SA, Walz J, Suardi N, Capitanio U, Graefen M, Erbersdobler A, Huland H, Karakiewicz PI (2008) Critical assessment of tools to predict clinically insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy in contemporary men. Cancer 113(4):701–709PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Klein EA, Cooperberg MR, Magi-Galluzzi C, Simko JP, Falzarano SM, Maddala T, Chan JM, Li J, Cowan JE, Tsiatis AC, Cherbavaz DB, Pelham RJ, Tenggara-Hunter I, Baehner FL, Knezevic D, Febbo PG, Shak S, Kattan MW, Lee M, Carroll PR (2014) A 17-gene assay to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness in the context of gleason grade heterogeneity, tumor multifocality, and biopsy undersampling. Eur Urol. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.004 Klein EA, Cooperberg MR, Magi-Galluzzi C, Simko JP, Falzarano SM, Maddala T, Chan JM, Li J, Cowan JE, Tsiatis AC, Cherbavaz DB, Pelham RJ, Tenggara-Hunter I, Baehner FL, Knezevic D, Febbo PG, Shak S, Kattan MW, Lee M, Carroll PR (2014) A 17-gene assay to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness in the context of gleason grade heterogeneity, tumor multifocality, and biopsy undersampling. Eur Urol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2014.​05.​004
11.
go back to reference Ahmed HU, Arya M, Freeman A, Emberton M (2012) Do low-grade and low-volume prostate cancers bear the hallmarks of malignancy? Lancet Oncol 13(11):e509–e517PubMedCrossRef Ahmed HU, Arya M, Freeman A, Emberton M (2012) Do low-grade and low-volume prostate cancers bear the hallmarks of malignancy? Lancet Oncol 13(11):e509–e517PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ahmed HU, Hindley RG, Dickinson L, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Sahu M, Scott R, Allen C, Van der Meulen J, Emberton M (2012) Focal therapy for localised unifocal and multifocal prostate cancer: a prospective development study. Lancet Oncol 13(6):622–632PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ahmed HU, Hindley RG, Dickinson L, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Sahu M, Scott R, Allen C, Van der Meulen J, Emberton M (2012) Focal therapy for localised unifocal and multifocal prostate cancer: a prospective development study. Lancet Oncol 13(6):622–632PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Moore CM, Petrides N, Emberton M (2014) Can MRI replace serial biopsies in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer? Curr Opin Urol 24(3):280–287PubMedCrossRef Moore CM, Petrides N, Emberton M (2014) Can MRI replace serial biopsies in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer? Curr Opin Urol 24(3):280–287PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Salami SS, Vira MA, Turkbey B, Fakhoury M, Yaskiv O, Villani R, Ben-Levi E, Rastinehad AR (2014) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging outperforms the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer. Cancer. doi:10.1002/cncr.28790 Salami SS, Vira MA, Turkbey B, Fakhoury M, Yaskiv O, Villani R, Ben-Levi E, Rastinehad AR (2014) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging outperforms the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer. Cancer. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​28790
15.
go back to reference Moore CM, Robertson NL, Arsanious N, Middleton T, Villers A, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Emberton M (2013) Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review. Eur Urol 63(1):125–140PubMedCrossRef Moore CM, Robertson NL, Arsanious N, Middleton T, Villers A, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Emberton M (2013) Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review. Eur Urol 63(1):125–140PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Robertson NL, Hu Y, Ahmed HU, Freeman A, Barratt D, Emberton M (2014) Prostate cancer risk inflation as a consequence of image-targeted biopsy of the prostate: a computer simulation study. Eur Urol 65(3):628–634PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Robertson NL, Hu Y, Ahmed HU, Freeman A, Barratt D, Emberton M (2014) Prostate cancer risk inflation as a consequence of image-targeted biopsy of the prostate: a computer simulation study. Eur Urol 65(3):628–634PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prostate imaging—the future is now: current concepts and future potentials
Authors
Felix K.-H. Chun
Thomas R. W. Herrmann
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1354-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

World Journal of Urology 4/2014 Go to the issue